Abstract
Reducing non-marital childbearing and making nonresidential fathers take greater responsibility for their children were identified as goals of numerous policy changes since the 1980s. Child-support award rates for children born to unmarried parents have been quite low historically, leading lawmakers to focus on increasing both award and payment rates for this group. Nonmarital fathers are also much less likely to have contact with their children. Although evidence suggests that policy efforts increase child support awards and receipt, the link between child support policies, child support outcomes, and father-child contact has received less attention. This paper uses data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation on children born between 1985–1997 to investigate the relationship between child-support award and receipt and the amount of contact that fathers have with their non-residential children. Since it is likely that both of these behaviors are, in part, determined by unobservable characteristics of the father, we estimate an instrumental variables Tobit model. The model is identified by our assumption that child support policy variables can impact child support awards and payments, but father-child contact cannot be directly legislated. Our results suggest that there are unintended, but desirable effects of child support establishment and collection. Policies to collect child support not only increase financial resources to families, but through their impact on payments increase visitation and contact between these children and their fathers. The estimated impact of receiving child support on contact is more than 27 days per year.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Laura M. Argys H. Elizabeth Peters Donald Waldman (2001) ArticleTitle“Can the Family Support Act Put Some Life Back into Deadbeat Dads? An Analysis of Child Support Guidelines Award Rates and Levels” Journal of Human Resources 36 IssueID2 226–252
Laura M. Argys H. Elizabeth Peters (2001) ArticleTitle“Interactions Between Unmarried Fathers and Their Children: The Role of Paternity Establishment and Child Support Policies” American Economic Review 91 IssueID2 125–129
Laura M. Argys H. Elizabeth Peters (2003) ArticleTitle“Can Adequate Child Support be Legislated? A Model of Responses to Child Suport Guidelines and Enforcement Efforts”. Economic Inquiry 41 IssueID3 463–479
Andrea H. Beller John W. Graham (1993) Small Change: The Economics of Child Support. Yale University Press New Haven, Conn
Russell Davidson G.MacKinnon James (1993) Estimation and Inference in Econometrics Oxford University Press New York
Richard B. Freeman Jane Waldfogel (2000) ArticleTitle“Dunning Delinquent Dads: The Effects of Child Support Enforcement Policy on Child Support Receipt by Never-married Women” Journal of Human Resources 36 IssueID2 207–225
Garfinkel, Irwin, Lenna Nepomnyaschy, and Ronald B. Mincy. (2002). “Child Support Enforcement and Father/Child Involvement in Fragile Families”, paper presented at the Annual Research Meeting of the Association for Public Policy and Management, Dallas, TX, November, 2002.
Irwin Garfinkel K.Robins Philip (1994) “The Relationship between Child Support Enforcement Tools and Child Support Outcomes” Irwin Garfinkel S.McLanahan Sara K.Robins Philip (Eds) Child Support and Child Well-being Urban Institute Press Washington DC 133–171
Grall, Timothy. (2002). “Custodial Mothers and Fathers and Their Child Support, 1999”, Current Population Reports, P60–217, U.S. Bureau of the Census (http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/p60–217.pdf).
Greene H. William (2000) Econometric Analysis Prentice-Hall Upper Saddle River, New Jersey
Heckman, James J., Robert J. Lalonde, and Jeffrey A. Smith. (1999).Handbook of Labor Economics, Volume 3 Edited by A. Ashenfelter and D. Card, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science BV: 1865--2097.
Hansen, Lars Peter. (1982). “Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators”, Econometrica 1029–1054.
Lucas, Robert E. (1981). “Econometric Policy Evaluation: A Critique”, in Studies in Business-Cycle Theory, edited by R.E. Lucas.
National Center for Health Statistics. (1999). “Number and Percent of Births to Unmarrried Women, by Race: United States, 1940--97. (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/statab/t1*1797.pdf)
H.Elizabeth Peters Laura M. Argys Eleanor E. Maccoby Robert H. Mnookin (1993) ArticleTitle“Enforcing Divorce Settlements: Evidence from Child Support Compliance and Award Modifications” Demography 30 IssueID4 719–735
Judith A. Seltzer S. McLanahan Sara L. Hanson Thomas (1998) “Will Child Support Enforcement Increase Father–child Contact and Parental Conflict After Separation?” Irwin Garfinkel S. McLanahan Sara Daniel Meyer A. Seltzer Judith (Eds) Fathers Under Fire. Russell Sage Foundation. New York 157–190
Sorensen, Elaine J. and Kate Pomper. (2002). “Nonresident Fathers’ Social Involvement with their Children: Does Child Support Enforcement Have an Impact?” paper presented at the Annual Research Meeting of the Association for Public Policy and Management, Dallas, TX, November, 2002 (http://www.appam.org/conferences/fall/tx02/papers/372.1.pdf).
Yoram Weiss J. Willis. Robert (1985) ArticleTitle“Children as Collective Goods in Divorce Settlements” Journal of Labor Economics 3 IssueID3 229–44
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
An earlier version of this paper was presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Economic Association, Washington DC, January 2003 and the Annual Meetings of the Association of Public Policy and Management, November 2003. Support from NICHD Grant # HD30944 is gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Suzann Eshleman for excellent computer programming and James Scully for providing us with data on genetic testing laws.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elizabeth Peters, H., Argys, L.M., Howard, H.W. et al. LEGISLATING LOVE: The Effect of Child Support and Welfare Policies on Father–child Contact. Rev Econ Household 2, 255–274 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-5647-5
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-004-5647-5