Abstract
Sceletium tortuosum is a South African protected species with tremendous value in traditional and modern medicine. The plants’ mesembrine-type alkaloids are potential therapeutics for a plethora of psychological, neurological and inflammatory disorders. In our in vitro and ex vivo studies, vegetative propagation and growth of this species were investigated. Cytokinin (CK) profiles were also explored. Shoot multiplication was induced on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 2.5 µM indole-3-butyric acid (IBA). In vitro-generated shoots were inoculated on MS medium supplemented with 0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 µM IBA or indole-3-acetic acid (IAA). Optimal rooting (55%), mean number of roots (3.80 ± 0.83) and new leaf pairs (4.65 ± 0.67) were achieved by 10.0 µM IBA. After greenhouse acclimatization, 45–90% of plantlets survived. All ex vivo shoot cuttings rooted well (90–100%). The highest mean number of roots (11.20 ± 1.37) and root length (57.18 ± 3.85 mm) were obtained by 5.0 µM IBA. Although spontaneous rooting was observed in both experiments, auxins enhanced multiple growth parameters. Cytokinin analyses of tissue-cultured (auxin-treated) and greenhouse (untreated) plants revealed higher cytokinin levels in vitro. These investigations provide rapid and efficient propagation techniques for Sceletium tortuosum which will be valuable to conservationists and pharmaceutical companies.
Key message
Plant tissue culture and cuttings enabled rapid propagation of Sceletium tortuosum. Exogenous plant growth regulators were not essential for shoot multiplication, flowering and rooting. Auxins effectively improved growth parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Sceletium tortuosum (L.) N. E. Br. (Aizoaceae) is a succulent decumbent shrub native to the south-western regions of South Africa (Gericke and Viljoen 2008). It is utilized in traditional medicine to treat a variety of ailments, including pain, insomnia and anxiety. However, it is most-exploited for its mood-enhancing and calming properties (Digby 2005; Laidler 1928; Rood 1994; Thunberg 1795). The mesembrine-type alkaloids responsible for these effects are suitable treatments for anxiety, stress and depression (Elev8™ 2017; Gericke and Van Wyk 2001; Harvey et al. 2011; Murbach et al. 2014; Terburg et al. 2013). They are also recognized as promising therapeutics for neurodegenerative, psychological and inflammatory disorders, ranging from Alzheimer’s disease and drug dependencies to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (Bennett et al. 2018; Coetzee et al. 2016; Dimpfel et al. 2018; Kapewangolo et al. 2016; Napoletano et al. 2001).
Unfortunately, a pure commercial source of mesembrine-type alkaloids does not exist, thus researchers and pharmaceutical companies are reliant upon fresh plant material (Elev8™ 2017; Krstenansky 2017; Wild 2015). Sceletium tortuosum is now a protected species due to diminished natural populations (Elev8™ 2017; Gericke and Viljoen 2008). Its value and conservation status suggest that rapid and efficient propagation techniques would be a credit to this species and the pharmacological industry.
Vegetative propagation is a much swifter approach than seed propagation, allowing for conservation of genetic diversity within populations or species (Leakey et al. 1994; LeBude and Blazich 2018). It is particularly useful for medicinal plants because chemotypes are selected for pharmacological use based on their yield of phytochemicals (Elev8™ 2017). Non-aseptic techniques such as grafting, budding, layering and cuttings are common and involve the use of plant organs only (LeBude and Blazich 2018). However, through aseptic plant tissue culture, somatic cells, tissues and organs can be utilized (George et al. 2008; Skoog and Miller 1957). This sophisticated and versatile technique can be easily implemented on a large scale for the production of disease-free plants (Hussain et al. 2012).
Plant growth regulators (PGRs), such as auxins, CKs, gibberellins, ethylene and abscisic acid are widely used in tissue culture (Gaspar et al. 1996; George et al. 2008). Plant growth and phytochemical production can be modified through their use (Amoo et al. 2012; Bairu et al. 2011). However, the use of these PGRs must allow for favourable interactions with endogenous hormones to facilitate healthy plant growth (Gaspar et al. 1996).
Auxins and CKs are regarded as the most influential PGRs for in vitro growth and development (Gaspar et al. 1996). They are well-known for their stimulatory effects on root and shoot growth, respectively (Howell et al. 2003; Overvoorde et al. 2010), but these phytohormones play multiple, often overlapping roles in plant growth and development. Both are involved in the induction and development of root and shoot meristems, branching of lateral and aerial organs and the formation of reproductive organs (Aloni et al. 2006a, b; Chandler 2011; D’Aloia et al. 2011; Schaller et al. 2015; Shimizu-Sato et al. 2009; Su et al. 2011). Thus, various growth characteristics may be directly or indirectly affected by an alteration in the level of even one of these phytohormones (Gaspar et al. 1996; Schaller et al. 2015).
This study aims to develop quick and effective vegetative propagation methods for Sceletium tortuosum. In vitro and ex vivo techniques are evaluated and the effects of PGRs (auxins) on growth and development are investigated. Auxin effects on endogenous CK profiles are also explored. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first comparative vegetative propagation study for this species.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Sceletium tortuosum plants were sourced, collected and identified by Dr J. H. de Lange of Oudtshoorn (S 33° 40.883’ E 22° 09.749’). A voucher specimen was deposited in the Bews herbarium (NU0089203) at the University of KwaZulu-Natal (UKZN) in Pietermaritzburg. Plants were potted in a 1:1 mixture of vermiculite and soil and maintained in a greenhouse in the botanical garden at UKZN.
In vitro culture initiation
Shoot nodal segments (2–3 cm) were rinsed under running tap water for 1–2 min. Plant material was immersed in sterile distilled water with 2–3 drops of Tween 20 for 20 min. Material was then washed with 1 g/L Benomyl for 40 min, followed by 0.05% streptomycin sulphate for 20 min. After this immersion, plant material was taken to a sterile laminar flow bench and immersed in 20% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 20 min, followed by a wash with 70% ethanol for 2 min. Finally, explants were rinsed three times with sterile distilled water.
