Abstract
Each species cultured in vitro has specific nutritional requirements on the culture medium. The use of silicon in culture can provide benefits to plants, such as increase of tolerance to water stress, increase of photosynthetic capacity and reduction in transpiration. These effects may be quite relevant for in vitro growth and development of plant and during acclimatization. However, the effectiveness of this nutrient may vary depending on the used sources. The aim of this study was to verify the ideal concentration of the MS culture medium and to evaluate the to evaluate the different sources as well as the function of silicon for in vitro development and acclimatization of gerbera plantlets. Shoots (4–6 cm) of gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii cv. Jaguar Cream) cultured in vitro were inoculated in MS medium with different concentrations of salts (MS ¼, MS ½, MS ¾, MS) supplemented with different silicon sources (potassium silicate, sodium silicate, calcium silicate and silicic acid) at concentrations of 0 (control), 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1 mg L−1. The use of MS ¼ medium and the supplementation of 0.25 g L−1 calcium silicate provided better shoot development. The acclimatization rate was not affected by the origin of plants treated in vitro by different silicon sources, their concentrations, and the used culture medium. Thus, the use of silicon is beneficial for in vitro development of gerberas, however, the effectiveness depends on the used source.
Key message
In vitro shoots of Gerbera jamesonii cv. Jaguar Cream regenerate better, shoots are taller and healthier, and root more effectively when are cultured on MS 1/4 supplemented with 0.25 mg L−1 calcium silicate.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gerbera jamesonii Bolus is one of the most popular ornamental plant worldwide used both as cut flower and potted plant. Some cultivar show excellent agronomic characters such as color, floral diameter, stem length, and vigor, which make this plant of commercial importance. the “Jaguar Cream”, with white flowers, is one of the most planted worldwide planted cultivar. Conventionally, multiplication is done through seeds or rhizome cuttings however the multiplication of Gerbera, with improved agronomic traits, has been achieved by using tissue culture methods (Minerva and Kumar 2012).
The use of micropropagation techniques allows obtaining, in a short time, a large number of plants with superior quality (Al-Khayri and Naik 2017; Silva et al. 2018). Therefore, it is a widely used technique for the commercial propagation of gerbera and other commercial ornamental species, such as orchids (Chugh et al. 2009), anthurium (Desai et al. 2015), zantedeschia (Kulpa 2016; Chang et al. 2003), Portulaca grandiflora (Cruz et al. 2019) among others largely produced.
However, in vitro cultured plants or explants have specific nutritional requirements, requiring nutrient media supplemented with different concentrations of essential and beneficial elements, organic constituents and energy sources (Sa et al. 2016; Sá et al. 2018; Ayub et al. 2019; Timoteo et al. 2019). For gerbera, several studies testing culture media have already been developed (Nhut et al. 2007, Bhatia et al. 2009; Cardoso and Teixeira da Silva 2012), but the use of low concentrations of culture media salts has not yet been found in the literature. These studies are important to determine the lower consumption of culture medium in order to reduce the expenses of gerbera micropropagation.
Silicon, although is not usually included in culture medium formations, stood out among the mineral element beneficial for plants. For instance, its storage in the epidermis of leaves forms a mechanical barrier of protection. This accumulation of silicon in transpiration organs promotes the formation of a cuticle-silicon double layer, providing greater tolerance to water stress (Yoshida et al. 1962; Malavolta 2006).
For in vitro development, silicon may affect the growth and development of plants (Braga et al. 2009; Lim et al. 2012; Soares et al. 2013; He et al. 2013; Hartley 2015), the formation and regeneration of adventitious shoot (Sahebi et al. 2016). It is also reported to increase the frequency of shoot induction and the average number of shoots per explant (Sivanesan and Jeong 2014), and promote greater induction and root development (Luz et al. 2012; Soares et al. 2013; Sahebi et al. 2016), besides increasing the plantlet survival in acclimatization (Ziv 2010; Asmar et al. 2013). Silicon can be supplemeted to media in the form of several different sources, such as calcium, potassium and sodium silicate, and silicic acid. However, there is no information on the effectiveness of this element based on the use of varied sources. There is also no information on the effect of this nutrient on in vitro development of gerberas.
The aim of the present study was to determine the ideal concentration of the MS basal mrdium and to evaluate the effcincy of different silicon sources and their different concetration on in vitro growth and development of gerbera.
