Abstract
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) are a global problem for environmental and human health. They are defined as “an exogenous chemical, or mixture of chemicals, that can interfere with any aspect of hormone action”. It is estimated that there are about 1000 chemicals with endocrine-acting properties. EDCs comprise pesticides, fungicides, industrial chemicals, plasticizers, nonylphenols, metals, pharmaceutical agents and phytoestrogens. Human exposure to EDCs mainly occurs by ingestion and to some extent by inhalation and dermal uptake. Most EDCs are lipophilic and bioaccumulate in the adipose tissue, thus they have a very long half-life in the body. It is difficult to assess the full impact of human exposure to EDCs because adverse effects develop latently and manifest at later ages, and in some people do not present. Timing of exposure is of importance. Developing fetus and neonates are the most vulnerable to endocrine disruption. EDCs may interfere with synthesis, action and metabolism of sex steroid hormones that in turn cause developmental and fertility problems, infertility and hormone-sensitive cancers in women and men. Some EDCs exert obesogenic effects that result in disturbance in energy homeostasis. Interference with hypothalamo-pituitary-thyroid and adrenal axes has also been reported. In this review, potential EDCs, their effects and mechanisms of action, epidemiological studies to analyze their effects on human health, bio-detection and chemical identification methods, difficulties in extrapolating experimental findings and studying endocrine disruptors in humans and recommendations for endocrinologists, individuals and policy makers will be discussed in view of the relevant literature.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Endocrine disrupting chemicals: Definition, history and impact on environmental and human health
In early 1990s, a workshop was organized by Theo Colborn and colleagues that introduced the term “endocrine disruptor” and issued a consensus statement (known as Wingspread Statement) about the effects of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) on human and environmental health [1]. Endocrine disruptors were formally introduced by USA Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in 1996 as exogenous agents that interfere with the synthesis, secretion, transport, binding, action or elimination of natural hormones in the body that are responsible for the maintenance of homeostasis, reproduction, development and/or behavior. Later, the Endocrine Society statement re-defined endocrine disruptors as “an exogenous chemical, or mixture of chemicals, that can interfere with any aspect of hormone action” [2]. A wide range of substances, both natural and synthetic, are thought to cause endocrine disruption, including pharmaceuticals, dioxin and dioxin-like compounds, polychlorinated biphenyls, organochlorinated pesticides and plasticizers [3, 4]. Endocrine disruptors may be found in many everyday products– including plastic bottles, metal food cans, detergents, flame retardants, food, toys, cosmetics, and pesticides. Research shows that endocrine disruptors may pose the greatest risk during prenatal and early postnatal development when organ and neural systems are forming.
Endocrine disruption is a major public health and environmental health problem. Several environmental contaminants have been reported to have “endocrine disruptor” effects including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and organochlorinated pesticides (OCPs) [3, 5]. These persistent organic pollutants (POPs) cause environmental pollution worldwide and pose several problems for human health. POPs cause carcinogenic, neurotoxic, hepatotoxic, nephrotoxic and immunotoxic effects and birth defects [5,6,7,8,9,10,11]. However, in this text, only the endocrine disruptive actions of POPs and other chemicals will be reviewed.
When definition of endocrine disruption was introduced in 1991, researchers mainly focused on estrogenic effects of chemicals polluting the environment [1]. EDCs were therefore initially called xenoestrogens [12]. Several compounds were found to have estrogenic, anti-estrogenic, androgenic and anti-androgenic effects in various in vivo and in vitro studies [13,14,15,16]. Reproductive toxicity of EDCs included reduced fertility in both male and female, breast, endometrial and testicular cancer [17, 18], birth defects of reproductive organs [19], changes in the onset of puberty [20,21,22] and alteration of the ratio of male to female births [23, 24].
Effects of EDCs on the other endocrine systems have also been reported. Several industrial and environmental chemicals affect thyroid function causing disturbances in metabolism [25,26,27]. In the recent years, it has been hypothesized that some EDCs (termed obesogens) have adverse effects on insulin action, promote obesity and increase the risk of type II diabetes [11, 28, 29]. EDCs-related metabolic diseases appear to be major risk factors for cardiovascular disease and thus have an important impact on human health. Some POPs alter bone metabolism [8, 30]. Although the mechanisms have not been fully understood, it is likely to be through disrupted hormonal regulation, especially by exerting estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects on bone formation and turnover processes [8]. A variety of chemicals affect immune system function, hyper-immunity or immune suppression [11]. Thus, there will be an altered response to infection and increased risk of cancer [31]. Effects of EDCs on the immune system are still debated whether it is an “endocrine” effect, however, it is a very important hazardous effect on human health.
In this review, several groups of potential endocrine disrupting chemicals, their mechanism of action as endocrine disruptors, bio-detection and chemical identification methods, epidemiological studies to analyze their effects on human health, difficulties in extrapolating experimental findings and studying endocrine disruptors in humans will be discussed in view of the most recent and relevant literature.
2 Various types of chemicals as endocrine disruptors
There has been an enormous increase in the production of different types of chemicals during the last several decades throughout the World. Although these chemicals have proven to be useful for many aspects of modern life, it is increasingly recognized that they may pollute the environment and cause harm to human beings to varying extent. Of the thousands of manufactured chemicals, it is estimated that about 1000 may have endocrine-acting properties [32].
According to the Stockholm Convention in 2001, production and use of POPs was restricted [33]. Guideline for storage and elimination of a list of chemicals was developed that was appended in 2008 and 2014 [34]. Initially, 12 POPs were identified as “dirty dozen” causing severe adverse effects on humans and the ecosystem. Their production and use were banned. The dirty dozen included pesticides, industrial chemicals and by-products namely aldrin, chlordane, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT), dieldrin, endrin, heptachlor, hexachlorobenzene, mirex, toxaphene, PCBs, polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans.
EDCs comprise pesticides, fungicides, industrial chemicals, plasticizers, nonylphenols, metals, pharmaceutical agents and phytoestrogens. In the next few paragraphs, we will provide brief information about several groups of chemicals that are potential EDCs (Fig. 1). References about the properties, manufacturing and use of these chemicals will also be given for further reading.
2.1 Persistent Organochlorine pollutants (POPs)
POPs are chemical substances that may persist a long time in the environment and pose a high degree of toxicity for human health [35]. They are lipophilic substances that can bioaccumulate in the food change, particularly in fatty tissues. Thus, these chemicals may ultimately reach concentrations that have harmful effects on human health and the environment. In addition, POPs can potentially be transported over long distances and dispersed around the World by air and ocean currents and pose not just a local, but global toxic threat. Therefore, appropriate measures were recommended to be implemented by the Stockholm Convention to prevent the release of POPs into the environment or at least reduce such contamination as far as is technically feasible and economically acceptable [33, 34]. Despite the regulations and implementations, POPs are still routinely detected in environmental and human samples.
Polychlorinated biphenyls
PCBs are mixtures of different congeners having various numbers (1–10) and positions (ortho, meta, para) of chlorine atoms around biphenyl rings [7, 36, 37]. They were widely used as insulators in capacitors and transformers because of their inflammability and insulating properties, as hydraulic fluids, and in paints and related products. Because of their lipophilic nature and persistent properties, they remain global contaminants in both the environment and the human body [37] in spite of the fact that their production was banned in most countries in the late 1970s [7]. PCBs with biphenyl rings substituted with zero chlorines in the ortho position that assume a coplanar biphenyl orientation in solution, and PCBs with one to four chlorines in the ortho position that assume noncoplanar biphenyl orientation [7]. Several PCB congeners and mixtures have been reported to have neurotoxic, carcinogenic, immunotoxic, hepatatoxic, nephrotoxic and cytotoxic effects in various experimental models and also in human studies [8, 9, 36,37,38,39,40,41]. With regard to endocrine disruptive effects, noncoplanar PCBs structurally resemble to estradiol 17-β (E2) and hence can mimic estrogenic effects in the cell [31]. In contrast, coplanar PCBs mimic dioxin in that they bind with relatively high affinity to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AHR) [42, 43]. It regulates the transcription of a large group of dioxin-responsive genes and results in a reduction in cytosolic estrogen level (i.e. anti-estrogenic effect).
Organochlorine pesticides (OCPs)
Pesticides are used as insecticides, herbicides, fungicides and rodenticides. Based on their chemical structure, there five major classes of pesticides; organochlorines (such as DDT, endosulfan, lindane, mirex, dieldrin, chlordane), organophosphates (such as malathion, parathion), carbamates (such as carbaryl, carbofuran, aminocarb), phyrethroids (such as cypermethrin, permethrin) and triazines (atrazine is the most studied triazine herbicide). Although all classes of pesticides may produce adverse effects on human health [44,45,46,47], OCPs pose the greatest risk as EDCs because of their lipophilic feature and thus bioaccumulation potential [4]. OCPs are among the persistent organic and environmental pollutants. Occupational and residential exposure to pesticides is a significant problem and subject of several epidemiological studies. Primary exposure of populations to pesticides occurs through food intake and ingestion of these chemicals. However, inhalation and dermal absorption of OCPs (such as DDT) may be important routes of exposure [48].
Endocrine disruptive effects of OCPs have been extensively studied. Their effects on male and female fertility as a consequence of estrogenic, anti-estrogenic, androgenic and anti-androgenic actions, obesity and metabolic disorders, thyroid homeostasis, hormone-sensitive cancers and hypothalamo-pituitary axis have been reported [4, 43, 49, 50]. Some OCPs structurally resemble to E2 and thus can bind to estrogen receptor (ER) and mimic the effects of the endogenous ligand. Some xenohormones may display anti-estrogenic actions by binding to AHR and initiating transcription of cytochrome p450 enzymes that metabolize E2. Residues of OCPs have been found in human tissues all over the World. There are numerous epidemiological studies reporting OCP levels in biological samples (such as serum, fat tissue, breast milk) and investigating relationships to various diseases and disorders in humans [49, 51,52,53,54]. Their residues have also been detected in cord blood [50].
Plasticizers & nonyphenols
Bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates are plasticizers that provide shape and flexibility to plastic products. These chemicals may leach out of the plastic material (especially when containing warm food & drinks) into food chain and cause toxic effects, especially in children and pregnant women. Unlike POPs, plasticizers are not lipophilic and do not bioaccumulate in the body. More than 90% of BPA is eliminated in urine as metabolites usually in less than 24 h [55, 56]. However, these chemicals are widely used and there is extensive exposure to them on a daily basis. Over the last decade, some limitations have been implemented about the use of BPA in children’s products and thermal paper receipts [57]. Alternative plasticizers have been developed such as Bisphenol S, Bisphenol B and Bisphenol AF [58]. Since these alternative bisphenols are structurally similar to BPA, they are suspected to have equivalent toxicological effects. Various endocrine disruptive effects of plasticizers are reviewed later in the text.
Nonylphenols are organic chemicals with nine carbons bound to a phenol ring. They are commonly used in pesticides, industrial oils and detergents, and thus cause widespread contamination in soil, sediments, water and food [59]. Although information on the effects of nonylphenols on reproductive functions is limited, a review of the recent literature is reported [46].
Heavy metals
Populations are exposed to various heavy metals through different routes such as dietary supplements, cigarettes, alcoholic drinks and contaminated air, water and food [46, 60]. Humans are generally exposed to arsenic via ingestion of contaminated food and water. Lead exposure occurs through inhalation of combusted petroleum products, ingestion of drinking water contaminated by lead used in pipes and inhalation/ingestion of particles of lead -based paints. Mercury is another heavy metal that can contaminate water, soil and air. The most common way of exposure to mercury occurs through ingestion of contaminated fish. In a study conducted in Alaska, mercury and arsenic were found in lipid-rich food samples [61]. These findings were taken to suggest that organometals may exert endocrine disruptive effects, especially on reproductive functions. Heavy metals have reported to induce testicular damage. In this regard, cadmium toxicity as environmental contaminant has long been known [62]. Presence of heavy metals as EDCs in human biological samples has recently been reported in a Belgian population [63]. Although there are several reports in the literature [46, 60, 62, 63], the effects of heavy metals on endocrine functions need to be further elucidated.
