Abstract
String theory promises to be able to provide us with a working theory of quantum gravity and a unified description of all fundamental forces. In string theory there are so called ‘dualities’; i.e. different theoretical formulations that are physically equivalent. In this article these dualities are investigated from a philosophical point of view. Semantic and epistemic questions relating to the problem of underdetermination of theories by data and the debate on realism concerning scientific theories are discussed. Depending on ones views on semantic issues and realism different interpretations are possible of the dualities.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aharony O., Gubser S. S., Maldacena J. M., Ooguri H., Oz Y. (2000) Large N field theories string theory and gravity. Physics Reports 323: 183–386
Bain, J. (Draft). Towards structural realism. http://ls.poly.edu/~jbain/papers/SR.pdf.
Becker K., Becker M., Schwarz J. H. (2007) String theory and M-theory: A modern introduction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Callender C., Huggett N. (2001) Physics meets philosophy at the Planck scale. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cao T. (1997) Conceptual developments of 20th century field theories. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cao T. (2003) Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory. Synthese 136: 3–24
Chakravartty A. (2007) A metaphysics for scientific realism: Knowing the unobservable. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Churchland, P. M., Hooker, C. A. (eds) (1985) Images of science. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Dawid R. (2006) Underdetermination and theory succession from the perspective of string theory. Philosophy of Science 73: 298–322
Dawid, R. (2007). Scientific realism in the age of string theory. Physics and Philosophy ID:11.
Demoupoulos W., Friedman M. (1985) Critical notice: Bertrand Russell’s the analysis of matter: Its historical context and contemporary interest. Philosophy of Science 52: 621–639
English J. (1973) Underdetermination: Craig and Ramsey. The Journal of Philosophy 70: 453–462
French S., Ladyman J. (2003) Remodeling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136: 31–56
Giveon A., Poratti M., Rabinovici E. (1994) Target space duality in string theory. Physics Reports 244: 77–202
Green M. B., Schwarz J. H., Witten E. (1987) Superstring theory: 2 volumes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Greene B. R., Plesser M. R. (1990) Duality in Calabi-Yau moduli space. Nuclear Physics B338: 15–37
Greene, B. (1999). The elegant universe. London: Jonathan Cape.
Greene, B. (2004). The fabric of the cosmos. London: Allen Lane.
Healey R. (2007) Gauging what’s real: The conceptual foundations of contemporary Gauge theories. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hull C. M., Townsend P. K. (1995) Unity of superstring dualities. Nuclear Physics B438: 109–137
Kikkawa K., Yamasaki M. (1984) Casimir effects in superstring theories. Physics Letters B149: 357–360
Ladyman J. (1998) What is structural realism?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29: 409–424
Ladyman J., Ross D. (2007) Every thing must go. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (1970) Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lyre, H. (2009). Is structural underdetermination possible? Synthese (online first).
Maldacena J. M. (1998) The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity. Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics 2: 231–252
Newman M. H. A. (1928) Mr. Russell’s causal theory of perception. Mind 37: 137–148
Polchinski J. (1998) String theory: 2 volumes. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Polchinski J., Witten E. (1996) Evidence for heterotic—type I string duality. Nuclear Physics B 460: 525–540
Psillos S. (1999) Scientific realism: How science tracks truth. Routledge, London
Quine W. V. O. (1975) On empirically equivalent systems of the world. Erkenntnis 9: 313–328
Rickles, D. (eds) (2008) The Ashgate companion to contemporary philosophy of physics. Ashgate, Aldershot
Rickles D. (2011) A philosopher looks at string theory dualities. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42: 54–67
Rickles, D., French, S., Saatsi, J. (eds) (2006) The structural foundations of quantum gravity. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Sklar L. (1975) Methodological conservatism. Philosophical Review 84: 374–400
Smolin L. (2006) The trouble with physics. Houghton Mifflin, Boston
Stanford P. K. (2001) Refusing the Devil’s bargain: What kind of underdetermination should we take seriously?. Philosophy of Science: Proceedings 68: 1–12
Suppe, F. (eds) (1977) The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed.). University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Susskind L. (2005) The cosmic landscape: String theory and the illusion of intelligent design. Little Brown, New York
van Fraassen B. C. (1980) The scientific image. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Woit P. (2006) Not even wrong. Jonathan Cape, London
Worall J. (1989) Structural realism: The best of both worlds. Dialectica 43: 99–124
Zwiebach B. (2004) A first course in string theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Matsubara, K. Realism, underdetermination and string theory dualities. Synthese 190, 471–489 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0041-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-0041-3