Abstract
In this paper I critically examine the notion of explanation used in artificial intelligence in general, and in the theory of belief revision in particular. I focus on two of the best known accounts in the literature: Pagnucco’s abductive expansion functions and Gärdenfors’ counterfactual analysis. I argue that both accounts are at odds with the way in which this notion has historically been understood in philosophy. They are also at odds with the explanatory strategies used in actual scientific practice. At the end of the paper I outline a set of desiderata for an epistemologically motivated, scientifically informed belief revision model for explanation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Achinstein P.: The nature of explanation. Oxford University Press, New York (1983)
Alchourrón C., Gärdenfors P., Mackinson D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction functions and their associated revision functions. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50, 510–530 (1985) doi:10.2307/2274239
Aliseda A.: Abductive reasoning. Springer, Dordrecht (2006)
Boutilier C.: Unifying default reasoning and belief revision in a modal framework. Artificial Intelligence 68, 33–85 (1994). doi:10.1016/0004–3702(94)90095-7
Boutilier C., Becher V.: Abduction as belief revision. Artificial Intelligence 77, 43–94 (1995). doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)00025-V
Cherniak C.: Minimal rationality. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)
Gärdenfors P.: Knowledge in flux. MIT Press, Modeling the dynamics of epistemic states. Cambridge (1988)
Gärdenfors P., Makinson D.: Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial Intelligence 65, 197–245 (1994). doi:10.1016/0004-3702(94)90017-5
Hansson S.O., Wassermann R.: Local change. Studia Logica 70, 49–76 (2002). doi:10.1023/A:1014654208944
Harman G.: The inference to the best explanation. The Philosophical Review 74, 88–95 (1965). doi:10.2307/2183532
Harman G.: Change in view. MIT Press, Cambridge (1986)
Hempel C.G.: Aspects of scientific explanation. The Free Press, New York (1965)
Hempel C.G.: Postscript 1976: More recent ideas on the problem of statistical explanation. In: J.H., Fetzer(eds) The philosophy of Carl G. Studies in science, explanation, and rationality, Oxford University Press, New York (2001)
Hempel C.G., Oppenheim P.: Studies in the logic of explanation. Philosophy of Science 15, 135–175 (1948)
Jeffrey R.: Statistical explanation vs statistical inference. In: Salmon, W.C.(eds) Statistical explanation and statistical relevance., Pittsburgh University Press, Pittsburgh (1971)
Kakas A.C., Kowalski R.A., Toni F.: Abductive logic programming. Journal of Logic and Computation 2, 719–770 (1993). doi:10.1093/logcom/2.6.719
Levesque, H. J. (1989). A knowledge-level account of abduction. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufman.
Levi I.: Four themes in statistical explanation. In: Harper, W.L., Skyrms, B.(eds) Causation in decision, belief change, and statistics., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1988)
Levi I.: Mild contraction. Oxford University Press, Evaluating loss of information due to loss of belief. New York (2004)
Lewis D.: Logic for equivocators. Nous 16, 431–441 (1982). doi:10.2307/2216219
Lewis, D. (1986). Causal explanation. In Philosophical papers (Vol. II). New York: Oxford University Press.
Mackinson D., Gärdenfors P.: Relations between the logic of theory change and nonmonotonic Logic. In: Fuhrmann, A., Morreau, M.(eds) The logic of theory change, Springer, Berlin (1991)
Ng, H. T., & Mooney, R. J. (1990). On the role of coherence in abductive explanation. In Proceedings of the Eighth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Los Altos: Morgan Kaufmann.
Páez A.: Explanations in K. An analysis of explanation as a belief revision operation. Oberhausen, Athena Verlag (2006)
Pagnucco, M. (1996). The role of abductive reasoning within the process of belief revision. Dissertation, University of Sydney.
Parikh, R. (1999). Beliefs, belief revision, and splitting languages. In L. Moss, J. Ginzburg, & M. de Rijke (Eds.), Logic, language, and computation. Amsterdam: CSLI Publications.
Paul G.: Approaches to abductive reasoning: An overview. Artificial Intelligence Review 7, 109–152 (1993). doi:10.1007/BF00849080
Peng Y., Reggia J.A.: Abductive inference models for diagnostic problem-solving. Springer, Berlin (1990)
Poole D.: Explanation and prediction: An architecture for default and abductive reasoning. Computational Intelligence 5, 97–110 (1989). doi:10.1111/j.1467-8640.1989.tb00319.x
Railton P.: A deductive-nomological model of probabilistic explanation. Philosophy of Science 45, 206–226 (1978). doi:10.1086/288797
Ram, A., & Leake, D. (1991). Evaluation of explanatory hypotheses. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Rott H.: Change, choice, and inference. Oxford University Press, A study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. Oxford (2001)
Salmon W.C.: Scientific explanation and the causal structure of the world. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1984)
Salmon W.C.: Four decades of scientific explanation. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis (1989)
Schurz, G. (2007). Patterns of abduction. Synthese (in press). doi:10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4.
Scriven M.: Truisms as the grounds for historical explanation. In: Gardiner, P.(eds) Theories of history., The Free Press, New York (1959)
Stickel M.E.: A Prolog-like inference system for computing minimal-cost abductive explanation in natural language interpretation. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 4, 89–106 (1991). doi:10.1007/BF01531174
Thagard P.R.: Explanatory coherence. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12, 435–502 (1989)
Wassermann, R. (2000). Resource-bounded belief revision. Amsterdam: Institute for Logic, Language and Computation Dissertation Series.
Wassermann, R., & Dias, W. (2001). Abductive expansion of belief bases. In Proceedings of the IJCAI Workshop on Abductive Reasoning, Seattle.
Woodward J.: Making things happen. A theory of causal explanation. Oxford University Press, New York (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Páez, A. Artificial explanations: the epistemological interpretation of explanation in AI. Synthese 170, 131–146 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9361-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-008-9361-3