Abstract
This paper argues that besides mechanistic explanations, there is a kind of explanation that relies upon “topological” properties of systems in order to derive the explanandum as a consequence, and which does not consider mechanisms or causal processes. I first investigate topological explanations in the case of ecological research on the stability of ecosystems. Then I contrast them with mechanistic explanations, thereby distinguishing the kind of realization they involve from the realization relations entailed by mechanistic explanations, and explain how both kinds of explanations may be articulated in practice. The second section, expanding on the case of ecological stability, considers the phenomenon of robustness at all levels of the biological hierarchy in order to show that topological explanations are indeed pervasive there. Reasons are suggested for this, in which “neutral network” explanations are singled out as a form of topological explanation that spans across many levels. Finally, I appeal to the distinction of explanatory regimes to cast light on a controversy in philosophy of biology, the issue of contingence in evolution, which is shown to essentially involve issues about realization.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Albert R., Barabasi A.-L. (2002) Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Review Modern Physics 74: 47–97
Amundson R. (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Arcos, H., & Pereira, J. (2007) Spacetime: Arena or reality?. In V. Petkov (Ed.), Relativity and the dimensionality of the world. Fundamental theories of physics (Vol. 153, pp. 217–227). Berlin: Springer.
Attolini C. S. O., Stadler P. F. (2005) Neutral Networks of interacting RNA secondary structures. Advances in Complex Systems 8(2–3): 275–283
Beatty J. (1995) The evolutionary contingency thesis. In: Wolters G., Lennox J. (eds) Concepts, theories, and rationality in the biological sciences. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp 45–81
Berlow E. L. (1999) Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities. Nature 398: 330–334
Bernstein H., Byerly H.C., Hopf F.A., Michod R.E. (1985) Genetic damage, mutation, and the evolution of sex. Science 229(4719): 1277–1281
Craver C., Bechtel W. (2007) Top-down causation without top-down causes. Biology and Philosophy 22: 547–563
Craver, C. (forth.). Functions and mechanisms in contemporary neuroscience. In P. Huneman, (Ed.), Functions: Selection and mechanisms. Berlin: Synthese Library, Springer.
Crick F. H. C. (1968) The origin of the genetic code. Journal Molecular Biology 38: 367–379
Crutchfield J. (1994) Is anything ever new? Integrative themes. In: Cowan G., Pines D., Melzner D. (eds) Santa Fe Institute studies in the sciences of complexity XIX. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Cupal J., Stadler P., Schuster P. (1999) Topology in phenotype space. In: Giegerich J. (Ed.) Computer science in biology. Springer, Berlin, pp 9–15
Dawkins R. (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press, Oxford
de Visser J. A. G. M., Hermisson J., Wagner G. P., Ancel Meyers L., Bagheri-Chaichian H., Blanchard J. L., Chao L. (2003) Evolution and detection of genetic robustness. Evolution 57: 1959–1972
Dennett D. (1995) Darwin’s dangerous idea. Simons & Shuster, New York
Dokholyan N., Li L., Ding F., Shakhnovich E. I. (2002) Topological determinants of protein folding. PNAS 99(13): 8637–8641
Dunne J. (2006) The network structure of food webs. In: Pascual M., Dunne J. (eds) Ecological networks: Linking structure to dynamics in food webs. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dunne J. A., Williams R. J., Martinez N. D. (2002a) Network structure and biodiversity loss in food webs: Robustness increases with connectance. Ecology Letters 5: 558–567
Dunne J. E., Williams R. J., Martinez N. D. (2002b) Food web structure and network theory: The role of connectance and size. PNAS 99: 12917–12922
Fontana W., Stadler P.F., Bornberg-Bauer E., Griesmacher T., Hofacker I.L., Tacker M. et al (1999) RNA folding and combinatory landscapes. Physics Review E 47: 2083–2099
Friedman M. (1974) Explanation and scientific understanding. Journal of Philosophy 71: 5–19
Gillett (2007). Understanding the new reductionism: The metaphysics of science and compositional reduction. The Journal of Philosophy, 193–216.
Gilllett (2010). Moving beyond the subset model of realization: The problem of qualitative distinctness in the metaphysics of science. Synthese. doi:10.1007/s11229-010-9840-1.
