Abstract
The Himalayan region is not only threatened by rapid anthropogenic activities but also by the effects of global climate change. Given the uncertainties in magnitude and characteristics of climate change, it is of crucial importance to accumulate prior knowledge of existing and the adaptive future change in the distribution pattern of tree species, especially in the Himalayas which are pronounced with highly heterogeneous ecology. Quercus semecarpifolia, a high-altitude Oak, ranges up to timberline in the Himalayan region. This species forms the climax community on the southern aspect of the mountainside, and is considered to be one of the oldest trees belonging to the Himalayan region. Due to climate-influenced phenomena like masting and inherently slow growth rate, this dominant species is under severe decline. Hence, the present study aimed to delineate and predict the potential distribution range of Q. semecarpifolia in the Uttarakhand region of northwestern Himalayas in relation to associated species, land use land cover, wind, edaphic and bioclimatic variables. Furthermore, potential spatio-temporal variations within the purview of climate change were also predicted through MaxEnt modelling. In total, 589 geo-coordinates were recorded during field surveys (2016–2021) that cover a wide-range of slope, aspect and elevation. Over the WorldClim dataset, ~ 70% well-distributed geo-coordinates were used for training the model and the remaining for validation. The model performance was supported by statistically significant and high AUC value of 0.943 ± 0.059; whereas, the Jackknife test showed that bioclimatic variables, namely annual temperature range (Bio 7), precipitation of the driest month (Bio 14), minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio 6), and mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio 11) contributed significantly in predicting the current distribution of Q. semecarpifolia. The species is majorly distributed in a total of 29 sites belonging to nine districts (dominated in Pithoragarh, Chamoli and Uttarkashi) with altitude ranging from 2249 (Ghes) to 3652 m (Karandam Bugyal). The distribution was further overlaid on KGCC map, which showed maximum occurrence in Cwb (C = warm temperate, w = winter dry, and b = warm summer), i.e., subtropical highland oceanic climate of middle and upper Himalayas constituted by the northwestern Bageshwar, southern Chamoli, small stretch of northeastern Pauri, southeastern Rudraprayag, northern Tehri and Uttarkashi. In the study area, Q. semecarpifolia has been observed to be associated with 19 tree species, where the highest density ratio was recorded with Rhododendron arboreum. The MaxEnt model-based prediction revealed an area of ~ 832 km2 with the loss of ~ 79 km2 (RCP 8.5_2050) and ~ 168 km2 (RCP 8.5_2070), in advancing upslope of the northwestern Himalayas. Geological analysis indicated that tectonic uplift, an important control to the altitudinal shift modelled for the distribution of Q. semecarpifolia due to time scale divergence. Bedrock composition variations, however, might control distribution by means of influencing soil acidity. This study predicts an upslope movement of Q. semecarpifolia in response to climate change where topography and climatic factors could play a significant role.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plant communities living in extreme environmental conditions and growing at the edges of their distribution range are usually more sensitive to climate change. Consequently, they are more prone to experience altitudinal and latitudinal shifts, whilst maintaining normal or adaptive physiological responses (Telwala et al. 2013). The effects of climate change are quite severe in the Himalayas as evident by an increase in the global average temperature (Srinivasan 2006). Further, near surface temperature lapse rate (− 5.3 °C in western Himalayas > − 6.5 °C World’s average per km) dipped gradually in the steep mountain slopes and warming remained for a prolonged period in the Himalayas when equated across the globe (Joshi et al. 2018). These anomalies suggest that climate in the Himalayan mountains is warming two to three times faster than the global average rate (Shrestha and Aryal 2011). Despite great uncertainty in climate change-induced impacts, global estimates show marked influences over species extinction rates, distribution patterns, phenology, ecosystem structure and composition (Urban 2015). Several other concurrent stressors, such as spread of invasive species, habitat degradation, over-extraction, grazing, diseases and insect-pests, further aggravate the impacts, which either act independently or in combination (Mantyka-Pringle et al. 2015). Thus, the long-lived plant communities, i.e., K-selected trees perhaps grow and migrate slowly (Pearson 2006), and the unprecedented climate change will not allow immediate adaptation to newer climatic conditions (Aitken et al. 2008). However, more comprehensive assessments are required to understand the impact of climatic and non-climatic forces on the ecological niches, distribution patterns and probable shifts of keystone forest tree species (Gairola et al. 2013).
Quercus semecarpifolia (Vern: Khasru Oak), a broad-leaved sub-alpine tree, is an important foundation species of the central Himalayas. The Steppe biome was colonized by Q. semecarpifolia and therefore, Oaks became a dominant element of the sub-alpine and alpine forests (Singh and Singh 1992). The Oak forest is found throughout the Indian subcontinent in the Indian Himalayan Region (IHR), where Q. semecarpifolia is reported to exist between 2000 and 3700 m. Oak forest types usually predominate in the exposed ridges of mountains, where Q. semecarpifolia frequently occurs in association with conifers, such as Abies spp., Picea spp. and Taxus wallichiana. In some localities, it has been found mixed with Pinus wallichiana and occasionally associated with broad-leaved species, namely Acer sp., Betula sp., Juglans regia, Pyrus sp. and Prunus sp. (Troup 1921). In hill slopes and ridges, it forms pure gregarious forests, where heavy snowfall occurs in winter with an annual rainfall ranging from 70 to 250 cm. Being a later successional species with poor colonizing habit, achieving good regeneration has been a matter of concern for Q. semecarpifolia. Recently, a considerable decline in the number of saplings and complete absence of seedlings was observed for this species (Negi and Negi 2021). Main causes are the masting event (long fruiting cycle of 8–10 years), low seed viability, vivipary and sensitivity to shade (Singh and Singh 1986; Negi and Naithani 1995), which may potentially be influenced by climate change in the Himalayas (Chakraborty et al. 2018). Further, tree diversity and the temporal stability of mountain forest are prejudiced by climate change, which affect ecosystem processes directly besides changing community composition indirectly (Jourdan et al. 2021).
Changing climatic regimes are predicted to examine for its influence over vegetation composition and forest structure. These associations will remain intact and move together in response to changing climatic conditions or whether the co-occurring companion species will be changed according to the differential adaptive potential, are the key questions that require a more detailed explanation. It is interesting to find out the ecological behaviour of the Q. semecarpifolia in association with the tree species occurring on a biogeographical region in purview of the present and future climate scenarios. However, given the uncertainties in future climate change, prior investigations on the long-term changing distribution patterns of forest species are of crucial importance. Further, owing to the heterogeneity of the mountain ecosystem in the Himalayas, knowledge on the potential impacts over species association is of paramount concern (Sharma 2014; Chakraborty et al. 2018). For instance, waning and replacement of Q. semecarpifolia forest is mostly linked with associate species, such as P. roxburghii, P. wallichiana, Eupatorium adenophorum, and Lantana camara (Singh et al. 1984; Nautiyal 2015). In addition, human-induced impacts, such as agricultural expansion, grazing, lopping of branches, dry season fodder, manure, charcoal making, high quality fuelwood, durable timber, felling of trees, litter collection, and harvest of important ground vegetation may also link to the reduced natural regeneration in the Oak forests (Subedi 2006).