Murashige and Skoog (1962) (MS) medium (3% sucrose) was prepared and supplemented with 2.5 µM uM IBA. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.8 using dilute sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrochloric acid (HCl) and solidified with 10 g/L OXOID agar no. 3. The medium was dispensed into tissue culture vessels (20 mL each) and autoclaved (121 °C, 15 psi) for 15 min. Surface-sterilized nodal explants were inoculated onto this medium for shoot multiplication throughout the study. Cultures were incubated at 25 ± 2 °C under constant light (Photosynthetic active radiation (PAR) = 9.07 × 10 µmol.m− 2.s− 1).
Cytokinin analysis
Shoots of non-flowering auxin-treated (2.5 µM IBA) in vitro plantlets and untreated greenhouse mother plants (GMPs) were harvested. Plant material was ground in liquid nitrogen and freeze-dried. Sample preparation and CK analysis were carried out via the procedure developed by Novák et al. (2008). Briefly, technical triplicates (2 mg per sample) were homogenized and extracted with 1 mL of modified Bieleski buffer (60% methanol, 10% formic acid, 30% water (Hoyerová et al. 2006)) with a cocktail of stable isotope-labelled internal standards (0.25 pmol of CK bases, ribosides and N-glucosides, and 0.5 pmol of CK O-glucosides and nucleotides per sample) (Gupta et al. 2019). Extracts were purified with a combination of C18 (1 mL/30 mg) and MCX (1 mL/30 mg) cartridges (Dobrev and Kamínek 2002). Eluates were evaporated until dry and dissolved in 30 µL of 10% methanol. Cytokinin levels were determined using an ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) device (Acquity UPLC® I-class System; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electrospray interface (Xevo™ TQ-S, Waters, Manchester, UK). Multiple reaction monitoring of [M + H]+ and the appropriate product ion allowed for quantification. MassLynx software was used to compare the ratio of CKs and internal standards of known concentration to determine individual CK levels (Novák et al. 2008; Plačková et al. 2017; Svačinová et al. 2012). Detected CKs are reported in pmol/g DW (dry weight).
In vitro rooting
Nodal explants (1–2 cm) were excised from non-flowering plantlets maintained on 2.5 µM IBA. Explants were inoculated onto MS media supplemented with 0, 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 µM IBA or IAA. Twenty replicates were used per treatment. Cultures were incubated at 25 °C under constant light (PAR 9.07 × 10 µmol.m− 2.s− 1) for 21 days.
Acclimatization
All in vitro-generated plantlets were potted in plastic pots (diameter 75 mm, depth 45 mm) containing a 3:2:1 mixture of soil: sand: perlite. Soil and sand were autoclaved prior to addition of sterile perlite. Plantlets were placed in a mist-house for 1 week where they were watered every 6 min for 10–12 h (daylight hours) and once for 5 min at midnight. Thereafter, they were moved to a greenhouse with watering once a day. Plantlets that survived for 10 days in greenhouse conditions were considered to be acclimatized.
Ex vivo rooting
Shoot pieces (3–6 cm) with 1–2 nodes were used. Shoots with small leaf pairs that had newly emerged were allowed. If present, flowers were removed. The cuttings (cut-ends) were pre-treated with auxin solutions for 10 min prior to potting. Treatments applied were 2.5, 5.0 and 10.0 µM IBA or IAA. The positive control was a pre-treatment in tap water for 10 min while the negative control was untreated. Ten replicates were used per treatment.
Cuttings were planted in plastic pots (diameter 75 mm, depth 45 mm) containing a 3:2:1 mix of sterile soil: sand: perlite and watered with the respective solutions. Both controls were watered with tap water. All cuttings were placed in a greenhouse partially covered with a mesh shade cloth where they were watered 2–3 times a week (when drying was observed) with the treatment solutions or tap water. Temperature ranged from 7 to 40 °C. Growth was allowed for 21 days.
Measurements and statistical analyses
In vitro and ex vivo rooting experiments were repeated twice. The number of new leaf pairs and roots were recorded manually. Root length (mm) was measured using digital electronic Vernier calipers (model DC001). Root type was also recorded for the in vitro experiment. Roots emanating from callus tissue were classified as non-functional.
All data were analysed using Genstat 18.0. One-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) were performed with Duncan’s multiple range tests to identify significant treatment effects on growth parameters. An unbalanced regression analysis was used to determine if treatment and root type had an effect on the number of new leaf pairs. Graphs were generated using GraphPad Prism 8.0.
Results
In vitro cultures and cytokinin analysis
Healthy plantlets with multiple shoots, roots, and in some cases, flowers were generated on MS medium supplemented with 2.5 µM IBA (Fig. 1). Flower induction was observed in vitro ~ 1–2 months before it was observed in greenhouse mother plants (hereafter referred to as in situ).
The induction of these growth responses (Fig. 1) on auxin-only medium suggested that endogenous CK levels were high. The CK analysis revealed the total CK pool to be three-fold higher in tissue cultured plantlets as compared to in situ plants (Table 1). Aromatic CKs were responsible for 74.7% of the in vitro CK pool, while isoprenoid and aromatic CK pools were approximately equal in situ. Active free CK bases (cis-zeatin (cZ), trans-zeatin (tZ) and N6-isopentenyladenine (iP)) resulted in a larger pool in situ (35.60 pmol/g) than in vitro (27.03 pmol/g). In both samples, para-topolin (pT) represented the most abundant free CK base (547.33 ± 183.95 and 636.86 ± 132.44 pmol/g for in situ and in vitro shoots, respectively). The four 7-glucosides present in situ were more prevalent in vitro (tZ7G, iP7G, DHZ7G and pT7G), with the most substantial increase observed for pT7G (from 56.05 ± 0.71 pmol/g in situ to 1826.09 ± 69.16 pmol/g in vitro). The in vitro sample also contained an additional 7-glucoside (cZ7G) that was not detected in situ. Dihydrozeatin-9-glucoside (DHZ9G) was the only 9-glucoside detected in situ (DHZ9G), but it was more abundant in vitro (32.23 ± 2.69). Additionally, mT9G was detected in vitro (484.71 ± 46.76 pmol/g), but not at all in situ (Table 1).
