Abstract
We present a novel variant of decision making based on the mathematical theory of separable Hilbert spaces. This mathematical structure captures the effect of superposition of composite prospects, including many incorporated intentions, which allows us to describe a variety of interesting fallacies and anomalies that have been reported to particularize the decision making of real human beings. The theory characterizes entangled decision making, non-commutativity of subsequent decisions, and intention interference. We demonstrate how the violation of the Savage’s sure-thing principle, known as the disjunction effect, can be explained quantitatively as a result of the interference of intentions, when making decisions under uncertainty. The disjunction effects, observed in experiments, are accurately predicted using a theorem on interference alternation that we derive, which connects aversion-to-uncertainty to the appearance of negative interference terms suppressing the probability of actions. The conjunction fallacy is also explained by the presence of the interference terms. A series of experiments are analyzed and shown to be in excellent agreement with a priori evaluation of interference effects. The conjunction fallacy is also shown to be a sufficient condition for the disjunction effect, and novel experiments testing the combined interplay between the two effects are suggested.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allais M. (1953) Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l’ecole Américaine. Econometrica 21: 503–546
Al-Najjar, N. I., & Weinstein J. (2009). The ambiguity aversion literature: a critical assessment, Kellogg School of Management Working Paper, Northwestern University.
Atmanspacher H. (2003) Mind and matter as asymptotically disjoint inequivalent representations with broken time-reversal symmetry. Biosystems 68: 19–30
Atmanspacher H., Römer H., Walach H. (2002) Weak quantum theory: complementarity and entanglement in physics and beyond. Foundation of Physics 22: 379–406
Bather J. (2000) Decision theory. Wiley, Chichester
Barkan R., Danziger S., Ben-Bashat G., Busemeyer J. R. (2005) Framing reference points: The effect of integration and segregation on dynamic inconsistency. Journal of Behaal Decision Making 18: 213–226
Baron J. (1998) Judgement misguided: Intuition and error in public decision-making. Oxford University, Oxford
Bechara A., Damasio H., Damasio A. (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10: 295–307
Beck F., Eccles J. (1992) Quantum aspects of brain activity and the role of consciousness. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA, 89: 11357–11361
Bell J. S. (1964) On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1: 195–200
Benioff P. A. (1972) Decision procedures in quantum mechanics. Journal of Mathematical Physics 13: 909–915
Benjamin S. C., Hayden P. M. (2001) Multi-player quantum games. Physical Review A 64: 030301
Berger J. O. (1985) Statistical decision theory and bayesian analysis. Springer, New York
Bohr N. (1929) Wirkungsquantum und Naturbeschreibung. Naturwissenschaft 17: 483–486
Bohr, N. (1933). Light and life. Nature, 131, 421–423, 457–459.
Bohr N. (1937) Kausalität und Komplemetarität. Erkenntnissenscahft 6: 293–303
Bohr N. (1961) La Physique Atomique et la Connaissance Humaine. Gontier, Genève
Buchanan J. T. (1982) Discrete and dynamic decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Busemeyer J. R., Wang Z., Townsend J. T. (2006) Quantum dynamics of human decision- making. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 50: 220–241
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., Rabin, R. (eds) (2003) Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton University, Princeton
Chalmers D. (1996) The conscious mind. Oxford University, Oxford
Charness, G. B., Levin, D., & Karni, E. (2008). On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgement: New experimental evidence. Department of Economics Working Paper, UCSB.
