Abstract
Purpose
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy in Western countries, affecting more men than women. By contrast, UTUC is relatively common in Taiwan and diagnosed more often in women than in men. Previous studies regarding the gender effect on cancer behaviour with UTUC have been controversial. Investigation of female predominance of UTUC in Taiwan may help improve UTUC management in Taiwan as well as understand the gender effect on urothelial carcinoma.
Methods
Between January 2005 and December 2015, 828 patients with localized UTUC treated with radical nephroureterectomy were enrolled. Cox regression analysis was performed to assess the independent roles of perioperative factors on local recurrence and systemic recurrence.
Results
Multivariate analysis revealed the male gender had a trend associated with higher systemic recurrence (P = 0.096) and independently associated with higher bladder recurrence (P = 0.011) and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.014), even after taking smoking and other established prognostic factors into consideration. Bladder cancer history and multifocal disease are strongly associated with bladder recurrence.
Conclusion
Compared with female UTUC patients, male UTUC patients in Taiwan were associated with more bladder recurrences and higher cancer-specific mortality and had a trend associated with more systemic recurrences.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a relatively uncommon malignancy in Western countries, with an incidence of approximately two cases per 100,000 people, and accounts for only 5–10% of urinary carcinomas (UC) [1, 2]. In addition, males have higher incidences of UTUC than females in Western countries. There is a high degree of difference in the epidemiology of UTUC in Western countries and Taiwan, where UTUC patients are predominantly female. According to the Health Promotion Administration of Taiwan, the incidence rate of UTUC in 2016 was 3.61 per 100,000 in males and 4.21 per 100,000 in females. The mortality rate of UTUC in 2016 was 1.36 (16th in males) per 100,000 in males and 1.40 (13th in females) per 100,000 in females. Furthermore, UTUCs represent more than 40% of UCs in Taiwan [3]. Therefore, UTUC is indeed a crucial health problem in Taiwan and its female predominance is unique compared with rest of the world.
Several studies have reported that gender is associated with cancer behaviour of UCs. In T1 urinary bladder UCs, female patients had a higher incidence of recurrence, shorter time to recurrence, and shorter cancer-specific survival [4,5,6]. In muscle-invasive bladder cancer, survival in female patients was also reported to be shorter than that in males [7]. For upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), data from previous studies regarding the gender effect on cancer behaviour have been sparse and controversial. Hurel et al. reported female gender was a considerable predictor of non-organ-confined disease [8]. A surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis conducted by Raman et al. reported that male gender was associated with lower overall survival [9]. Further investigation of the female predominance of UTUC in Taiwan may help improve UTUC management in Taiwan as well as understand the gender effect on urothelial carcinoma. In this study, we analysed the gender effect on oncologic outcomes of UTUC in Taiwan.
Materials and methods
Between January 2005 and December 2015, 905 patients with UTUC were treated by surgical intervention at our institution. We excluded 77 patients who underwent nephron-sparing surgery. Thus, the study included 828 patients with localized UTUC treated at our institution with radical nephroureterectomy. All patients underwent computed tomography (CT) and cystoscopy to determine if they had concurrent bladder disease or distant metastasis. Perioperative and follow-up data, such as age, gender, smoking history, bladder cancer history, bladder recurrence, local recurrence, distant metastasis, and cancer-specific death, were obtained from chart review and the institutional cancer centre registry department. Systemic recurrence was defined as local recurrence and distant metastasis. Local recurrence was defined as ipsilateral retroperitoneal space disease relapse. Distant metastasis was defined as disease relapse outside the urinary tract and ipsilateral retroperitoneal space. Pathological features, including stage, tumour grade, architecture, lymphovascular invasion, concomitant carcinoma in situ, tumour necrosis, and squamous differentiation, were recorded by uropathologists at our institution.