In vitro rooting
There were no significant differences between treatments with regards to mean rooting percentage, with 25–55% of shoot explants producing functional roots after 21 days (Fig. 2a). Although, statistically significant differences were observed between treatments for the remaining growth parameters (Fig. 2). The mean number of roots (MNR) was found to increase in accordance with increasing concentrations of IBA, with the highest MNR recorded for 10.0 µM IBA (3.80 ± 0.83). The highest mean number of new leaf pairs (MNLP) was also produced by this treatment (Fig. 2b).
Interestingly, MS media supplemented with 5.0 µM and 10.0 µM IAA produced the longest (10.04 ± 3.13 mm) and shortest (1.97 ± 1.16 mm) mean root lengths (MRL) respectively (Fig. 2a). There was no single treatment in which all growth parameters were noticeably low. However, the lowest MNR was recorded in the control treatment (0.95 ± 0.26) (Fig. 2b).
Statistical analysis showed that MNLP was affected by treatment (P = 0.003), and by functionality of roots (P < 0.001) (Table 2). However, the interaction between treatment and type of roots did not have a significant effect on the number of new leaf pairs produced (P = 0.608). Nonetheless, Table 2 shows that plantlets with functional roots have more new leaf pairs than those with non-functional roots.
Acclimatization
Acclimatization was successful for 45–90% of in vitro-generated plantlets. The highest percentage of acclimatized plantlets came from the control treatment (90 ± 6.9%). The best overall treatment for improving growth parameters in vitro (10.0 µM IBA) resulted in 50% acclimatization after 10 days (Fig. 4).
Ex vivo cuttings
All treatments and controls resulted in rooted cuttings within 21 days. All but one treatment (10.0 µM IAA) gave 100% rooting (Fig. 5a). The treatment that achieved the highest MNR (11.20 ± 1.37) and MRL (57.18 ± 3.85 mm) was 5.0 µM IBA (Fig. 5). Only the MNLP was highest in the 2.5 µM IBA treatment (4.20 ± 0.36) (Fig. 5b). The lowest rooting parameters were found in the positive control (5.20 ± 0.36 and 13.18 ± 1.78 mm for MNR and MRL respectively) (Fig. 5).
Discussion
Cytokinin analysis
A much larger total CK pool was observed in vitro (Table 1), suggesting that auxin played a role in this CK increase. It has been determined that auxin and CK influence and regulate each other’s levels (Jones et al. 2010; Jones and Ljung 2011). Although some research has shown auxin to have a negative effect on CK biosynthesis (Jones and Ljung 2011; Nordström et al. 2004; Zhang et al. 1995), our results are consistent with the findings of Bairu et al. (2011). They documented that CK production in Harpagophytum procumbens was higher with auxin-only medium compared to the control, and that auxin addition to CK treatments further increased CK levels.
Despite the substantial increase in total CKs in vitro, the majority of these CKs were inactive (pT7G and mT9G) or minimally active forms (pT) (Hothorn et al. 2011; Kamínek et al. 1987). Zhang et al. (1995) documented an increase in adenine derivatives due to enhanced CK oxidase activity caused by auxin. Cytokinin oxidase results in the irreversible inactivation of CKs. However, N-glucosylation can prevent the action of CK oxidase altogether (Kieber and Schaller 2014; Werner et al. 2006). Hence, N-glucosylation may have been triggered to convert CKs to conjugates that can release free CK bases (Hoyerová and Hošek 2020). This reasoning would account for higher levels of 7- and 9-glucosides in vitro (Table 1).
The major metabolic route for CKs in S. tortuosum was 7-conjugation (in both samples), though it appears that an additional 9-conjugation pathway was activated in vitro (Table 1). Through this pathway, a previously absent CK conjugate (mT9G) was produced in abundance. Despite high levels of this and other inactive CK conjugates, the active free base CK pools of both samples were similar in size (Table 1). This suggests that increased conjugation was induced to regulate the active CK level in response to the large CK quantities being produced (Hoyerová and Hošek 2020). N-glucosylation is a method of inactivating active CKs to achieve said regulation. Furthermore, 7-glucosylation is usually the pathway utilized for quickly modulating active CK levels (Fox et al. 1973; Šmehilová et al. 2016). This mechanism accounts for the heightened levels of 7-glucosides in vitro, as well as the higher abundance of mT7G rather than pT9G (Table 1).
N-glucosides can be metabolized to form their active free bases (Hošek et al. 2020; Hoyerová and Hošek 2020; Mok 2019; Podlešáková et al. 2012), however high levels of 9-glucosides have been shown to cause growth defects and necrosis in vitro (Bairu et al. 2011; Werbrouck et al. 1995). Thus, it is noteworthy that no adverse growth effects were observed in S. tortuosum (Fig. 1).
The physiological and morphological effects of auxin may have contributed to the enlarged CK pool (Table 1). Auxin stimulates and facilitates cell division and elongation in plants (Cleland 1987; Perrot-Rechenmann 2010). Cytokinin biosynthesis occurs in actively dividing cells, particularly in root and shoot apical meristems and in young leaves (Chen et al. 1985; Nordström et al. 2004). Thus, exogenous auxin likely increased cell division, inducing CK biosynthesis. Rapid growth and morphogenesis (Fig. 1) could have enhanced this biosynthesis, accounting for the overall increase in CKs (Bairu et al. 2011).
Although it seems likely that auxin was responsible for enhanced CK production in vitro, the conditions, specifically constant light exposure, light intensity and quality may have also influenced cytokinin metabolism (Strnad 1997; Zürcher and Müller 2016).
Regardless, the elicitation of multiple growth responses on auxin-only medium (Fig. 1) could be a result of (1) auxin driving these developmental changes (Sassi et al. 2014; Yancheva et al. 2003), (2) a suitable active CK level facilitating these changes (D’Aloia et al. 2011; Werner et al. 2001), or (3) favourable auxin-cytokinin interactions between endogenous and exogenous auxins and CKs (Gaspar et al. 1996; Shani et al. 2006).