Material and methods
Inicial establishment of the gerbera
Gerbera jamesonii cv. Jaguar Cream already established in vitro, were sectioned in two-leaf explants measuring 4–6 cm long. The plantlets were subcultured and inoculated in modified nutrient medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) without the addition of pyridoxine and nicotinic acid and the addition of 10 mg L−1 Mio inositol and 1 mg L−1 thiamine. The medium was added with 30 g L−1 sucrose and solidified with 6 g L−1 agar with the pH adjusted to 5.8 ± 0.1. Glass vials containing 50 mL of culture medium were used.
Sterilization of the culture media was performed by autoclaving at 121 °C and pressure of 1.05 kg cm−2 for 20 min. The plantlets were inoculated in a laminar flow chamber under sterile conditions and transferred to the growth room for 45 days with 16 h photoperiod, 25 ± 2 °C temperature and 43 µmol m−2 s−1 photon irradiance.
Culture medium concentrations for in vitro growth and development of gerbera
Plantlets of Gerbera jamesonii cv. Jaguar Cream with 60 days, which were already established in vitro, after 3 multiplication, were sectioned in shoots with two leaves measuring between 4 and 6 cm and inoculated in MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) at concentrations of 25% (MS ¼), 50% (MS ½), 75% (MS ¾), and 100% (MS) of their salts, supplemented with 30 g L−1 sucrose, and solidified with 6 g L−1 agar.
Silicon sources and concentrations for in vitro growth and development of gerbera
In another experiment, gerbera shoots with two leaves, measuring between 4 and 6 cm and inoculated in MS medium with ¼ of salts, supplemented, before the sterilization, with different silicon sources dissolved in distilled water before the sterlization [potassium silicate (K2SiO3) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), calcium silicate (CaSiO3) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA), sodium silicate (Na2SiO3) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) or silicic acid (H4SiO4) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA)] at concentrations of 0 (Witness), 0.25; 0.5; 0.75 and 1 g L−1, amounting a 4 × 5 factorial. Two plants per vials were arranged in 10 replicates for each treatment. The medium was added with 30 g L−1 sucrose and solidified with 6 g L−1 agar.
General conditions for sterilization and incubation
The pH of all media, 50 mL of which was included to each 300 mL flask, were adjusted to 5.8 ± 0.1, with 50 mL of culture medium at each 300 mL flask. Sterilization of culture media was performed by autoclaving them at temperature of 121 °C and pressure of 1.2 atm for 20 min.
Plants were inoculated in 10 replications, with two plants per vial and transferred to growth room with 16 h photoperiod, temperature of 25 ± 2 °C and irradiance of 58 μmol photon m−2 s−1.
The characteristics evaluated after 45 days of culture were: number of shoots, shoot length of the highest shoot (cm), number of leaves, and number of roots.
Silicon sources in gerbera acclimatization
After development, the plants were acclimatized by transferring to tubes containing the commercial Plantmax® substrate. The tubes were covered with plastic bags to maintain humidity, which were gradually withdrawn every seven days, until the total withdrawal, on the 21st day. The plants were kept in a acclimatization room under 12 h photoperiod and irradiance of 60 μmol photon m−2 s−1. After 30 days, the survival rate of plantlets (%) was evaluated.
Statistical design
All experiments were conducted in a completely randomized design (CRD) and the data were analyzed via Scott-Knott test by the SISVAR® statistical software (Ferreira 2014).
Results and discussion
Culture medium concentrations for in vitro growth and development of gerbera
Gerbera shoot culture at MS medium with 50% of salts (MS ½) and 25% of salts (MS ¼) resulted in higher shoot formation (10.83 and 10.79 shoots/plants, respectively) (Fig. 1a), with higher length of shoots (6.39 and 6.56 cm, respectively) (Fig. 1b) and higher number of leaves (3.34 and 3.32 leaves/plants, respectively) (Fig. 1c). Considering the root formation, a higher number was observed only at MS ¼, with an average of 3.56 roots/plants (Fig. 1d), indicating that it is possible to reduce salt concentrations of the culture medium during rooting stage, which besides providing optimal results, also makes the process more economically viable.
The MS culture medium is the most commonly used. The modification of this medium, as well as the use of its dilution, has been recommended not only for crop adequacy but also for cost saving (Vieira et al. 2009; Silva et al. 2016).
Silicon sources and concentrations for in vitro growth and development of gerbera
When evaluated the effect of the addition of silicates to the culture medium, the use of calcium silicate showed generally a higher shoot formation when compared to the other silicon sources (Fig. 2). The use of silicic acid also provided an increase in the number of shoots, even when used up to 0.75 g L−1. The effectiveness was reduced at higher concentrations. However, the use of calcium silicate in all tested concentrations provided a discrepant increase in the number of shoots compared to the other concentrations and, above all, with the other tested sources.