Based on the above facts, the declining population of Q. semecarpifolia has been attributed to the climatic and non-climatic factors. All the gentle-sloped and accessible meadows in the alpine, sub-alpine and temperate regions have undergone extensive habitat degradation and perhaps altitudinal shift, with a considerable loss of the natural vegetation (Ives and Messerli 1989; Singh 1991). These relevant observations could be implied with the use of species distribution modelling (SDM) tools, where MaxEnt has an additive advantage as it works on the ‘presence only’ data relative to both bioclimatic and non-climatic determinants. The MaxEnt model has been widely used for niche modelling and developing distribution maps in several Himalayan Oaks, namely Q. floribunda, Q. leucotrichophora, Q. semecarpifolia (Chakraborty et al. 2016), Q. lanata (Bhandari et al. 2020b), Q. leucotrichophora (Dhyani et al. 2020) and Q. semecarpifolia (Singh et al. 2021). Globally, the MaxEnt model has been successfully applied to determine the potential consequences of future climate change on the distribution of Diospyros virginiana, Oxydendrum arboreum, P. virginiana, Q. falcata var. falcata in Ohio, USA (Schwartz et al. 2001), Larix occidentalis in North America (Rehfeldt and Jaquish 2010), fourteen threatened forest tree species in the Philippines (Garcia et al. 2013), T. baccata in the Bolkar Mountains of southern Turkey (Koç et al. 2018) and Pterocarya stenoptera in China (Zhang et al. 2020). Many of these studies indicated that change in the area of species occurrence, such as altitudinal shift, upslope movement, in response to global climate change scenarios as depicted by a Representative Concentration Pathways (RCPs) trajectory adopted by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Generally, the four RCP pathways (RCP 2.6, 4.5, 6.0 and 8.5 W m−2) for each of the projected time scales (2041–2060 and 2061–2080), were used for climate modelling as discussed in the IPCC fifth Assessment Report (AR5) (IPCC 2014).
A habitat suitability can be predicted by ecological niche modelling (Pearson and Dawson 2003), besides explicitly recognizing climatic response functions (Wang et al. 2010; Chakraborty et al. 2018). Whereas other non-climatic factors are also important and crucial for any shift and future projections. In the present study, we hypothesized that the current distribution of Q. semecarpifolia may show upward shift movement in purview of climate change scenarios and future community structure will be determined on the basis of edaphic, geological and associated species composition. The foremost goal was to quantify the potential altitudinal shift of Q. semecarpifolia in the Himalayas. With this, our study aimed to: (i) survey the distribution range and compare density of all the tree species associated with Q. semecarpifolia in Uttarakhand Himalayas; (ii) build models to predict the current and future spatio-temporal distribution of this species through MaxEnt; and (iii) quantify the predictions regarding altitudinal shifts on Q. semecarpifolia and the key role of non-climatic associates in the prediction of species ecological niche. The study provides scientific support for policy making on the impact of species shifting whilst advocating mitigation measures. Overall, the research work contributes towards conservation, protection and habitat restoration of Q. semecarpifolia in the Himalayan region.
Material and methods
Recording of field data
The study sites are located in the state of Uttarakhand, which is one of the 12 Himalayan states of India, known for its highly varied physiography and biodiversity. The study area ranged between geo-coordinates E 77° 34′–81° 03′; N 28° 43′–31° 28′ and occupying a total area of 53,483 km2 . Based on the geological evolutionary history, the state comprises a cross-section of the northwestern Himalayan orogen, which can be further categorized into the following sub-domains: Trans-Himalaya, the Greater Himalaya or Himadri, Lesser Himalaya, Shivalik Ranges, Foothills, Terai and the Plains (https://sbb.uk.gov.in). The first two zones represent alpine and temperate climatic conditions; whereas Lesser Himalaya and Shivalik correspond to subtropical and subtemperate regions, and the last three zones imbibe the tropical ecological climate niche (FSI 2019). However, based on the altitude, there are five climatic zones in Uttarakhand, namely warm temperate (900–1800 m), cold temperate (1800–2400 m), cold zones (2400–3000 m), alpine zone (3000–4000 m), glacier zone (4000–4800 m) and perpetually frozen zone (> 4800 m) (Uttarakhand Forest Statistics 2012–2013). Typically, the mean annual temperature ranged from − 4.7 to 40.7 °C, and the mean annual rainfall has been recorded as 1613 mm in the year interval of 2018–2019 (Uttarakhand at a Glance 2018–2019). The study area is one of the main hot spots for biological diversity of forest genetic resources and habitat of five Oak species.
The comprehensive mapping scheme and procedure used to predict the altitudinal shift is shown in Fig. 1. The maps of Forest Survey of India (FSI 2015) and the working plans of the state forest department (Uttarakhand, India) were reviewed to locate the distribution status of the species. Species occurrence data were also acquired from the herbarium specimens available at Forest Research Institute (FRI), Wildlife Institute of India (WII) and northwestern Botanical Survey of India (BSI), Dehradun; and by reviewing the literature available at the National Forest Library Information Center (NFLIC) of FRI, Dehradun.
During 2016–2021, field surveys were conducted in 11 districts of Uttarakhand. However, Q. semecarpifolia was found to occur only in nine districts, namely Bageshwar, Chamoli, Dehradun, Nainital, Pauri, Pithoragarh, Rudraprayag, Tehri and Uttarkashi (Table 1). The sampling was performed throughout the distribution range, thus representing density variation of the focal species. Despite our efforts to include the most representative areas of Q. semecarpifolia forests, in some areas, the geographical terrain was difficult to access due to very steep slopes. Therefore, the quadrat and line transect approaches were used for unbiased sampling of forest areas. The latitude, longitude and altitude were recorded with Global Positioning System (GPS; 5–8 m precision accuracy) and quadrats (10 × 10 m) were laid with a minimum of 300 m distance apart. A total of 29 line transects were laid across the sampling sites as per the standard methodology devised to map R. arboreum (Mamgain et al. 2017). For precise distribution mapping, individual trees and patches were also demarcated in polygons through GPS. Furthermore, the quadrats were used for density analysis, whereas line transects were used to acquire more GPS points for eco-distribution mapping and population status analysis. In total, 589 geo-coordinates of Q. semecarpifolia were recorded in the nine districts of Uttarakhand.
Based on the tree density, populations surveyed along 29 line transects were classified into the following categories: (i) reduced (10–20 trees per 500 m); (ii) disturbed (20–30 trees per 500 m); (iii) fair (30–40 trees per 500 m); (iv) healthy (40–50 trees per 500 m); and (v) pristine (> 50 trees per 500 m). Further, the population distribution was categorized as random (where the trees were unevenly distributed in scattered or mixed forest) and uniform (dominant, gregariously present and evenly distributed). In addition, the data on tree associates in or nearby the sampling quadrat were also recorded for the phytocoenological analysis. In total, ten sample plots of 0.1 ha each were randomly laid out in every population. The species name and numbers were recorded in each plot (Mishra 1968). Density (individuals ha−1) was calculated on the basis of data recorded in 29 sites. A heat map was developed for the species with its associates on the basis of density ratio.
Geoinformatics data and MaxEnt modelling
The recorded geospatial parameters were converted into point shape-file (.SHP) and transformed into a Keyhole Markup Language (KML) file, which was later used in Explore Google Earth for visible interpretation at the Forest Informatics Laboratory, FRI, Dehradun. Different bioclimatic variables representing annual trends in rainfall and temperature data, seasonality, and extreme environmental factors represented by wind and water vapour, were derived from WorldClim Ver. 2.1 (http://www.worldclim.org). Global Digital Elevation Model (GDEM) was used to generate aspect, elevation and slope maps (Hijmans et al. 2005). Further, the data on direct normal irradiance (DNI) and pedologic variables were downloaded from the Solar Energy Center, Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE), Government of India, New Delhi (https://maps.nrel.gov) and the India Dataset of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT; https://swat.tamu.edu/data/india-dataset/), respectively. Lastly, the SENTINEL datasets (2A–2B; Supplementary Table 1) were downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) (https://www.usgs.gov). The softwares’ ArcGIS Ver. 9.3 and QGIS were used for Digital Image Processing of the SENTINEL satellite data to compose False Colour Composite (FCC) image. To generate Land Use Land Cover map (LULC) of Uttarakhand Himalayas, the image was classified through features, such as forest (very dense, moderate and open), agriculture, barren land, settlements, scrubland and water body. All data were resampled in the same projection parameters as well in the same spatial resolution (30 arc second match with 27 layers representing bioclimatic and non-climatic parameters). Cumulatively, all these variables were subjected to multicollinearity test, where cross-correlation coefficient value greater than ± 0.70 was excluded to delineate common variables. As a result, only 14 variables were used for the modelling purpose (Supplementary Table 2).