Nonetheless, S. tortuosum in vitro plantlets demonstrated the ability to produce copious amounts of CKs and elicit several healthy growth responses in the absence of exogenous CKs (Table 1). This is remarkable as such responses are typically elicited with the use of CKs, sometimes in combination with other PGRs (Ashraf et al. 2014; Hesami et al. 2019; Jeong and Sivanesan 2015; Lee and Pijut 2017). These results are contrary to previous findings that the absence of exogenous CKs results in declines in shoot growth and overall plantlet health (Koda and Okazawa 1980; Kudikala et al. 2020; Maheshwari and Kumar 2006). To further understand phytohormone metabolism in S. tortuosum, additional PGR treatments and in vitro conditions must be investigated.
In vitro rooting
All auxin treatments successfully generated plantlets with a significant number of new leaf pairs in just 21 days (Fig. 2b). This phenomenon of shoot proliferation in the absence of CKs is not extensively documented. However, Gürel and Gulşen (1998) noted that shoot growth in two cultivars of Amygdalus communis improved with a low concentration of IBA (0.5 µM). Furthermore, Dahab et al. (2005) stated that the number of leaves produced by Ruscus hypoglossum increased when half strength MS medium supplemented with 3.0 mg/L IBA (≈ 15.0 µM IBA) was used. These reports support the use of auxin for enhancing shoot proliferation and growth. Additionally, they showed that these parameters were also improved on hormone-free MS media (Dahab et al. 2005; Gürel and Gulşen 1998). This lends support for the high MNLP observed in the control treatment (Fig. 2b).
The ability of auxins to perform their crucial function (root induction) in vitro is well-established (Agarwal and Kamal 2004; Islam et al. 2005; Jahan et al. 2009; Yildirim and Turker 2014), and easily observed in this investigation (Figs. 2 and 3). However, the results indicated that IBA was the more appropriate auxin for rooting nodal explants of S. tortuosum (Fig. 2b). This is consistent with other researchers who have achieved greater success with IBA compared to IAA (Islam et al. 2005; Štefančič et al. 2005). Recently, Fattorini et al. (2017) reported that IBA controls adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis thaliana. Their results showed that 10.0 µM IBA had a stronger effect on root induction than 10.0 µM IAA, which aligns with the findings of this experiment (Fig. 2b).
There was a distinct difference between the lateral growth observed from IBA and IAA treatments. This type of growth is more pronounced in IBA treatments (Fig. 3). Babaei et al. (2014) also reported that lateral root production from adventitious roots increased with the use of IBA in Curculigo latifolia cultures.
Despite various studies documenting the potent effects of IBA in vitro, a “carry-over” effect may be partly responsible for the outcomes of the 10.0 µM treatment. This may be explained by the following acclimation hypothesis: multiplication plantlets were grown on media supplemented with 2.5 µM IBA. During the growth period, plantlets may have acclimated to the uptake of this low concentration of IBA. This could have allowed the explants to tolerate and make full use of an even higher concentration during the experiment (10.0 µM). Following this logic, plantlets had never before experienced an exogenous supply of IAA and may have begun acclimating to this during the experiment. During this process, signalling for the storage of some IAA, as well as for root proliferation would have been ongoing (Korasick et al. 2013; Ljung et al. 2005; Normanly et al. 2010; Overvoorde et al. 2010). It is possible that this combination of signalling resulted in slower mobilization of IAA for root proliferation (Figs. 2b and 3g).
Alternatively, 10.0 µM may have simply been the optimum concentration of IBA, allowing for rapid uptake and conversion to IAA (Ludwig-Müller et al. 2005). Conversely, the same concentration of IAA may have resulted in a disruption in hormone signalling pathways (Li et al. 2009; Overvoorde et al. 2010; Skoog and Miller 1957), likely requiring some time for regulation to be achieved. Such a disruption would explain the slow root growth observed with 10.0 µM IAA (Figs. 2b and 3g).
Despite producing the lowest MNR, rooting was observed in the control treatment (Figs. 2b and 3a). This has been documented in other Aizoaceae species. Drosanthemum spp., Lampranthus spp. and Delosperma cooperi rooted on PGR-free MS medium (Braun and Winkelmann 2015; Mlungwana 2018). Other reports have documented similar findings (Babaei et al. 2014; Islam et al. 2005; Shahzad et al. 2011). Additionally, shoot proliferation was quite successful in this treatment (Figs. 2b and 3a). Thus, these results most closely correlate with findings from Agarwal and Kamal (2004). They reported successful root and shoot proliferation on hormone-free MS medium.
Acclimatization
All but one treatment (10.0 µM IBA) had a greater percentage acclimatized than the percentage of plantlets with functional roots (Figs. 2a and 4). The major discovery here was that plantlets devoid of functional roots were able to acclimatize to greenhouse conditions. This indicates that S. tortuosum plantlets possess the ability to induce ex vitro root proliferation unaided by subsequent PGR application. Furthermore, only 40% of control plantlets had functional roots when transplanted ex vitro, however 90% of plantlets acclimatized successfully (Figs. 2a and 4). Thus, with the absence of an in vitro auxin supply, plantlets demonstrated a heightened ability to induce rooting ex vitro and survive.
It can be said that root proliferation occurs spontaneously in this species. Hence, plantlets should be generated on PGR-free MS media in vitro. However, in instances where rooting parameters need to be enhanced by auxins, plantlets should be allowed more time to acclimatize to mist-house conditions prior to transfer to a greenhouse.
Ex vivo rooting
Exogenously applied auxins were not essential to induce rooting in S. tortuosum cuttings (Fig. 5a). This suggests that GMPs had sufficiently high auxin levels when shoots were excised. Endogenous auxin levels can improve rooting capabilities (Weigel et al. 1984). Nevertheless, an exogenous auxin supply was able to enhance rooting parameters (Fig. 5). This is supported by Haissig (1974), who stated that auxins are able to enhance root proliferation even in cuttings that root easily. Indole-3-butyric acid was the better auxin for rooting cuttings of S. tortuosum, in terms of MNR and MRL (Fig. 5). Kesari et al. (2009) and Sevik and Guney (2013) recorded similar findings with Pongamia pinnata and Melissa officinalis cuttings.
Outcomes from control treatments indicated that a short pre-treatment in water resulted in decreased rooting responses compared to the negative control (Fig. 5). Yeboah et al. (2009) showed that submerging cut-ends in water caused auxins and nutrients to leach out. They submerged Vitellaria paradoxa cuttings in water for 24 h and rooting was inhibited completely.
