Abstract
Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) was the first reported and still widely used virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) vector for monocotyledons including wheat and barley. Despite BSMV’s reported infectivity on maize (Zea mays), the use of the virus as a vector in maize has not been optimized. Here, we assayed infectivity of BSMV in different maize cultivars by vascular puncture inoculation. Through knockdown of the endogenous host phytoene desaturase gene, we demonstrate for the first time that BSMV can be used as a VIGS vector in maize. This adds BSMV to the repertoire of tools available for functional studies in maize.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
The 2.4-gigabase genome sequence of the ten maize chromosomes was first published for B73 maize [1], and additional, diverse maize sequences have since been reported [2,3,4]. The functional roles of the majority of the predicted 39,498 genes are yet to be characterized. Among the different functional genomic tools currently available, virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) has great promise, especially in monocot genomes with extensive gene sequence duplication where functional assessment by mutagenesis is difficult. Despite the agricultural value of monocotyledonous crops, fewer effective VIGS vectors are available than for dicotyledonous plants [5,6,7]. Among the different viral vectors available for maize, so far Brome mosaic virus (BMV) [8,9,10,11,12,13], Foxtail mosaic virus (FoMV) [14], and Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) [15] have been successfully adapted as VIGS vectors. Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV; family Virgaviridae, genus Hordeivirus) has been one of the most widely used gene silencing vectors for monocotyledonous crops including barley and wheat [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23]. Even though some maize genotypes, such as Oh28, are hosts of BSMV [24], BSMV VIGS has not been reported for maize to our knowledge. We show that the agro-binary vector-based infectious cDNA clone of BSMV isolate ND18 [23], kindly provided by Dr. Dawei Li, China, can also be used for VIGS in maize plants that are inoculated by vascular puncture inoculation (VPI) [25, 26].
To test the infectivity of BSMV in maize, binary plasmids pCaBS-α, pCaBS-β, and pCaBS-γ [23] expressing each of the three genomic segments of BSMV (α, β, and γ) were transformed into C58C1 Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Transformed cultures containing these and an expression construct (pCASS4N-p19) for the known suppressor of RNA silencing from Tomato bushy stunt virus (TBSV) p19 were prepared for inoculation as reported previously [27]. The binary plasmid construct pCASS4N-p19, kindly provided by Dr. Siddarame Gowda (University of Florida), carries TBSV-p19 gene under 35S promoter and TEV leader sequence [28, 29]. Agrocultures adjusted to 0.8 OD (600 nm) were mixed in a 1:1:1:2 ratio (α:β:γ:p19) and infiltrated into the abaxial surface of 3- to 4-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Five days post inoculation (dpi), infiltrated leaf tissue of N. benthamiana was ground in 0.01M potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) (5 ml buffer per gram of tissue), centrifuged for 1 min at 10,000 rcf (relative centrifugal force), and used to inoculate maize. VPI inoculation methodology was used to inoculate sterile water-soaked maize kernels as described previously [25, 26]. A panel of six maize genotypes, comprising genotypes with broad susceptibility to maize viruses (Spirit, B73, Oh28, Wf9xOh51a) and strong potyvirus and multi-virus resistance (Oh1VI, Pa405) [30, 31], were used for inoculations. Three near-isogenic lines with Oh28 genetic background carrying introgressed Wsm alleles conferring resistance against potyviruses from the cultivar Pa405 [32, 33] were also tested by VPI with BSMV.
The potential utility of BSMV for VIGS in maize was evaluated by targeting the maize phytoene desaturase gene. An 81-nt maize PDS sequence (corresponding to nt 815–895 of GenBank accession no. L39266.1) was inserted in the γ segment of BSMV (γPDS). To do this, sequence SP230 (5′-CGTAGCTTCTTCTTTTGAAGATTCTGTTGGATGTGATGATTCTTCTTCCGTTTCTAAGAGGCCTTTCCTGATCGGGTGAACGATGAGGTTTTTATTGCAATGTCCAAGGCACTCAATTTCATAAATCCTGATGAGCTATCTATGCGGCGCGCCGGGCCCGGTGGTGGTGGTTAAAAAAAAAAAAAAATGTTTGATCAGATCATTCAAATCTGATGGTG-3′) was synthesized in vitro (IDT DNA technologies) to contain sequence corresponding to BSMV-γ nts 2479–2536 and 2537–2583 (U13917.1), an 81-bp maize PDS insert sequence (italicized; nt 815–895 of L39266), and pCa-γbLIC (modified pCaBS-γ with restriction sites) [23] with restriction sites (StuI, AscI, and ApaI; underlined). A virus-specific fragment corresponding to nt 2029–2529 of BSMV γ (GenBank accession no. U13917.1) was amplified with the primers SP223 (5′-CGAGTGGTGAACTCTAGGTCC-3′) and SP224 (5′-ACGGAAGAAGAATCATCACATC-3′). The two overlapping fragments were first joined by PCR with the primers SP223 and SP226 (5′-CAAACATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTAACCACCACCACCGGGCCC-3′). The gel-purified PCR product of the two joined fragments was then inserted by Gibson assembly [34] into the pCa-γbLIC cut with KpnI and ApaI.