A model based on the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) was used for estimating the distribution and habitat suitability of Q. semecarpifolia with a set of 14 (current prediction) and 12 (two variables were removed due to their dynamicity in the future prediction scenarios) variables in MaxEnt Ver. 3.4.4 programme (Table 2; https://www.cs.priceton.edu). Using above-mentioned parameters, the model was allowed to run with 100 replicates for prediction mapping (Flory et al. 2012). Over the WorldClim dataset, out of 589 geo-coordinates, 413 were used for training (Blue in colour) and the rest ~ 30% (Green in colour) for validation (Fig. 2). Maximum number of background points (10,000) along with linear or quadratic or product (0.050), categorical (0.250), threshold (1.000) and hinge (0.500) features were used as input variables in the software (Phillips et al. 2004). Predictions from 100 models were averaged to produce the final map of probability to determine the presence of Q. semecarpifolia. Based on the bioclimatic data, the MaxEnt predicts high values for grid cells that are suitable for species occurrence. Afterwards, accuracy of the probability distribution was enhanced by masking the non-forest and the over-predicted area using FCM.
The model performance was evaluated by Area Under ‘Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)’ Curve (AUC) with values ranging between 0 and 1. The categorized models with values > 0.9 are considered as highly accurate in prediction modelling (Swets 1988). In addition, model accuracy and precision were also evaluated by calculating other measures, such as kappa coefficient (K), true skill statistic (TSS), sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), prevalence (P). (Fielding and Bell 1997; Allouche et al. 2006). Further, the MaxEnt-derived response curves and Jackknife test were used to determine the relative contribution and permutation importance of each variable used in prediction modelling (Phillips et al. 2006).
As MaxEnt gives the probabilistic distribution of a species occurrence with probability ranging from 0 to 1, we chose a more conservative value of 0.7 to delineate species distribution. The remaining area with probability between 0.7 and 1.0 was retained to represent the probable sites of a species across its distribution range. A buffer of 1 km around the sampling point was used to calculate the actual sampled distribution of Q. semecarpifolia. Additionally, the distribution map was overlaid on Köppen-Geiger climatic classification (KGCC; 1976–2000; Kottek et al. 2006) and the geological map (Geological Survey of India; http://bhukosh.gsi.gov.in). The KGCC describes the types of vegetation in a given geographical region, where the agroecological climatic conditions could be analyzed. Notably, the geological map reveals the edaphic factors and rock types influence on the distribution pattern of Q. semecarpifolia.
Determination of altitudinal shift
To assess the potential distribution shifts within a real landscape, we selected a geographical setting that met several criteria. First, we sought a site located in the eco-distribution map predicting future distribution shifts. The region must be characterized by: (a) available satellite coverage of forest habitat availability; (b) known tree distribution and density through sampled plots; (c) a minimum distance of 300 m span to cover the maximum landscape; and (d) variability in the relative amount of forest availability. Within Uttarakhand Himalayas, we selected a few sites for measuring the shifts in association with neighbouring tree species. The associated species varied in terms of the required abiotic and biotic constituents of the geographical sites, which might be affected by the life history attributes across the fragmented landscapes.
All landscape analysis and map production were conducted using the Geographical Information System (GIS)-based softwares. The altitudinal shift, i.e., projected area under Q. semecarpifolia was demarcated. This was measured using MaxEnt modelling prediction output by subtracting the projected area of the species under the two time-periods, i.e., RCPs 8.5 for 2050 and 2070 from the current occurrence. For future climate scenarios, the RCP 8.5 pathway arises from little effort to reduce emissions and represents a failure to curb warming by 2100 mentioned in the IPCC AR5 (http://www.ipcc.ch/), was selected. The RCP 8.5 is developed by the Model for Energy Supply Strategy Alternatives and their General Environmental Impact (MESSAGE) modelling team and the Integrated Assessment Framework at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Austria (Rao and Riahi 2006; Riahi et al. 2007). Importantly, the RCP 8.5 is characterized by increasing greenhouse gas emissions over time and represents scenarios in the literature leading to high greenhouse gas concentration levels.
In each district, geographical areas (regions) on the map (qualitative data) were identified. After that, the GDEM was used to produce 20 m interval contour lines marked as G1 to G9, covering the entire nine areas where the shift was presumed to have occurred. Further, the area between two time periods, i.e., RCP 8.5 2050 and 2070, was masked through contour lines. For the nine regions, a circular plot of diameter 3.14 km was laid on the final output map for calculating the average elevation covered in the presumed area of shift. In the next step, masked contour lines representing elevation were calculated to find the average value of current prediction. Similarly, the same method to determine the average elevation was applied for RCP 8.5 2050 and 2070. Afterwards, the contemporary habitat suitability and average altitudinal range of Q. semecarpifolia were compared with that of the projected RCPs. Herein, the altitudinal shift for the entire distributional range was calculated in a probabilistic manner by subtracting the differences in the average value of the altitude between RCP 8.5 (2050) and the current prediction; as well as RCP 8.5 (2070) and current prediction. The maximum and minimum value of the altitudinal shift were marked in the probability range of 0–1. The same methodology of shift calculation was applied for R. arboreum in the western Himalayas (Veera et al. 2019).
Results
Field surveys, distribution status and associated species of Q. semecarpifolia
A total of 29 sites distributed in nine districts of Uttarakhand, India was surveyed from 2016 to 2021. Only one site near Badrinath shrine in district Chamoli was planted whilst the rest 28 sites were naturally inhabited. Field surveys revealed that the species altitude ranged from 2249 (Ghes, Chamoli) to 3652 m (Karandam Bugyal, Pithoragarh). Out of 29 sites explored for population distribution, 12 new sites were explored, i.e., not described in the findings of earlier research work. Further, 26 sites showed uniform and three had a random distribution. The majority of the surveyed populations were under fair and healthy status (Table 1), but inadequate seedling recruitment was observed during the expedition.
The populations of Q. semecarpifolia were distributed across a wide altitudinal gradient in Uttarakhand Himalayas, where it has been associated with 19 tree species (Table 3). Due to wide-ranging distribution and broad species associations, it forms a key component of distinct forest types and landscapes, like tree lines, dominating zones in temperate forest, mixed forests and climatic-climax vegetation. The data acquired in the lower altitude range (2000–2500 m) indicated fragmented and disturbed population status. However, the middle (2500–3000 m) and higher (3000–3500 m) range showed uniform distribution with healthy population status. The species in the lower elevation zone assembled with mixed forestry species, such as Cedrus deodara, Lyonia ovalifolia, Q. floribunda, Q. leucotrichophora and Rhododendron barbatum. Composition of association in temperate regions were shown by Acer caesium, Fraxinus micrantha, Q. floribunda, R. arboreum and Taxus wallichiana as a middle-storey trees; whilst Abies pindrow, Picea smithiana, Pinus wallichiana and Q. lanata can be classified as upper-storey vegetation. Finally, in higher reaches of the subalpine zone, the species commonly occurs with Betula utilis as a middle-storey tree; and A. spectabilis as an upper-storey tree, whereas R. campanulatum shrub was present as a ground-based lower-vegetation.