The relatively high MNLPs and the lack of significant differences between treatments (Fig. 5b) may be explained by the disruption of auxin flow when shoots are severed. This can cause new leaf pairs to emerge on previous nodal segments (Aloni et al. 2006a). These nodal segments were also used in the experiment. More likely though, the state of GMPs at the time of the experiment could account for this. These plants were flowering when cuttings were taken. This reproductive phase is normally associated with high endogenous CK levels (Bernier et al. 1990; Corbesier et al. 2003), which could have contributed to MNLPs.
Flowering can upregulate other phytohormone levels as well (Baydar and Ülger 1998). Consequently, when cuttings were supplied with the highest concentration of IBA (10.0 µM), this may have caused a considerable hormonal imbalance (Li et al. 2009; Overvoorde et al. 2010; Shahzad et al. 2011; Skoog and Miller 1957). This may explain the better responses observed from a lower concentration of IBA (5.0 µM). Alternatively, if the acclimation hypothesis holds true, the lack of exposure of GMPs to an exogenous auxin could have also played a role.
In both experiments, IBA had a compelling influence on the growth of S. tortuosum. Comparatively, the ex vivo experiment produced higher rooting percentages, along with plantlets with more roots and new leaf pairs, as well as longer roots (Figs. 2 and 4). This indicates that cuttings result in faster rooting and more vigorous growth as compared to in vitro-derived plantlets. Although, it should be noted that the in vitro method allows for more efficient propagation due to the shoot multiplication stage.
Conclusions
Root and shoot proliferation, elongation, multiplication and flowering of S. tortuosum plantlets occurred on auxin-containing medium (2.5 µM IBA). Shoot nodal explants and cuttings rooted spontaneously in vitro and ex vivo, however auxins enhanced growth parameters of the plantlets. The optimal concentrations for growth enhancements differed between experiments, however IBA was more effective than IAA. Ex vivo, 5.0 µM IBA significantly increased mean root number and length, while 10.0 µM IBA improved mean number of roots, new leaf pairs and rooting percentage in vitro. Cytokinin levels were higher in in vitro auxin-treated plants, rather than untreated greenhouse plants, suggesting that auxin plays a role in CK metabolism, along with the induction and facilitation of several growth responses.
These vegetative propagation strategies can be used to aid conservation efforts of this protected species. They will also be useful to researchers and pharmaceutical companies. Owing to the value of this species in pharmacology, these methods and additional in vitro methods should be investigated to determine their effects on alkaloid content. This could pave the way towards the production of a commercial source of mesembrine-type alkaloids.
Data availability
All data are available from the corresponding author on request.
Code availability
Software applications used to analyse data and generate figures are disclosed.
Abbreviations
- BAP :
-
N6-Benzylaminopurine
- BAP7G :
-
N6-Benzylaminopurine-7-glucoside
- BAP9G :
-
N6-Benzylaminopurine-9-glucoside
- BAPR :
-
N6-Benzylaminopurine riboside
- BAPR5´MP :
-
N6-benzylaminopurine-5´-monophosphate
- CK:
-
Cytokinin
- cZ :
-
cis-zeatin
- cZ7G :
-
cis-zeatin-7-glucoside
- cZ9G :
-
cis-zeatin-9-glucoside
- cZOG :
-
cis-zeatin-O-glucoside
- cZR :
-
cis-zeatin riboside
- cZR5´MP :
-
cis-zeatin riboside-5´-monophosphate
- cZROG :
-
cis-zeatin-O-glucoside riboside
- DHZ:
-
Dihydrozeatin
- DHZ7G:
-
Dihydrozeatin-7-glucoside
- DHZ9G:
-
Dihydrozeatin-9-glucoside
- DHZOG:
-
Dihydrozeatin-O-glucoside
- DHZR:
-
Dihydrozeatin riboside
- DHZR5´MP:
-
Dihydrozeatin riboside-5´-monophosphate
- DHZROG:
-
Dihydrozeatin-O-glucoside riboside
- GMP:
-
Greenhouse mother plant
- IAA:
-
Indole-3-acetic acid
- IBA:
-
Indole-3-butyric acid
- iP:
-
N6-isopentenyladenine
- iP7G:
-
N6-isopentenyladenine-7-glucoside
- iP9G:
-
N6-isopentenyladenine-9-glucoside
- iPR:
-
N6-isopentenyladenosine
- iPR5´MP:
-
N6-isopentenyladenosine-5´-monophosphate
- K:
-
Kinetin
- K9G:
-
Kinetin-9-glucoside
- KR:
-
Kinetin riboside
- MNLP:
-
Mean number of new leaf pairs
- MNR:
-
Mean number of roots
- MRL:
-
Mean root length
- MS medium:
-
Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium
- mT:
-
meta-topolin
- mT7G:
-
meta-topolin-7-glucoside
- mT9G:
-
meta-topolin-9-glucoside
- mTR :
-
meta-Topolin riboside
- oT:
-
ortho-topolin
- oT7G:
-
ortho-topolin-7-glucoside
- oT9G:
-
ortho-topolin-9-glucoside
- oTR:
-
ortho-topolin riboside
- PAR:
-
Photosynthetic active radiation
- PGR:
-
Plant growth regulator
- pT:
-
para-topolin
- pT7G :
-
para-topolin-7-glucoside
- pT9G :
-
para-topolin-9-glucoside
- pTR :
-
para-topolin riboside
- tZ:
-
trans-zeatin
- tZ7G:
-
trans-zeatin-7-glucoside
- tZ9G:
-
trans-zeatin-9-glucoside
- tZOG:
-
trans-zeatin-O-glucoside
- tZR:
-
trans-zeatin riboside
- tZR5´MP:
-
trans-zeatin riboside-5´-monophosphate
- tZROG:
-
trans-zeatin-O-glucoside riboside
References
Agarwal M, Kamal R (2004) In vitro clonal propagation of Momordica charantia L. Indian J Biotechnol 3:426–430
Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich CI (2006a) Role of auxin in regulating Arabidopsis flower development. Planta 223:315–328
Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich CI (2006b) Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann Bot 97:883–893
Amoo SO, Aremu AO, Van Staden J (2012) In vitro plant regeneration, secondary metabolite production and antioxidant activity of micropropagated Aloe arborescens Mill. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 111:345–358
Ashraf MF, Aziz MA, Kemat N, Ismail I (2014) Effect of cytokinin types, concentrations and their interactions on in vitro shoot regeneration of Chlorophytum borivilianum Sant. & Fernandez. Electron J Biotechnol 17:275–279