3 Human exposure to EDCs
Humans are exposed to a broad range of chemicals through different routes. Transmission of environmental pollutants to the human organism occurs usually in an unconscious manner during the daily course of life [35]. Human exposure to EDCs mainly occurs by ingestion and to some extent by inhalation and dermal uptake [43].
Dietary intake is the main entering route of POPs and other EDCs to the human body and accounts for more than 90% of the total chemical exposure [35, 64, 65]. It is well known that organic chemicals, particularly POPs are lipophilic substances and therefore can bioaccumulate in the fatty tissue in the organism. Once these chemicals are spread in the environment, they easily contaminate fish, meat, dairy and poultry products and finally transported to human organism by ingestion. POPs can be stored in the adipose tissue of the body for a long time and thus cause a prolonged exposure to these pollutants. Plasticizers such as bisphenol A do not bioaccumulate in the body with an estimated half-life of about 6 h [66, 67]. They are then excreted into urine. Plasticizers are very often detected in populations, for instance bisphenol A was detected in 92.6% of persons ≥6 years of age in the US [68]. Although plasticizers are not stored in the adipose tissue, there is continuous exposure to these chemicals on a daily basis that raises concern about their endocrine disruptive effects [67].
Some environmental chemicals may be volatilized and transferred to humans through inhalation route [7, 69]. Inhalation may be a very important route of exposure, especially for some volatile chemicals and semi-volatile compounds [35]. Environmental pollutants are often detected in animals such as polar bears living in Arctic areas [70]. Presence of EDCs in the tissues of mammals in remote areas is taken to implicate that these chemicals are long-range dispersed through air as well as ocean currents [7, 71].
Indoor area is an important environment for potential exposure to air-borne chemicals and particles. Occupational exposure to EDCs is also a significant route of contamination for people working at risky environment [35].
As mentioned earlier, POPs are fat-soluble substances, therefore they can be transferred to human body through dermal absorption [7]. Exposure to indoor organic chemicals through the dermal route accounts for only a small percentage of the total exposure, but can be significant [35]. The risk of transdermal exposure to POPs may be substantially greater at instances like handling contaminated materials or swimming in polluted waters [72, 73].
4 EDCs and female reproductive functions (estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects)
The female reproductive functions are regulated by the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland by secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle stimulating hormone. These gonadotropic hormones in turn regulate ovarian and uterine functions including synthesis and secretion of gonadal hormones [74, 75]. Since the definition and introduction of xenoestrogens in early 1990s, particular focus has been given to the adverse effects of EDCs to the female and male reproductive systems. EDCs appear to have the potential to interfere with reproductive system by adversely affecting the structure and/or function of female reproductive organs [43]. Disrupted hormone action, irregular cyclicity, decreased fertility, infertility, polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, hormone sensitive cancer, precocious or delayed puberty and adverse birth outcomes have been associated with some EDCs [46, 76, 77].
EDCs exhibit their toxic effects by interfering with physiology of hormones that promote growth and development of reproductive tissues. These exogenous chemicals interfere with binding of hormones to their corresponding receptors such as ER (Fig. 2) and androgen receptor (AR) that can result in an agonistic or antagonistic effect [78]. An organochlorine pesticide (methoxychlor) has been reported to cause estrogenic action by binding to ERα and ERβ subtypes [79]. Methoxychlor was also shown to bind to AR and cause an opposite effect [80]. A very toxic environmental polluting dioxin, tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is known to cause antiandrogenic effect [43]. An insecticide, endosulfan also demonstrated estrogenic action in vitro and caused ovarian regression by interfering with the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis [81]. BPA has been reported to bind ERα and ERβ receptors and exhibit estrogenic activity [82, 83]. Breast, ovarian and endometrial cancer incidences are reportedly increasing, and it is suggested that EDCs and other environmental factors contribute to these hormone-sensitive malignancies in women.
In addition to hormone receptor interference, EDCs can also act on enzymes involved in steroidogenesis and metabolism. Phthalates exert anti-androgenic activity by inhibiting testosterone synthesis in Leydig cells [84]. It has also been reported that some EDCs inhibit 5-α reductase, an enzyme that converts testosterone to a very potent androgen, dihydrotestosterone [85]. It should also be noted that EDCs may affect hormone receptor expression. It has been reported that BPA may alter the epigenome and cause dysregulation of steroid receptors [86].
Dioxins and several OCPs can bind to AHR that promotes induction of CYP1 genes expression. They in turn metabolize intracellular E2 and thus cause anti-estrogenic action [43]. TCDD has been shown to interfere with steroidogenesis in the ovaries and decrease steroid levels [87]. A similar anti-estrogenic effect has been reported for metabolite of methoxychlor [88]. Phthalates have also been shown to stimulate AHR and induce expression of CYP1B1 [89].
Adverse effects of EDCs on female reproductive system involves interruption of folliculogenesis [78]. BPA has been suggested to decrease fertility. It triggers apoptosis through a caspase 3-mediated mechanism in the rat follicles and regress luteal development [90]. BPA levels have been associated with decreased number of antral follicles and oocytes in women receiving fertility treatment [91]. This plasticizer has also been associated with polycystic ovarian syndrome, endometriosis, decreased fertilization and risk of implantation failure [92, 93]. Premature births, miscarriages, developmental abnormalities and behavioral deficits have been linked with BPA, phthalates and phenols in human [94,95,96].
There is strong epidemiological evidence to suggest a relationship between developmental exposure to OCPs and subsequent fertility problems in women [78]. Exposure to EDCs during critical phase of development (pre- and peri-natal period of life) is considered to affect the reproductive system greater than in the adult life. Thus, timing of exposure to EDCs is of great importance in terms of type and severity of adverse effects on the reproductive functions.
5 EDCs and male reproductive functions (androgenic and anti-androgenic effects)
Male reproductive system is also hormonally regulated by the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary hormones, and androgens provide the driving force development of the genitalia [43, 97, 98]. EDCs can seriously affect male reproduction and several studies have reported a decrease in sperm count, reduced motility and abnormal sperm morphology [76, 99]. Birth defects such as cryptorchidism and hypospadias, prostate and testicular cancer have been linked with environmental pollutants. These adverse effects of EDCs on the male reproductive functions have been increasing significantly over the last decades [78, 100].
Sperm count and semen quality have been reported to be low in the male population in the North Europe, particularly in Danish men [101, 102]. In various occupational exposure and environmental contamination studies, reduced male fertility has been attributed to EDCs. For instance, occupational exposure to pesticides brought about abnormal sperm morphology, decreased sperm count and motility [51]. Adverse effects of OCPs such as DDT and endosulfan have been reported to disrupt hypothalamo-pituitary-testicular axis and interfere with steroidogenesis in the gonadal tissue [52]. Disruption of testosterone by Leydig cells in young Faroese men have been associated with elevated serum PCB levels [103]. Phthalates and BPA exposures have also been reported to have adverse effects sperm count and motility, DNA damage in spermatozoa and testosterone levels in human populations [104, 105]. Exposure to heavy metals such as lead and cadmium were also shown to affect male reproductive parameters [106]. It has been suggested that exposure to EDCs may result in reduced semen quality, testicular cancer, cryptorchidism and hypospadias [107]. It has been shown that neonatal rats exposed to BPA had increased risk of prostate hyperplasia later in life [108].
There is increasing mechanistic evidence that androgenic and anti-androgenic chemicals play important role in impairment in development and maintenance of male reproductive health [43]. Mechanisms that are responsible for the adverse effects of EDCs on male genital development and reproductive functions involve inhibition of 5α-reductase and aromatase [78]. It has been suggested that the sex ratio at birth can be modified by environmental pollutants [109]. Indeed, recent evidence has shown that the Y/X ratio of live spermatozoa was significantly lower in sperm treated with EDCs such as TCDD than control spermatozoa [24]. These findings implicate that a reduction in Y sperm viability may result in a female-biased sex ratio of offspring at birth.
6 EDCs and obesity
Prevalence of obesity and obesity-related diseases are progressively increasing and now at an epidemic level [110]. The endocrine system plays a fundamental role in regulation of energy metabolism. The main cause of metabolic diseases is generally believed to be genetic along with environmental factors such as excessive food intake and lack of physical activity [111]. In addition to these classical factors, it has been suggested that there may be other players in the pathogenesis of obesity to account for the current trend [112]. In the recent years, it has been hypothesized that EDCs stimulate adipogenesis and cause obesity. These EDCs were hence termed “obesogens” [29, 113].
Obesogens may promote adipogenesis and lipid accumulation (Fig. 3). Disruption of lipid homeostasis may involve multiple mechanisms [29]: 1) increasing the number of adipocytes, 2) increasing the size of adipocytes, 3) altering endocrine regulation of adipose tissue development, 4) changing hypothalamic regulation of appetite, satiety and food preference, 5) affecting basal metabolic rate and 6) energy balance in favor of calorie storage and 7) altering insulin sensitivity in the liver, skeletal muscle, pancreas, gastrointestinal system and the brain. At cellular level, obesogens can exert their endocrine disruptive effects by interfering with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) and steroid receptors [29, 114, 115]. These nuclear transcriptional regulators can bind their response elements in the DNA and control gene expression. PPARs can bind to unsaturated fatty acids and thus act as lipid sensors [116]. They regulate lipid influx, adipocyte proliferation and/or differentiation. Some EDCs can bind to these nuclear receptors, alter gene expression that results in obesity.
It has been shown that various EDCs alter adipogenesis through interfering with PPAR-γ function [114]. Tributyltin stimulates preadipocytes to differentiate into adipocytes in 3 T3-L1 cell line, promotes adiposity and impairs metabolic functions in rat by increasing PPAR-γ [117]. BPA, nonyphenol and triflumizole have also been reported to increase adipogenesis [118, 119]. Another plasticizer phthalate also activates PPAR-γ and promotes differentiation of 3 T3-L1 cells into adipocytes [120]. In human studies, detection of phthalate metabolites has been associated with increased Body Mass Index (BMI) and waist circumference [121, 122]. Exposure to POPs is correlated with obesity and disturbance in metabolism [123]. Biologically significant level of exposure to PCBs can promote obesity [4]. In NHANES survey between 1999 and 2002, a significant relationship was found between serum levels of PCB congeners and OCPs with increased waist circumference [124]. In two recent studies conducted in Swedish cohorts, serum levels of OCPs have been associated with altered lipid metabolism and development of obesity [54, 125].
Steroid hormones can also affect lipid homeostasis and hence fat deposition [126]. Adipocytes are known to contain the cytochrome P450 enzyme aromatase (encoded by CYP19A1 gene) which converts androgens to estrogen. Several EDCs have been reported to alter intracellular aromatase activity [127] that result in increased levels of estrogen and corresponding obesity in men [128]. AHR is a ligand-activated transcription factor, usually activated by presence of environmental toxicants such as POPs. Activation of AHR leads to increased expression of xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes, cytochrome P450s [129]. AHR pathway may also indirectly affect adipogenesis by changing PPAR-γ expression. Some POPs have been suggested to exert their obesogenic activity thorough this mechanism [130, 131].
Obesogens may also affect the hypothalamic control of food intake and energy balance [132]. There are relatively very few studies directly examining the effects of EDCs on hypothalamic circuits that regulate feeding and satiety. A very recent experimental study has reported that chronic treatment with tributyltin causes changes in orexigenic and anorexigenic hypothalamic systems in a gender dependent manner [133]. Serum BPA levels have been correlated positively with leptin and adiponectin, but negatively with ghrelin hormones in humans [134]. Leptin is secreted by the adipose tissue and inhibits appetite, while ghrelin is produced by the stomach and being stimulatory. Although evidence is limited, it is thought that some EDCs may interfere with the hormonal regulation of hunger and satiety.
