Abstract
This paper defends an interventionist treatment of mechanisms and contrasts this with Waskan (forthcoming). Interventionism embodies a difference-making conception of causation. I contrast such conceptions with geometrical/mechanical or “actualist” conceptions, associating Waskan’s proposals with the latter. It is argued that geometrical/mechanical conceptions of causation cannot replace difference-making conceptions in characterizing the behavior of mechanisms, but that some of the intuitions behind the geometrical/mechanical approach can be captured by thinking in terms of spatio-temporally organized difference-making information.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bechtel W. (2006) Discovering cell mechanisms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Bonawitz L., Ferranti D., Saxe R., Gopnik A., Meltzoff A., Woodward J., Schulz L. (2010) Just do it? Investigating the gap between prediction and action in toddlers’ causal inferences. Cognition 115: 104–117
Dowe P. (2000) Physical causation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hall N. (2004) Two concepts of causation. In: Collins J., Hall N., Paul L. Causation and counterfactuals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Hitchcock C. (1995) Discussion: Salmon on causal relevance. Philosophy of Science 62: 304–320
Lombrozo T. (2010) Causal-explanatory pluralism: How intentions, functions, and mechanisms influence causal ascriptions. Cognitive Psychology 61: 303–332
Mink J. (1996) The Basal Ganglia: Focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Progress in Neurobiology 50: 381–425
Salmon W. (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Schlottman A., Shanks D. (1992) Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 44A: 321–342
Woodward J. (2002) What is a mechanism? A counterfactual account. Philosophy of Science 69: 366–377
Woodward J. (2003) Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New York
Woodward J. (2006) Sensitive and insensitive causation. The Philosophical Review 115: 1–50
Woodward J. (2010) Causation in biology: Stability, specificity and the choice of levels of explanation. Biology and Philosophy 25: 287–318
Woodward, J. (forthcoming). Causal perception and causal cognition. In J. Roessler (Ed.), Perception, causation and objectivity: Issues in philosophy and psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Woodward, J. Mechanisms revisited. Synthese 183, 409–427 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9870-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9870-3