Babaei N, Abdullah P, Ashikin N, Saleh G, Lee Abdullah T (2014) An efficient in vitro plantlet regeneration from shoot tip cultures of Curculigo latifolia, a medicinal plant. The Scientific World Journal 2014. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/275028
Bairu MW, Novák O, Doležal K, Van Staden J (2011) Changes in endogenous cytokinin profiles in micropropagated Harpagophytum procumbens in relation to shoot-tip necrosis and cytokinin treatments. Plant Growth Regul 63:105–114
Baydar H, Ülger S (1998) Correlations between changes in the amount of endogenous phytohormones and flowering in the Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Turkish J Biol 22:421–426
Bennett AC, Van Camp A, Lopez V, Smith C (2018) Sceletium tortuosum may delay chronic disease progression via alkaloid-dependent antioxidant or anti-inflammatory action. J Physiol Biochem 74:539–547
Bernier G, Lejeune P, Jacqmard A, Kinet J-M (1990) Cytokinins in flower initiation. In: Pharis RR, Rood SB (eds) Plant Growth Substances 1988. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 486–491
Braun P, Winkelmann T (2015) Cytological investigations in midday flowers (Aizoaceae) reveal high DNA contents in different somatic tissues and potential occurrence of unreduced male gametes. In: XXV International EUCARPIA Symposium Section Ornamentals: Crossing Borders 1087, pp 437–444
Chandler J (2011) The hormonal regulation of flower development. J Plant Growth Regul 30:242–254
Chen C-M, Ertl JR, Leisner SM, Chang C-C (1985) Localization of cytokinin biosynthetic sites in pea plants and carrot roots. Plant Physiol 78:510–513
Cleland RE (1987) Auxin and cell elongation. In: Plant hormones and their role in plant growth and development. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 132–148
Coetzee DD, López V, Smith C (2016) High-mesembrine Sceletium extract (Trimesemine™) is a monoamine releasing agent, rather than only a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. J Ethnopharmacol 177:111–116
Corbesier L, Prinsen E, Jacqmard A, Lejeune P, Van Onckelen H, Périlleux C, Bernier G (2003) Cytokinin levels in leaves, leaf exudate and shoot apical meristem of Arabidopsis thaliana during floral transition. J Exp Bot 54:2511–2517
D’Aloia M et al (2011) Cytokinin promotes flowering of Arabidopsis via transcriptional activation of the FT paralogue TSF. Plant J 65:972–979
Dahab AMA, Habib AMA, Hosni YA, Gabr AMM (2005) Effect of MS-salt strength, sucrose and IBA concentration and acclimatization media on Ruscus hypoglossum L. micropropagation. Arab J Biotechnol 8:141–154
Digby A (2005) Self-Medication and the trade in medicine within a multi-ethnic context: a case study of South Africa from the mid-nineteenth to mid-twentieth centuries. Soc Hist Med 18:439–457
Dimpfel W, Franklin R, Gericke N, Schombert L (2018) Effect of Zembrin® and four of its alkaloid constituents on electric excitability of the rat hippocampus. J Ethnopharmacol 223:135–141
Dobrev PI, Kamínek M (2002) Fast and efficient separation of cytokinins from auxin and abscisic acid and their purification using mixed-mode solid-phase extraction. J Chromatogr A 950:21–29
Elev8™ (2017) Zembrin® Sceletium Extract. Retrieved from http://elev8me.co.za/zembrin/. Accessed on 31 August 2019
Fattorini L, Veloccia A, Della Rovere F, D’Angeli S, Falasca G, Altamura MM (2017) Indole-3-butyric acid promotes adventitious rooting in Arabidopsis thaliana thin cell layers by conversion into indole-3-acetic acid and stimulation of anthranilate synthase activity. BMC Plant Biol 17:121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1071-x.
Fox JE et al (1973) The formation, isolation, and biological activity of a cytokinin 7-glucoside. Plant Physiol 52:627–632
Gaspar T, Kevers C, Penel C, Greppin H, Reid DM, Thorpe TA (1996) Plant hormones and plant growth regulators in plant tissue culture. In Vitro Cell and Dev Biol-Plant 32:272–289
George EF, Hall MA, De Klerk G-J (2008) Plant Propagation by Tissue Culture, vol 1, 3rd Edn. Springer, Dordrecht
Gericke N, Viljoen AM (2008) Sceletium—a review update. J Ethnopharmacol 119:653–663
Gericke NP, Van Wyk B-E (2001) Pharmaceutical compositions containing mesembrine and related compounds. U.S, Washington, DC. Patent 6,288,104
Gupta S, Plačková L, Kulkarni MG, Doležal K, Van Staden J (2019) Role of smoke stimulatory and inhibitory biomolecules in phytochrome-regulated seed germination of Lactuca sativa. Plant Physiol 181:458–470
Gürel S, Gulşen Y (1998) The effects of IBA and BAP on in vitro shoot production of almond (Amygdalus communis L.). Turkish J Bot 22:375–380
Haissig BE (1974) Influences of auxins and auxin synergists on adventitious root primordium initiation and development. NZ J Forest Sci 4:311–323
Harvey AL, Young LC, Viljoen AM, Gericke NP (2011) Pharmacological actions of the South African medicinal and functional food plant Sceletium tortuosum and its principal alkaloids. J Ethnopharmacol 137:1124–1129
Hesami M, Daneshvar MH, Yoosefzadeh-Najafabadi M (2019) An efficient in vitro shoot regeneration through direct organogenesis from seedling-derived petiole and leaf segments and acclimatization of Ficus religiosa. J For Res 30:807–815
Hošek P et al (2020) Distinct metabolism of N-glucosides of isopentenyladenine and trans‐zeatin determines cytokinin metabolic spectrum in Arabidopsis. New Phytol 225:2423–2438
Hothorn M, Dabi T, Chory J (2011) Structural basis for cytokinin recognition by Arabidopsis thaliana histidine kinase 4. Nat Chem Biol 7:766–768
Howell SH, Lall S, Che P (2003) Cytokinins and shoot development. Trends Plant Sci 8:453–459
Hoyerová K et al (2006) Efficiency of different methods of extraction and purification of cytokinins. Phytochemistry 67:1151–1159
Hoyerová K, Hošek P (2020) New insights into the metabolism and role of cytokinin N-glucosides in plants. Front Plant Sci 11:741. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00741
Hussain A, Qarshi IA, Nazir H, Ullah I (2012) Plant tissue culture: current status and opportunities. In: Leva A, Rinaldi LMR (eds) Recent Advances in Plant in vitro Culture. InTech, Rijeka
