Abstract
The growth in science understanding and reasoning of 12 children is being traced through their primary school years. The paper reports findings concerning children’s growing understandings of evaporation, and their changing responses to exploration activities, that show the complexity and coherence of learning pathways. Children’s responses to identical explorations of flight, separated by two years, are used to explore the interactions between conceptual knowledge and scientific reasoning, and the manner in which they change over this time. The paper discusses the particular insights afforded by a longitudinal study design, and some attendant methodological issues.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arzi, H. J. (1988). From short- to long-term: Studying science education longitudinally. Studies in Science Education, 15, 17–53.
Black, P., & Lucas, A. (Eds.). (1993). Children’s informal ideas in science. London: Routledge.
Carey, S. (1985a). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Carey, S. (1985b). Are children fundamentally different kinds of thinkers and learners than adults? In S. Chipman, J. Segal, & R. Glaser (Eds.), Thinking and learning skills (Vol. 2, pp. 485–514). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2000). Learning in science: A comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s understanding of science concepts: Implications of cross-age studies for curriculum planning. Studies in Science Education, 24, 75–100.
Duschl, R., & Gitomer, D. (1991). Epistemological perspectives on conceptual change: Implications for classroom practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9), 839–858.
Engel Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of consistency in the use of students’ conceptual frameworks across different task contexts. Science Education, 70(4), 473–496.
Engel Clough, E., Driver, R., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1987). How do children’s scientific ideas change over time? School Science Review, 69(247), 255–267.
Koslowski, B. (1996). Theory and evidence: The development of scientific reasoning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Pintrich, P., Marx, R., & Boyle, R. (1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: The role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167–199.
Solomon, J. (1994). The rise and fall of constructivism. Studies in Science Education, 23, 1–19.
Strike, K., & Posner, G. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. Duschl & R. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology, and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York.
Tytler, R. (1993). Developmental aspects of primary school children’s construction of explanations of air pressure: The nature of conceptual change. Research in Science Education, 23, 308–316.
Tytler, R. (1994). Children’s construction of explanations in science. In J. D. Novak (Ed.), Proceedings of the third international seminar on misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics (published electronically, disk 21). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
Tytler, R. (1998a). The nature of students’ informal science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 901–927.
Tytler, R. (1998b). Children’s conceptions of air pressure: Exploring the nature of conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 929–958.
Tytler, R. (2000). A comparison of year 1 and year 6 students’ conceptions of evaporation and condensation: Dimensions of conceptual progression. International Journal of Science Education, 22(5), 447–467.
Tytler, R., Duggan, S., & Gott, R. (2001). Dimensions of evidence, the public understanding of science and science education. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 815–832.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2000). Deconstructing learning in science: Young children’s responses to a classroom sequence on evaporation. Research in Science Education, 30(4), 339–355.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003a). Tracing young children’s scientific reasoning. Research in Science Education, 33(4), 433–465 (Theme Issue on Science in the Early Years).
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003b). The nature of growth in children’s science understandings: Insights from a longitudinal study. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tselfes, E. Hatzikraniotis, G. Fassoulopoulos, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Science education research in the knowledge based society (pp. 191–200). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2003c, July). Capturing the child: A longitudinal study of children’s science learning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne, Australia.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004a). From “try it and see” to strategic exploration: Characterizing young children’s scientific reasoning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(1), 94–118.
Tytler, R., & Peterson, S. (2004b). Young children learning about evaporation: Insights from a longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, 4(1), 111–126.
Tytler, R., & Swatton, P. (1992). A critique of Attainment Target 1 based on case studies of students’ investigations. School Science Review, 74(266), 21–35.
Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A., & Wood-Robinson, V. (1999). What is not fair with investigations? School Science Review, 80(292), 101–106.
White, R.T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
White, R.T. (2001). The revolution in research on science teaching. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 457–471). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tytler, R., Peterson, S. A Longitudinal Study of Children’s Developing Knowledge and Reasoning in Science. Res Sci Educ 35, 63–98 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3434-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-004-3434-1