Many EDCs (especially POPs) are lipophilic and known to bioaccumulate in body fat over the years. As our recent unpublished data have indicated, the higher is the BMI, the greater will be the retention of EDCs in the fat. Therefore, the relationship of obesity to diseases is not just to the deposition of fat, but to prolonged exposure to POPs. Since several compounds are present in adipose tissue, the body is exposed to a mixture of obesogenic chemicals, rather than being exposed to a single molecule. Therefore, it is likely that they may exert a combination of effects as detailed above. The mixture of chemicals may stimulate adipogenesis at lower concentrations than needed for each compound alone. Timing of exposure to the obesogenic EDCs is another critical issue. Obesogen exposure during pre- and early post-natal life can increase number of adipocytes permanently into adult life [135, 136]. Therefore, early-life exposure to obesogens may cause a prolonged burden of pollutants, especially POPs.
Although over consumption of food coupled with lack of exercise is the major contributor to the increased incidences of obesity, exposure to obesogens may also promote adipogenesis and lipid accumulation. Preventive measures to avoid and/or reduce exposure to EDCs will be discussed later in the text.
7 EDCs and risk for type 2 diabetes
Diabetes is a chronic and complex metabolic disease that arises from persistent insulin resistance and/or insufficient insulin secretion due to β-cell dysfunction or death [137, 138]. Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a multifactorial syndrome in which genetic predisposition and environmental factors play important roles in its physiopathology [139]. There is growing evidence for a link between EDCs and development of diabetes and related metabolic disorders. Exposure to several environmental pollutants have been correlated with risk of diabetes. These toxicants include PCBs, OCPs, dioxins, bisphenol A and phthalates [140]. Serum PCB levels were significantly associated with diabetes in women included in the Anniston Community Health Survey [141]. In 1979, about 2000 people were accidentally exposed to PCBs and dibenzofurans due to ingestion of contaminated cooking oil in Taiwan [142]. This poisoning event is called Yucheng, “oil-syndrome” in Chinese. It has been reported that women affected during the Yucheng toxic exposure had an increased risk of developing diabetes [142]. This risk was markedly higher in individuals having chloracne, a cutaneous manifestation of dioxin-like PCB exposure, in the same study. In a meta-analysis that included data from six prospective studies showed that POPs are associated with increasing incidence of diabetes [143]. Eleven years after this study, a second meta-analysis was conducted under the name of Nurses’ Health Study II and suggest that prolonged exposure to POPs have diabetogenic potential [144]. Similarly, significant relationship has been reported between serum levels of dioxins, PCBs, pesticides and bisphenol A and prevalent diabetes in a systematic review and meta-analysis [145]. Phthalates levels showed a borderline significance with T2D in the same study. Vietnam veterans exposed to dioxins had an increased risk of developing diabetes [146, 147]. Evidence for diabetogenic role for plasticizers bisphenol A and phthalates and POPs such as PCBs, perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluoro octane sulfonate and DDT as well as some heavy metals including cadmium and arsenic has been reported [43, 139, 148].
There are also experimental studies about a possible link between EDCs and diabetes and related metabolic syndrome. Perinatal exposure to an organochlorine pesticide, DDT caused impairment in glucose tolerance (12) and reduced insulin secretion (13) later in adult mice. Similarly, administration of bisphenol A to mice in utero resulted in disruption in glucose tolerance and insulin secretion [149]. Chronic exposure to bisphenol A also impaired glucose metabolism in mice [150].
Metabolic disturbance related to environmental pollutants has usually been attributed to obesogenic effects of EDCs. However, there may be direct effects of these chemicals leading to interference with glucose metabolism and finally T2D as discussed in several epidemiological and experimental studies, above. However, mechanism(s) of EDCs leading to T2D are currently not well documented. It is conceivable that these chemicals (at least some of them) may cause toxicity to pancreatic β-cells [148, 151]. This toxicity may be direct or by induction of reactive oxygen species that increases rate of β-cell death [152]. Recent evidence has suggested another mechanism in which impairment of mitochondrial dynamics has been related to insulin resistance and T2D [153]. Changes in mitochondrial fission and fusion contribute to mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress and β-cell apoptosis that may cause disrupted glucose homeostasis [139, 154]. Administration of tributyltin and chlorpyrifos in vitro on human induced pluripotent stem cells has resulted in decreased expression of mitochondrial fusion protein mitofusin 1 and mitochondrial fragmentation [155]. In summary, EDCs may impair glucose metabolism, insulin secretion and sensitivity either directly or indirectly by acting as obesogens. It should also be noted that genetic predisposition, lifestyle factors such as lack of exercise and weight gain and bioaccumulation of POPS in human body may all contribute to increased risk of developing T2D.
8 EDCs and adrenal hormones
The hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is essential for proper functionality of human body and is a common target for many drugs and environmental chemicals [156]. There are relatively few studies examining cellular mechanisms underlying the effects of EDCs on the adrenal gland and hormones [157, 158]. Most of the reports available have focused on interference with biosynthesis and metabolism of steroid hormones [159]. Various steps in the adrenocortical steroidogenic pathway (hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases, 5-α reductase, steroidogenic acute regulatory and several Cytochromes P450 such as aromatase) may be disrupted by exogenous chemicals [156]. Zone-specific expression of steroidogenic enzymes promote biosynthesis of aldosterone in the Zona Glomerulosa, cortisol in the Zona Fasciculata and adrenal androgens in the Zona Reticulata [157]. It has previously been shown that hexachlorobenzene impairs adrenal steroidogenesis and decreases corticosterone levels in ovariectomized rats [160]. A recent study has investigated prenatal exposure to organochlorinated chemicals on steroid hormones in a Japanese cohort [161]. A total of 29 OCPs were detected in maternal and cord blood that were inversely correlated with cortisol and adrenal androgen levels.
When evaluating adverse effects of ECDs on HPA axis, it should be considered that even a partial interference with adrenal endocrine function may result in severe disturbance in physiological parameters in human. As most of the EDCs bioaccumulate in adipose tissue, usually an exposure model to mixtures of chemicals develops [162]. Therefore, clinical manifestations may appear only after several years of low dose, but constant, exposure to EDCs. As mentioned above, there is limited number of studies examining the effects of EDCs on the HPA axis and adrenal function. More attention has been given to the analysis of obesogens and their effects on the metabolism. Today, comprehensive epidemiological studies are needed to elucidate any relationship between concentrations of various EDCs in human samples and adrenocortical functions / disorders, in addition to mechanistic experiments using in vivo and in vitro models.
9 EDCs and thyroid hormones
Thyroid hormones are essential for normal brain development and regulation of metabolism, and interference with thyroid function has several consequences at all age levels, particularly during development [163]. Several weeks supply of triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) hormones are stored in the thyroid gland. These hormones are transported to target tissues usually in combination with thyroid hormone-binding globulin, transthyretin or albumin. T4 is converted to T3 primarily in the liver and kidney, and T3 is the active form of thyroid hormones in the target tissues [164].
EDCs may interfere with the thyroid function at different levels [165, 166]. Disruption of thyroid function may involve central regulatory mechanisms at the hypothalamic and/or anterior pituitary level and synthesis, transportation, bioavailability or metabolism of T3 and T4 hormones [167]. Some POPs may inhibit thyroxine 5-deiodinase activity that is responsible for conversion of T4 to T3 [168]. Some environmental chemicals may interfere with thyroid hormone binding to its receptors and hence disrupt signaling directly. Several EDCs have been reported to alter iodine absorption by inhibiting the sodium-iodide symporter channel (NIS), a transmembrane protein responsible for iodide uptake into the thyroid gland [158, 165]. Perchlorate, thiocyanate and nitrate competitively inhibit the NIS and affect thyroid hormone production and bioavailability [169]. Hence, a lower iodine bioavailability may result in hypothyroidism. Perchlorate, thiocyanate and nitrate are widely used in industrial products, but many food and water samples are also contaminated with these EDCs [43]. Several studies by Braverman and colleagues have shown that subjects exposed to perchlorate, thiocyanate and nitrates had low levels of free thyroxine levels [170,171,172]. This observation was more dramatic in the pubertal subjects.
It is generally believed that PCB exposure decreases serum T4 concentrations in both adult and neonate rodents [173, 174]. One of the mechanisms for this decrease may be the ability of PCBs to induce hepatic microsomal enzymes leading to biliary excretion and elimination of the thyroid hormones [174, 175]. In an early study, Collins and Capen (1980) reported that perinatal rats exposed in utero and by the milk to PCBs showed structural changes in the thyroid gland and reduced serum thyroid hormone levels [176]. Similar observations have been reported by a number of other researchers [177]. However, increased levels of thyroid hormones as an immediate response to PCB administration have also been documented. Six weeks administration with commercial mixtures of PCBs caused an increase in serum thyroid hormone levels in female rats [25]. It has been suggested that structural similarity between thyroid hormones (particularly T4) and some PCB congeners [178]. As a consequence, these contaminants may interfere with thyroid function by binding to the thyroid transporting proteins, reducing production or increasing metabolism of T4 or reducing conversion of T4 to T3 [173]. It may cause a functional hypothyroidism, most likely due to displacement of the endogenous hormone from the transporting proteins which promote excretion of the thyroid hormone.
EDCs may also cause thyroid cancer [179]. A recent study has provided evidence for linking occupational exposure to biocides and risk of developing thyroid cancer [53]. This population-based case-control study was conducted in Connecticut and involved 462 incident thyroid cancer cases who were occupationally exposed to biocides and pesticides through a job-exposure matrix.
Since thyroid hormones are essential for growth and development, exposure to EDCs during fetal and neonatal life could cause potential adverse effects both on the thyroid function and also on the nervous system. Developmental exposure is critical since thyroid dysfunction is known to cause severe impairment in neurogenesis [43]. Experimental studies have shown that prenatal EDC exposure interferes with thyroid function that in turn causes cognitive and behavioral impairments [180]. Epidemiological studies have also shown that perinatal exposure to thyroid disrupting chemicals cause cognitive deficit and a decline in IQ score in the affected children [165, 181]. A recent study on Danish women revealed that POPs were present in placental samples [27]. Concentrations of these chemicals were inversely associated with thyroid hormones. These findings are taken to implicate that disruption of thyroid hormones may have significant developmental effects on the new born.
10 Environmental Pollution & Growth Hormone Disruption
Acromegaly is a rare endocrine disease that occurs in less than 125 persons in about one million population [182]. It is caused by growth hormone (GH) secreting anterior pituitary tumors. There are relatively very few reports about a possible connection between acromegaly and environmental pollution. The first clinical study was reported by Cannavo and colleagues in 2010 [183]. They evaluated acromegaly patients in about 600.000 population living in four low to high industrially dense areas in the province of Messina, Italy. An increased prevalence of the disease was found in the highly polluted area. This effect could not be explained on the basis of a familial susceptibility or a known genetic predisposition, rather, environmental factors were attributed in the pathogenesis of GH-secreting pituitary adenomas. It has recently been reported that long-term exposure to some POPs increased GH synthesis in an in vitro model of GH3 cells, and this finding was associated with increased expression of AHR [184]. AHR pathway has an important role in cellular detoxification mechanisms and tumorigenesis [185]. In a recent study from the Cannavo and colleagues [186], AHR mutation was shown in 9 of 23 acromegaly patients living in highly polluted area in Italy. The functional abnormality of the AHR gene was associated with more severe acromegaly, increased pituitary tumor size and resistance to somatostatin analog treatment [187]. These studies suggest that EDCs may indeed cause alterations in GH secretion, however, understanding of the mechanism(s) requires further experimental and clinical investigation.
11 Testing EDCs, in vivo and in vitro models
In this section, in vivo and in vitro test models for analysis of effects of EDCs on various endocrine axis and organs/tissues will be briefly reviewed. Test protocols, their use and sensitivity will be referred. In addition, technology for cell-based systems and genetic models for screening of EDCs in biological, dietary and environmental samples will be discussed.
In vivo estrogenicity assay
Uterotrophic assay is an internationally recognized short-term screening method to determine estrogenic and anti-estrogenic properties of chemicals in vivo [188, 189]. It is based on the development of uterine tissue under the influence of estrogen. There are two models of uterotrophic assay in which immature and ovariectomized (OVX) young adult rodents are used. In both models, the hypothalamo-pituitary-ovarian axis is not functional so that sensitivity and response of the uterine tissue to exogenous substances can be evaluated. In the immature uterotrophic assay, pre-pubertal (22 day old) female mice or rats are used. In the adult model, young mature rodents are OVX, and adequate time is allowed for uterine tissue to regress. The test substance is administered daily by oral gavage or subcutaneous injection for three days, and then weight of uterine tissue is determined and histomorphometric analysis is performed [13].