Our institutional follow-up protocol, which was performed in this study, is postoperative fibre cystoscopy and renal echo every 3 months during the first 2 years, every 6 months during the third year, and then every year during the follow-up period. CT was performed annually to assess local or regional recurrence of the tumour and lymph node status. SPSS version 21 software was used for all statistical analyses. Chi-square tests and two-sample t tests were used for intergroup comparisons, and the Kaplan–Meier test was used for time-to-event analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to assess the independent roles of perioperative factors on intravesical events. Any parameters with statistically significant association were adopted for further multivariate analysis. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
As shown in Table 1, this study included 382 male patients (46.1%) and 446 female patients (53.9%). No significant differences in age, follow-up duration, bladder cancer history, distribution of tumour location, tumour necrosis, squamous differentiation, and adjuvant chemotherapy was observed between the sexes. Male patients were significantly more likely to smoke (P < 0.001), were less likely to have chronic kidney disease (P < 0.001), and experienced greater lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.022) compared with female patients. Regarding oncologic outcomes, a higher incidence of bladder recurrence (P = 0.001) and systemic recurrence (P = 0.004) as well as a greater cancer-specific mortality rate (P = 0.001) were observed in male patients (Fig. 1).
As shown in Table 2, using multivariate Cox regression analyses, male gender was found to be independently associated with bladder recurrence (P = 0.011) and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.014). However, it only revealed a trend for systemic recurrence (P = 0.096). Locally advanced stage (stage > 2) was the most significant and independent factor associated with systemic recurrence and cancer-specific mortality (both P < 0.001), but not urinary bladder recurrence. In addition, nodal positive disease and nonpapillary tumour architecture were also significantly associated with systemic recurrence (P < 0.001 and 0.023) and cancer-specific mortality (P = 0.028 and 0.005). Regarding bladder recurrence, other independently associated factors included smoking history (P = 0.035), previous bladder cancer history (P < 0.001), multifocal disease (P < 0.001), and high-grade disease (P = 0.044).
Discussion
In Western countries, UTUC is a relatively rare malignancy and more prevalent in men. In the United States, the incidence of UTUC is 0.7–1.1 per 100,000 over the last 30 years with a male-to-female ratio of 1.7–1 [10]. The incidence of UTUC was 2.45 per 100,000 in men and 1.25 per 100,000 in women from 1999 through 2003 in Denmark [11]. In Asian countries other than Taiwan, the epidemiology of this condition appears similar. According to the 2015 annual cancer report of Korea, the incidence of renal pelvis UC was 0.3 per 100,000 in men and 0.1 per 100,000 in women. The incidence of ureter UC was 0.3 per 100,000 in men and 0.2 per 100,000 in women [12]. In Japan, the male‐to‐female ratio of UTUC incidence was found to be 2:1 [13]. Therefore, because UTUC is more prevalent in Taiwan and with a unique female predominance, we conducted this study to analyse the gender effect on oncologic outcomes of UTUC in Taiwan.
Bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for UTUC was reported in 30–50% of patients. Level 1 evidence has been reported wherein a single postoperative administration of intravesical mitomycin C reduced postoperative intravesical recurrence. However, only a small minority of patients receive adjuvant administration of intravesical mitomycin C due to the concern of cost and side effects [14]. In our study, the 5-year bladder recurrence rate was 29.1%. We also identified that bladder cancer history and multifocal disease were both strong associated factors for bladder recurrence. This is compatible with previous studies and further proves the credibility of this study. Both factors indicated that urothelial cancerization is an important feature in clinical practice and that such high-risk patient should be closely monitored or intensively treated with intravesical prevention [15]. In addition, both Tanaka et al. and Xylinas et al. reported that male gender was also strongly associated with intravesical recurrence [14, 16]. The results were similar to our observation that male patients were also found to have a higher risk of intravesical recurrence in Taiwan. This finding improved our clinical decision making regarding cystoscopic follow-up and postoperative intravesical chemotherapy instillation. However, some bladder cancer studies reported female gender to be associated with an increased risk of recurrence in primary T1 high-grade disease [5]. Though UTUC and UBUC are similar in histology, the clinical cancer behaviour is different between the two [17]. The aetiology of bladder recurrence of UTUC is much more complicated because of urothelial field cancerization and intraluminal cancer cells seeding from the upper tract to the urinary bladder [18, 19]. Identification of bladder recurrence patterns between UTUC and UBUC is worth further investigation. In regards to distant UTUC recurrence, the mechanism includes the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells [20, 21]. Such recurrence outside the urinary tract is difficult to manage by endoscopic or surgical intervention. Male patients in this study tended to have poorer oncologic and survival outcomes, whereas previous studies reported higher mortality rates in female than in male patients [1].