Cohen M., Tallon J. M. (2000) Décision dans le risque et l’incertain: l’apport des modèles non additifs. Revue d’Economie Politique 110: 631–681
Croson R. T. A. (1999) The disjunction effect and reason-based choice in games. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80: 118–133
Dickhaut J., McCabe K., Nagode J.C., Rustichini A., Smith K., Pardo J.V. (2003) The impact of the certainty context on the process of choice. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA 100: 3536–3541
Dieudonné J. (2006) Foundations of modern analysis. Hesperides, London
Dirac P. A. M. (1958) The principles of quantum mechanics. Clarendon, Oxford
Du J., Li H., Xu X., Shi M., Wu J., Zhou X., Han R. (2002) Experimental realization of quantum games on a quantum computer. Physical review letters 88: 137902
Du J., Xu X., Li H., Zhou X., Han R. (2001) Entanglement playing a dominating role in quantum games. Physics Letters A 289: 9–15
Einstein A., Podolsky B., Rosen N. (1935) Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review 47: 777–780
Eisert J., Wilkens M. (2000) Quantum games. Journal of Modern Optics 47: 2543–2556
Epstein L. G. (1999) A definition of uncertainty aversion. The Review of Economic Studies 66: 579–608
Feller W. (1970) Introduction to probability theory and its applications. Wiley, New York
Fox C., Rogers B., Tversky A. (1996) Option traders exhibit subadditive decision weights. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 13: 5–17
Frederick S., Loewenstein G., O’Donoghue T. (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: 351–401
French S., Insua D. R. (2000) Statistical decision theory. Arnold, London
Frölich H. (1968) Bose condensation of strongly excited longitudinal electric modes. Physics Letters A 26: 402–403
Gilboa I. (1987) Expected utility with purely subjective non-additive probabilities. Journal of Mathematical Economics 16: 65–88
Gilboa I., Schmeidler D. (1989) Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics 18: 141–153
Goldenberg L., Vaidman L., Wiesner S. (1999) Quantum gambling. Physical Review Letters 82: 3356–3359
Hagan S., Hameroff S. R., Tuszynski J. A. (2002) Quantum computation in brain microtubules: Decoherence and biological feasibility. Physical Review E 65: 061901
Hastings N. A., Mello J. M. (1978) Decision networks. Wiley, Chichester
Iqbal A., Toor A. H. (2001) Evolutionally stable strategies in quantum games. Physics Letters A 280: 249–256
Johnson N. F. (2001) Playing a quantum game with a corrupted source. Physical Review A 63: 020302
Kaplan S., Garrick B. J. (1981) On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis 1: 11–27
Kühberger A., Komunska D., Perner J. (2001) The disjunction effect: Does it exist for two-step gambles?. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 85: 250–264
Lambdin C., Burdsal C. (2007) The disjunction effect reexamined: Relevant methodological issues and the fallacy of unspecified percentage comparisons. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 103: 268–276
Lee C. F., Johnson N. F. (2003) Efficiency and formalism of quantum games. Physical Review A 67: 022311
Li C. F., Zhang Y. S., Huang Y. F., Guo G. C. (2001) Quantum strategies of quantum measurements. Physics Letters A 280: 257–260
Li S., Taplin J. E., Zhang Y. (2007) The equate-to-differentiate way of seeing the prisoner’s dilemma. Information Sciences 177: 1395–1412
Lindgren B. W. (1971) Elements of decision theory. Macmillan, New York
Lockwood M. (1989) Mind, brain and the quantum. Basil Blackwell, Oxford
Machina M. J. (2008) Non-expected utility theory. In: Durlauf S. N., Blume L. E. (eds) The new palgrave dictionary of economics. Macmillan, Basingstoke
Marshall K. T., Oliver R. M. (1995) Decision making and forecasting. McGraw-Hill, New York
Mendelson E. (1965) Introduction to mathematical logic. Van Nostrand, Princeton
Meyer D. (1999) Quantum strategies. Physical Review Letters 82: 1052–1055
Montesano A. (2008) Effects of uncertainty aversion on the call option market. Theory and Decision 65: 97–123
Morier D. M., Borgida E. (1984) The conjunction fallacy: A task-specific phenomenon?. Personality Social Psychology Bulletin 10: 243–253
Penrose R. (1989) The emperor’s new mind. Oxford University, Oxford
Pessa E., Vitiello G. (2003) Quantum noise, entanglement and chaos in the quantum field theory of mind-brain states. Mind and Matter 1: 59–79
Primas H. (2003) Time-entanglement between mind and matter. Mind and Matter 1: 81–119
Quiggin J. (1982) A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3: 323–343
Raiffa H., Schlaifer R. (2000) Applied statistical decision theory. Wiley, New York
Rivett P. (1980) Model building for decision analysis. Wiley, Chichester
Rottenstreich Y., Tversky A. (1997) Unpacking, repacking and anchoring: Advances in support theory. Psychological Review 104: 406–415
Safra Z., Segal U. (2008) Calibration results for non-expected utility theories. Econometrica 76: 1143–1166
Satinover J. (2001) The quantum brain. Wiley, New York
Savage L. J. (1954) The foundations of statistics. Wiley, New York
Schmeidler D. (1989) Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica 57: 571–587
Shafir E. (1994) Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition 50: 403–430
Shafir E., Simonson I., Tversky A. (1993) Reason-based choice. Cognition 49: 11–36
Shafir E., Tversky A. (1992) Thinking through uncertainty: Nonconsequential reasoning and choice. Cognitive Psychology 24: 449–474
Shafir E. B., Smith E. E., Osherson D. N. (1990) Typicality and reasoning fallacies. Memory and Cognition 18: 229–239
Sheremeta, R. M., & Zhang, J. (2009). Can groups solve the problem of over-building in contests? Department of Economics Working Paper, McMaster University.
