Abstract
Types and sources of received support among 902 Costa Rican employees were examined; gender and age differences as well as associations with mental health were considered. Four types of support (advice giving, assistance, reassurance, and empathic listening) were measured as received from four sources, namely friends, family, spouses, and groups/organizations. Support types were not very distinct, therefore we aggregated sum scores across these variables. In contrast, sources were discriminant and had to be analyzed separately. An interaction between gender and age pointed to a larger discrepancy of received spousal support in middle-aged men and women than in younger ones. The older the women were, the less support they received from their spouses. In addition to this interaction, further gender differences emerged at the correlation level, where the association between spousal support and depression was significant for men only.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Antonucci, T. C., & Akiyama, H. (1987). An examination of sex differences in social support among older men and women. Sex Roles, 17, 737–749.
Belle, D. (1982). The stress of caring: Women as providers of social support. In L. Goldberger & S. Breznitz (Eds.), Handbook of stress: Theoretical and clinical aspects (pp. 496–505). New York: Free Press.
Burleson, B. R. (2003). The experience and effects of emotional support: What the study of cultural and gender differences can tell us about close relationships, emotion, and interpersonal communication. Personal Relationships, 10, 1–23.
Cohen, S., Underwood, S., & Gottlieb, B. (2000). Social support measures and intervention. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cutrona, C. E. (1996). Social support in couples. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., Rickels, K., Uhlenhuth, E. H., & Covi, L. (1974). The Hopkins Symptoms Checklist (HSCL): A self-report inventory. Behavioral Science, 19, 1–15.
Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L., & Call, J. (1986). UCLA Social Support Inventory (UCLA-SSI). Unpublished psychometric instrument. Los Angeles: University of California.
DuPertuis, L. L., Aldwin, C. M., & Bossé, R. (2003). Does the source of support matter for different health outcomes? Findings from the normative aging study. Retrieved January 31, 2003, from http://hcd.ucdavis.edu/faculty/aldwin/Support.pdf.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Carstensen, L. L. (1998). Choosing social partners: How old age and anticipated endings make people more selective. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 511–538). New York: New York University Press.
Glynn, L. M., Christenfeld, N., & Gerin, W. (1999). Gender, social support, and cardiovascular responses to stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 61, 234–242.
Greenglass, E. R. (1982). A world of difference: Gender roles in perspective. Toronto: Wiley.
Hagedoorn, M., Kuijer, R. G., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Wobbes, T., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Marital satisfaction in patients with cancer: Does support from intimate partners benefit those who need it the most? Health Psychology, 19, 274–282.
Hobfoll, S. E. (1986). Stress, social support, and women. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Klauer, T., & Winkeler, M. (2002). Gender, mental health status, and social support during a stressful event. In G. Weidner, M. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series, Series I: Life and Behavioural Sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 223–236). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Knoll, N., & Schwarzer, R. (2002). Gender and age differences in social support: A study of East German refugees. In G. Weidner, M. S. Kopp, & M. Kristenson (Eds.), Heart disease: Environment, stress, and gender [NATO Science Series 1: Life and behavioural sciences, Vol. 327] (pp. 198–210). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Kuijer, R. G., Ybema, J. F., Buunk, B. P., De Jong, G. M., Thijs-Boer, G., & Sanderman, R. (2000). Active engagement, protective buffering, and overprotection: Three ways of giving support by intimate partners of patients with cancer. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 256–275.
Kunkel, A. W., & Burleson, B. R. (1999). Assessing explanations for sex differences in emotional support: A test of the different cultures and skill specialization accounts. Human Communication Research, 25, 307–340.
Laireiter, A., & Baumann, U. (1992). Network structures and support functions: Theoretical and empirical analyses. In H. O. F. Veiel & U. Baumann (Eds.), The meaning and measurement of social support (pp. 33–55). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Lowenthal, M. F., & Haven, C. (1998): Interaction and adaptation: Intimacy as a critical variable. In M. P. Lawton & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Essential papers on the psychology of aging (pp. 445–462). New York: New York University Press.
Mickelson, K. D., Helgeson, V. S., & Weiner, E. (1995). Gender effects on social support provision and receipt. Personal Relationships, 2, 211–224.
Newcomb, M. D. (1990). What structural equation modeling can tell us about social support. In B. R. Sarason, I. G. Sarason, & G. R. Pierce (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 26–63). New York: Wiley.
Pasch, L. A., & Bradbury, T. N. (1998). Social support, conflict, and the development of marital dysfunction. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 219–230.
Pasch, L. A., Bradbury, T. N., & Davila, J. (1997). Gender, negative affectivity, and observed social support behavior in marital interaction. Personal Relationships, 4, 361–378.
Power, M., Bullinger, M., Harper, A., & World Health Organization Quality of Life Group, Switzerland. (1999). The World Health Organization WHOQOL-100: Tests of the universality of quality of life in 15 different cultural groups worldwide. Health Psychology, 18, 495–505.
Sarason, I. G., Levine, H. M., Basham, R. B., & Sarason, B. R. (1983). Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 127–138.
Schröder, K. E. E., Schwarzer, R., & Endler, N. S. (1997). Predicting cardiac patients’ quality of life from the characteristics of their spouses. Journal of Health Psychology, 2, 231– 244.
Schulz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2004). Long-term effects of spousal support on coping with cancer after surgery. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 23, 716–732.
Schwarzer, R., Dunkel-Schetter, C., & Kemeny, M. (1994). The multidimensional nature of received social support in gay men at risk of HIV infections and AIDS. American Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 319–339.
Schwarzer, R., & Leppin, A. (1992). Social support and mental health: A conceptual and empirical overview. In L. Montada, S.-H. Filipp, & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Life crises and experiences of loss in adulthood (pp. 435–458). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Thoits, P. A. (1986). Social support as coping assistance. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 416–423.
Thoits, P. A. (1991). Gender differences in coping with emotional distress. In J. Eckenrode (Ed.), The social context of coping (pp. 107–138). New York: Plenum.
Uno, D., Uchino, B. N., & Smith, T. W. (2002). Relationship quality moderates the effect of social support given by close friends of cardiovascular reactivity in women. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 9, 243– 262.
Watson, D., Clark, A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.
Wills, T. A., & Fegan, M. F. (2001). Social networks and social support. In A. Baum, T. A. Revenson, & J. E. Singer (Eds.), Handbook of health psychology (pp. 209–234). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Xu, Y., & Burleson, B. R. (2001). Effects of sex, culture, and support type on perceptions of spousal support: An assessment of the “support gap” hypothesis in early marriage. Human Communication Research, 27, 535–563.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schwarzer, R., Gutiérrez-Doña, B. More Spousal Support for Men Than for Women: A Comparison of Sources and Types of Support. Sex Roles 52, 523–532 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3718-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-005-3718-6