Gender-related behavioural dimorphism, such as cigarette smoking, UV radiation exposure, and HPV infection, was thought to be associated with the relatively poor oncologic outcomes of male UTUC patients [22, 23]. However, the gender effect is still borderline associated with systemic recurrence and independently associated with cancer-specific mortality under multivariate analysis by taking smoking and other established prognostic factors into consideration. A previous study also reported that even in the absence of exposure to cigarettes or occupational hazards, the gender-related risk persisted [24].
With similar disease staging between genders as well as taking smoking and other established prognostic factors into consideration, gender differences in metabolic detoxification of carcinogens and hormonal effects may also explain the difference in oncological outcomes between genders. The hormonal effect on cancer is commonly seen in ovarian, lung, and colorectal cancer [25,26,27,28,29,30]. Previous studies have increasingly evidenced that UC is potentially an endocrine-related cancer. Hormone receptors, including androgen receptor (AR), oestrogen receptor (OR), progesterone receptor (PR), and glucocorticoid receptor (GR), were found to be expressed on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma cells without appreciable differences of expression levels between women and men. Kashiwagi et al. reported that in male tumours, the expression of AR and PR tended to be higher and lower, respectively [31, 32]. Additionally, hormonal receptors were also reported to be associated with oncologic outcomes of UCs [33, 34]. In addition, Liu et al. reported higher cancer-specific survival for women aged less than 59 years, whereas women aged 59 years or older had lower survival rates than men. This finding may support the concept that premenopausal women have more favourable oncologic outcomes, whereas postmenopausal women have less favourable oncologic outcome than men [35]. Previous studies have also revealed that gender difference in metabolism of carcinogens, such as the enzyme uridine 5′-diphosphoglucuronosyltransferase, which are involved in aromatic amine metabolism, may explain differences in tumour behaviour of UTUCs between genders [36]. Further research investigating possible molecular-level factors that may be related to cancer behaviour is warranted.
The strength of this study is the large number of patients included. However, this study is limited by its retrospective and single population design. The unique predominantly female UTUC population may have led to collection bias, and the data may need further validation from other predominantly UTUC populations. The comorbidity evaluated in this study included chronic kidney disease only. Other comorbidities might also influence the analysis, especially for survival outcomes. In addition, we did not retrospectively collect the data about potential risk factor to UTUC such as occupational exposure and analgesic drug use. The reported median time to bladder recurrence is 10 months [37]. Most extraurinary tract recurrences are identified within 2 years [38]. In this study, the average follow-up duration in male and female populations was 33.8 and 35.9 months. This was sufficient time to observe cancer-related outcomes and provide a preliminary report on the gender effect on UTUC.
Conclusions
For UTUC patients in Taiwan, men are associated with more bladder recurrence and systemic recurrence and have higher cancer-specific mortality compared with women.
Abbreviations
- UTUC:
-
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
References
Munoz JJ, Ellison LM (2000) Upper tract urothelial neoplasms: incidence and survival during the last 2 decades. J Urol 164(5):1523–1525
Siegel R, Naishadham D (2012) Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.20138
Health promotion administration, ministry of health and welfare, Taiwan (2018) Cancer registry annual report, 2016
Burger M, Catto JW, Dalbagni G, Grossman HB, Herr H, Karakiewicz P, Kassouf W, Kiemeney LA, La Vecchia C, Shariat S, Lotan Y (2013) Epidemiology and risk factors of urothelial bladder cancer. Eur Urol 63(2):234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.033
Kluth LA, Fajkovic H, Xylinas E, Crivelli JJ, Passoni N, Roupret M, Becker A, Comploj E, Pycha A, Holmang S, Gupta A, Lotan Y, Karakiewicz PI, Gontero P, Chun FK, Fisch M, Scherr DS, Shariat SF (2013) Female gender is associated with higher risk of disease recurrence in patients with primary T1 high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. World J Urol 31(5):1029–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-012-0996-9
