Abstract
The absence of a common understanding of attention plagues current research on the topic. Combining the findings from three domains of research on attention, this paper presents a univocal account that fits normal use of the term as well as its many associated phenomena: attention is a process of mental selection that is within the control of the subject. The role of the subject is often excluded from naturalized accounts, but this paper will be an exception to that rule. The paper aims to show how we might reinstate the subject into the act of attention, endorsing the ordinary notion that attention is a direction of the mind by the subject, rather than a mere occurrence or happening. To do so, it lays out the best work of phenomenology, psychology, and neuroscience on specifying the ordinary notion of attention and, in finding them individually wanting, combines them into a unified view that avoids the problems of each. In this way the paper presents a “how possible” account of the ordinary notion of attention, wherein attention is enacted by a subject.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Allport, A. (1989). Visual attention. In M. I. Posner (Ed.), Foundations of Cognitive Science. The MIT Press, 631–682.
American Heritage Dictionary. (2012). Attention. Accessed March 30, 2012, from http://ahdictionary.com/.
Baluch F., Itti L. (2011) Mechanisms of top-down attention. Trends in Neurosciences. 34: 210–224
Bisley J. W., Goldberg M. E. (2003) Neuronal activity in the lateral intraparietal area and spatial attention. Science 299(5603): 81–86
Block N. (2011) Perceptual consciousness overflows cognitive access. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 15: 567–575
Bradley F. H. (1886) Is there any special activity of attention? Mind. 11: 305–323
Busse, L., Katzner, S., & Treue, S. (2008). Temporal dynamics of neuronal modulation during exogenous and endogenous shifts of visual attention in macaque area MT. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 16380–16385.
Carrasco, M. (2011). Visual attention: The past 25 years. Vision Research, 51, 1484–1525.
Carrasco M., Ling S., Read S. (2004) Attention alters appearance. Nature Neuroscience 7(3): 308–313
Colby C., Goldberg M. (1999) Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience. 22: 319–349
Corbetta M., Shulman G.L. (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 3: 201–215
De Brigard F., Prinz J. (2010) Attention and consciousness. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1: 51–59
de Fockert J. W., Rees G., Frith C. D., Lavie N. (2001) The role of working memory in visual selective attention. Science 291(5509): 1803–1806
de Vries W. A. (1988) Hegel’s theory of mental activity. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY
Desimone, R. (2009). Neural synchrony and selective attention. Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks 683–684.
Eimer, M., & Driver, J. (2001). Crossmodal links in endogenous and exogenous spatial attention: Evidence from event-related brain potential studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 497–511.
Flanagan O. (1995) Consciousness and the natural method. Neuropsychologia. 33: 1103–1115
Gregoriou G., Gotts S., Zhou H., Desimone R. (2009) High-frequency, long-range coupling between prefrontal and visual cortex during attention. Science. 324: 1207–1210
Hajcak, G., Anderson, B., Arana, A., Borckardt, J., Takacs, I., & George, M. (2010). Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates electrocortical measures of visual attention: Evidence from direct bilateral epidural cortical stimulation in treatment-resistant mood disorder. Neuroscience, 170, 281–288.
Hegel G. W. F. (1971) Philosophy of mind. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Herrmann K., Montaser-Kouhsari L., Carrasco M., Heeger D. J. (2010) When size matters: Attention affects performance by contrast or response gain. Nature Neuroscience 13(12): 1554–1559
Husserl E. (1975) Experience and judgment. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL
Husserl E. (2001) Concerning passive and active synthesis. Lectures on transcendental logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht
James W. (2010) The principles of psychology. H. Holt and Company, New York
Jonides J. (1981) Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind’s eye’s movement. Attention and Performance IX 9: 187–203
Kahneman D. (1973) Attention and effort. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Klein R. M. (2000) Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4(4): 138–147
Knudsen E. I. (2007) Fundamental components of attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience 30: 57–78
Lamme V. A. F., Roelfsema P. R. (2000) The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing. Trends in Neurosciences 23(11): 571–579
Lavie N. (1995) Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology 21(3): 451–468
Marshall G.D. (1970) Attention and will. The Philosophical Quarterly. 20: 14–25
Milliken B., Tipper S. P. (1998) Attention and inhibition. In: Pashler H. (eds) Attention. Psychology Press, New York
Mole C. (2011) Attention is cognitive unison: An essay in philosophical psychology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Noudoost B., Moore T. (2011) The role of neuromodulators in selective attention. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 20: 183–190
Oxford English Dictionary. (2012). Attention. Accessed March 30, 2012, from http://www.oed.com/.
Peelen M. V., Heslenfeld D. J., Theeuwes J. (2004) Endogenous and exogenous attention shifts are mediated by the same large-scale neural network. Neuroimage 22(2): 822–830
Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 3–25.
Posner M. I., Cohen Y. (1984) Components of visual orienting. Attention and Performance X 32: 531–556
Reynolds J.H., Heeger D.J. (2009) The normalization model of attention. Neuron. 61: 168–185
Rosen A. C., Rao S. M., Caffarra P., Scaglioni A., Bobholz J. A., Woodley S. J., Hammeke T. A., Cunningham J. M., Prieto T. E., Binder J. R. (1999) Neural basis of endogenous and exogenous spatial orienting: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 11(2): 135–152
Roskies A. (2010) How does neuroscience affect our conception of volition?. Annual Review of Neuroscience 33: 109–130
Serences J., Yantis S. (2006) Selective visual attention and perceptual coherence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10: 38–45
Shomstein S., Yantis S. (2006) Parietal cortex mediates voluntary control of spatial and nonspatial auditory attention. The Journal of Neuroscience. 26: 435–439
Spratling M. W., Johnson M. H. (2004) A feedback model of visual attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(2): 219–237
Titchener E. B. (1908) Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. The Macmillan Company, New York
Titchener E. B. (1910) Attention as sensory clearness. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 7: 180–182
Trappenberg, T. P., Dorris, M. C., Munoz, D. P., & Klein, R. M. (2001). A model of saccade initiation based on the competitive integration of exogenous and endogenous signals in the superior colliculus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 256–271.
Urban Dictionary. (2012). Attention. Accessed March, 30, 2012 from http://www.urbandictionary.com/.
Wolfe J. M., Horowitz T. S. (2004) What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it?. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5: 495–501
Yantis S. (1998) Control of visual attention. In: Pashler H. (eds) Attention. Psychology Press, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jennings, C.D. The subject of attention. Synthese 189, 535–554 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0164-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-012-0164-1