Islam MA, Zubair H, Imtiaz N, Chaudhary MF (2005) Effect of different plant growth regulators for the economical production of in vitro root cultures of Cicer arietinum L. Int J Agric Biol 7:621–626
Jahan MT, Islam MR, Khan R, Mamun ANK, Ahmed G, Hakim L (2009) In vitro clonal propagation of anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum L.) using callus culture. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol 19:61–69
Jeong BR, Sivanesan I (2015) Direct adventitious shoot regeneration, in vitro flowering, fruiting, secondary metabolite content and antioxidant activity of Scrophularia takesimensis Nakai. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult 123:607–618
Jones B et al (2010) Cytokinin regulation of auxin synthesis in Arabidopsis involves a homeostatic feedback loop regulated via auxin and cytokinin signal transduction. Plant Cell 22:2956–2969
Jones B, Ljung K (2011) Auxin and cytokinin regulate each other’s levels via a metabolic feedback loop. Plant Signaling Behavior 6:901–904
Kamínek M, Vaněk T, Motyka V (1987) Cytokinin activities of N6-benzyladenosine derivatives hydroxylated on the side-chain phenyl ring. J Plant Growth Regul 6:113–120
Kapewangolo P, Tawha T, Nawinda T, Knott M, Hans R (2016) Sceletium tortuosum demonstrates in vitro anti-HIV and free radical scavenging activity. S. Afr J Bot 106:140–143
Kesari V, Krishnamachari A, Rangan L (2009) Effect of auxins on adventitious rooting from stem cuttings of candidate plus tree Pongamia pinnata (L.), a potential biodiesel plant. Trees 23:597–604
Kieber JJ, Schaller GE (2014) Cytokinins. The Arabidopsis Book 12:e0168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1199/tab.0168
Koda Y, Okazawa Y (1980) Cytokinin production by Asparagus shoot apex cultured in vitro. Physiol Plant 49:193–197
Korasick DA, Enders TA, Strader LC (2013) Auxin biosynthesis and storage forms. J Exp Bot 64:2541–2555
Krstenansky JL (2017) Mesembrine alkaloids: Review of their occurrence, chemistry, and pharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 195:10–19
Kudikala H, Jogam P, Sirikonda A, Mood K, Allini VR (2020) In vitro micropropagation and genetic fidelity studies using SCoT and ISSR primers in Annona reticulata L.: an important medicinal plant. Vegetos 33:446–457
Laidler PW (1928) The magic medicine of the Hottentots. S Afr J Sci 25:433–447
Leakey RRB, Newton AC, Dick JM (1994) Capture of genetic variation by vegetative propagation: processes determining success. In: Leakey RRB, Newton AC (eds) Tropical Trees: The Potential for Domestication and the Rebuilding Forest Resources. HMSO, London
LeBude AV, Blazich FA (2018) Propagation. In: Moore KA, Bradley LK (eds) North Carolina Extension Gardener Handbook. NC State Extension, Raleigh
Lee JH, Pijut PM (2017) Adventitious shoot regeneration from in vitro leaf explants of Fraxinus nigra. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 130:335–343
Li S-W, Xue L, Xu S, Feng H, An L (2009) Mediators, genes and signaling in adventitious rooting. Bot Rev 75:230–247
Ljung K, Hull AK, Celenza J, Yamada M, Estelle M, Normanly J, Sandberg G (2005) Sites and regulation of auxin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis roots. Plant Cell 17:1090–1104
Ludwig-Müller J, Vertocnik A, Town CD (2005) Analysis of indole-3-butyric acid-induced adventitious root formation on Arabidopsis stem segments. J Exp Bot 56:2095–2105
Maheshwari P, Kumar A (2006) Organogenesis, shoot regeneration, and flowering response of Vernonia cinerea to different auxin/cytokinin combinations. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plantt 42:589–595
Mlungwana A (2018) In-vitro propagation studies of the endangered succulents Drosanthemum micans and Drosanthemum hallii (Aizoaceae). Doctoral dissertation, Cape Peninsula University of Technology
Mok DWS (2019) Cytokinins: Chemistry, Activity, and Function. CRC press, Boca Raton
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Murbach TS, Hirka G, Szakonyiné IP, Gericke N, Endres JR (2014) A toxicological safety assessment of a standardized extract of Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin®) in rats. Food Chem Toxicol 74:190–199
Napoletano M, Fraire C, Santangelo F, Moriggi E (2001) Mesembrine is an inhibitor of PDE4 that follows structure-activity relationship of rolipram. Chem Prepr Archive 2001:303–308
Nordström A, Tarkowski P, Tarkowska D, Norbaek R, Åstot C, Dolezal K, Sandberg G (2004) Auxin regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana: a factor of potential importance for auxin–cytokinin-regulated development. Proce Nat Academy Sci 101:8039–8044
Normanly J, Slovin JP, Cohen JD (2010) Auxin biosynthesis and metabolism. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant Hormones. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 36–62
Novák O, Hauserová E, Amakorová P, Doležal K, Strnad M (2008) Cytokinin profiling in plant tissues using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. Phytochemistry 69:2214–2224
Overvoorde P, Fukaki H, Beeckman T (2010) Auxin control of root development. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a001537. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001537
Perrot-Rechenmann C (2010) Cellular responses to auxin: division versus expansion. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2:a001446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a001446
Plačková L et al (2017) Microscale magnetic microparticle-based immunopurification of cytokinins from Arabidopsis root apex. Plant J 89:1065–1075
Podlešáková K et al (2012) Novel cytokinin derivatives do not show negative effects on root growth and proliferation in submicromolar range. PloS One 7:e39293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0039293
Rood B (1994) Uit die Veld-Apteek. Tafelberg, Cape Town
Sassi M et al (2014) An auxin-mediated shift toward growth isotropy promotes organ formation at the shoot meristem in Arabidopsis. Curr Biol 24:2335–2342
