Abstract
This article contributes to the ongoing debate initiated by Bernard Williams’ claim that, due to the non-contingent finitude of the categorical desires that give meaning to our lives, an immortal life would necessarily become intolerably boring. Jeremy Wisnewski has argued that even if immortality involves periods in which our categorical desires have been exhausted, this need not divest life of meaning since some categorical desires are revivable. I argue that careful reflection upon the thought-experiments adduced by Wisnewski reveals that they do not substantiate his proposal, and hence that a plausible reason for rejecting Williams’ position has not been provided.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Burley, M. (2008). Immortality and meaning: Reflections on the Makropulos debate. Paper delivered at the Death: What it is and why it matters conference at the University of York, July 18, 2008.
Chappell, T. (2007). Infinity goes up on trial: Must immortality be meaningless? European Journal of Philosophy [published online, print version forthcoming].
Fischer J.M. (1994) Why immortality is not so bad. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2: 257–270
Glover J. (1977) Causing death and saving lives. Penguin, London
Momeyer R.W. (1988) Confronting death. Indiana University Press, Bloomington
Moore A.W. (2006) Williams, Nietzsche, and the meaninglessness of immortality. Mind 115: 311–330
Overall C. (2003) Aging, death, and human longevity: A philosophical inquiry. University of California Press, Berkeley
Scarre G. (2007) Death. Stocksfield, Acumen
Steele H. (1976) Could body-bound immortality be liveable?. Mind 85: 424–427
Williams B. (1993) The Makropulos case: Reflections on the tedium of immortality. In: Fischer J.M. (eds) The metaphysics of death. Stanford, CA, pp 73–92 [1973]
Wisnewski J.J. (2005) Is the immortal life worth living?. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 58: 27–36
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Burley, M. Immortality and boredom: a response to Wisnewski. Int J Philos Relig 65, 77–85 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9181-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-008-9181-x