Abstract
An efficient protocol for the development of genetically uniform clones of a valuable medicinal plant Solanum trilobatum L. has been established. An optimal shoot regeneration response was observed in a modified Murashige and Skoog medium (M-MS) containing 25 mM ammonium nitrate, 2 mg l−1 6-benzyl adenine and 0.1 mg l−1 indole-3-acetic acid using in vitro derived node and shoot tip explants. Consequently, the multiple shoot buds were elongated in MS medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l−1 Gibberellic acid. The in vitro regenerated shoots were rooted best in MS medium containing 1.5 mg l−1 indole-3-butyric acid and successfully acclimatized in the field. The single primer amplification reaction (SPAR) approach, including random amplified polymorphic DNA, inter simple sequence repeats and directed amplification of minisatellite DNA regions markers did not identify any genetic polymorphism among in vitro regenerants. Similarly flow cytometry analysis illustrated that the DNA content and genome size of micropropagated plants were equivalent to that of intact plants from field. In addition, the accumulation of solasodine in micropropagated plants was confirmed by thin layer chromatography and further quantified by high performance liquid chromatography analysis as 2.47 mg g−1 DW which is comparable to field grown plants. Thus the protocol can be effectively exploited for commercial propagation of this species to obtain solasodine and also in genetic transformation studies.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Solanum trilobatum L. is a thorny medicinal shrub (Solanaceae) globally distributed in Indo-Malaysia and chiefly found in Southern India. The plant is extensively used in Indian traditional and folklore medicines to treat a wide array of ailments (Purushothaman et al. 1969), the therapeutic property of the plant being mainly attributed to glycoalkaloids such as β-solamarine and solasodine (Balakrishna et al. 1992). Solasodine (C27H43O2N) is a nitrogen analogue and alternative of diosgenin, a prime raw material for the synthesis of steroid drugs in pharmaceutical industry (Mann 1978). The increasing demand of this multipurpose medicinal plant for its active principles has led to indiscriminate harvesting from wild affecting the status of wild plants (Dhavala et al. 2009). Moreover, propagation through seeds is inefficient due to poor germination of seeds (Alagumanian et al. 2004). Thus an effective strategy is required for rapid and large-scale proliferation of S. trilobatum.
Tissue culture is a potential tool for rapid mass multiplication of plants and holds great promise for controlled production of useful secondary metabolites, but the major problem encountered with tissue culture is somaclonal variation, which is often heritable (Breiman et al. 1987) and authentication of true-to-typeness remains crucial. Though several regeneration protocols are available for S. trilobatum (Arockiasamy et al. 2002; Jawahar et al. 2004; Alagumanian et al. 2004; Dhavala et al. 2009) to date no attempt has been made in appraising the genetic stability and measurement of active principles of micropropagated plants of S. trilobatum. Here, we have achieved successful plant regeneration in M-MS medium using node and shoot tip explants, evaluated the genetic integrity of in vitro regenerants by molecular markers (RAPD, ISSR and DAMD) and flow cytometry, and compared the levels of solasodine in micropropagated plants in relation to intact plants.
Explants were obtained from field grown plants of S. trilobatum established in the nursery of Department of Biotechnology, Alagappa University, Karaikudi and surface sterilized with 2 % Bavistin for 10–15 min followed by a brief rinse in 70 % alcohol (30 s) then treated with 0.1 % (w/v) mercuric chloride for 3–4 min and thoroughly washed in sterile distilled water thrice. The explants were incubated on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) and M-MS medium containing 25 mM ammonium nitrate supplemented with 3 % (w/v) sucrose, 0.8 % agar, and varying concentrations of plant growth regulators (PGRs). All cultures were maintained at 24 ± 2 °C under a light–dark cycle of 16:8, with a light intensity of 70 μ mol m−2 s−1. The shoots were elongated in MS medium with GA3 (0.1–1 mg l−1). The elongated shoots (4–5 cm) were rooted in MS medium having different concentrations of IBA (0.5–3 mg l−1). Plantlets with well developed roots were removed after 5 weeks and transferred to polypropylene Magenta™ vessels (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) containing equal proportions of autoclaved sand, red soil and vermiculite and maintained in culture room for 2 weeks. Thereafter they were transferred to earthen pots containing a mixture of 1:1 ratio of garden soil and vermiculite and kept in greenhouse for 2–3 weeks and finally transferred to the field for acclimatization. The experiments were carried out in a completely randomized design in which each treatment had 20 explants and all experiments were repeated thrice. The results were presented as a mean ± SE of three independent experiments. The data were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the treatment means with significant differences were distinguished using Duncan’s multiple range test (DMRT) at 5 % probability level. For analyzing the results of flow cytometry Student’s t test was used at P = 0.05. All statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS version 15.0 statistical package.
