Abstract
We develop and test a dual-route model of genetic effects on reading aloud and spelling, based on irregular and non-word reading and spelling performance assessed in 1382 monozygotic and dizygotic twins. As in earlier research, most of the variance in reading was due to genetic effects. However, there were three more specific conclusions: the first was that most of the genetic effect is common to both regular and irregular reading. In addition to this common variance evidence was found for distinct genes influencing the acquisition of a lexicon of stored words, and additional genetic effects influencing the acquisition of grapheme–phoneme correspondence rules. The third conclusion, from a combined model of reading and spelling, is that reading and spelling have a common genetic basis. Models that did not distinguish lexical and non-lexical performance fit significantly worse than dual route genetic models. An implication of the research is that models of reading, whether connectionist or dual-route, must allow for the genetic independence of neurological processes underlying the decoding of non-words and irregular words.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bates T. C., Castles A., Coltheart M., Gillespie N., Wright M., Martin N. G., (2004). Behaviour genetic analyses of reading and spelling: a component processes approach Australian Journal of Psychology 56(2): 115–126
Bouchard, T. J. J., & Propping, P. (Eds.) (1993). Twins as a tool for behavioral genetics (Vol. Life Sciences Research Report 53). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
Byrne B., Wadsworth S., Corley R., Samuelsson S., Quain P., DeFries J. C., et al., (2005). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool and kindergarten phases Scientific Studies of Reading 9: 219–235
Castles A., Coltheart M., (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia Cognition 47(2): 149–180
Coltheart M., (1978). Lexical access in simple reading tasks In Underwood G., (Ed.), Strategies of information processing Academic Press London
Coltheart M., Curtis B., Atkins P., Haller M., (1993). Models of reading aloud: Dual-route and parallel-distributed-processing approaches Psychological Review 100(4): 589–608
Coltheart M., Rastle K., Perry C., Langdon R., Ziegler J., (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud Psychological Review 108(1): 204–256
DeFries J. C., Fulker D. W., LaBuda M. C., (1987). Evidence for a genetic aetiology in reading disability of twins Nature 329(6139): 537–539
DeFries J. C., Stevenson J., Gillis J. J., Wadsworth S. J., (1991). Genetic etiology of spelling deficits in the Colorado and London twin studies of reading disability Reading & Writing 3(3–4): 271–283
Ellis A. W., (1982). Normality and pathology in cognitive functions Academic Press London
Gayan J., Olson R. K., (2001). Genetic and environmental influences on orthographic and phonological skills in children with reading disabilities Developmental Neuropsychology 20(2): 483–507
Gayan J., Olson R. K., (2003). Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in printed word recognition Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 84(2): 97–123
Grigorenko E. L., Wood F. B., Meyer M. S., Pauls J. E., Hart L. A., Pauls D. L., (2001). Linkage studies suggest a possible locus for developmental dyslexia on chromosome 1p American Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics 105(1): 120–129
Harm M. W., Seidenberg M. S., (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology 18(1): 71–92
Houghton G., Zorzi M., (2003). Normal and impaired spelling in a connectionist dual-route architecture Cognitive Neuropsychology 20(2): 115–162
Jinks J. L., Fulker D. W. (1970). A comparison of the biometrical genetic, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behaviour. Psychological Bulletin, 73 311–349
Kendler K. S., Neale M. C., Kessler R. C., Heath A. C., Eaves L. J. (1993). A test of the equal-environment assumption in twin studies of psychiatric illness. Behavior Genetics 23 21–27
Martin N. G., Eaves L. J., (1977). The genetical analysis of covariance structure Heredity 38(1): 79–95
McGregor B., Pfitzner J., Zhu G., Grace M., Eldridge A., Pearson J., et al., (1999). Genetic and environmental contributions to size, color, shape, and other characteristics of melanocytic naevi in a sample of adolescent twins Genetic Epidemiology 16(1): 40–53
Morton J., Patterson K., (1987). A new attempt at an interpretation, or, an attempt at a new interpretation In Coltheart M., Patterson K., Marshall J.C., (Eds.), Deep dyslexia (2 ed.). Routledge and Kegan Paul Londonpp. 91–118
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G. & Maes, H. H. (2002). Mx: Statistical modelling (6th ed.). VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry
Neale, M. C. & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families (Vol. 67). Kluwer Academic Publishers
Nothen M. M., Schulte-Korne G., Grimm T., Cichon S., Vogt I. R., Muller-Myhsok B., et al., (1999). Genetic linkage analysis with dyslexia: evidence for linkage of spelling disability to chromosome 15 European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry 8(Suppl 3): 56–59
Petryshen T. L., Kaplan B. J., Fu Liu M., de French N. S., Tobias R., Hughes M. L., et al., (2001). Evidence for a susceptibility locus on chromosome 6q influencing phonological coding dyslexia American Journal of Medical Genetics 105(6): 507–517
Plaut D. C., McClelland J. L., Seidenberg M. S., Patterson K., (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains Psychological Review 103(1): 56–115
Plomin R., DeFries J. C., McClearn G. E., McGuffin P., (2001). Behavioral genetics (4 ed.) Worth Publishers New York
Schulte-Körne G., Grimm T., Nothen M. M., Muller-Myhsok B., Cichon S., Vogt I. R., et al., (1998). Evidence for linkage of spelling disability to chromosome 15 American Journal of Human Genetics 63(1): 279–282
Seidenberg M. S., McClelland J. L., (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming Psychological Review 96(4): 523–568
Stevenson J., Graham P., Fredman G., McLoughlin V., (1987). A twin study of genetic influences on reading and spelling ability and disability Journal of child psychology and psychiatry 28(2): 229–247
Tiu R. D., Wadsworth S. J., Olson R. K., DeFries J. C., (2004). Causal models of reading disability: a twin study Twin Research 7(3): 275–283
Trouton A., Spinath F. M., & Plomin, R. (2002). Twins early development study (TEDS): a multivariate, longitudinal genetic investigation of language, cognition and behavior problems in childhood. Twin Research 5: 444–448
Wright M., Martin N. G., (2003). The Brisbane Adolescent Twin Study: outline of study methods and research projects Australian Journal of Psychology 56 65–78
Wright M. J., De Geus E., Ando J., Luciano M., Posthuma D., Ono Y., et al., (2001). Genetics of cognition: outline of a collaborative twin study Twin Research 4(1): 48–56
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, T.C., Castles, A., Luciano, M. et al. Genetic and environmental bases of reading and spelling: A unified genetic dual route model. Read Writ 20, 147–171 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9022-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9022-1