12 Vitellogenin assay for xenoestrogens
Expression of vitellogenin in male fish is widely used as a biomarker of exposure to environmental estrogens due to its specificity and sensitivity [190]. Vitellogenin in fish is an estrogen-induced yolk precursor protein. Vitellogenin is considered to be a hallmark of female protein due to its estrogen-dependent synthesis [191]. Its levels in male fish are quite low, and non-physiological induction of vitellogenin in the male is taken to indicate estrogen mediated endocrine disruption. Vitellogenin assay is a well standardized and sensitive endocrine disruptor assay, and there are universal guidelines for this test [190, 192].
In vitro estrogenicity & anti-estrogenicity assays: There are several in vitro models to test estrogenic and anti-estrogenic actions of EDCs.
MCF-7 Focus Assay is a human breast-cancer cell assay [193, 194]. In this test, MCF-7 cells proliferate in response to oestrogen and chemicals with estrogenic action. Confluent cells are stained with a fluorescence dye and then staining density is analysed.
Yeast Estrogen Screen Assay utilizes a recombinant yeast strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae BJ1991 [195]. Yeast hosts an integrated gene coding for human ER in its genome and expression plasmids carrying the reporter gene lac-Z. When lac-Z gene is activated by presence of estrogenic compounds, β-galactosidase degrades chlorophenol red β-D-galactopyranoside substrate [196].
Luciferase Reporter Gene Assay is an advanced molecular biology method that can be used as a screening test for estrogenic and anti-estrogenic compounds. Luciferase reporter gene assays monitor the transcription of specific genes in cells through detection of light generated by the enzyme luciferase [197]. For estrogenic reporter gene assay, MCF-7 cells are stably transfected and used [198]. For anti-estrogenicity assay, mouse hepatoma cells were stably transfected and used [199]. Dioxin like substances bind to AHR and activate cytochrome enzymes that in turn decreases intracellular concentrations of estrogen. This method is recognized by the European Union as a screening test for analysis of EDCs for dioxin-like activity in biological samples as well as food and environmental samples [200].
13 In vivo androgenic assay: Hershberger assay
The Hershberger Assay is a short-term in vivo screening assay intended to identify substances with androgenic and antiandrogenic activity [201]. Accessory tissues of the male reproductive tract, in castrated rats, sensitively respond to chemicals with androgenic or antiandrogenic activities as an increase or decrease in absolute weights [14]. Pre-pubertal male rats are castrated before puberty and then allowed to recover for a period of 10 days. Animals are given the test compounds under evaluation as well as a known androgen (usually testosterone) as positive control for a period of 10 days. At the end, post-mortem androgen-sensitive tissues (ventral prostate, seminal vesicles, paired Cowper’s glands, levator ani bulbocavernosus muscle and the glans penis) are obtained, weighed out and processed for histomorphometry if further analysis is needed. Details of the method can be found at an EPA guideline [201].
14 Test models for thyroid disrupting chemicals
It has been reported that Xenopus laevis serves as an ideal model organism to test thyroid axis disruption as thyroid hormones are highly conserved across vertebrates [202]. This is a 3-day exposure protocol in which evaluation of endocrine disruption of thyroid axis by the analysis of gene expression using wild-type X. laevis is described [202, 203].
There is also a cellular and molecular model to test thyroid disrupting chemicals in vitro. Thyroid signaling thorough Phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) has been reconstituted with recombinant receptors in mammalian cell lines [204]. Fluorescent reporters for PI3K activity can be used to qualitatively test large number of chemicals for disruption of PI3K stimulation by thyroid hormones [168].
15 Test models for Obesogens
A screening system for obesogenic compounds has been recently developed. This well-standardized adipogenesis model is based on 3 T3-L1 cell line [205]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ) is a nuclear receptor, acting as regulator for adipocyte differentiation and lipid metabolism [206]. PPARs can bind to unsaturated fatty acids and thus act as lipid sensors [116]. PPARγ agonists frequently induce adipogenesis. These nuclear transcriptional regulators can bind their response elements in the DNA and control gene expression. Details of the method has previously been described [205, 207].
16 Test models for adrenocortical disrupting chemicals
Cell lines have a prominent role in toxicity assessment, mechanistic investigations and high throughput analysis of chemicals for potential steroidogenesis disrupting activities. A comprehensive overview of cell lines available for studying effects of chemicals on adrenal and gonadal steroidogenesis and their use and limitations as test models has been reported [208].
H295R cell line derived from a human adenocarcinoma has been developed as an in vitro test model for evaluation of EDCs on adrenocortical function [156]. Protocols using H295R cell line to examine molecular mechanisms of steroidogenic pathway toxicity have been described [156, 209]. In vivo protocols using Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have recently been reported to test modifiers of adrenocortical function and examine effects of EDCs [210, 211].
Genotoxic and epigenetic analysis: Advanced molecular biology techniques such as single cell gel electrophoresis assay (COMET), terminal transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling (TUNEL), sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA) and in situ nick translation (ISNT) are employed to evaluate and monitor DNA damage in endocrine and gonadal cells [78]. COMET assay is a sensitive and practical tool to analyze DNA damage in various types of cells [36, 212, 213]. Methylation analysis by pyrosequencing is also employed to evaluate effects of EDCs on epigenetic changes in hormone sensitive and tumor related genes [214].
Today, sensitive, practical and cost-effective methods are needed to monitor and detect EDCs in human samples as well as in food and environmental samples. Detection of hundreds and thousands of chemicals in biological samples is time consuming, labor intensive and expensive. Therefore, we recommend use of screening methods (such as luciferase reporter gene assay) to determine biological actions (e.g. estrogenic or anti-estrogenic) of EDCs, and then, individual chemicals can be identified by chromatography and mass spectrometry in biological, food and environmental samples.
17 Human exposure to EDCs, risk assessment and strategy for prevention
EDCs are a global and ubiquitous problem [43]. It is difficult to assess the full impact of human exposure to EDCs because adverse effects develop latently and manifest at later ages, and in some people do not present. Most of the EDCs are lipophilic and accumulate in the adipose tissue, thus they have a very long half-life in the body. Latency between early exposures to EDCs and adult dysfunction/disease may be more than 50 years.
Main transmission route of EDCs occurs through ingestion of contaminated food. However, dermal contact with these environmental pollutants and inhalation of air-borne chemicals are two alternative ways of contamination to the human body. Therefore, exposure to EDCs occurs at home, in the office, on the farm, in the air we breathe, the food we ingest, and the water we consume. Biomonitoring studies show that almost all humans have a chemical body burden of these chemicals in their biological samples (adipose tissue, blood, urine, placenta and fetal blood). Response of individuals to chemical insult may be different. Some may experience overt toxicity, others may exhibit more subtle dysfunctions, and still others will not be affected at all [43]. These differences in responsiveness are due to the genetic background, environmental, occupational and life style factors, diseases, other stressors, eating habits and source of food consumed.
Identifying the risk associated with a single EDC is complex because humans are exposed to low doses of hundreds of chemicals starting at fetal life. These lifelong environmental exposures (known as the exposome) will need to be taken into consideration for comprehensive risk assessment studies. To investigate these complex interactions, methods based on omics technologies are being utilized [215].
For most EDCs, high doses are required for presentation of clear adverse effects. This causes controversy about the risks of life-long exposure to low doses of these pollutants. Sometimes very low doses of EDCs can exert potent effects on the endocrine and homeostatic systems. Why some EDCs produce non-traditional dose-response curves is not understood [216]. Human organisms are usually exposed to a mixture of chemicals, rather than a single contaminant. These features of exposure may generate a cocktail of endocrine disruptor effects with unknown consequences [158]. A recent experimental study showed that there was a different response in steroidogenesis and gene expression between the exposure to a mixture compared to the exposure to a single compound [217]. It is difficult to evaluate endocrine disruptor actions of a broad spectrum of chemicals in mixture exposures. Some EDCs have diverse hormonal activities, for example, the pesticide DDT is an ER agonist, whereas one of its metabolites exerts anti-androgenic effect [218]. Similarly, BPA is an estrogen agonist, but also antagonizes thyroid hormone receptor [219].
Timing of exposure to EDCs is evidently very important. Developing fetus and neonates are the most vulnerable to endocrine disruption [43], although EDCs may exert adverse effects on human health in other phases of the life cycle as well. Fetal development is a period of high plasticity which may be negatively influenced by exposure to environmental pollutants, resulting in disease later in life [32, 158]. Therefore, timing of exposure is of importance in assessment of the effects on the endocrine system.
EDCs are natural and synthetic substances with ubiquitous exposure in children and adults including pregnant women. Once these chemicals get into the food chain, it is difficult to get rid of them from the human body since most of the EDCs (particularly POPs) bioaccumulate in the fatty tissue. Plasticizers are not lipophilic and thus do not bioaccumulate in the body [66]. They are usually cleared from the organism in less than 24 h [55, 56]. However, we are continuously exposed to plasticizers such as BPA on a daily basis that causes a great deal of concern. Despite overwhelming evidence of its adverse effects on the endocrine system, there is still debate about safe exposure levels of BPA. Use of this plasticizer for production of baby bottles has been banned in Europe and USA since 2011 and 2012, respectively. Risk of exposure to POPs is well recognized, and some limitations are being implemented. For instance, maximum levels for dioxins and dioxin-like PCBs have been limited in milk and fat as 2.5 and 5.5 pg/g fat, respectively [220]. However, such a value has not been issued for estrogenic substances probably because their wide range of use and distribution. For pesticides, a maximum residue level (0.01 mg/kg) has been published that sets the amount of residues legally tolerated in food [221].
A strategy for prevention of exposures to EDCs is urgently needed. This will require a political will to limit the use of these offending chemicals, and development and implementation of remediation technologies. Education programs in schools and hospitals (especially in endocrinology, pediatric and maternity clinics) will be helpful to improve general understanding of EDCs and the consequences of exposure to such pollutants, especially in early life. Clinical endocrinologists should be better educated about EDCs and their potential adverse effects on the human organism. Exposure to EDCs is more common among low-income individuals. Professional workers using pesticides, fungicides, paints and chemicals are at high risk of exposure to EDCs. Individuals at high risk should be informed and preventive measures be implemented to avoid extensive exposure. Informed individuals can act on a precautionary principle to reduce exposure of themselves and their children ahead of any regulatory actions, and thus have some degree of self-determination in their own exposure to EDCs. There are other preventive measures that are beyond individual capacity and therefore should be developed and implemented by policy makers and local governers. A number of recommendations towards protection of individuals and prevention strategies to be developed and implemented by policy makers / authorities are summarized in Table 1.
In this review, identification of EDCs, contamination routes, their adverse effects, underlying mechanisms and functional implications have been summarized. A translational approach is needed for the science of endocrine disruption. Biomonitoring and epidemiological studies should be carefully designed and conducted by collaborating basic and clinical scientists. It is also necessary to design basic research in in vivo and in vitro models and elucidate translational implications in humans. To avoid EDC exposure, prevention & protection strategies for individuals and policy makers / authorities should be developed and implemented.
Abbreviations
- AR:
-
Androgen Receptor
- AHR:
-
Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor
- BPA:
-
Bisphenol A
- BMI:
-
Body Mass Index
- DDT:
-
Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane
- EDCs:
-
Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
- EPA:
-
Environmental Protection Agency
- ER:
-
Estrogen Receptor
- GH:
-
Growth Hormone
- HPA:
-
Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal
- ISNT:
-
In Situ Nick Translation
- OCPs:
-
Organochlorinated Pesticides
- OVX:
-
Ovariectomized
- PPAR γ::
-
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor γ
- POPs:
-
Persistent Organochlorine Pollutants
- PI3K :
-
Phosphatidylinositol 3 Kinase
- PCBs:
-
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
- COMET:
-
Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis Assay
- NIS:
-
Sodium-Iodide Symporter Channel
- SCSA:
-
Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay
- TUNEL:
-
Terminal Transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling
- TCDD:
-
Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-Dioxin
- T4:
-
Thyroxine
- T3:
-
Triiodothyronine
- T2D:
-
Type 2 Diabetes
References
Colborn T, Clement C. Wingspread Consensus Statement. Chemically-induced Alterations in Sexual and Functional Development: The Wildlife/human Connection. Princeton Scientific Publishing Company; 1992. p. 1–8.
