Abstract
Biologists and philosophers that debate the existence of the species category fall into two camps. Some believe that the species category does not exist and the term ‘species’ should be eliminated from biology. Others believe that with new biological insights or the application of philosophical ideas, we can be confident that the species category exists. This paper offers a different approach to the species problem. We should be skeptical of the species category, but not skeptical of the existence of those taxa biologists call ‘species.’ And despite skepticism over the species category, there are pragmatic reasons for keeping the word ‘species.’ This approach to the species problem is not new. Darwin employed a similar strategy to the species problem 150 years ago.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baum D., Donoghue M. (1995) Choosing among alternative “phylogenetic” species concepts. Systematic Biology 20: 560–573
Beatty J. (1992) Speaking of species: Darwin’s strategy. In: Ereshefsky M. (eds) The units of evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 227–246
Boyd R. (1999) Homeostasis, species and higher taxa. In: Wilson R. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge MA, pp 141–185
Browne J. (2006) Darwin’s origin of species: A biography. Douglas and McIntyre, Vancouver
Cantino P.D., Bryant H.N., de Queiroz K., Donoghue M.J., Eriksson T., Hillis D.M., Lee M.S.Y. (1999) Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology 48: 790–807. doi:10.1080/106351599260012
Coleman W. (1962) Lyell and the “reality” of species: 1830–1833. Isis 53: 325–338. doi:10.1086/349595
Coyne J., Orr H. (2004) Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Darwin, F. (eds) (1877) The life and letters of Charles Darwin, including an autobiographical chapter. John Murray, London
Darwin C. (1964) On the origin of species: A facsimile of the first edition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (Original work published 1859)
Darwin, C. (1975). In R. Stauffer (Ed.), Charles Darwin’s natural selection; being the second part of this big species book written from 1856 to 1858. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Queiroz K. (1999) The general lineage concept of species and the defining properties of the species category. In: Wilson R. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 49–90
de Queiroz K. (2005) Different species problems and their resolution. BioEssays 27: 1263–1269. doi:10.1002/bies.20325
de Queiroz K. (2007) Species concepts and species delimitation. Systematic Biology 56: 879–866. doi:10.1080/10635150701701083
de Queiroz K., Donoghue M. (1988) Phylogenetic systematics and the species problem. Cladistics 4: 317–338. doi:10.1111/j.1096-0031.1988.tb00518.x
Devitt M. (2008) Biological realisms. In: Dyke H. (eds) From truth to reality: New essays in logic and metaphysics. Routledge, London, pp 43–65
Donoghue M. (1985) A critique of the biological species concept and recommendations for a phylogenetic alternative. The Bryologist 88: 172–181. doi:10.2307/3243026
Doolittle W.F., Bapteste E. (2007) Pattern pluralism and the tree of life hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 2043–2049. doi:10.1073/pnas.0610699104
Dupré J. (1993) The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Eldredge N. (1985). Unfinished synthesis. New York: Oxford University Press
Eldridge N., Cracraft J. (1980) Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York
Ereshefsky M. (1991) Species, higher taxa, and the units of evolution. Philosophy of Science 58: 84–101. doi:10.1086/289600
Ereshefsky M. (1992) Eliminative Pluralism. Philosophy of Science 59: 671–690
Ereshefsky M. (1998) Species pluralism and anti-realism. Philosophy of Science 65: 103–120. doi:10.1086/392628
Ereshefsky M. (2001) The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy: A philosophical study of biological taxonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ferguson J. (2002) On the use of genetic divergence for identifying species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. Linnean Society of London 75: 509–519. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8312.2002.00042.x
Fisher K. (2006) Rank-free monograph: A practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella (Calymperaceae). Systematic Biology 31: 13–30
Forey P. (2002) Phylocode—pain, no gain. Taxon 51: 43–54. doi:10.2307/1554962
Franklin L. (2007) Bacteria, sex and systematics. Philosophy of Science 74: 69–95. doi:10.1086/519476
Frost D., Hillis D. (1990) Species in concept and practice: Herpetological applications. Herpetologica 46: 87–104
Futuyma D. (1986) Evolutionary biology (2nd ed). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Futuyma D.J. (1998) Evolutionary biology (3rd ed). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA
Ghiselin M. (1969) The triumph of the Darwinian method. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Ghiselin M. (1987) Species concepts, individuality, and objectivity. Biology and Philosophy 2: 127–143. doi:10.1007/BF00057958
Ghiselin M. (1989) Sex and the individuality of species: A reply to Mishler and Brandon. Biology and Philosophy 4: 77–80. doi:10.1007/BF00144041
Ghiselin M. (1997) Metaphysics and the origin of species. SUNY Press, Albany, NY
Grant V. (1981) Plant speciation (2nd ed). Columbia University Press, New York
Hempel C. (1965) Aspects of scientific explanation and other essays. Free Press, New York
Hendry A., Vamosi S., Latham S., Heilbuth J., Day T. (2000) Questioning species realities. Conservation Genetics 1: 67–76. doi:10.1023/A:1010133721121
Hennig W. (1966) Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Herbert P., Cywinska A., Ball S., deWaard J. (2003) Biological identification through DNA barcodes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 270: 313–321. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2218
Herbert P., Gregory R. (2005) The promise of barcoding for taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54: 852–859. doi:10.1080/10635150500354886
Hey J. (2001) The mind of the species problem. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16: 326–329. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02145-0
Hey J., Waples R., Arnold M., Butlin R., Harrison R. (2003) Understanding and confronting species uncertainty in biology and Conservation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18: 597–603. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2003.08.014
Hodge M. (1987) Darwin, species, and the theory of natural selection. In: Roger J., Fischer J. (eds) Histoire du concept d’espèce dans les sciences de la vie. Singer-Polignac, Paris, pp 227–252
Hull, D. (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: Two thousand years of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15, 314–326; 16, 1–18.