Schaller GE, Bishopp A, Kieber JJ (2015) The yin-yang of hormones: cytokinin and auxin interactions in plant development. Plant Cell 27:44–63
Sevik H, Guney K (2013) Effects of IAA, IBA, NAA, and GA3 on rooting and morphological features of Melissa officinalis L. stem cuttings. Sci World J 2013:909507. doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/909507
Shahzad A, Parveen S, Fatema M (2011) Development of a regeneration system via nodal segment culture in Veronica anagallis-aquatica L.–an amphibious medicinal plant. J Plant Interact 6:61–68
Shani E, Yanai O, Ori N (2006) The role of hormones in shoot apical meristem function. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:484–489
Shimizu-Sato S, Tanaka M, Mori H (2009) Auxin–cytokinin interactions in the control of shoot branching. Plant Mol Biol 69:429–435
Skoog F, Miller C (1957) Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. In: Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology 11, pp 118–130
Šmehilová M, Dobrůšková J, Novák O, Takáč T, Galuszka P (2016) Cytokinin-specific glycosyltransferases possess different roles in cytokinin homeostasis maintenance. Front Plant Sci 7:1264. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01264
Štefančič M, Štampar F, Osterc G (2005) Influence of IAA and IBA on root development and quality of Prunus’ GiSelA 5’leafy cuttings. HortScience 40:2052–2055
Strnad M (1997) The aromatic cytokinins. Physiol Plant 101:674–688
Su Y-H, Liu Y-B, Zhang X-S (2011) Auxin–cytokinin interaction regulates meristem development. Mol Plant 4:616–625
Svačinová J, Novák O, Plačková L, Lenobel R, Holík J, Strnad M, Doležal K (2012) A new approach for cytokinin isolation from Arabidopsis tissues using miniaturized purification: pipette tip solid-phase extraction. Plant Methods 8:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-8-17
Terburg D et al (2013) Acute effects of Sceletium tortuosum (Zembrin), a dual 5-HT reuptake and PDE4 inhibitor, in the human amygdala and its connection to the hypothalamus. Neuropsychopharmacology 38:2708–2716
Thunberg CP (1795) Travels in Europe, Africa, and Asia, made between the years 1770 and 1779; in four volumes: containing travels in the empire of Japan. In: and in the islands of Java and Ceylon, together with the voyage home, vol 4. F. and C. Rivington, London
Weigel U, Horn W, Hock B (1984) Endogenous auxin levels in terminal stem cuttings of Chrysanthemum morifolium during adventitious rooting. Physiol Plant 61:422–428
Werbrouck SPO, van der Jeugt B, Dewitte W, Prinsen E, Van Onckelen HA, Debergh PC (1995) The metabolism of benzyladenine in Spathiphyllum floribundum ‘Schott Petite’ in relation to acclimatisation problems. Plant Cell Rep 14:662–665
Werner T, Köllmer I, Bartrina I, Holst K, Schmülling T (2006) New insights into the biology of cytokinin degradation. Plant Biol 8:371–381
Werner T, Motyka V, Strnad M, Schmülling T (2001) Regulation of plant growth by cytokinin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98:10487–10492
Wild S (2015) Bushmen cure-all offers locals a sustainable income. Retrieved from https://mg.co.za/article/2015-02-19-bushmen-cure-all-offers-locals-a-sustainable-income/. Accessed on 8 December 2020
Yancheva SD, Golubowicz S, Fisher E, Lev-Yadun S, Flaishman MA (2003) Auxin type and timing of application determine the activation of the developmental program during in vitro organogenesis in apple. Plant Sci 165:299–309
Yeboah JSTL, Lowor ST, Amoah FM (2009) The rooting performance of Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn) cuttings leached in water and application of rooting hormones in different media. J Plant Sci 4:10–14
Yildirim AB, Turker AU (2014) Effects of regeneration enhancers on micropropagation of Fragaria vesca L. and phenolic content comparison of field-grown and in vitro-grown plant materials by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC–ESI-MS/MS). Sci Hortic 169:169–178
Zhang R, Zhang X, Wang J, Letham DS, McKinney SA, Higgins TJV (1995) The effect of auxin on cytokinin levels and metabolism in transgenic tobacco tissue expressing an ipt gene. Planta 196:84–94
Zürcher E, Müller B (2016) Cytokinin synthesis, signaling, and function—advances and new insights. In: Jeon KW (ed) International Review of Cell and Molecular Biology, vol 324:1–38 doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.ircmb.2016.01.001
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to Dr J. H. de Lange for generously donating plant material for this study. This research was supported by an ERDF project entitled “Development of Pre-Applied Research in Nanotechnology and Biotechnology” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007323).
Funding
This research was supported by a European Regional Development Fund project entitled “Development of Pre-Applied Research in Nanotechnology and Biotechnology” (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/17_048/0007323).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.S, J.F.F and J.V.S conceived the research idea and design. J.V.S was responsible for the distribution of the materials necessary for the study. A.S conducted the vegetative propagation experiments. L.P and K.D performed the UHPLC-MS/MS analysis. A.S performed the subsequent data analysis and writing of the manuscript. J.F.F and J.V.S supervised the research. All authors reviewed and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Consent for Publication
The authors grant permission for this work to be published.
Additional information
Communicated by Ali R. Alan.
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sreekissoon, A., Plačková, L., Doležal, K. et al. In vitro and ex vivo vegetative propagation and cytokinin profiles of Sceletium tortuosum (L.) N. E. Br.: a South African medicinal plant. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 145, 191–202 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-02001-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-02001-2