Shor P. (1997) Polynomial-type algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM Journal of Scientific and Statistical Computing 26: 1484–1494
Simon H. A. (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69: 99–118
Sornette D., Davis A.B., Ide K., Vixie K.R., Pisarenko V., Kamm J.R. (2007) Algorithm for model validation: Theory and applications. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of USA 104: 6562–6567
Stapp H. P. (1993) Mind, matter, and quantum mechanics. Springer, Berlin
Stapp H. P. (1999) Attention, intention, and will in quantum physics. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6: 143–164
Stuart C. I. J., Takahashi Y., Umezawa H. (1978) On the stability and non-local properties of memory. Journal of Theoretical Biology 71: 605–618
Stuart C. I. J., Takahashi Y., Umezawa H. (1979) Mixed system brain dynamics: Neural memory as a macroscopic ordered state. Foundations of Physics 9: 301–327
Tegmark M. (2000) Importance of quantum decoherence in brain processes. Physical Review E 61: 4194–4205
Tentori K., Bonini N., Osherson D. (2004) The conjunction fallacy: A misunderstanding about conjunction?. Cognitive Science 28: 467–477
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1973) Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology 5: 207–232
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1980) Judgements of and by representativeness. In: Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. (eds) Judgements under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge University, New York, pp 84–98
Tversky A., Kahneman D. (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement. Psychological Review 90: 293–315
Tversky A., Koehler D. (1994) Support theory: A nonexistential representation of subjective probability. Psychological Review 101: 547–567
Tversky A., Shafir E. (1992) The disjunction effect in choice under uncertainty. Psychological Science 3: 305–309
van Enk S. J., Pike R. (2002) Classical rules in quantum games. Physical Review A 66: 024306
Vitiello G. (1995) Dissipation and memory capacity in the quantum brain model. International Journal of Modern Physics B 9: 973–989
von Neumann J. (1955) Mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Princeton University, Princeton
von Neumann J., Morgenstern O. (1944) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University, Princeton
Wells G. L. (1985) The conjunction error and the representativeness heuristic. Social Cognition 3: 266–279
Weirich P. (2001) Decision space. Cambridge University, Cambridge
White D. I. (1976) Fundamentals of decision theory. Elsevier, New York
Yates J. F., Carlson B. W. (1986) Conjunction errors: Evidence for multiple judgement procedures, including signed summation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 37: 230–253
Yukalov V. I. (1975) Causality problem in quantum physics. Philosophical Sciences 18: 145–147
Yukalov V. I. (2003a) Entanglement measure for composite systems. Physical Review Letters 90: 167905
Yukalov V. I. (2003b) Quantifying entanglement production of quantum operations. Physical Review A 68: 022109
Yukalov V. I. (2003c) Evolutional entanglement in nonequilibrium processes. Modern Physics Letters B 17: 95–103
Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2008) Quantum decision theory as quantum theory of measurement. Physics Letters A 372: 6867–6871
Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2009a) Scheme of thinking quantum systems. Laser Physics Letters 6: 833–839
Yukalov V. I., Sornette D. (2009b) Physics of risk and uncertainty in quantum decision making. European Physical Journal B 71: 533–548
Zeckhauser R. (2006) Investing in the unknown and unknowable. Capitalism and Society 1: 1–39
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yukalov, V.I., Sornette, D. Decision theory with prospect interference and entanglement. Theory Decis 70, 283–328 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9202-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-010-9202-y
Keywords
- Conjunction fallacy
- Decision making
- Decision noncommutativity
- Disjunction effect
- Entangled decisions
- Intention interference
- Interference alternation
- Uncertainty aversion