Abstract
Ignoring the role of chance in science distorts the nature of the scientific process. Teachers can address this issue by means of several in-depth historical case studies, such as the discovery of electromagnetism by Oersted. Oersted was led to his lecture experiment by logic (two new hypotheses), but its success from the first trial was largely due to chance. Reproducing Oersted’s experiment in the classroom complements the story by allowing students to see for themselves the role of some accidental factors, such as the choice of materials and instruments. The message to students is that chance and logic go together in science.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
G. Aldini (1804) Essai theorique et expémental sur le galvanisme single volume quarto Paris
S. Altmann (1992) Icons and Symmetries Clarendon Press Oxford
E. Bauer (1964) Déuverte de léctromagnésme. R Taton (Eds) Histoire Gérale des Sciences 3 vols Déuverte de léctromagnésme. Presses universitaires de France Paris 208
S.P. Bouvier (1803) ArticleTitleGalvanisch-electrische Versuche mit Eisund, und üie electrische Anziehung der Säule. Annalen der Physik 13 434–437
T.W. Chalmers (1949) Historic Researches: Chapters in the History of Physical and Chemical Discovery Morgan Brothers Ltd. London
D.Ch. Christensen (1995) ArticleTitleThe Oersted-Ritter Partnership and the Birth of Romantic Natural Philosophy. Annals of Science 52 153–185
Th. Coulson (1950) Joseph Henri: His Life and Work Princeton University Press Princeton,NJ 34–35
B. Dibner (1961) Oersted and the Discovery of Electromagnetism Burndy Library Norwalk, CT
P. Dunsheath (1967) Giants of Electricity Thomas Y. Growell Co. New York. 81
L.W. Gilbert (1820) ArticleTitle‘Entdeckung ausgezeichneter Wirkungen des geschlossenen galvanischelectrischen kreises auf die Magnetnadel, und der Kraft der galvanischen Electricitäzu magnetisiren’ Annalen der Physik 66 291–294
Gerard, J.: 1961, ‘Sur quelques problés concernant loeuvre d’ersted enéctromagnésme’. Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 14, 297-312 (p. 297).
B. Gower (1973) ArticleTitle‘Speculation in Physics: The History and Practice of Naturphilosophie’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3 IssueID4 301–356
Ch. Hansteen (1857) ‘Letter to Faraday December 30 1857’. Bence Jones (Eds) The Life and Letters of Faraday Longmans, Green &Co. London 395–396
J. Hamel1859 ‘Historical account of the Introduction of the Galvanic and Electromagnetic Telegraph’. Journal of the Society of Arts 7 595-599, 605-610 (p. 606)
A. Hermann (1980) Weltreich der Physik: von Galilei bis Heisenberg Bechtle Verlag Esslingen am Neckar 120–122
J. Izarn (1804) Manuel du galvanisme chez , Dumotiez, far. instr. de physique J.F. Barreau, libr. Paris
N. Kipnis (1987) ArticleTitle‘Luigi Galvani and the Debate on Animal Electricity 1791-1800’ Annals of Science 44 107–142
N. Kipnis (2000) ArticleTitle‘ The Window of Opportunity: Logic and Chance in Becquerel’s Discovery of Radioactivity’ Physics in Perspective 2 63–99
A. Kohn (1989) Fortune or failure: Missed Opportunities and Chance Discoveries Blackwell Oxford
E.W. Lee (1970) Magnetism: An Introductory Survey Dover Publications Inc., New York
R. Martins 2001 ‘Romagnosi and Voltas Pile: Early Difficulties in the Interpretation of Voltaic Electricity’, in F. Bevilacqua & L. Fregonese (eds.) Nuova Voltiana: Studies on Volta and His Times 4 vols, Editore Ulrico Hoepli, Milano, Vol. 3, pp. 81-102
Martins, R.: 1999, ‘Resistance to the Discovery of Electromagnetism: Oersted and the Symmetry of the Magnetic Field’. posted at http://oliver.cilea.it/cgi-bin/fisicasite/webdriver?MIval=qpcomom&pg=CO After reaching this site, click Conference Papers and the papers title.
K.Meyer,1920 ‘The Scientific Life and Works of H. C. Oersted’. in Kirstine Meyer H.C. (ed.)Oersted Scientific Papers, 3 vols, A.F. Host &Son, Copenhagen, Vol. I, pp. XIII-CLXVI (p. CIII)
H.C. Oersted 1812 Ansicht der chemischen Naturgesetze reprinted in Oersted’s Scientific Papers II 35-169
Oersted, H.C.: 1813, Recherches sur l’identite des forces electriques et chimiques, Paris.