BSMV (α + β + γ + p19) and BSMV-PDS (α + β + γPDS + p19) infection rates, scored by symptom development, differed among cultivars (Table 1). BSMV symptoms and average infection rates of 30–57% were observed in inoculated Spirit, B73, Oh28, and Wf9 x Oh51a genotypes, with similar infection rates for BSMV-PDS constructs. However, in contrast to previous reports of BSMV-susceptible maize genotypes including Oh28 [24, 35,36,37], the symptoms observed did not extend beyond the fifth leaf in the vascular puncture-inoculated plants we tested. The multi-virus-resistant cultivars Pa405 and Oh1VI [30, 31] exhibited lower susceptibility to BSMV, with the average infection rates of 1–12%. Wsm NIL had lower survival/overall germination, confounding conclusions about BSMV susceptibility, but with trends indicating some possible resistance conferred by Wsm3. In contrast, these alleles show resistance strength in a Wsm1 > Wsm2 > Wsm3 pattern for potyviruses [32, 33]. Mechanical rub-inoculations of 7-day-old seedlings of the same maize genotypes with extracts from agro-inoculated N. benthamiana resulted in few infections (data not shown), despite systemic infections reported in Oh28 and other maize genotypes by others [24, 35,36,37], suggesting that other conditions or virus genotypes may improve BSMV infection in maize.
BSMV-PDS (α + β + γPDS + p19) clones inoculated to maize by VPI produced the expected VIGS photobleaching phenotype in the first and second leaves in a subset of symptomatic plants (Fig. 1a). The photobleaching symptoms appeared along midribs as long parallel white-colored streaks distinct from the light greenish yellow and occasionally necrotic symptoms observed with wild-type BSMV. The average percentage of plants showing photobleaching varied from 7 to 21% among the susceptible genotypes, whereas the uninfected genotypes showed no photobleaching phenotype (Table 1). PDS mRNA levels were measured by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). Silenced tissue showed three- to eightfold decrease in PDS mRNA levels compared to chlorotic tissues from wild-type virus inoculations (Fig. 1b).
The BSMV was developed as a VIGS vector in 2002 [19]. Since then, the virus has been used in a number of studies for functional characterization of different genes in monocots. Despite the widespread use of the virus and its reported infectivity in maize, the virus has not previously been reported to have utility as a VIGS vector in maize. Here we show that BSMV can be readily inoculated into maize through VPI and the virus can be used to induce gene silencing in maize seedlings. Like other current VIGS vectors, this approach to utilize BSMV in maize seedlings has disadvantages of virus symptoms, low infection rates, and patchy phenotypic penetrance. These limitations are not unique to BSMV, but similar observations were made with other VIGS vectors such as BMV [8, 41]. Being one of the commonly used vector systems, BSMV offers advantages in terms of better understanding of its molecular biology and opportunities for further improvements with additional research efforts. Agro-infiltration in N. benthamiana followed by VPI inoculations of maize kernels has been the method of choice for using gene silencing vectors in maize [4, 8]. The VPI methodology allows inoculation of many plants with minimal inoculum. Some of the challenges such as low infection rates can be circumvented through VPI inoculations with large sample size and potentially through simultaneous silencing of a gene of interest and a phenotypic marker gene such as PDS. By reducing the virus-specific symptoms through sequence modifications in viral cDNA clone and with further optimization of conditions to improve silencing spread, BSMV may be adapted as a useful VIGS vector for maize seedlings, adding the virus to the repertoire of tools available for functional studies in maize. Comparative characterization of VIGS vectors has not been done so far. Now with the advent multiple VIGS vectors for maize, including BMV, BSMV, CMV, and FoMV, relative characterization studies would provide better understanding of the challenges and opportunities conferred by these different vectors in maize functional genomic studies.