Zoeller RT, Brown TR, Doan LL, Gore AC, Skakkebaek NE, Soto AM, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and public health protection: a statement of principles from the Endocrine Society. Endocrinology. 2012;153(9):4097–110. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2012-1422.
Gore AC. Environmental toxicant effects on neuroendocrine function. Endocrine. 2001;14(2):235–46. https://doi.org/10.1385/endo:14:2:235.
Carpenter DO. Effects of Persistent and Bioactive Organic Pollutants on Human Health. Wiley; 2013.
McKinlay R, Plant JA, Bell JN, Voulvoulis N. Endocrine disrupting pesticides: implications for risk assessment. Environ Int. 2008;34(2):168–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.07.013.
Safe SH. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): environmental impact, biochemical and toxic responses, and implications for risk assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol. 1994;24(2):87–149. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408449409049308.
Carpenter DO. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): routes of exposure and effects on human health. Rev Environ Health. 2006;21(1):1–23.
Yilmaz B, Seyran AD, Sandal S, Aydin M, Colakoglu N, Kocer M, et al. Modulatory effects of Aroclors 1221 and 1254 on bone turnover and vertebral histology in intact and ovariectomized rats. Toxicol Lett. 2006;166(3):276–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2006.08.003.
Kutlu S, Colakoglu N, Halifeoglu I, Sandal S, Seyran AD, Aydin M, et al. Comparative evaluation of hepatotoxic and nephrotoxic effects of aroclors 1221 and 1254 in female rats. Cell Biochem Funct. 2007;25(2):167–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbf.1289.
Yilmaz B, Sandal S, Carpenter DO. PCB 9 exposure induces endothelial cell death while increasing intracellular calcium and ROS levels. Environ Toxicol. 2012;27(3):185–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20676.
Bansal A, Henao-Mejia J, Simmons RA. Immune system: an emerging player in mediating effects of endocrine disruptors on metabolic health. Endocrinology. 2018;159(1):32–45. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2017-00882.
Davis DL, Bradlow HL, Wolff M, Woodruff T, Hoel DG, Anton-Culver H. Medical hypothesis: xenoestrogens as preventable causes of breast cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1993;101(5):372–7. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.93101372.
Uslu U, Sandal S, Cumbul A, Yildiz S, Aydin M, Yilmaz B. Evaluation of estrogenic effects of polychlorinated biphenyls and organochlorinated pesticides using immature rat uterotrophic assay. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2013;32(5):476–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327112472999.
Marty MS, O'Connor JC. Key learnings from the endocrine disruptor screening program (EDSP) tier 1 rodent uterotrophic and Hershberger assays. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2014;101(1):63–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.21098.
Rachon D. Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and female cancer: informing the patients. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2015;16(4):359–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-016-9332-9.
Pinto CL, Mansouri K, Judson R, Browne P. Prediction of estrogenic bioactivity of environmental chemical metabolites. Chem Res Toxicol. 2016;29(9):1410–27. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00079.
Giulivo M. Lopez de Alda M, Capri E, Barcelo D. human exposure to endocrine disrupting compounds: their role in reproductive systems, metabolic syndrome and breast cancer. A review. Environ Res. 2016;151:251–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.07.011.
Morgan M, Deoraj A, Felty Q, Roy D. Environmental estrogen-like endocrine disrupting chemicals and breast cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;457:89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.10.003.
Lymperi S, Giwercman A. Endocrine disruptors and testicular function. Metabolism. 2018;86:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.03.022.
Fudvoye J, Bourguignon JP, Parent AS. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and human growth and maturation: a focus on early critical windows of exposure. Vitam Horm. 2014;94:1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-800095-3.00001-8.
Beszterda M, Franski R. Endocrine disruptor compounds in environment: as a danger for children health. Pediatr Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2018;24(2):88–95. https://doi.org/10.18544/pedm-24.02.0107.
Greenspan LC, Lee MM. Endocrine disrupters and pubertal timing. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2018;25(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/med.0000000000000377.
Jacobsen PR, Christiansen S, Boberg J, Nellemann C, Hass U. Combined exposure to endocrine disrupting pesticides impairs parturition, causes pup mortality and affects sexual differentiation in rats. Int J Androl. 2010;33(2):434–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01046.x.
Song WH, Mohamed EA, Pang WK, Kang KH, Ryu DY, Rahman MS, et al. Effect of endocrine disruptors on the ratio of X and Y chromosome-bearing live spermatozoa. Reprod Toxicol. 2018;82:10–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2018.09.002.
Kilic N, Sandal S, Colakoglu N, Kutlu S, Seyran A, Yilmaz B. Endocrine disruptive effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on the thyroid gland in female rats. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2005;206(4):327–32. https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.206.327.
Calsolaro V, Pasqualetti G, Niccolai F, Caraccio N, Monzani F. Thyroid disrupting chemicals. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18122583.
Li ZM, Hernandez-Moreno D, Main KM, Skakkebaek NE, Kiviranta H, Toppari J, et al. Association of in Utero Persistent Organic Pollutant Exposure with Placental Thyroid Hormones. Endocrinology. 2018;159(10):3473–81. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2018-00542.
Sharpe RM, Drake AJ. Obesogens and obesity - an alternative view? Obesity (Silver Spring). 2013;21(6):1081–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20373.
Darbre PD. Endocrine disruptors and obesity. Curr Obes Rep. 2017;6(1):18–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13679-017-0240-4.
Agas D, Sabbieti MG, Marchetti L. Endocrine disruptors and bone metabolism. Arch Toxicol. 2013;87(4):735–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-012-0988-y.
Carpenter DO, Sly PD. Environmental chemicals as endocrine disruptors. Rev Environ Health. 2016;31(4):399. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0064.
Gore AC, Crews D, Doan LL, La Merill M, Patisaul H, Zota A. Introduction to endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). 2014. www.endocrine.org/~/media/endosociety/files/advocacy-and-outreach/important-documents/introduction-to-endocrine-disrupting-chemicals.pdf. Accessed July, 30 2019.
Stockholm convention on persistent organic pollutants 2001. http://chm.pops.int/Portals/0/Repository/convention_text/UNEP-POPS-COP-CONVTEXT-FULL.English.PDF. Accessed June, 06 2019.
The new POPs under the Stockholm Convention. Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention 2014. http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/TheNewPOPs/tabid/2511/Default.aspx. Accessed June, 06 2019.
Nadal M, Domingo JL. Sources of Human Exposure. In: Carpenter DO, editor. Effects of Persistent and Bioactive Organic Pollutants on Human Health. Wiley; 2013. p. 8–25.
Sandal S, Yilmaz B, Carpenter DO. Genotoxic effects of PCB 52 and PCB 77 on cultured human peripheral lymphocytes. Mutat Res. 2008;654(1):88–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2008.05.005.
Pessah IN, Lein PJ, Seegal RF, Sagiv SK. Neurotoxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls and related organohalogens. Acta Neuropathol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-019-01978-1.
Yilmaz B, Sandal S, Chen CH, Carpenter DO. Effects of PCB 52 and PCB 77 on cell viability, [Ca(2+)](i) levels and membrane fluidity in mouse thymocytes. Toxicology. 2006;217(2–3):184–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2005.09.008.
Sandal S, Yilmaz B, Chen CH, Carpenter DO. Comparative effects of technical toxaphene, 2,5-dichloro-3-biphenylol and octabromodiphenylether on cell viability, [Ca2+]i levels and membrane fluidity in mouse thymocytes. Toxicol Lett. 2004;151(3):417–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2004.03.006.
Sandal S, Yilmaz B, Godekmerdan A, Kelestimur H, Carpenter DO. Effects of PCBs 52 and 77 on Th1/Th2 balance in mouse thymocyte cell cultures. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2005;27(4):601–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923970500418752.
Ozcan M, Yilmaz B, King WM, Carpenter DO. Hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) is reduced by a coplanar PCB congener. Neurotoxicology. 2004;25(6):981–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2004.03.014.
Hombach-Klonisch S, Pocar P, Kauffold J, Klonisch T. Dioxin exerts anti-estrogenic actions in a novel dioxin-responsive telomerase-immortalized epithelial cell line of the porcine oviduct (TERT-OPEC). Toxicol Sci. 2006;90(2):519–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfj102.
Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE, Flaws JA, Nadal A, Prins GS, et al. EDC-2: the Endocrine Society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E1–e150. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2015-1010.
Ozturk MA, Kelestimur F, Kurtoglu S, Guven K, Arslan D. Anticholinesterase poisoning in Turkey - clinical, laboratory and radiologic evaluation of 269 cases. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1990;9(5):273–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/096032719000900503.
Guven M, Bayram F, Unluhizarci K, Kelestimur F. Endocrine changes in patients with acute organophosphate poisoning. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1999;18(10):598–601. https://doi.org/10.1191/096032799678839419.
Rattan S, Zhou C, Chiang C, Mahalingam S, Brehm E, Flaws JA. Exposure to endocrine disruptors during adulthood: consequences for female fertility. J Endocrinol. 2017;233(3):R109–r29. https://doi.org/10.1530/joe-17-0023.
Sandal S, Yilmaz B. Genotoxic effects of chlorpyrifos, cypermethrin, endosulfan and 2,4-D on human peripheral lymphocytes cultured from smokers and nonsmokers. Environ Toxicol. 2011;26(5):433–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/tox.20569.
Sereda B, Bouwman H, Kylin H. Comparing water, bovine milk, and indoor residual spraying as possible sources of DDT and pyrethroid residues in breast milk. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2009;72(13):842–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390902800447.
Langer P, Ukropec J, Kocan A, Drobna B, Radikova Z, Huckova M, et al. Obesogenic and diabetogenic impact of high organochlorine levels (HCB, p,p'-DDE, PCBs) on inhabitants in the highly polluted eastern Slovakia. Endocr Regul. 2014;48(1):17–24.
Luo D, Pu Y, Tian H, Wu W, Sun X, Zhou T, et al. Association of in utero exposure to organochlorine pesticides with thyroid hormone levels in cord blood of newborns. Environ Pollut. 2017;231(Pt 1):78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.07.091.
Yucra S, Rubio J, Gasco M, Gonzales C, Steenland K, Gonzales GF. Semen quality and reproductive sex hormone levels in Peruvian pesticide sprayers. Int J Occup Environ Health. 2006;12(4):355–61. https://doi.org/10.1179/oeh.2006.12.4.355.
Mehrpour O, Karrari P, Zamani N, Tsatsakis AM, Abdollahi M. Occupational exposure to pesticides and consequences on male semen and fertility: a review. Toxicol Lett. 2014;230(2):146–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.01.029.
Zeng F, Lerro C, Lavoue J, Huang H, Siemiatycki J, Zhao N, et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides and other biocides and risk of thyroid cancer. Occup Environ Med. 2017;74(7):502–10. https://doi.org/10.1136/oemed-2016-103931.
Lee DH, Steffes MW, Sjodin A, Jones RS, Needham LL, Jacobs DR Jr. Low dose organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls predict obesity, dyslipidemia, and insulin resistance among people free of diabetes. PLoS One. 2011;6(1):e15977. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015977.
Collet SH, Picard-Hagen N, Lacroix MZ, Puel S, Viguie C, Bousquet-Melou A, et al. Allometric scaling for predicting human clearance of bisphenol a. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2015;284(3):323–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2015.02.024.
Thayer KA, Doerge DR, Hunt D, Schurman SH, Twaddle NC, Churchwell MI, et al. Pharmacokinetics of bisphenol a in humans following a single oral administration. Environ Int. 2015;83:107–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.06.008.
Usman A, Ahmad M. From BPA to its analogues: is it a safe journey? Chemosphere. 2016;158:131–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.05.070.
Liao C, Kannan K. A survey of bisphenol a and other bisphenol analogues in foodstuffs from nine cities in China. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2014;31(2):319–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/19440049.2013.868611.