In contrast, the use of sodium silicate and potassium silicate did not favor the formation of the number of shoots in gerbera explants, with results similar or inferior to the control (Fig. 2). It was also observed that the increase of potassium silicate concentrations affected positively the formation of new orchid shoots (Soares et al. 2008; Alves et al. 2016).
By evaluating the plant height, it was observed that the use of different concentrations and different silicon sources resulted in a small increase in its length in relation to the control. But when compared the different tested sources, silicic acid and sodium silicate showed to be less effectiveness (Fig. 3).
Moreover, it was verified that the use of calcium silicate at lowest concentration (0.25 g L−1) resulted in the formation of higher number of leaves. In contrast, the other silicon sources formed a number of leaves similar or inferior to the control (Fig. 4).
It was also observed that the increasing concentrations of calcium silicate also increased root formation. Conversely, when tested the sodium silicate, potassium and silicon acid sources, the root development was affected negatively (Fig. 5).
Thereby, the use of calcium silicate, besides the formation of a larger number of shoots and with higher height, provided a larger number of leaves, confirming the non-occurrence of etiolation. Therefore, it is proven that a careful selection of silicon source to be used is fundamental for the effectiveness of results.
In orchids, the effect of silicon on growth is dependent on the species and source. The use of calcium silicate increased shoot size in Brassavola perrine and Laelia hybrid (Pasqual et al. 2011), while the use of sodium silicate inhibited the growth of Hadrolaelia lobatta x Hadrolaelia purpurata aço (Soares et al. 2008). These authors, however, did not test the effects of different sources, therefore it is not possible to determine if there are different behaviors when the source is different.
In general, the use of calcium silicate has been shown to be the best silicon source for the plant, favoring the higher growth and development of gerbera plantlets. The use of sodium silicate and potassium silicate did not affect the development. Considering that the shoot development is fundamental, the use of 0.25 and 0.5 g L−1 is very effective, providing a significant increase in the number of shoots with good size and good root development.
The efficiency of the use of calcium silicate source may be related to the supply of calcium in association with silicon to gerbera plantlets, which plays an important role in cell signaling, besides maintaining plasmalemma integrity (Reddy 2001; Aranda-Peres et al. 2009) and being an important component of cell wall (Schroeder et al. 2001).
The silicon absorption in plants is preferably performed by the silicic acid form (Epstein 1999; Assis et al. 2018). However, our results showed that the use of sources other than silicic acid, calcium silicate for instance, might be more efficient in increasing the effective growth of gerbera plantlets.
Some studies have demonstrated the efficiency on the use of some silicon sources, but at a fixed concentration (Asmar et al. 2013, 2015; Luz et al. 2012) and others performed tests at different concentrations, but using only one or two sources (Colombo et al. 2016; Soares et al. 2012). Thus, the silicon efficiency can only be confirmed if different sources at different concentrations were tested. In our opinion, the silicon efficiency can be confirmed the most accurately if different sources of silicon are tested at the different concentrations.
The use of silicon sources such as calcium and potassium silicate may have favored the growth and development of gerbera plantlets by providing calcium and potassium in addition to silicon. When MS medium concetration was tested, the increase of the nutrient concetration did not favor the development and growth of gerbera plantlets. We can thus infer that increased growth of gerbera plantlets was favored by the supply of silicon.
During the acclimatization process, no significant differences were observed in the different silicon sources for the survival rate (Fig. 6). A high survival rate was observed in all silicon sources, with an overall average of 86% of plantlet survival (Fig. 7).
Conclusions
Our results suggest that in vitro gerbera shoots regenerate and even root better on MS 1/4, and shoot regeneration is even further enhanced when 0.25 mg L−1 calcium silicate is added to the multiplication medium.