Gould S. J. (1989) Wonderful life. The Burgess shale and the nature of history. Norton, New-York
Granovetter M. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380
Gross J. L., Tucker T. W. (1987) Topological graph theory. Wiley Interscience, Reading, MA
Holling G. (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 4: 1–23
Hubbell S. P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Huneman P. (2010). The conceptual foundations of ecological engineering. Stability, individuation, ethics. In S. Barot (Ed.), Ecological engineering, from concepts to applications. Physics Procedia. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Huynen M., Stadler P. F., Fontana W. (1996) Smoothness within ruggedness: The role of neutrality in adaptation. PNAS 93: 397–401
Kettlewell H.B.D. (1955) Selection experiments on industrial melanism in the Lepidoptera. Heredity 9: 323–342
Kitano H. (2004) Biological robustness. Nature Review Genetics 5: 826–837
Kitcher P. (1989) Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. In: Kitcher P., Salmon W. (eds) Scientific explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 410–505
Lehmann L., Keller L. (2006) The evolution of cooperation and altruism—A general framework and a classification of models. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19: 1365–1376
Levin R., May R., Sugihara C. (2008) Complex systems: Ecology for bankers. Nature 451: 893–895
Lewontin R. C. (1970) Units of selection. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 1: 1–18
Machamer P., Darden L., Craver C. (2000) Thinking about mechanisms. Philosophy of Science 67(1): 1–25
Maser G. L., Guichard F., McCann K. S. (2007) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of enriched metacommunities. Journal of Theoretical Biology 247: 337–345
May R. M. (1974) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
McCann K., Hastings J., Huxel R. (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature 395: 794–798
Montoya J., Pimm S., Solé R. (2006) Ecological networks and their fragility. Nature 442: 259–267
Montoya J. M., Solé R. V. (2002) Small world patterns in food webs. Journal of Theoretical Biology 214: 405–412
Morange M. (2000) A history of molecular biology. Harvard University Press, New Haven
Neander K. (1991) Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analysts defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184
Nowak M. (2005) Five rules to the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805): 1560–1563
Park J., Newman M. (2003) The origin of degree correlations in the Internet and other networks. Physical Review E 68(2): 026112
Pimm S. L. (1984) The complexity and stability of ecosystems. Nature 307: 321–326
Pimm S. L. (2001) The balance of nature? Ecological issues in the conservation of species and communities. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Randrup T., Rogen T. (1997) How to twist a knot. Archiv der Mathematik 68(3): 252–264
Revilla I., Domingo R., Davidson E. (2003) Developmental gene network analysis. International Journal of Developmental Biology 47: 695–703
Romano L.A., Gray G.A. (2003) Conservation of endo 16 expression in sea urchins despite evolutionary divergence in both cis and trans-acting components of transcriptional regulation. Development 130(17): 4187–4199
Salmon W. (1984) Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Santos F. C., Pacheco J. M. (2005) Scale-free networks provide a unifying framework for the emergence of cooperation. Physical Review Letter 95(098104): 1–5
Santos F. C., Pacheco J. M. (2006) A new route to the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 19(3): 726–733
Schuster P. (2002) A testable genotype-phenotype map: Modeling evolution of RNA molecules. In: Lässig M., Valleriani A. (eds) Lecture notes in physics, 585. Springer, Berlin, pp 55–81
Schuster P., Fontana W., Stadler P. F., Hofacker I. (1994) From sequences to shapes and back: A case study in RNA secondary structures. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 255: 279–284
Shapiro L. (2000) Multiple realizations. Journal of Philosophy 97: 635–654
Sober E. (1998) Six sayings about adaptationism. In: Hull D., Ruse M. (eds) Oxford readings in philosophy of biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 72–86
Solé R. V., Montoya J. M. (2001) Complexity and fragility in ecological networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 268: 2039–2045
Sole R., Valverde S. (2008) Spontaneous emergence of modularity in cellular networks. Journal of the Royal Society Interface 5: 129–133
Solé R. V., Ferrer R., Montoya J. M., Valverde S. (2002) Selection, tinkering and emergence in complex networks. Complexity 8: 20–33
Stadler P., Stadler P., Wagner G., Fontana W. (2001) The topology of the possible: formal spaces underlying patterns of evolutionary change. Journal Theoretical Biology 213(2): 241–274
Stadler B., Stadler P. (2004) The topology of evolutionary biology. In: Ciobanu C. (Ed.) Modeling in molecular biology. Natural computing series. Springer, Berlin, pp 267–286
Strogatz S. (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410: 268–276
Tilman D. (1996) Biodiversity: Population versus ecosystem stability. Ecology 77(2): 350–363
Tylianakis J. (2008) Understanding the web of life: The birds, the bees, and sex with aliens. PLoS Biology 6(2): 224–228
Ulanowicz R. (2002) The balance between adaptability and adaptation. Biosystems 64(1–3): 13–22
Van Nimwegen E., Crutchfield J., Huynen M. (1999) Neutral evolution of mutational robustness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(17): 9716–9720
Vendruscolo M., Dokholyan N., Paci E., Karplus N. (2002) Small-world view of the amino acids that play a key role in protein folding. Physical Review E 65(061910): 1–5
Wagner G., Altenberg L. (1996) Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50(3): 967–976
Wagner A. (2005a) Robustness and evolvability in living systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wagner A. (2005b) Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. Bioessays 27: 176–188
Watts D. (2003) Six degrees of separation. Norton, New York
Watts D. J., Strogatz S. H. (1998) Collective dynamics in “small-world” networks. Nature 393: 440–442
West S.A., Griffin A.S., Gardner A. (2007) Social semantics: Altruism, cooperation, mutualism, strong reciprocity and group selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20: 415–432
White S., Kiester D. (2008) Topology matters: Network topology affects outcomes from community ecology neutral models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 32(2): 165–171
Wilke C. O., Wang J., Ofria C., Lenski R. E., Adami C. (2001) Evolution of digital organisms at high mutation rate leads to survival of the flattest. Nature 412: 331–333
Yodzis P. (1989) Introduction to theoretical ecology. Harper & Row, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huneman, P. Topological explanations and robustness in biological sciences. Synthese 177, 213–245 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9842-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9842-z