The density per hectare of Q. semecarpifolia associates were calculated in a total of 29 geographical sites and a heat map was also generated (Fig. 3). Overall, a tree density of 673 individuals ha−1 was recorded in the populations of Q. semecarpifolia. Field surveys and density data indicate that the species is mainly associated with R. arboreum (abundance in 27 sites; 60 trees ha−1), T. wallichiana (abundance in 21 sites; 48 trees ha−1) and Q. floribunda (abundance in 15 sites; 25 trees ha−1). However, minimum density of association was recorded with P. wallichiana (2 sites; 5 trees ha−1). Further, the heat map validated the density ratio of the associated species with respect to Q. semecarpifolia, where the highest density ratio (0.1000) was observed with R. arboreum followed by T. wallichiana (0.0700), Q. floribunda (0.0367), L. ovalifolia (0.0299) and B. utilis (0.0293). The lowest density ratio (0.0075) was associated with P. wallichiana followed by C. torulosa (0.0135), R. barbatum (0.0136), Q. leucotrichophora (0.0138) and A. pindrow (0.0145).
Validation and prediction of the MaxEnt model
A total of 589 geo-coordinates were recorded in nine districts of Uttarakhand based on species occurrence. Of these, 413 (~ 70%) geo-coordinates were used for training and the remaining 176 were used for validation of the MaxEnt model. In the modelling exercise, when the 176 geo-coordinates of the test data set overlaid on the predicted species distributions, a total of 150 (~ 85%) of the test data points fell within the predicted area. This reveals a high level of accuracy in prediction and estimation of distribution (Supplementary Fig. 1a; Supplementary Table 3). Notably, the prediction output revealed an actual area of validation for the model, where maximum percentage of geo-coordinates falls in the districts Chamoli and Pithoragarh (88.89%) and minimum in Nainital (60.00%).
Out of 27 environmental variables, 14 were selected through the multicollinearity test to run the MaxEnt programme for current prediction, whereas 12 of them were used for future prediction (Table 2). Herein, the assessment of literature survey and ground-based assessment of the forest types (Champion and Seth 1968), assist in choosing the best possible 12 variables in the prediction modelling of Q. semecarpifolia. In the current prediction, the average test AUC value for the replicate runs was 0.943 ± 0.059, which indicates high performance of the model for test data, and best fit with the variables chosen in the study (Fig. 4a). Additionally, the values of classification accuracy measures were 0.504 and 0.723 for K and TSS, respectively. However, other precision measures were also analyzed and shown in Supplementary Table 4. On the basis of response curves and Jackknife test, environmental variables, such as annual temperature range (Bio 7), precipitation of the driest month (Bio 14), minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio 6), and mean temperature of the coldest quarter (Bio 11), were statistically significant predictors of the current species distribution with an overall percentage contribution of 68.20% [Fig. 4b, c(i) and (ii)]. Further, for future (2050 and 2070) predictions, variables, namely annual temperature range (Bio 7), altitude (Alt) and soil, revealed significant information with the percentage contributions of 64.20% and 66.10%, respectively.
Conspicuously, the species occurrence areas were mapped over the SENTINEL image using ArcGIS, QGIS and Explore Google Earth Pro imagery tools (Fig. 2). The results showed that Q. semecarpifolia occupies an actual area of ~ 212 km2, derived on the basis of a 1 km buffer zone created with sampled geo-coordinates. However, a total area of ~ 832 km2 was predicted through the MaxEnt model, which was 1.56% of the total geographical area and 3.43% of the forest cover of the state Uttarakhand (Table 4). Overall, for the species, the predicted area (~ 250 km2 during 2050) was maximum in Pithoragarh and minimum (~ 17 km2 current prediction) in Nainital.
Furthermore, the aerial distribution was categorized into very dense (~ 188 km2), moderately dense (~ 523 km2) and open forest (~ 120 km2). In another exercise, the area was classified in accordance with different elevation zones. The highest estimate of ~ 368 km2 was recorded in the range of 2500–3000 m, where the species grew in mixed forest with R. arboreum, T. wallichiana, A. pindrow, P. smithiana and P. wallichiana. Secondly, an area of ~ 270 km2 was noted for Q. semecarpifolia in the lower range between 2000 and 2500 m, overlapping mainly with Q. floribunda, Q. leucotrichophora, Q. lanata, Acer sp. and R. arboreum forest. Lastly, at higher altitudinal gradient (3000–3500 m), a lowest prediction of ~ 193 km2 was recorded, where tree line communities, such as A. spectabilis, B. utilis, Juniper spp. and R. campanulatum, were the major associates.
Globally, the climatic regimes of the study area resemble the continental regions in South America, North America, Europe, South Africa, and Asia, where various species of Oaks are presently distributed. The current distribution of Q. semecarpifolia was then overlaid on KGCC map to reveal the association between species distribution and climatic conditions. The area is classified into five subtypes (Fig. 5), where Q. semecarpifolia occurs throughout the region except in the tropical plains. However, maximum occurrence was found in subtropical highland oceanic climate (Cwb; C = warm temperate, w = winter dry, and b = warm summer) of middle and upper Himalayas constituted by northwestern Bageshwar, southern Chamoli, small stretch of northeastern Pauri, southeastern Rudraprayag, northern Tehri and Uttarkashi. The second prominent distribution occurs in subarctic climate (Dwc; D = Snow, w = winter dry, and c = cool summer) conditions of eastern Bageshwar, northern Chamoli, and northern Pithoragarh. Notably, a lesser distribution occurs in the humid subtropical climate (Cwa; C = warm temperate, w = winter dry, and a = hot summer) of the upper reaches of Dehradun and Nainital.
Altitudinal shifts in the habitable zone of Q. semecarpifolia
In the MaxEnt model output of the future climatic RCP 8.5 scenario of 2050 and 2070 (Supplementary Fig. 1b, c), an altitudinal shift was predicted in the habitable zone of Q. semecarpifolia (Fig. 6a, b). The range of suitable habitat showed a trend of northwards and an upward shifting (10–115 m) in Uttarakhand. For instance, in district Dehradun, a shift in the altitude of 30 m (Av. = 2675 m; 2050) and 40 m (Av. = 2685 m; 2070) has been observed when compared to the current predicted altitude of 2645 m (Supplementary Fig. 2). However, the proportion of suitable habitat for species varied under the RCP (8.5) of the two projected climate scenarios (2050 and 2070) revealed a steady decline in the suitable climatic habitat (area) of Q. semecarpifolia (Table 5). Also, the model predicted a change towards the north and higher elevational zones for suitable habitat, with a climatic shift range from 10–115 m to 15–105 m for 2050 and 2070, respectively. Overall, a probability shift of 0.09–1.00 (2050) and 0.13–0.91 (2070) was observed for the climate change scenarios, with maximum altitudinal shift of 115 m noted in district Bageshwar and Pithoragarh; whereas, lowest shift (10 m) was observed in Rudraprayag. In both RCPs, the climatic niche showed a reduction of ~ 79 km2 (2050) and ~ 168 km2 (2070) as compared to the baseline scenario (currently predicted).