Palou J, Sylvester RJ, Faba OR, Parada R, Pena JA, Algaba F, Villavicencio H (2012) Female gender and carcinoma in situ in the prostatic urethra are prognostic factors for recurrence, progression, and disease-specific mortality in T1G3 bladder cancer patients treated with bacillus Calmette–Guerin. Eur Urol 62(1):118–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.029
May M, Stief C, Brookman-May S, Otto W, Gilfrich C, Roigas J, Zacharias M, Wieland WF, Fritsche HM, Hofstadter F, Burger M (2012) Gender-dependent cancer-specific survival following radical cystectomy. World J Urol 30(5):707–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0773-1
Hurel S, Roupret M, Seisen T, Comperat E, Phe V, Droupy S, Audenet F, Pignot G, Cathelineau X, Guy L, Cussenot O, Ouzzane A, Bozzini G, Nison L, Ruffion A, Colin P (2015) Influence of preoperative factors on the oncologic outcome for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 33(3):335–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1311-8
Raman JD, Messer J, Sielatycki JA, Hollenbeak CS (2011) Incidence and survival of patients with carcinoma of the ureter and renal pelvis in the USA, 1973–2005. BJU Int 107(7):1059–1064. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09675.x
Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI, Sesterhenn IA (2004) World Health Organization classification of tumours pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. IARC, Lyon
Wihlborg A, Johansen C (2010) Incidences of kidney, pelvis, ureter, and bladder cancer in a nationwide, population-based cancer registry, Denmark, 1944–2003. Urology 75(5):1222–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2009.05.013
Welfare MoHa (2015) Annual report of cancer statistics in Korea in 2015
Miyazaki J, Nishiyama H (2017) Epidemiology of urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 24(10):730–734. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13376
Xylinas E, Kluth L, Passoni N, Trinh QD, Rieken M, Lee RK, Fajkovic H, Novara G, Margulis V, Raman JD, Lotan Y, Roupret M, Aziz A, Fritsche HM, Weizer A, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Matsumoto K, Seitz C, Remzi M, Walton T, Karakiewicz PI, Montorsi F, Zerbib M, Scherr DS, Shariat SF, Collaboration U (2014) Prediction of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy: development of a clinical decision-making tool. Eur Urol 65(3):650–658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.003
Ito A, Shintaku I, Satoh M, Ioritani N, Aizawa M, Tochigi T, Kawamura S, Aoki H, Numata I, Takeda A, Namiki S, Namima T, Ikeda Y, Kambe K, Kyan A, Ueno S, Orikasa K, Katoh S, Adachi H, Tokuyama S, Ishidoya S, Yamaguchi T, Arai Y (2013) Prospective randomized phase II trial of a single early intravesical instillation of pirarubicin (THP) in the prevention of bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: the THP Monotherapy Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 31(11):1422–1427. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.45.2128
Tanaka N, Kikuchi E, Kanao K, Matsumoto K, Shirotake S, Kobayashi H, Miyazaki Y, Ide H, Obata J, Hoshino K, Hayakawa N, Kosaka T, Oyama M, Miyajima A, Momma T, Nakagawa K, Jinzaki M, Nakajima Y, Oya M (2014) The predictive value of positive urine cytology for outcomes following radical nephroureterectomy in patients with primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a multi-institutional study. Urol Oncol 32(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2013.07.003
Green DA, Rink M, Xylinas E, Matin SF, Stenzl A, Roupret M, Karakiewicz PI, Scherr DS, Shariat SF (2013) Urothelial carcinoma of the bladder and the upper tract: disparate twins. J Urol 189(4):1214–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.05.079
Habuchi T, Takahashi R, Yamada H, Kakehi Y, Sugiyama T, Yoshida O (1993) Metachronous multifocal development of urothelial cancers by intraluminal seeding. Lancet (London, England) 342(8879):1087–1088
Jones TD, Wang M, Eble JN, MacLennan GT, Lopez-Beltran A, Zhang S, Cocco A, Cheng L (2005) Molecular evidence supporting field effect in urothelial carcinogenesis. Clin Cancer Res 11(18):6512–6519. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0891
Paliwal P, Arora D, Mishra A (2012) Epithelial mesenchymal transition in urothelial carcinoma: twist in the tale. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 55(4):443–449. https://doi.org/10.4103/0377-4929.107777
Kalluri R, Weinberg RA (2009) The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Investig 119(6):1420–1428. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI39104
Cook MB, McGlynn KA, Devesa SS, Freedman ND, Anderson WF (2011) Sex disparities in cancer mortality and survival. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 20(8):1629–1637. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0246