Careghini A, Mastorgio AF, Saponaro S, Sezenna E. Bisphenol a, nonylphenols, benzophenones, and benzotriazoles in soils, groundwater, surface water, sediments, and food: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(8):5711–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3974-5.
Paschoalini AL, Savassi LA, Arantes FP, Rizzo E, Bazzoli N. Heavy metals accumulation and endocrine disruption in Prochilodus argenteus from a polluted neotropical river. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;169:539–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.11.047.
Welfinger-Smith G, Minholz JL, Byrne S, Waghiyi V, Gologergen J, Kava J, et al. Organochlorine and metal contaminants in traditional foods from St. Lawrence Island, Alaska. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2011;74(18):1195–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2011.590099.
De Toni L, Tisato F, Seraglia R, Roverso M, Gandin V, Marzano C, et al. Phthalates and heavy metals as endocrine disruptors in food: a study on pre-packed coffee products. Toxicol Rep. 2017;4:234–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxrep.2017.05.004.
Pirard C, Compere S, Firquet K, Charlier C. The current environmental levels of endocrine disruptors (mercury, cadmium, organochlorine pesticides and PCBs) in a Belgian adult population and their predictors of exposure. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2018;221(2):211–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2017.10.010.
Cornelis C, D'Hollander W, Roosens L, Covaci A, Smolders R, Van Den Heuvel R, et al. First assessment of population exposure to perfluorinated compounds in Flanders, Belgium. Chemosphere. 2012;86(3):308–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.034.
Perello G, Gomez-Catalan J, Castell V, Llobet JM, Domingo JL. Assessment of the temporal trend of the dietary exposure to PCDD/Fs and PCBs in Catalonia, over Spain: health risks. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50(2):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2011.06.077.
Chapin RE, Adams J, Boekelheide K, Gray LE Jr, Hayward SW, Lees PS, et al. NTP-CERHR expert panel report on the reproductive and developmental toxicity of bisphenol a. Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol. 2008;83(3):157–395. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdrb.20147.
Calafat AM, Ye X, Wong LY, Reidy JA, Needham LL. Exposure of the U.S. population to bisphenol a and 4-tertiary-octylphenol: 2003-2004. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(1):39–44. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10753.
Volkel W, Colnot T, Csanady GA, Filser JG, Dekant W. Metabolism and kinetics of bisphenol a in humans at low doses following oral administration. Chem Res Toxicol. 2002;15(10):1281–7.
Tasdemir Y, Salihoglu G, Salihoglu NK, Birgul A. Air-soil exchange of PCBs: seasonal variations in levels and fluxes with influence of equilibrium conditions. Environ Pollut. 2012;169:90–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2012.05.022.
Sonne C, Dyck M, Riget FF, Beck Jensen JE, Hyldstrup L, Letcher RJ, et al. Penile density and globally used chemicals in Canadian and Greenland polar bears. Environ Res. 2015;137:287–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2014.12.026.
Brown TM, Macdonald RW, Muir DCG, Letcher RJ. The distribution and trends of persistent organic pollutants and mercury in marine mammals from Canada's eastern Arctic. Sci Total Environ. 2018;618:500–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.052.
Lourencetti C, Grimalt JO, Marco E, Fernandez P, Font-Ribera L, Villanueva CM, et al. Trihalomethanes in chlorine and bromine disinfected swimming pools: air-water distributions and human exposure. Environ Int. 2012;45:59–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2012.03.009.
Weschler CJ, Nazaroff WW. Dermal uptake of organic vapors commonly found in indoor air. Environ Sci Technol. 2014;48(2):1230–7. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405490a.
Yilmaz B, Gilmore D, Wilson CA. Inhibition of the preovulatory LH surge in the rat by central noradrenergic mediation: involvement of an anaesthetic (urethane) and opioid receptor agonists. Biogenic Amines. 1996;12:423–35.
Yilmaz B, Gilmore DP, Wilson CA. Effects of DPDPE (a specific delta-opioid receptor agonist) and naloxone on hypothalamic monoamine concentrations during the pre-ovulatory LH surge in the rat. Eur J Endocrinol. 1998;139(5):546–51.
Safe S. Endocrine disruptors and falling sperm counts: lessons learned or not! Asian J Androl. 2013;15(2):191–4. https://doi.org/10.1038/aja.2012.87.
Yesildaglar N, Yildirim G, Attar R, Karateke A, Ficicioglu C, Yilmaz B. Exposure to industrially polluted water resulted in regressed endometriotic lesions and enhanced adhesion formation in a rat endometriosis model: a preliminary study. Fertil Steril. 2010;93(5):1722–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.09.028.
Sifakis S, Androutsopoulos VP, Tsatsakis AM, Spandidos DA. Human exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals: effects on the male and female reproductive systems. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2017;51:56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2017.02.024.
Mrema EJ, Rubino FM, Brambilla G, Moretto A, Tsatsakis AM, Colosio C. Persistent organochlorinated pesticides and mechanisms of their toxicity. Toxicology. 2013;307:74–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2012.11.015.
Gaido KW, Maness SC, McDonnell DP, Dehal SS, Kupfer D, Safe S. Interaction of methoxychlor and related compounds with estrogen receptor alpha and beta, and androgen receptor: structure-activity studies. Mol Pharmacol. 2000;58(4):852–8.
Senthilkumaran B. Pesticide- and sex steroid analogue-induced endocrine disruption differentially targets hypothalamo-hypophyseal-gonadal system during gametogenesis in teleosts - a review. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2015;219:136–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygcen.2015.01.010.
Bloom MS, Mok-Lin E, Fujimoto VY. Bisphenol a and ovarian steroidogenesis. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(4):857–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.08.021.
Le Fol V, Ait-Aissa S, Sonavane M, Porcher JM, Balaguer P, Cravedi JP, et al. In vitro and in vivo estrogenic activity of BPA, BPF and BPS in zebrafish-specific assays. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2017;142:150–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.04.009.
Foster PM. Mode of action: impaired fetal leydig cell function - effects on male reproductive development produced by certain phthalate esters. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2005;35(8–9):713–9.
Fisher JS. Environmental anti-androgens and male reproductive health: focus on phthalates and testicular dysgenesis syndrome. Reproduction. 2004;127(3):305–15. https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00025.
Skinner MK, Manikkam M, Guerrero-Bosagna C. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors. Reprod Toxicol. 2011;31(3):337–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2010.10.012.
Karman BN, Basavarajappa MS, Hannon P, Flaws JA. Dioxin exposure reduces the steroidogenic capacity of mouse antral follicles mainly at the level of HSD17B1 without altering atresia. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;264(1):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2012.07.031.
Harvey CN, Chen JC, Bagnell CA, Uzumcu M. Methoxychlor and its metabolite HPTE inhibit cAMP production and expression of estrogen receptors alpha and beta in the rat granulosa cell in vitro. Reprod Toxicol. 2015;51:72–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.12.001.
Zachow R, Uzumcu M. The methoxychlor metabolite, 2,2-bis-(p-hydroxyphenyl)-1,1,1-trichloroethane, inhibits steroidogenesis in rat ovarian granulosa cells in vitro. Reprod Toxicol. 2006;22(4):659–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.04.018.
Lee SG, Kim JY, Chung JY, Kim YJ, Park JE, Oh S, et al. Bisphenol a exposure during adulthood causes augmentation of follicular atresia and luteal regression by decreasing 17beta-estradiol synthesis via downregulation of aromatase in rat ovary. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(6):663–9. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205823.
Souter I, Smith KW, Dimitriadis I, Ehrlich S, Williams PL, Calafat AM, et al. The association of bisphenol-a urinary concentrations with antral follicle counts and other measures of ovarian reserve in women undergoing infertility treatments. Reprod Toxicol. 2013;42:224–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2013.09.008.
Kandaraki E, Chatzigeorgiou A, Livadas S, Palioura E, Economou F, Koutsilieris M, et al. Endocrine disruptors and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): elevated serum levels of bisphenol a in women with PCOS. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96(3):E480–4. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1658.
Ehrlich S, Williams PL, Missmer SA, Flaws JA, Berry KF, Calafat AM, et al. Urinary bisphenol a concentrations and implantation failure among women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(7):978–83. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104307.
Sugiura-Ogasawara M, Ozaki Y, Sonta S, Makino T, Suzumori K. Exposure to bisphenol a is associated with recurrent miscarriage. Hum Reprod. 2005;20(8):2325–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh888.
Philippat C, Mortamais M, Chevrier C, Petit C, Calafat AM, Ye X, et al. Exposure to phthalates and phenols during pregnancy and offspring size at birth. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(3):464–70. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1103634.
Philippat C, Nakiwala D, Calafat AM, Botton J, De Agostini M, Heude B, et al. Prenatal exposure to nonpersistent endocrine disruptors and behavior in boys at 3 and 5 years. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(9):097014. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1314.
Yilmaz B, Kutlu S, Canpolat S, Sandal S, Ayar A, Mogulkoc R, et al. Effects of paint thinner exposure on serum LH, FSH and testosterone levels and hypothalamic catecholamine contents in the male rat. Biol Pharm Bull. 2001;24(2):163–6. https://doi.org/10.1248/bpb.24.163.
Yilmaz B, Canpolat S, Sandal S, Akpolat N, Kutlu S, Ilhan N, et al. Paint thinner exposure inhibits testosterone synthesis and secretion in a reversible manner in the rat. Reprod Toxicol. 2006;22(4):791–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.08.002.
Bonde JP, Flachs EM, Rimborg S, Glazer CH, Giwercman A, Ramlau-Hansen CH, et al. The epidemiologic evidence linking prenatal and postnatal exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals with male reproductive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;23(1):104–25. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw036.
Joensen UN, Jorgensen N, Thyssen JP, Szecsi PB, Stender S, Petersen JH, et al. Urinary excretion of phenols, parabens and benzophenones in young men: associations to reproductive hormones and semen quality are modified by mutations in the Filaggrin gene. Environ Int. 2018;121(Pt 1):365–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.09.020.
Jensen TK, Carlsen E, Jorgensen N, Berthelsen JG, Keiding N, Christensen K, et al. Poor semen quality may contribute to recent decline in fertility rates. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(6):1437–40. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/17.6.1437.
Jorgensen N, Joensen UN, Jensen TK, Jensen MB, Almstrup K, Olesen IA et al. Human semen quality in the new millennium: a prospective cross-sectional population-based study of 4867 men. BMJ Open. 2012;2(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000990.
Petersen MS, Halling J, Jorgensen N, Nielsen F, Grandjean P, Jensen TK et al. Reproductive Function in a Population of Young Faroese Men with Elevated Exposure to Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) and Perfluorinated Alkylate Substances (PFAS). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(9). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091880.
Hauser R. Urinary phthalate metabolites and semen quality: a review of a potential biomarker of susceptibility. Int J Androl. 2008;31(2):112–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2007.00844.x.
Mendiola J, Jorgensen N, Andersson AM, Calafat AM, Ye X, Redmon JB, et al. Are environmental levels of bisphenol a associated with reproductive function in fertile men? Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(9):1286–91. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1002037.
Mendiola J, Moreno JM, Roca M, Vergara-Juarez N, Martinez-Garcia MJ, Garcia-Sanchez A, et al. Relationships between heavy metal concentrations in three different body fluids and male reproductive parameters: a pilot study. Environ Health. 2011;10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069x-10-6.
Nordkap L, Joensen UN, Blomberg Jensen M, Jorgensen N. Regional differences and temporal trends in male reproductive health disorders: semen quality may be a sensitive marker of environmental exposures. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;355(2):221–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.05.048.
Ho SM, Tang WY. Belmonte de Frausto J, Prins GS. Developmental exposure to estradiol and bisphenol a increases susceptibility to prostate carcinogenesis and epigenetically regulates phosphodiesterase type 4 variant 4. Cancer Res. 2006;66(11):5624–32. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-0516.
Kogevinas M. Human health effects of dioxins: cancer, reproductive and endocrine system effects. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(3):331–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/7.3.331.