Correlation of rock type occurrence to the distribution of Q. semecarpifolia
The current distribution and future predictions of Q. semecarpifolia were compared to the rock types occurring in the geological map of Uttarakhand (Fig. 7). Different rock types form soils with varying chemical and physical properties, which in turn may be favourable or unfavourable for species growth and expansion. The geological analysis indicated an interesting correlation between the edaphic factors and the occurrence of rock types influencing the distribution pattern of Q. semecarpifolia via. soil composition. With respect to the ecology and habitat suitability of Q. semecarpifolia in the Himalayas, it was observed that the soils where the species grow tend to have slightly acidic pH. Less acidic soils are formed by the weathering of acidic parent rocks, such as granite and rhyolite. Alternatively, the weathering of basic rocks, such as limestone, marble or chalk will result in alkaline soils. Accordingly, in the geological map (Fig. 7), the occurrence of Q. semecarpifolia corresponds to the occurrence of crystalline rocks, such as the Central Crystallines and Garhwal Group (volcanics) at sites 1, 2, 3 and 5, as well as to the Almora Crystallines and Bawali volcanics at site 4. Exceptions occur at the sites 6 and 7, where the mainly occurring Jaunsar Group and associated formations contain limestone and marble that will form alkaline soils. It is important to notice, however, that in spots 6 and 7, the local drainage flows from the crystalline and volcanic rocks located northward. Hence, sediment transport and water acidity may influence the acidity of soils along river margins and flooding areas. The species does not occur or is very scarce over rock groups where limestone is highly abundant, such as in the northeast, southwest and south of the state. When lithology is compared to our results of habitat suitability prediction modelling for 2070, the general trend towards higher altitudes was observed in sites 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, where acid rocks prevail, and was not observed in sites 6 and 7, where alkaline rocks start to occur.
Discussion
The broad-leaved evergreen Q. semecarpifolia usually form abrupt treelines at several locations in the western Himalayas (Körner 2012). Climate change-induced alterations and regeneration problems for this species in the last few decades have been further exaggerated by the ever-increasing human-population impacts (Shrestha 2003; Negi and Negi 2021). The present work represents a first ever attempt to model the impacts of future climate change, species association and topographical factors, on the spatial distribution of this important flagship tree species of the Himalayan region.
Associated species and eco-distribution mapping of Q. semecarpifolia
Oaks are an important member of broad-leaved forests of western Himalayas; where they grow gregariously either in pure or mixed-forest (Singh and Singh 1986). Based on the ground surveys, we recorded an altitudinal range of 2249–3652 m for Q. semecarpifolia, which is in accordance to the other studies conducted in IHR (Negi and Naithani 1995; Orwa et al. 2009). In our surveyed sites, Q. semecarpifolia was found to be associated with 19 tree species, where T. dimosa was observed for the first time in Narayana Ashram (Pithoragarh). The majority of Q. semecarpifolia populations were gregarious with a total density of 673 individuals ha−1, which is in accordance with other studies conducted on vegetation analysis for Oaks in the region (Singh and Singh 1986; Tiwari et al. 2018). Maximum numbers of stands were associated with R. arboreum and T. wallichiana, as moisture conditions favour both the species. Importantly, the alliance of R. arboreum with Q. semecarpifolia may be attributed to the wide altitudinal l range (Bhandari et al. 2020a). In the forest areas, we have physically observed the presence of dense populations consisting of old and middle-aged trees, which suggested that frequent monitoring will help to understand the dynamics of the Q. semecarpifolia populations in context of anthropogenic factors, ecological attributes and climate change alterations. Notably, the regeneration status of Oaks is determined by monitoring and evaluating the newly emerging seedlings or saplings in the forests (Joshi and Samant 2004; Caignard et al. 2017). In spite of intensive surveying of various populations with different status (undisturbed to little disturbed), new recruits of Q. semecarpifolia were inadequately observed (Singh and Singh 1992; Negi and Negi 2021). For instance, literature revealed that Q. semecarpifolia shows masting in 8–10 years, which probably compounded the problem due to vivipary and die-back (Troup 1921; Singh et al. 2011). All these considerations highlight the importance to predict and map the species in current and future prospects.
This study provides a detailed eco-distribution map revealed through MaxEnt modelling approach, which estimated an area of ~ 832 km2 under Q. semecarpifolia. In total, 589 geo-coordinates were used in prediction modelling, a very high number in comparison to the data points used in earlier studies in the Garhwal Himalayas (Shekhar et al. 2017). The performance of the model output was supported by a significantly high value of AUC (0.943 ± 0.059). Importantly, values around 0.5 indicate optimum performance as compared to random models, whilst values closer to 1.0 indicate quality model performance. Likewise, the MaxEnt with higher output of AUC was used to map the ecologically and economically dominant forest tree species, such as B. utilis, Cedrus deodara, Q. incana, Q. dilatata, R. arboreum, P. smithiana and P. roxburghii (Sharma 2014), and Q. semecarpifolia (0.899 ± 0.02) (Singh et al. 2021) in Himachal Pradesh; Q. leucotrichophora (0.80 ± 0.020), Q. floribunda (0.98 ± 0.006), Q. semecarpifolia (0.97 ± 0.008) in Kumaun Himalayas (Chakraborty et al. 2016); M. esculenta (0.95 ± 0.020) (Shankhwar et al. 2019); R. arboreum (0.88 ± 0.023) and Q. lanata (0.982 ± 0.021) (Bhandari et al. 2020a, b), and Q. leucotrichophora (0.876 ± 0.002) (Dhyani et al. 2020) in Uttarakhand Himalayas. High AUC indicates the significant contribution and overall suitability of the variables chosen for modelling the Himalayan tree species, in accordance with the AUC prediction values in conservation presence/absence models (Fielding and Bell 1997). In any model, the AUC values are generally high if the species under study is restricted to a specific region or environmental niche. Whereas, species with wide and broad distribution ranges typically exhibit low AUC values (Elith et al. 2011; Phillips et al. 2006). Notably, the classification accuracy measures revealed a value of 0.504 for K, which is in fair agreement with Landis and Koch (1977), and 0.723 for TSS, which indicates perfect agreement and high performance of the model (Allouche et al. 2006). The model clearly supported a more defined and restricted ecological niche for Q. semecarpifolia in the study area of the northwest Himalayan mountains.
In our approach, a multicollinearity test was performed on 27 bioclimatic and non-climatic variables. These were later reduced to 14 by eliminating the overly dependent variables, thus, enhancing the accuracy in prediction assessment. The precipitation (Bio 14) and temperature (Bio 7, Bio 6 and Bio 11) variables contributed (68.20%) significantly for current distribution. Incongruity to our results, variables, such as Alt, Bio 7 and Bio 19 in Kumaun Himalayas (Uttarakhand) (Chakraborty et al. 2016); Bio 19, Asp, Bio 4 and Bio 12 in Great Himalayan National Park (Himachal Pradesh) (Singh et al. 2021), were used in prediction mapping of Q. semecarpifolia, which signifies that annual temperature fluctuation, i.e., minimum and maximum temperature extremes have profound effect on depicting the ecological niche of a species. Similarly, Q. aegilops distribution is maximally depicted by Bio 12 (45.4%), Asp (19.9%), Bio 1 (13.5%), and Slo (15.1%) in Iraq (Khwarahm 2020), justifies that Oaks distribution is majorly govern by precipitation and topographical factors. Overall, the modelling-based on Bio 14, Bio 7, Bio 6, Bio 11 and Bio 12 as the most influential variables used in the prediction modelling studies of Oaks. Further, when the current species distribution was overlaid on the KGCC map, the Cwb and Dwc emerged as the most preferable climatic type, which revealed that dry winter conditions prevail in most of the habitat. Similarly, the distribution pattern of Q. ilex in France Mediterranean region and Pakistan shows these climatic regimes (Delzon et al. 2013; Gilani et al. 2020). Here, the KGCC map helps to understand the relationship between the species occurrence and favouring climatic conditions, which is based on the threshold values derived from seasonality of monthly air temperature and precipitation (Beck et al. 2018).