References
P.S. Schnable, D. Ware, R.S. Fulton, J.C. Stein, F.S. Wei, S. Pasternak, C.Z. Liang, J.W. Zhang, L. Fulton, T.A. Graves, P. Minx, A.D. Reily, L. Courtney, S.S. Kruchowski, C. Tomlinson, C. Strong, K. Delehaunty, C. Fronick, B. Courtney, S.M. Rock, E. Belter, F.Y. Du, K. Kim, R.M. Abbott, M. Cotton, A. Levy, P. Marchetto, K. Ochoa, S.M. Jackson, B. Gillam, W.Z. Chen, L. Yan, J. Higginbotham, M. Cardenas, J. Waligorski, E. Applebaum, L. Phelps, J. Falcone, K. Kanchi, T. Thane, A. Scimone, N. Thane, J. Henke, T. Wang, J. Ruppert, N. Shah, K. Rotter, J. Hodges, E. Ingenthron, M. Cordes, S. Kohlberg, J. Sgro, B. Delgado, K. Mead, A. Chinwalla, S. Leonard, K. Crouse, K. Collura, D. Kudrna, J. Currie, R.F. He, A. Angelova, S. Rajasekar, T. Mueller, R. Lomeli, G. Scara, A. Ko, K. Delaney, M. Wissotski, G. Lopez, D. Campos, M. Braidotti, E. Ashley, W. Golser, H. Kim, S. Lee, J.K. Lin, Z. Dujmic, W. Kim, J. Talag, A. Zuccolo, C. Fan, A. Sebastian, M. Kramer, L. Spiegel, L. Nascimento, T. Zutavern, B. Miller, C. Ambroise, S. Muller, W. Spooner, A. Narechania, L.Y. Ren, S. Wei, S. Kumari, B. Faga, M.J. Levy, L. McMahan, P. Van Buren, M.W. Vaughn, K. Ying, C.T. Yeh, S.J. Emrich, Y. Jia, A. Kalyanaraman, A.P. Hsia, W.B. Barbazuk, R.S. Baucom, T.P. Brutnell, N.C. Carpita, C. Chaparro, J.M. Chia, J.M. Deragon, J.C. Estill, Y. Fu, J.A. Jeddeloh, Y.J. Han, H. Lee, P.H. Li, D.R. Lisch, S.Z. Liu, Z.J. Liu, D.H. Nagel, M.C. McCann, P. SanMiguel, A.M. Myers, D. Nettleton, J. Nguyen, B.W. Penning, L. Ponnala, K.L. Schneider, D.C. Schwartz, A. Sharma, C. Soderlund, N.M. Springer, Q. Sun, H. Wang, M. Waterman, R. Westerman, T.K. Wolfgruber, L.X. Yang, Y. Yu, L.F. Zhang, S.G. Zhou, Q. Zhu, J.L. Bennetzen, R.K. Dawe, J.M. Jiang, N. Jiang, G.G. Presting, S.R. Wessler, S. Aluru, R.A. Martienssen, S.W. Clifton, W.R. McCombie, R.A. Wing, R.K. Wilson, Science 326, 1112 (2009)
C.N. Hirsch, J.M. Foerster, J.M. Johnson, R.S. Sekhon, G. Muttoni, B. Vaillancourt, F. Penagaricano, E. Lindquist, M.A. Pedraza, K. Barry, N. de Leon, S.M. Kaeppler, C.R. Buell, Plant Cell 26, 121 (2014)
J.A. Martin, N.V. Johnson, S.M. Gross, J. Schnable, X.D. Meng, M. Wang, D. Coleman-Derr, E. Lindquist, C.L. Wei, S. Kaeppler, F. Chen, Z. Wang, Sci. Rep. 4, 59 (2014)
B. Wang, E. Tseng, M. Regulski, T.A. Clark, T. Hon, Y.P. Jiao, Z.Y. Lu, A. Olson, J.C. Stein, D. Ware, Nat. Commun. 7, 11708 (2016)
S. Jarugula, S.R. Charlesworth, F. Qu, L.R. Stewart, Arch. Virol. 161, 2291 (2016)
H. Ramanna, X.S. Ding, R.S. Nelson, Methods Mol. Biol. 975, 15 (2013)
S.R. Scofield, R.S. Nelson, Plant Physiol. 149, 152 (2009)
L.M. Benavente, X.S. Ding, M.G. Redinbaugh, R.S. Nelson, P. Balint-Kurti, Maydica 57, 206 (2012)
L.M. Benavente, S.R. Scofield, New Phytol. 189, 364 (2011)
X.S. Ding, W.L. Schneider, S.R. Chaluvadi, M.A.R. Mian, R.S. Nelson, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 19, 1229 (2006)
R.S. Nelson, X. Ding, K. Ballard, S.R. Chaluvadi, Phytopathology 97, S83 (2007)
Y. Shi, Y.H. Qin, Y.Y. Cao, H. Sun, T. Zhou, Y.G. Hong, Z.F. Fan, Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 131, 317 (2011)
K. van der Linde, C. Kastner, J. Kumlehn, R. Kahmann, G. Doehlemann, New Phytol. 189, 471 (2011)
Y. Mei, C.Q. Zhang, B.M. Kernodle, J.H. Hill, S.A. Whitham, Plant Physiol. 171, 760 (2016)
X.X. R.Wang, N. Yang, X.D. Wang, R.S. Liu, W.M. Nelson, Z.F. Li, T. Fan, Zhou, Plant J. 86, 102 (2016)
M. Bruun-Rasmussen, C.T. Madsen, S. Jessing, M. Albrechtsen, Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 1323 (2007)