Micheli A, Ciampichini R, Oberaigner W, Ciccolallo L, de Vries E, Izarzugaza I, Zambon P, Gatta G, De Angelis R, EW Group (2009) The advantage of women in cancer survival: an analysis of EUROCARE-4 data. Eur J Cancer 45(6):1017–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.11.008
Hartge P, Harvey EB, Linehan WM, Silverman DT, Sullivan JW, Hoover RN, Fraumeni JF Jr (1990) Unexplained excess risk of bladder cancer in men. J Natl Cancer Inst 82(20):1636–1640
Bardin A, Hoffmann P, Boulle N, Katsaros D, Vignon F, Pujol P, Lazennec G (2004) Involvement of estrogen receptor beta in ovarian carcinogenesis. Can Res 64(16):5861–5869. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-04-0552
Caiazza F, Ryan EJ, Doherty G, Winter DC, Sheahan K (2015) Estrogen receptors and their implications in colorectal carcinogenesis. Front Oncol 5:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2015.00019
Canver CC, Memoli VA, Vanderveer PL, Dingivan CA, Mentzer RM Jr (1994) Sex hormone receptors in non-small-cell lung cancer in human beings. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 108(1):153–157
Hendifar A, Yang D, Lenz F, Lurje G, Pohl A, Lenz C, Ning Y, Zhang W, Lenz HJ (2009) Gender disparities in metastatic colorectal cancer survival. Clin Cancer Res 15(20):6391–6397. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0877
Lund-Iversen M, Scott H, Strom EH, Theiss N, Brustugun OT, Gronberg BH (2018) Expression of estrogen receptor-alpha and survival in advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 38(4):2261–2269. https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12470
O'Donnell AJ, Macleod KG, Burns DJ, Smyth JF, Langdon SP (2005) Estrogen receptor-alpha mediates gene expression changes and growth response in ovarian cancer cells exposed to estrogen. Endocr Relat Cancer 12(4):851–866. https://doi.org/10.1677/erc.1.01039
Bolenz C, Lotan Y, Ashfaq R, Shariat SF (2009) Estrogen and progesterone hormonal receptor expression in urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 56(6):1093–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.032
Godoy G, Gakis G, Smith CL, Fahmy O (2016) Effects of androgen and estrogen receptor signaling pathways on bladder cancer initiation and progression. Bladder Cancer 2(2):127–137. https://doi.org/10.3233/BLC-160052
Kashiwagi E, Fujita K, Yamaguchi S, Fushimi H, Ide H, Inoue S, Mizushima T, Reis LO, Sharma R, Netto GJ, Nonomura N, Miyamoto H (2016) Expression of steroid hormone receptors and its prognostic significance in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract. Cancer Biol Ther 17(11):1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/15384047.2016.1235667
Luo HL, Sung MT, Tsai EM, Lin CS, Lee NL, Chung YH, Chiang PH (2016) Expression of estrogen receptor beta predicts oncologic outcome of pT3 upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma better than aggressive pathological features. Sci Rep 6:24263. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24263
Liu JY, Li YH, Zhang ZL, Ye YL, Liu ZW, Yao K, Dong P, Guo SJ, Jiang LJ, Zhong MZ, Chen W, Han H, Qin ZK, Zhou FJ (2013) Age-specific effect of gender on upper tract urothelial carcinoma outcomes. Med Oncol 30(3):640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-013-0640-6
Zhang Y (2013) Understanding the gender disparity in bladder cancer risk: the impact of sex hormones and liver on bladder susceptibility to carcinogens. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 31(4):287–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10590501.2013.844755
Ishioka J, Saito K, Kijima T, Nakanishi Y, Yoshida S, Yokoyama M, Matsuoka Y, Numao N, Koga F, Masuda H, Fujii Y, Sakai Y, Arisawa C, Okuno T, Nagahama K, Kamata S, Sakura M, Yonese J, Morimoto S, Noro A, Tsujii T, Kitahara S, Gotoh S, Higashi Y, Kihara K (2015) Risk stratification for bladder recurrence of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. BJU Int 115(5):705–712. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12707
Mao Y, Kilcoyne A, Hedgire S, Preston MA, McGovern FJ, Dahl DM, Harisinghani M (2016) Patterns of recurrence in upper tract transitional cell carcinoma: imaging surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 207(4):789–796. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16064
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Project number CMRPG8E0601. This manuscript was edited by Wallace Academic Editing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, YT., Luo, H.L., Wang, H.J. et al. Gender effect on the oncologic outcomes of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma in Taiwan. Int Urol Nephrol 52, 1043–1048 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02396-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02396-z