Oersted, H.C.: 1820a, ‘Experimenta circa effectum coflictus electrici in acum magneticam ’. H.C. Oersted Scientific Papers I, 214-218.
Oersted, H.C.: 1820b, ‘Experiments on the Effect of a Current of Electricity on theMagnetic Needle’, Annals of Philosophy 16, 273–276; subsequently referred to as ‘Experiments [1820]’.
H.C.: 1820c, ‘Sur les effets de l’explosion électrique sur laiguille aimant’ee’. Annales Générales des Sciences Physiques 5, 259-264
Oersted, H.C.: 1820d, ‘Expériences sur un effet que le courant de la pile excite dans l’aiguille aimantée’, Journal de physique 91, 72–76.
Oersted, H.C.: 1821, ‘On Electro-Magnetism’. Annals of Philosophy 2, 321-348.
Oersted, H.C.: 1827, ‘Thermo-Electricity [1827]’. H.C. Oersted Scientific Papers II, 351-398.
Oersted, H.C.: 1828, ‘Autobiography [in Danish]’, in Hans Ancher Kofod (ed.), Conversationslexicon, 28 vols, Copenhagen, Vol. XXVIII, p. 521 ff. Quotes given here are from an English translation by Robert Stauffer (Stauffer 1957, pp. 50–51)
Jelved, K. et al. (eds. & trans): 1998, Selected Scientific Works of Hans Christian Oersted, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Priestley, H.: 1958, Introductory Physics: A Historical Approach, Allyn & Bacon Inc., Boston. p.234;
H. Priestley (1958) Introductory Physics: A Historical Approach Allyn & Bacon Inc. Boston.
D.M. Riban (1982) Introduction to Physical Science McGraw-Hill New York
R.M. Roberts (1989) Serendipity: Accidental Discoveries in Science Wiley New York
Romagnosi, G.: 1802, ‘Articolo sul galvanismo’, Gazzetta di Trento di 3 d’augosto 1802, reprinted in Zantedeschi, F.: 1859, L’elettromagnetismo rivendicato a Giandomenico Romagnosi, et all’ Italia, Padua, pp. 8–10. See an abridged English translation in Dibner, B., Oersted and the Discovery of Electromagnetism, p. 31.
T. Shanahan (1989) ArticleTitle‘Kant Naturphilosiphie and Oersteds Discovery of Electromagnetism: A Reassessment’. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 20 IssueID3 287–305
Snelders, H.A.M.: 1970, ‘Romanticism and Naturphilosophie and the Inorganic Natural Sciences 1797-1840: An Introductory Survey’. Studies in Romanticism 9(3), 193-215.
H.A.M. Snelders (1990) Oersteds Discovery of Electromagnetism. A. Cunningham N. Jardine (Eds) Romanticism and the Sciences Cambridge University Press Cambridge 228–240
Stauffer, R.C.: 1953, ‘Persistent Errors Regarding Oersteds Discovery of Electromagnetism’. Isis 44, 307-310 (p. 310).
Stauffer, R.C.: 1957,‘Speculation and Experiment in the Background of Oersted’s Discovery of Electromagnetism‘. Isis 48, 33-50 (p. 50).
L.W. Taylor (1959) Physics the Pioneer Science EditionNumber2 Dover New York
S. Thompson (1893) Elementary Lessons in Electricity & Magnetism Macmillan London & New York
Thullier, P.: 1990, ‘De la philosophie . . . l’électromagnétisme: le casOersted’, La Recherche 21(219),344–351.
R. A. Tricker (1965) Early Electrodynamics: The First Law of Circulation Pergamon Press Oxford.
Whittaker, E.: 1951-1953, A History of Theories of Aether and Electricity, 2 vols, T. Nelson, London & New York, Vol. 1 was first published in 1910.
H.E. White (1969) Introduction to College Physics Van Nostrand-Reinhold New York.
L.P. Williams (1966) The Origins of the Field Theory Random House Clinton, MA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kipnis, N. Chance in Science: The Discovery of Electromagnetism by H.C. Oersted. Sci Educ 14, 1–28 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-3286-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-004-3286-0