Hull D. (1978) A matter of individuality. Philosophy of Science 45: 335–360. doi:10.1086/288811
Hull D. (1987) Genealogical actors in ecological roles. Biology and Philosophy 2: 168–183. doi:10.1007/BF00057961
Hull D. (1988) Science as a process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Kitcher P. (1984) Species. Philosophy of Science 51: 308–333. doi:10.1086/289182
Kohn D. (2008) Darwin’s keystone: The principle of divergence. In: Ruse M., Richards R. (eds) Cambridge companion to the “Origin of Species”. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 87–108
LaPorte E. (2005) Is there a single objective evolutionary tree of life? The Journal of Philosophy 102: 357–374
Lee M. (2003) Species concepts and species reality: Salvaging a Linnaean rank. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 16: 179–188. doi:10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00520.x
Maddison W. (1997) Gene trees in species trees. Systematic Biology 46: 523–536. doi:10.2307/2413694
Mallet J. (2008) Mayr’s view of Darwin; was Darwin wrong about speciation?. Biological Journal of Linnaean Society 95: 3–16. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01089.x
Marris E. (2007) The species and the specious. Nature 446: 250–253. doi:10.1038/446250a
Mayden R. (2002) On biological species, species concepts and individuation in the natural World. Fish and Fisheries 3: 171–196. doi:10.1046/j.1467-2979.2002.00086.x
Mayr E. (1959) Isolation as an evolutionary factor. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 103: 221–230
Mayr E. (1963) Animal species and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E. (1969) Principles of systematic zoology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E. (1970) Populations, species, and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E. (1982) The growth of biological thought. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Mayr E. (1987) The ontological status of species: Scientific progress and philosophical terminology. Biology and Philosophy 2: 145–166. doi:10.1007/BF00057967
Mill, J. S. (1963). A system of logic. In J. M. Robson (Ed.), The collected works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Original work published 1843)
Mishler B. (1999) Getting rid of species? In: Wilson R. (eds) Species: New interdisciplinary essays. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 307–316
Mishler B. (2003) The advantages of rank-free classification for teaching and research. Cladists 19: 157
Mishler B., Budd A. (1990) Species and evolution in clonal organisms—introduction. Systematic Botany 15: 79–85. doi:10.2307/2419018
Mishler B., Donoghue M. (1982) Species concepts: A case for pluralism. Systematic Zoology 31: 491–503. doi:10.2307/2413371
Mishler B., Theriot E. (2000) The phylogenetic species concept (sensu Mishler and Theriot). In: Wheeler Q., Meier R. (eds) Species concepts and phylogenetic theory: A debate. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 44–54
Peterson A., Navarro-Sigüenza A. (1999) Alternative species concepts as bases for determining priority conservation areas. Conservation Biology 13: 427–431. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.013002427.x
Pigliucci M. (2003) Species as family resemblance concepts: The (dis-)solution of the species problem? BioEssays 25: 596–602. doi:10.1002/bies.10284
Pigliucci M., Kaplan J. (2006) Making sense of evolution: Conceptual foundations of evolutionary biology. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Pleijel F., Rouse G. (2000) Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: A new taxonomic concept for biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 267: 627–630. doi:10.1098/rspb.2000.1048
Pleijel F., Rouse G. (2000) A new taxon, capricornia (Hesiondae, Polychaeta), illustrating the LITU (‘least-inclusive taxonomic unit’) concept. Zoologica Scripta 29: 157–168. doi:10.1046/j.1463-6409.2000.00041.x
Roselló-Mara R., Amann R. (2001) The species concept for prokaryotes. Microbiological Reviews 25: 39–67
Stackebrandt E. (2006) Defining taxonomic ranks. In: Dworkin M. (eds) Prokayrotes: A handbook of the biology of bacteria Vol. 1. Springer, New York, pp 29–57
Stamos D. (1996) Was Darwin really a species nominalist? Journal of the History of Biology 29: 127–144
Stamos D. (2007) Darwin and the nature of species. SUNY Press, Albany, NY
Templeton A. (1992) The meaning of species and speciation: A genetic Perspective. In: Ereshefsky M. (eds) The units of evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 159–185
Tudge C. (1999) The variety of life: A survey and a celebration of all the creatures that have ever lived. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Van Valen L. (1976) Ecological species, multispecies, and oaks. Taxon 25: 233–239. doi:10.2307/1219444
Waugh J. (2007) DNA barcoding in animal species: Progress, potential and pitfalls. BioEssays 29: 188–197. doi:10.1002/bies.20529
Whitfield J. (2007) We are family. Nature 446: 247–249. doi:10.1038/446247a
Wiley E. (1981) Phylogenetics. Wiley, New York
Wilson R. (2005) Genes and the agents of life: The individual in the fragile sciences: Biology. Cambridge University Press, New York
Wilson, R., Barker, M., & Brigandt, I. (2009). When traditional essentialism fails: Biological natural kinds. Philosophical Topics, 35(2) (in press).
Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (3rd ed., G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan.
Wu C., Ting C. (2004) Genes and speciation. Nature Genetics 5: 114–122. doi:10.1038/nrg1269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ereshefsky, M. Darwin’s solution to the species problem. Synthese 175, 405–425 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9538-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9538-4