Altitudinal shifts and its effect in the habitable zone of Q. semecarpifolia
The MaxEnt model was used to predict the distribution and the future climatic shift, i.e., RCP 8.5 (2050 and 2070) of Q. semecarpifolia with 12 variables, where most influential ones were Bio 7, Alt and soil. Both periods have shown a reduction of ~ 79 km2 and ~ 168 km2 as compared to the baseline scenario of ~ 832 km2, revealing suitable habitat with an upslope probability shift range of 0.09–1.00 (2050) and 0.13–0.91 (2070) towards the northwestern direction. The probable shift has been calculated through the methodology applied in R. arboreum (Veera et al. 2019), Q. leucotrichophora (Dhyani et al. 2020) and Q. semecarpifolia (Singh et al. 2021). However, the predicted future ranges of 2360–3710 m (RCP 8.5_2050) and 2370–3800 m (RCP 8.5_2070) implies that the lower habitats of Shivalik and middle Himalayas may have undergone shrinkage or decline due to unfavourable climatic and anthropogenic-driven factors. On the other hand, in higher elevation zones, the range may expand up to timberline. Interestingly, by correlating altitudinal shift prediction with the KGCC map of Q. semecarpifolia, most of the populations showed migration from climate type Cwb to Dwc, further validating the results. Previously, KGCC was used to investigate the potential changes in the future vegetation patterns over southern Africa in response to anthropogenic-induced climate change (Engelbrecht and Engelbrecht 2016). A very high resolution KGCC maps and their relationship with altitudinal belts were also presented for the European Alps, where Oaks occurred as a predominant species under the Dfb climates (boreal, no dry season, warm summer) (Rubel et al. 2016). Recently, the KGCC were used to project contractions of the alpine tundra domain and upward elevational shifts of the natural climatic treeline under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 scenarios in Europe, which projected an upward shift of vegetation across the mountain regions (Barredo et al. 2020).
In case of succession events, Q. ilex has colonized substantial new areas over the last century in France and Mediterranean regions. Noteworthily, the maximum rate of colonization by this species (22 to 57 m year−1) was much slower than predicted by the ecological niche models (Delzon et al. 2013). The habitats of Q. aegilops under the RCP 2.6 and 8.5 (2070s) showed a reduction of ~ 1850 km2 (3.6%) and ~ 1627 km2 (3.16%) and range expansion of ~ 777 km2 (1.5%) and ~ 848 km2 (1.7%) (Khwarahm 2020). These findings suggest that climate change impacts have been visualized on a globally distributed genus Quercus.
The habitat suitability changes require time to time monitoring and the notion on phenology was developed for an altitudinal shift, where the phenological cycle could be bound to be influenced by the non-climatic factors. It is important to note that the ecological population structure of a species is influenced by the reproductive potential, which itself depends on the 13 months period between the pollination and the ripening of the acorn (Shrestha 2003), and the precipitation and temperature variation probably shift the event. For instance, in the Himalayan region, if there is an increase in temperature during the coldest quarter (November–January) with a decrease in precipitation throughout the driest quarter (May–June), an early onset of spring is induced, which leads to the appearance of new shoots during February–March. Furthermore, flowers blooming take place in the month of late-March to April, with acorn formation taking place between late-April and mid-May. This hypothetical situation causes early flowering and fruiting events in Q. semecarpifolia, consequently leading to low viability of acorn due to the pre-monsoonal drought conditions. The phenological differences are reported from Nepal, where old leaves begin to fall in May–June, but do not fall entirely until the development of new leaves. At the lower elevations, the new shoots appear in May; whereas on the higher elevations, the new shoots do not commence to appear until June (Orwa et al. 2009). Irrefutably, altitudinal gradient may cause phenological shifts in the populations, which then act as a barrier for pollination amongst individuals of distantly located populations.
Noteworthily, the studied species shows signs of vivipary and masting phenology, with lesser formation of acorn in 6–7-consecutive years (Singh et al. 2011). Since monsoonal rain in the high-altitude zone of Himalayas arrives in late June to July, but the high temperature in May and early fortnight of June after acorn formation could aggravate the problem by causing a negative effect on the regeneration potential of Q. semecarpifolia. This could further lead to greater shifts in the distribution of Oaks in the Himalayas. Qualitative data indicates that the species tends to move upwards to cooler climatic zones (Fig. 6; Supplementary Fig. 2), where decline in the areas of timberline communities were observed. In response to the climate change, the species showed the tendency to shift towards southern aspects at treeline in the Uttarakhand Himalayas. Whereas, on monsoonal sites, Q. semecarpifolia is associated with B. utilis and conifers but occasionally form treeline (Singh 2018). During surveys, it was observed that at Karandam Bugyal (Pithoragarh), the species is present as a treeline and timberline communities in northern aspect and absent in southern aspect, where the dominant vegetation were B. utilis and R. campanulatum. In Tungnath and Rudranath (Chamoli) and Yamunotri (Uttarkashi), treeline was formed by Abies spp., R. campanulatum and B. utilis, and Q. semecarpifolia was mainly observed in timberline. At Khaliya top (Pithoragarh), treelines were formed by B. utilis and R. campanulatum in all aspects, and Q. semecarpifolia was observed only in the eastern aspect, forming timberline with Abies spp. (Supplementary Fig. 3). Thus, it is difficult to interpret and understand the shift towards treeline and across the aspects, but upward movements could be hypothesized as an adaptive response against global warming as revealed by the MaxEnt model. Also, the occupancy of different aspects at diverse locations could be the ecological adaptation for shade, light and moisture (Singh 2018). Invariably, the future prediction scenario and estimated density ratio suggested the habitat of Q. semecarpifolia at lower elevation may be encroached by other associates, viz. A. pindrow, Q. floribunda, Q. lanata, R. arboreum, etc.
Influence of geological factors in the distribution of Q. semecarpifolia
In a preliminary qualitative analysis, the occurrence of different rock types seems to indirectly influence the distribution and habitat suitability prediction of Q. semecarpifolia by the acidification of soils. Despite being easily observable in Fig. 7, these early assumptions are qualitative, and demand further quantitative investigation in future studies. It is widely acknowledged that the Himalayas represent a geologically dynamic environment in terms of altitude change through geological time scale (GTS). Thermochronological modelling ages suggest important uplift events in the region of this study at 0.9 and 2.3 million years (Ma) ago (Patel and Carter 2009). Older events are also recorded in the region, indicating important uplift in the middle Miocene (~ 16–12 Ma), and as well as climate-driven erosional exhumation in the late Miocene–Pliocene (~ 3–2 Ma) (Wang et al. 2010). Modelled uplift rates were calculated via. apatite fission track ages that varied from 0.25 to 0.69 mm year−1 and have been occurring since the Middle to Late Miocene (Adlakha et al. 2019). These events of altitude variation in the Himalayas might have influenced the adaptation of a species through GTS, selecting those able to thrive in different altitudes to adapt to the changes. However, in our models, we cannot consider uplift as an effective variable, since the timescales accounted for these processes are entirely different, millions of years are necessary for significant tectonic changes, whilst a few decades are enough for contrasting climatic changes.
Conclusions
Due to the high economic, ethnobotanical, and ecological significance of Oaks, the evolution of treeline has been the subject of global concern. The present study highlighted several starting points to the current situation of Q. semecarpifolia forest that are rapidly changing under the influence of climatic and non-climatic variables, besides being affected by the local anthropogenic activities. The study allows us to draw important conclusions.
-
1.
Field surveys and density analysis revealed the healthy and wide distribution of Q. semecarpifolia with an estimated area of ~ 832 km2 but there is a lack of inadequate seedling recruitment in the native habitat.