Total Genomic DNA was isolated from donor mother plant and in vitro raised plants using HiPurA kit (Himedia, Mumbai, India) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The PCR reactions were carried out in a 25 μl reaction containing 1× Taq buffer, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM of each dNTPs, 0.4 μM primer (Sigma, St. Louis, USA), 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (MBI, Fermentas, Lithuania) and 50 ng of template DNA. In a thermal cycler Eppendorf (Deutschland, Germany) the amplification was performed as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, 42 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, annealing at 37 °C for RAPD, 55 °C for ISSR and DAMD for 1 min, extension at 72 °C for 2 min. The last cycle was followed by a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min. Amplified products were resolved in 1.5 % agarose gel in 1× TAE buffer, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized and documented using gel documentation system (Gel Doc XR+, Bio-Rad, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong).
The leaves of 2 years old in vitro shoots grown in M-MS medium containing 2 mg l−1 BA and 0.1 mg l−1 IAA were used for flow cytometry analysis. Nuclei were isolated as described by Dolezel et al. (2007). For each sample, at least 5,000–8,000 nuclei were analyzed in FACS Aria III (BD Biosciences, India) flow cytometer using the FACSDiva software package. Solanum lycopersicum L. ‘Stupicke′ polnı′ rane′’ (2C = 1.96 pg, Dolezel et al. 2007) was used as an internal standard.
Solasodine was extracted from field grown and in vitro plant materials based on a modified Bradley’s method (Bradley et al. 1978). Dry plant powder (500 mg) was refluxed with 30 ml of 1 N HCl for 2 h at 100 °C and filtered. The pH of filtrate was adjusted to 10 using a dilute ammonia solution (10 % v/v) and the basic solution was extracted thrice with chloroform (CHCl3) to ensure complete extraction. The CHCl3 extracts were pooled and evaporated to dryness. For thin layer chromatography, the plant extracts and Solasodine standard (Sigma, St. Louis, USA) were dissolved in CHCl3 at 10 mg ml−1 concentration and 10 μl was spotted on a precoated silica gel aluminium sheet 60F254 (Merck, Germany). The mobile phase used for separation of solasodine consisted of n-hexane:acetone (4:1 v/v). TLC plates were viewed under UV hood at 365 nm after spraying with anisaldehyde reagent and dried at 100 °C. For HPLC analysis, the above extracts were redissolved in 100 % HPLC grade methanol and filtered through 0.2 μm membrane filter. An aliquot of 20 μl was injected into Waters 2998 liquid chromatography (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) equipped with the photodiode array detector. Separation was achieved on Symmetry® C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) using the mobile phase methanol: water (70:30), flow rate 1.0 ml min−1 at 30 °C and UV absorption at 205 nm. Data was analyzed using Empower 2 software.
Field collected explants showed best morphogenic response in MS medium containing 2 mg l−1 of BA and 0.1 mg l−1 of IAA, with higher shoot regeneration frequency (80, 76 %), number of shoots per explant (8.2 ± 0.40, 5.2 ± 0.73) and average shoot length (5.9 ± 0.32, 5.2 ± 0.73 cm) for node and shoot tip explants respectively (Online Resource 1). The efficiency of shoot regeneration was greatly influenced by addition of IAA at 0.1 mg l−1 along with cytokinins, while further increases in concentration resulted in basal callus formation. Nodal explants were better than shoot tips. Interestingly, when in vitro derived explants were cultured in M-MS medium containing PGRs, multiple shoot buds were developed. A 100 % bud break appeared within 5 days, subsequently developing into a tuft of shoot buds at the bottom of explant after 4 weeks, regardless of PGR combination and concentration. A fivefold increase in mean shoot number per explant (42 ± 0.54 per node and 25 ± 1.34 per shoot tip) (Table 1; Fig. 1a, c) was achieved, when the same hormonal combination of 2 mg l−1 BA and 0.1 mg l−1 IAA was added in M-MS medium. The role of modified MS medium with different nitrogen levels for the improvement of plant regeneration has often been reported previously (Poddar et al. 1997; Ivanova and Van staden 2009; Shirdel et al. 2011; Rahman et al. 2011). The in vitro regenerated shoots attained maximum elongation (10.8 ± 0.94 cm (node) and 9.2 ± 0.62 cm (shoot tip) using 0.5 mg l−1GA3 in MS medium (Online Resource 2) (Fig. 1b, d). The maximum frequency of root induction (77 %), mean number of roots (10.6 ± 0.35) and mean root length (4.6 ± 0.44 cm) was recorded in MS medium containing 1.5 mg l−1 IBA (Online Resource 3) (Fig. 1e). Rooted plantlets were initially maintained in laboratory conditions (Fig. 1f) then in greenhouse (Fig. 1g), in due course transferred to the field with 100 % survival rate (Fig. 1h).