Meldrum DR, Morris MA, Gambone JC. Obesity pandemic: causes, consequences, and solutions-but do we have the will? Fertil Steril. 2017;107(4):833–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.104.
Baudrand R, Goodarzi MO, Vaidya A, Underwood PC, Williams JS, Jeunemaitre X, et al. A prevalent caveolin-1 gene variant is associated with the metabolic syndrome in Caucasians and Hispanics. Metabolism. 2015;64(12):1674–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2015.09.005.
Muscogiuri G, Barrea L, Laudisio D, Savastano S, Colao A. Obesogenic endocrine disruptors and obesity: myths and truths. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(11):3469–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-017-2071-1.
Heindel JJ, Newbold R, Schug TT. Endocrine disruptors and obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2015;11(11):653–61. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2015.163.
Janesick A, Blumberg B. Minireview: PPARgamma as the target of obesogens. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2011;127(1–2):4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.01.005.
Watt J, Schlezinger JJ. Structurally-diverse, PPARgamma-activating environmental toxicants induce adipogenesis and suppress osteogenesis in bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells. Toxicology. 2015;331:66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2015.03.006.
Tontonoz P, Hu E, Spiegelman BM. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor. Cell. 1994;79(7):1147–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(94)90006-x.
Bertuloso BD, Podratz PL, Merlo E, de Araujo JF, Lima LC, de Miguel EC, et al. Tributyltin chloride leads to adiposity and impairs metabolic functions in the rat liver and pancreas. Toxicol Lett. 2015;235(1):45–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2015.03.009.
Li X, Pham HT, Janesick AS, Blumberg B. Triflumizole is an obesogen in mice that acts through peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma). Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(12):1720–6. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205383.
Ariemma F, D'Esposito V, Liguoro D, Oriente F, Cabaro S, Liotti A, et al. Low-dose Bisphenol-a impairs Adipogenesis and generates dysfunctional 3T3-L1 adipocytes. PLoS One. 2016;11(3):e0150762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150762.
Maloney EK, Waxman DJ. Trans-activation of PPARalpha and PPARgamma by structurally diverse environmental chemicals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1999;161(2):209–18. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1999.8809.
Stahlhut RW, van Wijngaarden E, Dye TD, Cook S, Swan SH. Concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with increased waist circumference and insulin resistance in adult U.S. males. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(6):876–82. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9882.
Harley KG, Berger K, Rauch S, Kogut K, Claus Henn B, Calafat AM, et al. Association of prenatal urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations and childhood BMI and obesity. Pediatr Res. 2017;82(3):405–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.112.
Yang C, Kong APS, Cai Z, Chung ACK. Persistent organic pollutants as risk factors for obesity and diabetes. Curr Diab Rep. 2017;17(12):132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-017-0966-0.
Lee DH, Lee IK, Porta M, Steffes M, Jacobs DR Jr. Relationship between serum concentrations of persistent organic pollutants and the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among non-diabetic adults: results from the National Health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2002. Diabetologia. 2007;50(9):1841–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-007-0755-4.
Salihovic S, Ganna A, Fall T, Broeckling CD, Prenni JE, van Bavel B et al. The metabolic fingerprint of p,p'-DDE and HCB exposure in humans. Environ Int 2016;88:60–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.015.
Law J, Bloor I, Budge H, Symonds ME. The influence of sex steroids on adipose tissue growth and function. Horm Mol Biol Clin Invest. 2014;19(1):13–24. https://doi.org/10.1515/hmbci-2014-0015.
Newbold RR, Padilla-Banks E, Jefferson WN. Environmental estrogens and obesity. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009;304(1–2):84–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2009.02.024.
Williams G. Aromatase up-regulation, insulin and raised intracellular oestrogens in men, induce adiposity, metabolic syndrome and prostate disease, via aberrant ER-alpha and GPER signalling. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2012;351(2):269–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2011.12.017.
Luo JJ, Su DS, Xie SL, Liu Y, Liu P, Yang XJ, et al. Hypersensitive assessment of aryl hydrocarbon receptor transcriptional activity using a novel truncated cyp1a promoter in zebrafish. FASEB J. 2018;32(5):2814–26. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201701171R.
Arsenescu V, Arsenescu RI, King V, Swanson H, Cassis LA. Polychlorinated biphenyl-77 induces adipocyte differentiation and proinflammatory adipokines and promotes obesity and atherosclerosis. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(6):761–8. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.10554.
Moyer BJ, Rojas IY, Kerley-Hamilton JS, Nemani KV, Trask HW, Ringelberg CS, et al. Obesity and fatty liver are prevented by inhibition of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor in both female and male mice. Nutr Res. 2017;44:38–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2017.06.002.
Nadal A, Quesada I, Tuduri E, Nogueiras R, Alonso-Magdalena P. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the regulation of energy balance. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(9):536–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.51.
Farinetti A, Marraudino M, Ponti G, Panzica G, Gotti S. Chronic treatment with tributyltin induces sexually dimorphic alterations in the hypothalamic POMC system of adult mice. Cell Tissue Res. 2018;374(3):587–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-018-2896-9.
Ronn M, Lind L, Orberg J, Kullberg J, Soderberg S, Larsson A, et al. Bisphenol a is related to circulating levels of adiponectin, leptin and ghrelin, but not to fat mass or fat distribution in humans. Chemosphere. 2014;112:42–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.042.
Spalding KL, Arner E, Westermark PO, Bernard S, Buchholz BA, Bergmann O, et al. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature. 2008;453(7196):783–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06902.
Janesick AS, Blumberg B. Obesogens: an emerging threat to public health. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(5):559–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.01.182.
Prentki M, Nolan CJ. Islet beta cell failure in type 2 diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(7):1802–12. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci29103.
Lind PM, Lind L. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and risk of diabetes: an evidence-based review. Diabetologia. 2018;61(7):1495–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4621-3.
Marroqui L, Tuduri E, Alonso-Magdalena P, Quesada I, Nadal A, Dos Santos RS. Mitochondria as target of endocrine-disrupting chemicals: implications for type 2 diabetes. J Endocrinol. 2018;239(2):R27–r45. https://doi.org/10.1530/joe-18-0362.
Ruiz D, Becerra M, Jagai JS, Ard K, Sargis RM. Disparities in environmental exposures to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and diabetes risk in vulnerable populations. Diabetes Care. 2018;41(1):193–205. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc16-2765.
Silverstone AE, Rosenbaum PF, Weinstock RS, Bartell SM, Foushee HR, Shelton C, et al. Polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure and diabetes: results from the Anniston community health survey. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(5):727–32. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104247.
Wang SL, Tsai PC, Yang CY, Guo YL. Increased risk of diabetes and polychlorinated biphenyls and dioxins: a 24-year follow-up study of the Yucheng cohort. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(8):1574–9. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2449.
Wu H, Bertrand KA, Choi AL, Hu FB, Laden F, Grandjean P, et al. Persistent organic pollutants and type 2 diabetes: a prospective analysis in the nurses' health study and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(2):153–61. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205248.
Zong G, Valvi D, Coull B, Goen T, Hu FB, Nielsen F, et al. Persistent organic pollutants and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective investigation among middle-aged women in Nurses' health study II. Environ Int. 2018;114:334–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.12.010.
Song Y, Chou EL, Baecker A, You NC, Song Y, Sun Q, et al. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals, risk of type 2 diabetes, and diabetes-related metabolic traits: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes. 2016;8(4):516–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/1753-0407.12325.
Kerger BD, Scott PK, Pavuk M, Gough M, Paustenbach DJ. Re-analysis of ranch hand study supports reverse causation hypothesis between dioxin and diabetes. Crit Rev Toxicol. 2012;42(8):669–87. https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2012.694095.
Taylor KW, Novak RF, Anderson HA, Birnbaum LS, Blystone C, Devito M, et al. Evaluation of the association between persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and diabetes in epidemiological studies: a national toxicology program workshop review. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(7):774–83. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1205502.
Cardenas A, Gold DR, Hauser R, Kleinman KP, Hivert MF, Calafat AM, et al. Plasma concentrations of per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances at baseline and associations with glycemic indicators and diabetes incidence among high-risk adults in the diabetes prevention program trial. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(10):107001. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp1612.
Garcia-Arevalo M, Alonso-Magdalena P, Rebelo Dos Santos J, Quesada I, Carneiro EM, Nadal A. Exposure to bisphenol-a during pregnancy partially mimics the effects of a high-fat diet altering glucose homeostasis and gene expression in adult male mice. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100214. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100214.
Moon MK, Jeong IK, Jung Oh T, Ahn HY, Kim HH, Park YJ, et al. Long-term oral exposure to bisphenol a induces glucose intolerance and insulin resistance. J Endocrinol. 2015;226(1):35–42. https://doi.org/10.1530/joe-14-0714.
Lee YM, Ha CM, Kim SA, Thoudam T, Yoon YR, Kim DJ, et al. Low-dose persistent organic pollutants impair insulin secretory function of pancreatic beta-cells: human and in vitro evidence. Diabetes. 2017;66(10):2669–80. https://doi.org/10.2337/db17-0188.
Chang KC, Hsu CC, Liu SH, Su CC, Yen CC, Lee MJ, et al. Cadmium induces apoptosis in pancreatic beta-cells through a mitochondria-dependent pathway: the role of oxidative stress-mediated c-Jun N-terminal kinase activation. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e54374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054374.
Rovira-Llopis S, Banuls C, Diaz-Morales N, Hernandez-Mijares A, Rocha M, Victor VM. Mitochondrial dynamics in type 2 diabetes: pathophysiological implications. Redox Biol. 2017;11:637–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.redox.2017.01.013.
Sebastian D, Hernandez-Alvarez MI, Segales J, Sorianello E, Munoz JP, Sala D, et al. Mitofusin 2 (Mfn2) links mitochondrial and endoplasmic reticulum function with insulin signaling and is essential for normal glucose homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(14):5523–8. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1108220109.
Yamada S, Asanagi M, Hirata N, Itagaki H, Sekino Y, Kanda Y. Tributyltin induces mitochondrial fission through Mfn1 degradation in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Toxicol in Vitro. 2016;34:257–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.04.013.
Harvey PW. Adrenocortical endocrine disruption. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;155(Pt B):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.10.009.
Martinez-Arguelles DB, Papadopoulos V. Mechanisms mediating environmental chemical-induced endocrine disruption in the adrenal gland. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2015;6:29. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00029.
Lauretta R, Sansone A, Sansone M, Romanelli F, Appetecchia M. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: effects on endocrine glands. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:178. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00178.
Hampl R, Kubatova J, Starka L. Steroids and endocrine disruptors - history, recent state of art and open questions. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;155(Pt B):217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2014.04.013.
Foster WG, Mertineit C, Yagminas A, McMahon A, Lecavalier P. The effects of hexachlorobenzene on circulating levels of adrenal steroids in the ovariectomized rat. J Biochem Toxicol. 1995;10(3):129–35.
Araki A, Miyashita C, Mitsui T, Goudarzi H, Mizutani F, Chisaki Y, et al. Prenatal organochlorine pesticide exposure and the disruption of steroids and reproductive hormones in cord blood: the Hokkaido study. Environ Int. 2018;110:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2017.10.006.
Sargis RM, Heindel JJ, Padmanabhan V. Interventions to address environmental metabolism-disrupting chemicals: changing the narrative to empower action to restore metabolic health. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:33. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2019.00033.
Mughal BB, Fini JB, Demeneix BA. Thyroid-disrupting chemicals and brain development: an update. Endocr Connect. 2018;7(4):R160–r86. https://doi.org/10.1530/ec-18-0029.
Carvalho DP, Dupuy C. Thyroid hormone biosynthesis and release. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;458:6–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.01.038.
Ghassabian A, Trasande L. Disruption in thyroid signaling pathway: a mechanism for the effect of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on child neurodevelopment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2018;9:204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00204.
Santos-Silva AP, Andrade MN, Pereira-Rodrigues P, Paiva-Melo FD, Soares P, Graceli JB, et al. Frontiers in endocrine disruption: impacts of organotin on the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2018;460:246–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2017.07.038.