-
2.
Major tree associates at lower elevation (2200–2700 m) are R. arboreum, Q. floribunda, T. wallichiana, etc.; whereas, B. utilis and A. pindrow are associated at higher elevation (3000–3500 m).
-
3.
This species tends to shift towards higher elevations in the Himalayas with respect to climate change scenarios of 2050 and 2070, with a sharp decline in potential abundance.
-
4.
The modelled scenarios indicate high risk of extinction of Q. semecarpifolia at lower elevations.
-
5.
Geological analysis indicates that tectonic uplift cannot be accounted as an important control to the altitudinal shift modelled in this study for the distribution of Q. semecarpifolia. Bedrock variations, however, might redeem distribution by means of influencing soil acidity.
Data availability
All data files have been uploaded and clearly written in the manuscript.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Adlakha V, Patel RC, Kumar A, Lal N (2019) Tectonic control over exhumation in the Arunachal Himalaya: new constraints from Apatite Fission Track Analysis, vol 481. Geological Society, London, pp 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP481.1
Aitken SN, Yeaman S, Holliday JA, Wang T, Curtis-McLane S (2008) Adaptation, migration or extirpation: climate change outcomes for tree populations. Evol Appl 1:95–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.17524571.2007.00013.x
Allouche O, Tsoar A, Kadmon R (2006) Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J Appl Ecol 43:1223–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x
Barredo JI, Mauri A, Caudullo G (2020) Impacts of climate change in European mountains—Alpine tundra habitat loss and treeline shifts under future global warming. European Union, Luxembourg. https://doi.org/10.2760/653658
Beck HE, Zimmermann NE, McVicar TR, Vergopolan N, Berg A, Wood EF (2018) Present and future Köppen-Geiger climate classification maps at 1-km resolution. Sci Data 5:180–214. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6396959
Bhandari MS, Meena RK, Shankhwar R, Shekhar C, Pandey VV, Saxena J, Kant R, Barthwal S, Pandey S, Chandra G, Ginwal HS (2020a) Prediction mapping through MaxEnt modeling paves the way for the conservation of Rhododendron arboreum in Uttarakhand Himalayas. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 48:411–422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-019-01089-0
Bhandari MS, Meena RK, Shankhwar R, Pandey S, Kant R, Barthwal S, Ginwal HS (2020) Global warming scenario depicts enhanced spatial distribution of Quercus lanata in the western Himalayas. Int J Glob Warm 22(3):255–271. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGW.2020b.110861
Caignard T, Kremer A, Firmat C, NicolasM VS, Delzon S (2017) Increasing spring temperatures favor oak seed production in temperate areas. Sci Rep 7(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09172-7
Chakraborty A, Joshi PK, Sachdeva K (2016) Predicting distribution of major forest tree species to potential impacts of climate change in the central Himalayan region. Ecol Eng 97:593–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.006
Chakraborty A, Saha S, Sachdeva K, Joshi PK (2018) Vulnerability of forests in the Himalayan region to climate change impacts and anthropogenic disturbances: a systematic review. Reg Environ Change 18(6):1783–1799. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1309-7
Champion HG, Seth SK (1968) A revised survey of forest types of India. Govt. of India Press, New Delhi
Delzon S, Urli M, Samalens JC, Lamy JB, Lischke H (2013) Field evidence of colonization by Holm Oak, at the northern margin of its distribution range, during the Anthropocene period. PLoS ONE 8:e80443. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0080443
Dhyani S, Kadaverugu R, Pujari P (2020) Predicting impacts of climate variability on Banj oak (Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus) forests: understanding future implications for Central Himalayas. Reg Environ Change 20:113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01696-5
Elith J, Phillips SJ, Hastie T, Dudík M, Chee YE, Yates CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Divers Distrib 17:43–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x
Engelbrecht CJ, Engelbrecht FA (2016) Shifts in Köppen-Geiger climate zones over southern Africa in relation to key global temperature goals. Theor Appl Climatol 123:247–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-014-1354-1
Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38–49. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892997000088
Flory AR, Kumar S, Stohlgren TJ, Cryan PM (2012) Environmental conditions associated with bat white nose syndrome mortality in the north-eastern United States. J Appl Ecol 49:680–689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02129.x
FSI (2015) Uttarakhand. India state of forest report 2015. Forest Survey of India (FSI), Dehradun, pp 252–257
FSI (2019) Uttarakhand. India state of forest report 2019. Forest Survey of India (FSI), Dehradun, pp 284–93
Gairola S, Proches S, Rocchini D (2013) High-resolution satellite remote sensing: a new frontier for biodiversity exploration in Indian Himalayan forests. Int J Remote Sens 34:2006–2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.730161
Garcia K, Lasco R, Ines A, Lyon B, Pulhin F (2013) Predicting geographic distribution and habitat suitability due to climate change of selected threatened forest tree species in the Philippines. Appl Geogr 44:12–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.07.005
Gilani HG, Ahmad MA, Hussain K (2020) Under predicted climate change: Distribution and ecological niche modelling of six native tree species in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Ecol Indic. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106049
Hijmans RJ, Cameron SE, Parra JL, Jones PG, Jarvis A (2005) Very high-resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. Int J Climatol 25:1965–1978. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
IPCC (2014) Summary for policymakers. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and Sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–32
Ives JD, Messerli B (1989) The Himalayan dilemma: reconciling development and conservation. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 295. https://doi.org/10.2307/3983952
Joshi HC, Samant SS (2004) Assessment of forest vegetation and conservation priorities of communities in part of Nanda Devi biosphere reserve, West Himalaya. Part I. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 11:326–336. https://doi.org/10.21474/IJAR01/5452
Joshi R, Sambhav K, Singh SP (2018) Near surface temperature lapse rate for treeline environment in western Himalaya and possible impacts on ecotone vegetation. Trop Ecol 59:197–209. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.32410.49607
Jourdan M, Piedallu C, Baudry J, Defossez E, Morin X (2021) Tree diversity and the temporal stability of mountain forest productivity: testing the effect of species composition, through asynchrony and overyielding. Eur J For Res 140:273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-020-01329-w
Khwarahm NR (2020) Mapping current and potential future distributions of the oak tree (Quercus aegilops) in the Kurdistan Region. Iraq Ecol Process 9:56. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-020-00259-0
Koç DE, Svenning JC, Avci M (2018) Climate change impacts on the potential distribution of Taxus baccata L. in the Eastern Mediterranean and the Bolkar Mountains (Turkey) from last glacial maximum to the future. Eurasian J Forest Sci 6:69–82. https://doi.org/10.31195/ejejfs.435962
Körner C (2012) Treelines will be understood once the functional difference between a tree and a shrub is. Ambio 41:197–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0313-2
Kottek MJ, Grieser C, Beck B, Rudolf RF (2006) World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol Z 15:259–263. https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2006/0130
Landis JR, Koch GC (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Luna RK (2005) Plantation Trees. International Book Distributor. Dehradun, Uttaranchal (India).