References
Al-Khayri JM, Naik PM (2017) Date palm micropropagation: advances and applications. Cienc Agrotec 41(4):347–358. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542017414000217
Alves GAC, Campos FR, Bertoncelli DJ, Furlan FF, Freiria GH, Faria RT (2016) Development of Cattleya loddigesii Lindley in vitro with doses of potassium silicate. Agropecuária Técnica 37(1):81–87. https://doi.org/10.25066/agrotec.v37i1.24193
Aranda-Peres AN, Peres LEP, Higashi EN, Martinelli AP (2009) Adjustment of mineral elements in the culture medium for the micropropagation of three Vriesea Bromeliads from the Brazilian Atlantic forest: the importance of calcium. HortScience 44:106–112
Asmar SA, Castro EM, Pasqual M, Pereira FJ, Soares JDR (2013) Changes in leaf anatomy and photosynthesis of micropropagated banana plantlets under different silicon sources. Sci Hortic 161:328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2013.07.021
Asmar SA, Soares JD, Silva RAL, Pasqual M, Pio LAS, Castro EM (2015) Anatomical and structural changes in response to application of silicon (Si) 'in vitro' during the acclimatization of banana cv. 'Grand Naine'. Aust J Crop Sci 9(12):1236–1241
Assis FA, Souza GA, Dias GMG, Assis GA, Rodrigues FA, Pasqual M, Costa BNS, Carvalho FJ (2018) Silicon and agar on in vitro development of cockscomb (Amaranthaceae). Pesqui Agropecu Bras 53(1):30–41. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2018000100004
Ayub RA, Santos JN, Zanlorensi LA, Jr, Silva DM, Carvalho TC, Grimaldi F (2019). Sucrose concentration and volume of liquid medium on the in vitro growth and development of blackberry cv. Tupy in temporary immersion systems. Cienc Agrotec 43:e007219. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054201943007219
Bhatia R, Singh KP, Jhang T, Sharma TR (2009) Assessment of clonal fidelity of micropropagated gerbera plants by ISSR markers. Sci Hortic 119:208–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2008.07.024
Braga FT, Nunes CF, Favero AC, Pasqual M, Carvalho JGD, Castro EMD (2009) Anatomical characteristics of the strawberry seedlings micropropagated using different sources of silicon. Pesqui Agropecu Bras 44:128–132. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2009000200003
Cardoso JC, Teixeira da Silva JA (2012) Micropropagation of gerbera using chlorine dioxide (ClO2) to sterilize the culture medium. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 48:362–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-011-9418-8
Chang HS, Chakrabarty D, Hahn EJ, Paek KY (2003) Micropropagation of calla lily (Zantedeschia albomaculata) via in vitro shoot tip proliferation. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 39:129–134. https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2002362
Chugh S, Guha S, Rao IU (2009) Micropropagation of orchids: a review on the potential of different explants. Sci Hortic 122:507–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2009.07.016
Colombo RC, Favetta V, Faria RT, Andrade FA, Melem VM (2016) Response of Cattleya forbesii orchid to increasing silicon concentrations in vitro. Rev Caatinga 29(1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21252016v29n103rc
Cruz CF, Santos WF, Souza CS, Machado MD, Carvalho IF, Rocha DI, Silva ML (2019) In vitro regeneration and flowering of Portulaca grandiflora Hook. Ornam Hortic 25(4):443–449. https://doi.org/10.1590/2447-536X.v25i4.2077
Desai C, Inghalihalli R, Krishnamurthy R (2015) Micropropagation of Anthurium andraeanum—an important tool in floriculture. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 4(3):112–117
Epstein E (1999) Silicon. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:641–664. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.50.1.641
Ferreira DF (2014) Sisvar: a guide for its bootstrap procedures in multiple comparisons. Cienc Agrotec 38(2):109–112. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542014000200001
Hartley SE (2015) Round and round in cycles? Silicon-based plant defenses and vole population dynamics. Funct Ecol 29:151–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12365
He C, Wang L, Liu J, Liu X, Li X, Ma J, Lin Y, Xu F (2013) Evidence for ‘silicon’ within the cell walls of suspension-cultured rice cells. New Phytol 200:700–709. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12401
Kulpa D (2016) Micropropagation of calla lily (Zantedeschia rehmannii). Folia Hortic 28(2):181–186. https://doi.org/10.1515/fhort-2016-0021
Lim MY, Lee EJ, Jana S, Sivanesan I, Jeong BR (2012) Effect of potassium silicate on growth and leaf epidermal characteristics of begonia and pansy grown in vitro. Hortic Sci Technol 30:579–585. https://doi.org/10.7235/hort.2012.1206
Luz JMQ, Asmar SA, Pasqual M, De Araujo AG, Pio LAS, Resende RF (2012) Modification in leaf anatomy of banana plants cultivar “Maca” subjected to different silicon sources in vitro. Acta Hortic 961:239–243. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2012.961.30
Malavolta E (2006) Manual de nutrição mineral de plantas. São Paulo, Ceres, p 638
Minerva G, Kumar S (2012) Micropropagation of Gerbera (Gerbera jamesonii Bolus). In: Lambardi M, Ozudogru E, Jain S (eds) Protocols for micropropagation of selected economically-important horticultural plants. Methods in molecular biology (Methods and Protocols), vol 994. Humana Press, Totowa, NJ, pp 305–316
