Abstract
Expressions of hostile and benevolent sexism toward a female character whose behavior was consistent with either a positive (i.e., chaste) or negative (i.e., promiscuous) sexual female subtype were examined. Consistent with the theory that benevolent and hostile sexism form complementary ideologies that serve to maintain and legitimize gender-based social hierarchies, men expressed increased hostile, but decreased benevolent,sexism toward a female character who fit a negative subtype, whereas they expressed increased benevolent, but decreased hostile, sexism toward a female character who fit a positive subtype that was consistent with traditional gender roles. Furthermore, men’s sexual self-schema moderated expressions of hostile sexism across subtypes, whichsuggests that men who think of themselves in sexual terms (i.e., those who are sexuallyschematic) may be predisposed to (a) interpret information about women in sexual terms and categorize women into positive or negative sexual female subtypes on the basis of limited information, which leads to (b) increased hostile sexist attributions when womenare perceived as fitting a negative sexual subtype. These findings emphasize the role of both social dominance motives and the more subtle sociocognitive processes underlyinggender stereotyping in the expression of ambivalent sexism.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abbey, A., & Harnish, R. J. (1995). Perception of sexual intent: The role of gender, alcohol consumption, and rape supportive attitudes. Sex Roles, 32, 297–313.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. London: Sage.
Andersen, B. L., Cyranowski, J. M., & Espindle, D. (1999). Men’s sexual self-schema. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 645–661.
Bagozzi, R. P., & Heatherton, T. F. (1994). A general approach for representing multifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling, 1, 35–67.
Bargh, J. A., Raymond, P., Pryor, J., & Strack, F. (1995). Attractiveness of the underling: An automatic power → sex association and its consequences for sexual harassment and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 768–781.
Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The moderatormediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (1998). Subtypes of women and men: A new taxonomy and an exploratory categorical analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 679–696.
Carpenter, S., & Trentham, S. (2001). Should we take “gender” out of gender subtypes? The effects of gender, evaluative valence, and context on the organization of person subtypes. Sex Roles, 45, 455–480.
Cyranowski, J. M., & Andersen, B. L. (1998). Schemas, sexuality, and romantic attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1364–1379.
Cyranowski, J. M. & Andersen, B. L. (2000). Evidence of self-schematic cognitive processing in women with differing sexual self-views. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 19, 519–543.
Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., & Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: Testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 75–93.
Eckes, T. (1994a). Explorations in gender cognition: Content and structure of female and male subtypes. Social Cognition, 12, 37–60.
Eckes, T. (1994b). Features of men, features of women: Assessing stereotypic beliefs about gender subtypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 107–123.
Eckes, T. (2001). Ambivalenter sexismus und die polarisierung von geschlechterstereotypen [Ambivalent sexism and the polarization of gender stereotypes]. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 32, 235–247.
Faludi, S. (1992). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Doubleday.
Fong, G. T., & Markus, H. (1982). Self-schemas and judgments about others. Social Cognition, 1, 191–204.
Forbes, G. B., Adams-Curtis, L. E., White, K. B., & Holmgren, K. M. (2003). The role of hostile and benevolent sexism in women’s and men’s perceptions of the menstruating woman. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 58–63.
García, L. T. (1999). The certainty of the sexual self-concept. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 8, 263–270.
García, L. T., & Kushnier, K. (1987). Sexual inferences about female targets: The use of sexual experience correlates. Journal of Sex Research, 23, 252–256.
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: Ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 1323–1334.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119–135.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2002). Ambivalent responses. American Psychologist, 57, 444–446.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775.
Haddock, G., & Zanna, M. P. (1994). Preferring “housewives” to “feminists”: Categorization and the favorability of attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 25–52.
Hollingshead, A. B., & Fraidin, S. N. (2003). Gender stereotypes and assumptions about expertise in transactive memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 355–363.
Kendzierski, D., Sheffield, A., & Morganstein, M. S. (2002). The role of self-schema in attributions for own versus other’s exercise lapse. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24, 251–260.
Lewicki, P. (1983). Self-image bias in person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 384–393.
Lewicki, P. (1984). Self -schema and social information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1177–1190.
Markus, H., Crane, M., Bernstein, S., & Siladi, M. (1982). Self-schemas and gender. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 38–50.
Markus, H., & Smith, J. (1981). The influence of self-schemas on the perception of others. In N. Cantor & J. Kihlström (Eds.), Personality, cognition, and social interaction(pp. 233–262). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Markus, H., Smith, J., & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Role of the self-concept in the perception of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1494–1512.
Masser, B., & Abrams, D. (1999). Contemporary sexism: The relationships among hostility, benevolence, and neosexism . Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 503–517.
Pek, J. C. X., & Leong, F. T. L. (2003). Sex-related self- concepts, cognitive styles, and cultural values of traditionality-modernity as predictors of general and domain-specific sexism. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 6, 31–49.
Petrocelli, J. V. (2002). Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Where’s the ambivalence? American Psychologist, 57, 443–444.
Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573.
Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Six, B., & Eckes, T. (1991). A closer look at the complex structure of gender stereotypes. Sex Roles, 24, 57–71.
Tavris, C., & Wade, C. (1984). The longest war: Sex differences in perspective (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Thompson, M. M., Zanna, M. P., & Griffin, D. W. (1995). Let’s not be indifferent about (attitudinal) ambivalence. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 361–386). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Vélez-Blasini, C. J., & Brandt, H. J. (2000). Expectancies, setting, age, and beverage choice as predictors of sexual behaviors in hypothetical dating situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1954–1976.
Viki, G. T., & Abrams, D. (2002). But she was unfaithful: Benevolent sexism and reactions to rape victims who violate traditional gender role expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 289–293.
Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Hutchison, P. (2003). The “true” romantic: Benevolent sexism and paternalistic chivalry. Sex Roles, 49, 533–537.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sibley, C.G., Wilson, M.S. Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexist Attitudes Toward Positive and Negative Sexual Female Subtypes. Sex Roles 51, 687–696 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x