Mamgain A, Bhandari PK, Semwal DP, Uniyal PL (2017) Population assessment, mapping and flowering response of R. arboreum Sm.—a keystone species in central Himalayan region of Uttarakhand, India. J Ecol Environ Sci 43:205–220
Mantyka-Pringle CS, Visconti P, Di Marco M, Martin TG, Rondinini C, Rhodes JR (2015) Climate change modifies risk of global biodiversity loss due to land-cover change. Biol Conserv 187:103–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.016
Mishra R (1968) Ecology workbook. Oxford and IBH publishing Co., New Delhi
Nautiyal A (2015) Is Chir pine displacing banj oak in the central Himalaya? In: Socioeconomic implications for local people and the conservation of oak forest biodiversity (Doctoral dissertation). University of Arkansas, Fayetteville. Available at https://scholarworks.uark.edu/etd/133
Negi SS, Naithani HB (1995) Oaks of India, Nepal and Bhutan. International Book Distributors, Dehradun
Negi M, Negi VS (2021) Temporal changes in Oak forests over last three decades in western Himalaya, India. Trees For People. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100146
Orwa C, Mutua A, Kindt R, Jamnadass R, Anthony S (2009) Agroforestree Database: a tree and selection guide version 4.0. http://www.worldagroforestry.org/sites/treedbs/treedatabases.asp
Patel RC, Carter A (2009) Exhumation history of the Higher Himalayan Crystalline along Dhauliganga-Goriganga river valleys, NW India: new constraints from fission track analysis. Tectonics. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008TC002373
Pearson RG (2006) Climate change and the migration capacity of species. Trends Ecol Evol 21:111–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.11.022
Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful. Global Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x
Phillips SJ, Miroslav D, Schapire RE (2004) Maxent software for species distribution planning: where to from here? Syst Biol 51:331–363. http://cs.princeton.edu/~schapire/Maxent/
Phillips SJ, Anderson RP, Schapire RE (2006) Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Eco Mod 190:231–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026
Rao S, Riahi K (2006) The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: Long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J 3:177–200
Rehfeldt GE, Jaquish BC (2010) Ecological impacts and management strategies for western larch in the face of climate-change. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 15:283–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9217-2
Riahi K, Gruebler A, Nakicenovic N (2007) Scenarios of long-term socio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol Forecast Soc Change 74:887–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.026
Rubel F, Brugger K, Haslinger K, Auer I (2016) The climate of the European Alps: shift of very high resolution Köppen-Geiger climate zones 1800–2100. Meteorol Z 26:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1127/metz/2016/0816
Schwartz M, Iverson LR, Prasad AM (2001) Predicting the potential future distribution of four tree species in Ohio using current habitat availability and climatic forcing. Ecosystems 4:568–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0030-3
Shankhwar R, Bhandari MS, Meena RK, Shekhar C, Pandey VV, Saxena J, Kant R, Barthwal S, Naithani HB, Pandey S, Ginwal HS (2019) Potential Eco-distribution Mapping of Myrica esculenta in Northwestern Himalayas. Ecol Eng 128:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2019.01.003
Sharma Y (2014) Modelling climate change impacts on species habitat and their association in Himalayan moist temperate forest of Himachal Pradesh (M. Tech. thesis). Indian Institute of Remote Sensing, Dehradun. Available at https://www.iirs.gov.in/iirs/sites/default/files/StudentThesis/Yeshu_Sharma_mtech_2012-14.pdf
Shekhar C, Barhwal S, Bhandari MS, Meena RK, Shankhwar R, Ginwal HS (2017) Eco-distribution mapping and prediction modeling of Quercus semecarpifolia in Garhwal Himalayas. International seminar on the Himalayan challenge: towards interdisciplinary dialogues for sustainability and development. Sri Dev Suman University, Badshahithaul, Tehri Garhwal and Doon University, Dehradun. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.20126.84805
Shrestha BB (2003) Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. in the Himalayan region: ecology, exploitation and threats. HJS 1:126–128. https://doi.org/10.3126/hjs.v1i2.212
Shrestha A, Aryal R (2011) Climate change in Nepal and its impact on Himalayan glaciers. Reg Environ Change 11:65–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-010-0174-9
Singh SP (1991) Structure and function of low and high-altitude grazing land ecosystems and the impact of the livestock component in the Central Himalaya. Dept. of Envi. Govt. of India, New Delhi
Singh SP (2018) Research on Indian Himalayan Treeline Ecotone: an overview. Trop Ecol 59(2):163–176
Singh JS, Singh SP (1986) Structure and function of the Central Himalayan Oak forests. Proc Indian Natl Sci Acad (Plant Sci) 96:156–189. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03053301
Singh JS, Singh SP (1992) Forest of Himalaya. Gyanodaya Prakashan, Nainital. Available at https://www.worldcat.org/title/forests-of-himalaya-structure-functioning-and-impactofman/oclc/28220597
Singh JS, Rawat YS, Chaturvedi OP (1984) Replacement of oak forest with pine in the Himalaya affects the nitrogen cycle. Nature 311:54–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/311054a0
Singh G, Rai ID, Rawat GS (2011) The year 2010 was ‘mast seed year’ for the Kharsu oak (Quercus semecarpifolia Sm.) in the Western Himalaya. Curr Sci 100(9):1275
Singh A, Samant SS, Naithani S (2021) Population ecology and habitat suitability modelling of Quercus semecarpifolia Sm. in the sub-alpine ecosystem of Great Himalayan National Park, north-western Himalaya, India. S Afr J Bot 141:158–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2021.04.022
Srinivasan J (2006) Hottest decade: early warning or false alarm? Curr Sci 90:273–274
Subedi MN (2006) Conservation and sustainable utilization of oak (Quercus semecorpofolia Sm.) forest in Nepal. Bull Dep Plant Resour 27:44–50
Swets JA (1988) Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science 240:285–1293. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3287615
Telwala Y, Brook BW, Manish K, Pandit MK (2013) Climate-induced elevational range shifts and increase in plant species richness in a Himalayan biodiversity epicenter. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057103
Tiwari OP, Rana YS, Krishan R, Sharma CM, Bhandari BS (2018) Regeneration dynamics, population structure, and forest composition in some ridge forests of the Western Himalaya, India. Forest Sci Technol 14:66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/21580103.2018.1447517
Troup RS (1921) The silviculture of Indian trees. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Urban MC (2015) Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:571–573. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa4984
Uttarakhand at a Glance (2018–2019) Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Government of Uttarakhand, Dehradun, India. Available at https://des.uk.gov.in/pages/display/61-uttarakhnad-at-a-glance
Uttarakhand Forest Statistics (2012–2013) Uttarakhand Forest Department, Dehradun, India. Available at https://forest.uk.gov.in/files/statistics_2013/Uttarakhand_Statistics_2013.pdf
Veera SNS, Panda RM, Behera MD et al (2019) Prediction of upslope movement of Rhododendron arboreum in Western Himalaya. Trop Ecol 60:518–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42965-020-00057-x
Wang A, Garver JI, Wang G, Smith JA, Zhang K (2010) Episodic exhumation of the Greater Himalayan Sequence since the Miocene constrained by fission track thermochronology in Nyalam, central Himalaya. Tectonophysics 495:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2010.09.037
Zhang K, Liu H, Pan H (2020) Shifts in potential geographical distribution of Pterocarya stenoptera under climate change scenarios in China. Ecol Evol 10:4828–4837. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6236
Acknowledgements
The financial support by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India, New Delhi under Grant No. 13-17/2012-CAMPA; dated 21st January, 2016 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors are thankful to the Director, FRI for providing the research facilities and highly obliged to the state forest department, Government of Uttarakhand, for permission and support during the field surveys. Authors wish to thank the anonymous reviewer for constructive and positive comments in the manuscript.
Funding
Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Government of India, New Delhi under grant No. 13-17/2012-CAMPA; dated 21st January, 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors critically revised the manuscript and contributed equally.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Communicated by Hsiao-Hsuan Wang.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shekhar, C., Ginwal, H.S., Meena, R.K. et al. Spatio-temporal distribution of broad-leaved Quercus semecarpifolia indicates altitudinal shift in northwestern Himalayas. Plant Ecol 223, 671–697 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-022-01240-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-022-01240-x