For genetic fidelity analysis a total of 10 RAPD, 5 ISSR and 5 DAMD primers were used to identify genetic variation among 8 (4 from node and 4 from shoot tip derived shoots) randomly selected micropropagated plants established in the lab over a period of 2 years. The SPAR methods produced totally 155 PCR amplification products (71 RAPD, 38 ISSR and 46 DAMD) (Online Resource 4). The amplification products were monomorphic in nature across all micropropagated plants in comparison to the donor mother plant (Fig. 2). Among three marker systems used, DAMD primers resulted in higher number of amplification products with an average of 9.2 bands per primer than RAPDs (7.1 bands per primer) and ISSRs (7.6 bands per primer). The SPAR methods have been extensively used for genetic stability analysis of micropropagated plants like Robinia ambigua (Guo et al. 2006), Aegle marmelos (Pati et al. 2008) and Kaempferia galanga (Mohanty et al. 2011).
Flow cytometry is commonly employed to analyze the nuclear DNA content, genome size and ploidy stability of in vitro regenerated plants (Mallon et al. 2010; Ghimire et al. 2012; Vujovic’ et al. 2012). In present study, flow cytometry analyses revealed that there was no significant difference (P = 0.05) among the 2C nuclear DNA content of in vitro cultured plants with that of donor mother plant (Fig. 3). To our knowledge, this is the first estimation of the genome size of S. trilobatum which, at 1C, was found to be in the range of 1,184–1,194 Mbp. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) values obtained was below 5 (Online Resource 5). Low CV value is a measure of accuracy of analysis (Galbraith et al. 2002) and depicts the reliability and applicability of this protocol for other Solanum species. The results from flow cytometry analysis strongly suggest that the micropropagation protocol described here does not induce ploidy changes. Thin layer chromatography analysis indicated the presence of solasodine in both in vivo and in vitro plant extracts, as a single band with an Rf value of 0.8 at 365 nm (Online Resource 6). A similar range of Rf value (0.78) for solasodine was reported by Bhatnagar et al. (2004) in Solanum laciniatum Ait. Further HPLC analysis has revealed that, the micropropagated plants accumulated 2.47 ± 0.04 mg g−1 DW of solasodine, while the solasodine content of field grown plants was found to be 2.38 ± 0.02 mg g−1 DW. Anirudhan et al. (2009) has reported almost similar quantity of solasodine (2.32 mg g−1 DW) in field grown plants of S. trilobatum. The results of our study signify that, in vitro grown plants of S. trilobatum can serve as a good source of solasodine which can be exploited in pharmaceutical industries.