Preau L, Fini JB, Morvan-Dubois G, Demeneix B. Thyroid hormone signaling during early neurogenesis and its significance as a vulnerable window for endocrine disruption. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1849(2):112–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.06.015.
Armstrong D. Implications of thyroid hormone signaling through the Phosphoinositide-3 kinase for xenobiotic disruption of human health. In: Gore AC, editor. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: from basic research to clinical practice. Totowa: Humana Press; 2007. p. 193–202.
Leung AM, Pearce EN, Braverman LE. Environmental perchlorate exposure: potential adverse thyroid effects. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2014;21(5):372–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/med.0000000000000090.
Braverman LE, He X, Pino S, Cross M, Magnani B, Lamm SH, et al. The effect of perchlorate, thiocyanate, and nitrate on thyroid function in workers exposed to perchlorate long-term. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(2):700–6. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1821.
Charatcharoenwitthaya N, Ongphiphadhanakul B, Pearce EN, Somprasit C, Chanthasenanont A, He X, et al. The association between perchlorate and thiocyanate exposure and thyroid function in first-trimester pregnant Thai women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(7):2365–71. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3986.
Knight BA, Shields BM, He X, Pearce EN, Braverman LE, Sturley R, et al. Effect of perchlorate and thiocyanate exposure on thyroid function of pregnant women from south-West England: a cohort study. Thyroid Res. 2018;11:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-018-0053-x.
McKinney JD, Waller CL. Polychlorinated biphenyls as hormonally active structural analogues. Environ Health Perspect. 1994;102(3):290–7. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.94102290.
Ulbrich B, Stahlmann R. Developmental toxicity of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs): a systematic review of experimental data. Arch Toxicol. 2004;78(5):252–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-003-0519-y.
Kato Y, Ikushiro S, Haraguchi K, Yamazaki T, Ito Y, Suzuki H, et al. A possible mechanism for decrease in serum thyroxine level by polychlorinated biphenyls in Wistar and Gunn rats. Toxicol Sci. 2004;81(2):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh225.
Collins WT Jr, Capen CC. Fine structural lesions and hormonal alterations in thyroid glands of perinatal rats exposed in utero and by the milk to polychlorinated biphenyls. Am J Pathol. 1980;99(1):125–42.
Khan MA, Hansen LG. Ortho-substituted polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners (95 or 101) decrease pituitary response to thyrotropin releasing hormone. Toxicol Lett. 2003;144(2):173–82.
Chauhan KR, Kodavanti PR, McKinney JD. Assessing the role of ortho-substitution on polychlorinated biphenyl binding to transthyretin, a thyroxine transport protein. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2000;162(1):10–21. https://doi.org/10.1006/taap.1999.8826.
Carpenter DO. Exposure to and health effects of volatile PCBs. Rev Environ Health. 2015;30(2):81–92. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2014-0074.
Schantz SL, Widholm JJ. Cognitive effects of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in animals. Environ Health Perspect. 2001;109(12):1197–206. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.011091197.
Gilbert ME, Rovet J, Chen Z, Koibuchi N. Developmental thyroid hormone disruption: prevalence, environmental contaminants and neurodevelopmental consequences. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(4):842–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2011.11.005.
Gruppetta M, Mercieca C, Vassallo J. Prevalence and incidence of pituitary adenomas: a population based study in Malta. Pituitary. 2013;16(4):545–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-012-0454-0.
Cannavo S, Ferrau F, Ragonese M, Curto L, Torre ML, Magistri M, et al. Increased prevalence of acromegaly in a highly polluted area. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163(4):509–13. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-10-0465.
Fortunati N, Guaraldi F, Zunino V, Penner F, D'Angelo V, Zenga F, et al. Effects of environmental pollutants on signaling pathways in rat pituitary GH3 adenoma cells. Environ Res. 2017;158:660–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2017.07.015.
Dietrich C, Kaina B. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the regulation of cell-cell contact and tumor growth. Carcinogenesis. 2010;31(8):1319–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgq028.
Cannavo S, Ragonese M, Puglisi S, Romeo PD, Torre ML, Alibrandi A, et al. Acromegaly is more severe in patients with AHR or AIP gene variants living in highly polluted areas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(4):1872–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-4191.
Cannavo S, Trimarchi F, Ferrau F. Acromegaly, genetic variants of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor pathway and environmental burden. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2017;457:81–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2016.12.019.
Shelby MD, Newbold RR, Tully DB, Chae K, Davis VL. Assessing environmental chemicals for estrogenicity using a combination of in vitro and in vivo assays. Environ Health Perspect. 1996;104(12):1296–300. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.961041296.
OECD. Test No. 440: Uterotrophic Bioassay in Rodents. 2007. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/9789264067417-en. Accessed July, 30 2019.
Denslow ND, Chow MC, Kroll KJ, Green L. Vitellogenin as a biomarker of exposure for estrogen or estrogen mimics. Ecotoxicology. 1999;8(5):385–98. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008986522208.
Heppell SA, Denslow ND, Folmar LC, Sullivan CV. Universal assay of vitellogenin as a biomarker for environmental estrogens. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103(Suppl 7):9–15. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103s79.
Matozzo V, Gagne F, Marin MG, Ricciardi F, Blaise C. Vitellogenin as a biomarker of exposure to estrogenic compounds in aquatic invertebrates: a review. Environ Int. 2008;34(4):531–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.008.
Arcaro KF, Gierthy JF. Assessing modulation of estrogenic activity of environmental and pharmaceutical compounds using MCF-7 focus assay. Methods Mol Biol. 2001;176:341–51. https://doi.org/10.1385/1-59259-115-9:341.
Ssempebwa J, Carpenter D, Yilmaz B, DeCaprio A, O'Hehir D, Arcaro K. Waste crankcase oil: an environmental contaminant with potential to modulate estrogenic responses. J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2004;67(14):1081–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15287390490452308.
Bistan M, Podgorelec M, Marinšek Logar R, Tišler T. Yeast estrogen screen assay as a tool for detecting estrogenic activity in water bodies. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2012;50(4):427–33.
Routledge E, Sheahan D, Desbrow C, Brighty G, Waldock M, Sumpter J. Identification of estrogenic chemicals in STW effluent. 2. In vivo responses in trout and roach. Environ Sci Technol. 1998;32(11):1559–65.
Naylor LH. Reporter gene technology: the future looks bright. Biochem Pharmacol. 1999;58(5):749–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00096-9.
Balaguer P, Boussioux AM, Demirpence E, Nicolas JC. Reporter cell lines are useful tools for monitoring biological activity of nuclear receptor ligands. Luminescence. 2001;16(2):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/bio.630.
Denison MS, Soshilov AA, He G, DeGroot DE, Zhao B. Exactly the same but different: promiscuity and diversity in the molecular mechanisms of action of the aryl hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Toxicol Sci. 2011;124(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr218.
EU. Methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of levels of dioxins, dioxin- like PCBs and non-dioxin-like PCBs in certain foodstuffs and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1883/2006, 252/2012 (2012).
EPA. Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program: Hershberger Assay OCSPP Guideline 890.1400 Standard Evaluation Procedure (SEP). In: Agency UEP, editor. Washington, DC2011.
Mughal BB, Demeneix BA, Fini JB. Evaluating thyroid disrupting chemicals in vivo using Xenopus laevis. Methods Mol Biol. 1801;2018:183–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7902-8_15.
Turque N, Palmier K, Le Mevel S, Alliot C, Demeneix BA. A rapid, physiologic protocol for testing transcriptional effects of thyroid-disrupting agents in premetamorphic Xenopus tadpoles. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(11):1588–93. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.7992.
Storey NM, Gentile S, Ullah H, Russo A, Muessel M, Erxleben C, et al. Rapid signaling at the plasma membrane by a nuclear receptor for thyroid hormone. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103(13):5197–201. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0600089103.
Pereira-Fernandes A, Demaegdt H, Vandermeiren K, Hectors TL, Jorens PG, Blust R, et al. Evaluation of a screening system for obesogenic compounds: screening of endocrine disrupting compounds and evaluation of the PPAR dependency of the effect. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e77481. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077481.
Casals-Casas C, Desvergne B. Endocrine disruptors: from endocrine to metabolic disruption. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:135–62. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142200.
Pereira-Fernandes A, Vanparys C, Vergauwen L, Knapen D, Jorens PG, Blust R. Toxicogenomics in the 3T3-L1 cell line, a new approach for screening of obesogenic compounds. Toxicol Sci. 2014;140(2):352–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfu092.
Odermatt A, Strajhar P, Engeli RT. Disruption of steroidogenesis: cell models for mechanistic investigations and as screening tools. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2016;158:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2016.01.009.
Ahmed KEM, Froysa HG, Karlsen OA, Blaser N, Zimmer KE, Berntsen HF, et al. Effects of defined mixtures of POPs and endocrine disruptors on the steroid metabolome of the human H295R adrenocortical cell line. Chemosphere. 2019;218:328–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.057.
Lee HB, Schwab TL, Sigafoos AN, Gauerke JL, Krug RG 2nd, Serres MR, et al. Novel zebrafish behavioral assay to identify modifiers of the rapid, nongenomic stress response. Genes Brain Behav. 2019;18(2):e12549. https://doi.org/10.1111/gbb.12549.
Huda Bhuiyan MN, Kang H, Kim JH, Kim S, Kho Y, Choi K. Endocrine disruption by several aniline derivatives and related mechanisms in a human adrenal H295R cell line and adult male zebrafish. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2019;180:326–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.05.003.
Tug N, Sandal S, Ozelgun B, Yilmaz B. Correlation of spermiogram profiles with DNA damage in sperm cells of infertile men: a comet assay study. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2011;27(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2010.487598.
Yilmaz B, Sandal S, Ayvaci H, Tug N, Vitrinel A. Genotoxicity profiles in exfoliated human mammary cells recovered from lactating mothers in Istanbul; relationship with demographic and dietary factors. Mutat Res. 2012;749(1–2):17–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.06.011.
Browne EP, Dinc SE, Punska EC, Agus S, Vitrinel A, Erdag GC, et al. Promoter methylation in epithelial-enriched and epithelial-depleted cell populations isolated from breast milk. J Hum Lact. 2014;30(4):450–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414548224.
Messerlian C, Martinez RM, Hauser R, Baccarelli AA. 'Omics' and endocrine-disrupting chemicals - new paths forward. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2017;13(12):740–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.81.
Welshons WV, Nagel SC. Vom Saal FS. Large effects from small exposures. III. Endocrine mechanisms mediating effects of bisphenol a at levels of human exposure. Endocrinology. 2006;147(6 Suppl):S56–69. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2005-1159.
Bunay J, Larriba E, Patino-Garcia D, Cruz-Fernandes L, Castaneda-Zegarra S, Rodriguez-Fernandez M, et al. Editor's highlight: differential effects of exposure to single versus a mixture of endocrine-disrupting chemicals on Steroidogenesis pathway in mouse testes. Toxicol Sci. 2018;161(1):76–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfx200.
Kelce WR, Stone CR, Laws SC, Gray LE, Kemppainen JA, Wilson EM. Persistent DDT metabolite p,p'-DDE is a potent androgen receptor antagonist. Nature. 1995;375(6532):581–5. https://doi.org/10.1038/375581a0.
Moriyama K, Tagami T, Akamizu T, Usui T, Saijo M, Kanamoto N, et al. Thyroid hormone action is disrupted by bisphenol a as an antagonist. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2002;87(11):5185–90. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-020209.
EU. Maximum levels for dioxins, dioxin-like PCBs and non dioxin-like PCBs in foodstuffs, 1259/2011 (2011).
EU. EU legislation on Maximum Residue Levels. https://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/pesticides/max_residue_levels/eu_rules_en. Accessed July, 30 2019.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grant TUBITAK 113S155 from the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (to Bayram Yilmaz).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This is a review manuscript in which no human or animal studies were performed. All studies from our laboratories have been performed in accordance with international guidelines on animal welfare and human ethics.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, B., Terekeci, H., Sandal, S. et al. Endocrine disrupting chemicals: exposure, effects on human health, mechanism of action, models for testing and strategies for prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 21, 127–147 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09521-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11154-019-09521-z