Abstract
One of the most significant theoretical contributions to welfare analysis across a range of disciplines has been the development of the capabilities framework by Sen and others. Motivated by the claim that freedom should play a key role in social evaluation, the capabilities framework suggests that we consider what it is that people are free to do, as well as what they actually do. Using data from the British Household Panel Survey in conjunction with a list of substantial values posited by Martha Nussbaum, we contribute to the operationalisation and testing of this approach. Specifically, we suggest that commonly used secondary data sources do provide some information about the capabilities people have and that this can be incorporated into models of (subjective) well-being such as those used by a growing number of labour and health economists. We find evidence that a wide range of capabilities exhibit statistically significant relations to well-being that the relations are complex and slightly different for men and women, and conclude with suggestions for future developments.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
S. Alkire (2002) Valuing Freedoms: Sen’s Capability Approach and Poverty Reduction Oxford University Press Oxford
P. Anand (1993) ArticleTitleThe philosophy of intransitive preference Economic Journal 103 337–346
Anand, P. and M. van Hees: 2003, ‘Capabilities and achievements’, Discussion Paper. The Open University
J. Angrist Kreuger (2001) ArticleTitleInstrumental variables and the search for identification: From supply and demand to natural experiments Journal of Economic Perspectives 15 69–85
M. Argyle (2001) The Psychology of Happiness EditionNumber2 Routledge Hove
A.B. Atkinson (1999) ArticleTitleThe contributions of Amartya Sen to welfare economics Scandinavian Journal of Economics 101 173–190 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-9442.00151
Blanchflower, D.G. and A.J. Oswald: 2000, ‘Well-being over time in Britain and the USA’, Working Paper 7487, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Available at www.nber.org/papers/w7487
Brandolini, A. and G.D’Alessio: 1998, ‘Measuring well-being in the functioning space’, paper given in the 12th World Congress of the International Economic Association, Buenos Aires, Argentina
British Household Panel Survey (computer file) SN4505, 2002, Economic and Social Research Council Research Centre on Micro-Social Change, Essex: UK Data Archive (distributor), 10 April
H. Cantril (1965) The Pattern of Human Concerns Rutgers University Press New Brunswick, NJ
I. Carter (1999) A Measure of Freedom Oxford University Press Oxford
A.E. Clark A.J. Oswald (1994) ArticleTitleUnhappiness and unemployment Economic Journal. 104 648–659
A.E. Clark A.J. Oswald (1996) ArticleTitleSatisfaction and comparison income Journal of Public Economics 61 359–381 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7
E. Diener E.M. Suh R.E. Lucas H.L. Smith (1999) ArticleTitleSubjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychological Bulletin 125 276–302 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
B.S. Frey A. Stutzer (2002) Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Wellbeing Princeton University Press Princeton
R.A. Easterlin (2001) ArticleTitleIncome and happiness: Towards a unified theory The Economic Journal 111 465–484 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1468-0297.00646
D. Gasper (1997) ArticleTitleSen’s capability approach and Nussbaum’s capability ethics Journal of International Development 9 281–302 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1099-1328(199703)9:2<281::AID-JID438>3.3.CO;2-B
U.-G. Gerdtham M. Johannesson (2001) ArticleTitleThe relationship between happiness, health and socioeconomic factors: Results based on Swedish micro data Journal of Socio-Economics 30 553–557 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1053-5357(01)00118-4
D.P. Goldberg (1972) The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire Oxford University Press London
Hausman, J.A.: 1978 `Specification texts on econometrics', Econometrica 46, pp. 1251–1271
D. Kahneman E. Diener E. Diener (Eds) (1999) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology Russell Sage Foundation New York
Layard, R.: 2003, Happiness: Has Social Science a Clue? Lionel Robbins Memorial Lectures (3–5 March), London School of Economics, Available at http://cep.lse.ac.uk/events/lectures/layard/RL030303.pdf
D. Lykken A. Tellegen (1996) ArticleTitleHappiness is a stochastic phenomenon Psychological Science 7 180–189
E.C. Martinetti (2000) ArticleTitleA multidimensional assessment of well-being based on Sen’s functioning approach Revista Internazionale di Scienze Social 108 207–239
M.C. Nussbaum (2001) ArticleTitleSymposium on Amartya Sen’s Philosophy: 5 Adaptive preferences and women’s options Economics and Philosophy 17 67–88 Occurrence Handle10.1017/S0266267101000153
M.C. Nussbaum (2000) Women and Human Development – The Capabilities Approach Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Qizilbash, M.: `Capabilities, well-being and human development: A survey', Journal of Development Studies 33, pp. 143–162.
I. Robeyns (2003) ArticleTitleSen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities Feminist Economics 9 61–92 Occurrence Handle10.1080/1354570022000078024
Schwarz, N. and F. Strack: 1999, ‘Reports of subjective well-being: Judgmental processes and their methodological implications’, in Kahneman, et al. (eds.), pp. 61–84
A.K. Sen (1977) ArticleTitleSocial choice theory: A re-examination Econometrica 45 53–89
A.K. Sen (1979) ArticleTitlePersonal utilities and public judgements, or What’s wrong with welfare economics? Economic Journal 89 537–558
Sen, A.K.: 1985, Commodities and Capabilities (North-Holland, Amsterdam)
A.K. Sen (1999) Development as Freedom Oxford University Press Oxford
T.N. Srinivasan (1994) ArticleTitleHuman development: A new paradigm or reinvention of the wheel? The American Economic Review 84 238–243
C. Starmer (2000) ArticleTitleDevelopments in non-expected utility theory: The hunt for a descriptive theory of choice under risk Journal of Economic Literature XXXVIII 332–382
F. Stewart (1995) ArticleTitleBasic needs, capabilities and human development’ in Festschrift for Amartya Sen Greek Economic Review 17 83–96
R. Sugden (1993) ArticleTitleWelfare, resources, and capabilities: A review of Inequality Re-examined by Amartya Sen Journal of Economic Literature XXXVI 1947–1962
van Praag, B.M.S. and P. Frijters: 1999, ‘The measurement of welfare and well-being – the Leyden approach’, in Kahneman et al
R. Veenhoven (1994) Correlates of Happiness (3 Vols) RISBO, Centre for Socio-Cultural Transformations Rotterdam, The Netherlands
R. Veenhoven (1997) ArticleTitleAdvances in understanding happiness Revue Quebecoise de Psychologie 1997 29–74
World Values Study Group: 1994, World Value Survey, 1981–1984 and 1990–1993, Arbor, A., Michigan, Institute for Social Research, University
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anand, P., Hunter, G. & Smith, R. Capabilities and Well-Being: Evidence Based on the Sen–Nussbaum Approach to Welfare. Soc Indic Res 74, 9–55 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-005-6518-z