R. Delventhal, N. Zellerhoff, U. Schaffrath, Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 867 (2011)
I. Hein, M. Barciszewska-Pacak, K. Hrubikova, S. Williamson, M. Dinesen, I.E. Soenderby, S. Sundar, A. Jarmolowski, K. Shirasu, C. Lacomme, Plant Physiol. 138, 2155 (2005)
S. Holzberg, P. Brosio, C. Gross, G.P. Pogue, Plant J. 30, 315 (2002)
A. Pacak, K. Geisler, B. Jorgensen, M. Barciszewska-Pacak, L. Nilsson, T.H. Nielsen, E. Johansen, M. Gronlund, I. Jakobsen, M. Albrechtsen, Plant Methods 6, 26 (2010)
S.R. Scofield, L. Huang, A.S. Brandt, B.S. Gill, Plant Physiol 138, 2165 (2005)
H.A. Tufan, F.L. Stefanato, G.R. McGrann, R. MacCormack, L.A. Boyd, J. Plant Physiol. 168, 990 (2011)
C. Yuan, C. Li, L. Yan, A.O. Jackson, Z. Liu, C. Han, J. Yu, D. Li, PLoS ONE 6, e26468 (2011)
D.R. Pring, Phytopathology 64, 64 (1974)
R. Louie, Phytopathology 85, 139 (1995)
M.G. Redinbaugh, R. Louie, P. Ngwira, R. Edema, D.T. Gordon, D.M. Bisaro, J. Virol. Methods 98, 135 (2001)
M. Senthil-Kumar, K.S. Mysore, Nat. Protoc. 9, 1549 (2014)
P. Saxena, Y.C. Hsieh, V.Y. Alvarado, F. Sainsbury, K. Saunders, G.P. Lomonossoff, H.B. Scholthof, Plant Biotech. J. 9, 703 (2011)
L.R. Stewart, S. Jarugula, Y. Zhao, F. Qu, D. Marty, Virology 504, 88 (2017)
R. Louie, M.W. Jones, R.J. Anderson, M.G. Redinbaugh, Crop Sci. 42, 991 (2002)
J.L. Zambrano, M.W. Jones, E. Brenner, D.M. Francis, A. Tomas, M.G. Redinbaugh, Theor. Appl. Genet. 127, 867 (2014)
M. Jones, E. Boyd, M. Redinbaugh, Theor. Appl. Genet. 123, 729 (2011)
L.R. Stewart, M.A. Haque, M.W. Jones, M.G. Redinbaugh, Mol. Breeding 31, 289 (2013)
D.G. Gibson, L. Young, R.Y. Chuang, J.C. Venter, C.A. Hutchison, H.O. Smith, Nat. Methods 6, 343 (2009)
M.K. Brakke, Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 22, 77 (1984)
H.H. McKinney, L.W. Greeley, Biological Characteristics of Barley Stripe-Mosaic Virus Strains and Their Evolution (United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, 1965)
G. Sprague, H. McKinney, L. Greeley, Science 141, 1052 (1963)
A. Manoli, A. Sturaro, S. Trevisan, S. Quaggiotti, A. Nonis, J. Plant Physiol. 169, 807 (2012)
M.W. Pfaffl, G.W. Horgan, L. Dempfle, Nucleic Acids Res. 30, e36 (2002)
J.M. Tuomi, F. Voorbraak, D.L. Jones, J.M. Ruijter, Methods 50, 313 (2010)
A. Pacak, P.M. Strozycki, M. Barciszewska-Pacak, M. Alejska, C. Lacomme, A. Jarmołowski, Z. Szweykowska-Kulińska, M. Figlerowicz, Arch. Virol. 155, 169 (2010)
Acknowledgements
The project was kindly supported by the Center for Applied Plant Sciences (CAPS), Ohio State University (OSU), and the United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS). We thank Dr. Dawei Li, China and Dr. Feng Qu, OSU for providing the BSMV binary vector plasmids.
Funding
This study was funded by the Center for Applied Plant Sciences at Ohio State University (in kind funding, no Grant No.) and by the USDA-ARS Corn Soybean and Wheat Quality Research Unit in-house appropriated project 3607-22000-013-00D.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Project research was carried out by SJ under the direction of LS, with technical support and analyses by KW. All authors contributed to and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Edited by Seung-Kook Choi.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarugula, S., Willie, K. & Stewart, L.R. Barley stripe mosaic virus (BSMV) as a virus-induced gene silencing vector in maize seedlings. Virus Genes 54, 616–620 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-018-1569-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-018-1569-9