References
Alagumanian SV, Saravana Perumal R, Balachandar K, Rameshkannan M, Rao V (2004) Plant regeneration from leaf and stem explants of Solanum trilobatum L. Curr Sci 86:1478–1480
Anirudhan K, Nair AS (2009) In vitro production of solasodine from Solanum trilobatum. Biol Plant 53(4):719–722
Arockiasamy DI, Muthukumar B, Natarajan E, John Britto S (2002) Plant regeneration from node and internode explants of Solanum trilobatum L. Plant Tissue Cult 12(2):93–97
Balakrishna K, Vasanth S, Sugunthan J, BhimaRao R (1992) Estimation of the total alkaloidal content in various parts of Solanum trilobatum Linn. Ind Drugs 29:509–510
Bhatnagar P, Bhatnagar M, Nath AK, Sharma DR (2004) Production of solasodine by Solanum laciniatum using plant tissue culture technique. Indian J Exp Biol 42:1020–1023
Bradley V, Collins DG, Crabbe PG, Eastwood FW, Irvine MC, Swan JM, Symon DE (1978) A survey of Australian Solanum plants for potentially useful sources of solasodine. Aust J Bot 26:723–754
Breiman AD, Karp RA, Shaskin H (1987) Heritable somaclonal variation in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). Theor Appl Genet 71:637–643
Dhavala VNC, Rao DT, Rao YV, Prabavathi K (2009) Effect of explant age, hormones on somatic embryogenesis and production of multiple shoot from cotyledonary leaf explants of Solanum trilobatum L. Afr J Biotechnol 8(4):630–634
Dolezel J, Greilhuber J, Suda J (2007) Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants using flow cytometry. Nat Protoc 2:2233–2244
Galbraith DW, Lambert G, Macas J, Dolezel J (2002) Analysis of nuclear DNA content and ploidy in higher plants. In: Robinson J, Azmi A, Tutois S (eds) Current protocols in cytometry. Wiley, New York, pp 7.6.1–7.6.15
Ghimire BK, Yu CY, Chung IM (2012) Direct shoot organogenesis and assessment of genetic stability in regenerants of Solanum aculeatissimum Jacq. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 108:455–464
Guo W, Li Y, Gong L, Li F, Dong Y, Liu B (2006) Efficient micropropagation of Robinia ambigua var. idahoensis (Idaho Locust) and detection of genomic variation by ISSR markers. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 84:343–351
Ivanova M, Vav SJ (2009) Nitrogen source, concentration, and NH4+:NO3− ratio influence shoot regeneration and hyperhydricity in tissue cultured Aloe polyphylla. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 99:167–174
Jawahar M, Amalan Rabert G, Jeyaseelan M (2004) Rapid proliferation of multiple shoots in Solanum trilobatum L. Plant Tissue Cult 14(2):107–112
Mallón R, Rodríguez-Oubiña J, González ML (2010) In vitro propagation of the endangered plant Centaurea ultreiae: assessment of genetic stability by cytological studies, flow cytometry and RAPD analysis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 101:31–39
Mann JD (1978) Production of solasodine for the pharmaceutical industry. AdvAgron 30:207–243
Mohanty S, Parida R, Singh S, Joshi RK, Subudhi E, Nayak S (2011) Biochemical and molecular profiling of micropropagated and conventionally grown Kaempferia galangal. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 106:39–46
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Pati R, Chandra R, Chauhan UK, Mishra M, Srivastava N (2008) In vitro clonal propagation of bael (Aegle marmelos Corr.) CV. CISHB1 through enhanced axillary branching. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 14(4):337–346
Poddar K, Vishnoi RK, Kothari SL (1997) Plant regeneration from embryogenic callus of finger millet Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn. on higher concentrations of NH4NO3 as a replacement of NAA in the medium. Plant Sci 129:101–106
Purushothaman KK, Saradambal S, Narayanaswamy V (1969) Chemical estimation of Solanum trilobatum L. Aust J Chem 22(7):1569–1570
Rahman MH, Haider SA, Hossain M, Islam R (2011) Effect of potassium and ammonium nitrate media on in vitro growth response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Int J Biosci 1(2):54–57
Shirdel M, Azar AM, Masiha S, Mortazavi N, Matloobi M, Sharafi Y (2011) Effects of inorganic nitrogen source and NH4+:NO3 ratio on proliferation of dog rose (Rosa canina). J Med Plant Res 5(18):4605–4609
Vujović T, Cerović R, Ružic D (2012) Ploidy level stability of adventitious shoots of sour cherry 'Čačanski Rubin' and Gisela 5 cherry rootstock. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 111:323–333
Acknowledgments
J. Shilpha thanks the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) New Delhi, for financial support [CSIR award No. 09/688 (0016) 2011 EMR-I] in the form of Junior Research Fellowship (JRF). The authors sincerely thank Dr. G.S. Selvam, Professor and Head, Department of biochemistry and Dr. A. Mahesh, Project faculty, School of Biological sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University (MKU) for access to the FACS instrumentation facility at UGC-Networking Resource Centre in Biological Sciences, MKU, and the Bioinformatics Infrastructure Facility of Alagappa University (funded by Department of Biotechnology, Government of India: Grant No. BT/BI/25/001/2006) for offering the computational facility to perform statistical analysis of the work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shilpha, J., Silambarasan, T., Largia, M.J.V. et al. Improved in vitro propagation, solasodine accumulation and assessment of clonal fidelity in regenerants of Solanum trilobatum L. by flow cytometry and SPAR methods. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 117, 125–129 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0420-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-013-0420-1