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x
Nhut DT, Truong TTA, Nguyen TDH, Nguyen TD, Nguyen TH, Nguyen QT, Nguyen HV (2007) Effect of genotype, explant size, position, and culture medium on shoot generation of Gerbera sp. by receptacle transverse thin cell layer culture. Sci Hortic 111:146–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.10.008
Pasqual M, Soares JDR, Rodrigues FA, Araujo AG, Santos RR (2011) Influência da qualidade de luz e silício no crescimento in vitro de orquídeas nativas e híbridas. Hortic Bras 29:324–329. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-05362011000300011
Reddy ASN (2001) Calcium: silver bullet in signaling. Plant Sci 161:381–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(00)00386-1
Sa FP, Ledo AS, Amorim JAE, Silva AVC, Pasqual M (2016) In vitro propagation and acclimatization of genipapo accessions. Cienc Agrotec 40(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542016402036015
Sá JF, Sampaio ES, Mendes MIS, Santos KCF, Sousa AS, Ledo CAS (2018) Culture media for the multiplication of wild Manihot species. Cienc Agrotec 42(6):598–607. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-70542018426024718
Sahebi M, Hanafi MM, Azizi P (2016) Application of silicon in plant tissue culture. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 52:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-016-9757-6
Schroeder JI, Allen G, Hugouvieux V, Kwak JM, Waner D (2001) Guard cell signal transduction. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 52:627–658. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.52.1.627
Silva HFJ, Asmar SA, Oliveira RC, Luz JMQ, Melo B (2016) Alternative supplements and MS medium concentrations in the in vitro establishment of Dipteryx alata. Vog. Biosci J 32(5):1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.14393/BJ-v32n5a2016-33682
Silva DPC, Paiva R, Herrera RC, Silva LC, Ferreira GN, Reis MV (2018) Somatic embryogenesis of Byrsonima intermedia A. Juss.: induction and maturation via indirect approach. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 133(1):115–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1366-5
Sivanesan I, Jeong BR (2014) Silicon promotes adventitious shoot regeneration and enhances salinity tolerance of Ajuga multiflora Bunge by altering activity of antioxidant enzyme. Sci World J 2014:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/521703
Soares JDR, Pasqual M, Rodrigues FA, Villa F, Carvalho JG (2008) Adubação com silício via foliar na aclimatização de um híbrido de orquídea. Cienc Agrotec 32(2):626–629. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542008000200043
Soares JDR, Pasqual M, Araujo AG, Castro EM, Pereira FJ, Braga FT (2012) Leaf anatomy of orchids micropropagated with different silicon concentrations. Acta Sci Agron 34:413–421. https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v34i4.15062
Soares JDR, Villa F, Almendagna Rodrigues F, Pasqual M (2013) Concentrações de silício e GA3 na propagação in vitro de orquídea em condição de luz natural. Sci Agrar Parana 12(4):286–292. https://doi.org/10.1818/sap.v12i4.5700
Timoteo CO, Paiva R, Reis MV, Claro PIC, Silva DPC, Marconcini JM, Oliveira JE (2019) Silver nanoparticles in the micropropagation of Campomanesia rufa (O. Berg) Nied. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 137(2):359–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-019-01576-9
Vieira JGZ, Unemoto LK, Yamakami JK, Nagashima GT, Faria RT, Aguiar RS (2009) Propagação in vitro e aclimatização de um híbrido de Cattleya Lindl. (Orchidaceae) utilizando polpa de banana e água de coco. Rev Cient 37(1): 48–52. https://doi.org/10.15361/1984-5529.2009v37n1p48-52
Yoshida S, Ohnishi Y, Kitagishi K (1962) Chemical forms, mobility and deposition of silicon in rice plant. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 8(3):15–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.1962.10430992
Ziv M (2010) Silicon effects on growth acclimatization and stress tolerance of bioreactor cultured Ornithogalum dubium plants. Acta Hortic 865:29–35
Acknowledgements
Authors kindly acknowledge the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq), the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Research Support Foundation of the State of Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for the financial support of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SDPC: main author of the manuscript, performing all analysis, tabulating data and discussing the results with the other authors. PPDO: main researcher, responsible for the laboratory where the experiment was executed. HRRC, PJMP, RMV and PR: assisted in the implementation of tests, tabulation and interpretation of data and construction of related tables and charts. Authors also assisted with writing and discussion of all results found.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Sergio J. Ochatt.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
da Silva, D.P.C., de Oliveira Paiva, P.D., Herrera, R.C. et al. Effectiveness of silicon sources for in vitro development of gerbera. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 141, 77–85 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01768-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-020-01768-8