Abstract
Genetic and environmental influences on prereading skills in preschool and on early reading and spelling development at the end of kindergarten were compared among samples of identical and fraternal twins from the U.S. (Colorado), Australia, and Scandinavia. Mean comparisons revealed significantly lower preschool print knowledge in Scandinavia, consistent with the relatively lower amount of shared book reading and letter-based activities with parents, and lack of emphasis on print knowledge in Scandinavian preschools. The patterns of correlations between all preschool environment measures and prereading skills within the samples were remarkably similar, as were the patterns of genetic, shared environment, and non-shared environment estimates: in all samples, genetic influence was substantial and shared environment influence was relatively weak for phonological awareness, rapid naming, and verbal memory; genetic influence was weak, and shared environment influence was relatively strong for vocabulary and print knowledge. In contrast, for reading and spelling assessed at the end of kindergarten in the Australian and U.S. samples, there was some preliminary evidence for country differences in the magnitude of genetic and environmental influences. We argue that the apparently higher genetic and lower shared environment influence in the Australian sample was related to a greater emphasis on formal reading instruction, resulting in more advanced reading and spelling skills at the end of kindergarten, and thus there was greater opportunity to observe genetic influences on response to systematic reading instruction among the Australian twins.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams W., Sheslow D., (1990). Wide range assessment of memory and learning Jasak Associates Wilmington, Delaware
Berko J., (1985). The child’s learning of English morphology Word 14: 47–56
Byrne B., Delaland C., Fielding-Barnsley R., Quain P., Samuelsson S., Høien T., et al. (2002). Longitudinal twin study of early reading development in three countries: Preliminary results Annals of Dyslexia 52: 49–73
Byrne B., Fielding-Barnsley R., (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up Journal of Educational Psychology 85: 104–111
Byrne B., Fielding-Barnsley R., Ashley L., (2000). Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response Journal of Educational Psychology 92: 659–667
Byrne B., Fielding-Barnsley R., Ashley L., Larsen K., (1997). Assessing the child’s and the environment’s contribution to reading acquisition: What we know and what we don’t know In Blachman B., (Ed), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention Lawrence Erlbaum Mahwah, NJ (pp. 265–286)
Byrne B., Olson R. K., Samuelsson S., Wadsworth S., Corley R., DeFries J. C., et al. (2006). Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy Journal of Research in Reading 29: 33–49
Byrne, B., Samuelsson, S., Wadsworth, S., Hulslander, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C. et al. (in press). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool through Grade 1. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Byrne, B., Shankweiler, D., & Hine, D. (in press). Reading development in children at risk for dyslexia. In M. Mody, & E. R. Silliman (Eds.), Language impairment and reading disability: Brain, behaviour, and experience. New York: Guilford Press
Byrne B., Wadsworth S., Corley R., Samuelsson S., Quain P., DeFries J. C., et al. (2005). Longitudinal twin study of early literacy development: Preschool and kindergarten phases Scientific Studies of Reading 9: 219–235
Clay M., (1975). The early detection of reading difficulties: A diagnostic survey Heinemann Auckland, New Zealand
Fisher J. P., Glenister J. M., (1992). The hundred pictures naming test Australian Council for Educational Research Hawthorn, Australia
Gathercole S. E., Willis C. S., Baddeley A. D., Emslie H., (1994). The children’s test of nonword repetition: A test of phonological working memory Memory 2: 103–127
Griffin E. A., Morrison F. J., (1997). The unique contribution of home literacy environment to differences in early literacy skills. Early Child Development & Care 127–128: 233–243
Grigorenko E. L., (2001). Developmental dyslexia: An update on genes, brains, and environments Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 42: 91–125
Hindson B. A., Byrne B., Fielding-Barnsley R., Newman C., Hine D., Shankweiler D., (2005). Assessment and early instruction of preschool children at risk for reading disability Journal of Educational Psychology 97: 687–704
Kovas Y., Hayiou-Thomas M. E., Oliver B., Dale P. S., Bishop D. V. M., Plomin R., (2005). Genetic influences in different aspects of language development: The etiology of language skills in 4,5-year-old twins Child Development 76: 632–651
Liu, Y., Dunlap, S., Fiez, J., & Perfetti, C. (2005). Learning to read characters: An FMRI study of controlled learning of orthographic, phonological, and semantic constituents. Paper presented at the Society for Scientific Studies of Reading, Toronto
Lundberg I., (1999). Literacy in Scandinavia. In Wagner D. A., Venezky R. L., Street B. V., (Eds.), Literacy-an international handbook Westview Press Oxford (pp. 396–399)
Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J., Fuchs, L., & Chhabra, V. (in press). Learning disabilities. In E. Mash, & R. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of childhood disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press
Mann V., Wimmer H, (2002). Phoneme awareness and pathways into literacy: A comparison of German and American children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal 15: 653–682
McCarthy J. J., Kirk S. A, (1961). The Illinois test of psycholinguistic abilities University of Illinois Press Urbana, IL
Neale, M. C., Boker, S. M., Xie, G., & Maes, H. H. (2002). Mx: Statistical modeling (6th ed.). VCU Box 900126, Richmond, VA 23298: Department of Psychiatry
Nichols R. C., Bilbro W. C., (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity Acta Genetica 16: 265–275
Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries. Paris: Author
Olson R. K., (2004). SSSR, environment, and genes. Scientific Studies of Reading 8: 111–124
Paulesu E., Demonet J.-F., Fazio F., McCrory E., Chanoine V., Brunswick N., et al. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity Science 291: 2165–2167
Perfetti C. (2003). The universal grammar of reading Scientific Studies of Reading 7: 3–24
Petrill, S. A., Deater-Deckard, K., Thompson, L. A., Schatschneider, C., & Dethorne, L. S. (in press). Longitudinal genetic analysis of early reading: The Western Reserve Reading Project. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Plomin R., DeFries J. C., McClearn G. E., McGuffin P., (2001). Behavioral genetics (4th ed.) Worth New York
Samuelsson S., Byrne B., Quain P., Wadsworth S., Corley R., DeFries J. C., et al. (2005). Environmental and genetic influences on prereading skills in Australia, Scandinavia, and the United States Journal of Educational Psychology 97: 705–722
Scarborough H., Dobrich W., (1994). On the efficacy of reading to preschoolers Developmental Review 14 245–302
Scarborough H. S., (1998). Early identification of children at risk for reading disabilities: Phonological awareness and some other promising predictors In Shapiro B. K., Accardo P. J., Capute A. J., (Eds), Specific reading disabilities: A view of the spectrum York Press Timonium, MD (pp. 75–119)
Sénéchal M., LeFevre J., (2002). Parental involvement in the development of children’s reading skill: A five-year longitudinal study Child Development 73: 445–460
Storch S. A., Whitehurst G., (2002). Oral language and code-related precursors to reading: Evidence from a longitudinal structural model. Developmental Psychology 38: 934–947
Stromswold K., (2001). The heritability of language: A review and metaanalysis of twin, adoption, and linkage studies Language 77: 647–723
Torgesen J., Wagner R., Rashotte C. A., (1999). A Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE) Pro-Ed Austin, Texas
Vellutino F. R., Fletcher J. M., (2005). Developmental dyslexia In Snowling M., Hulme C., (Eds), The science of reading: A handbook Blackwell Publishing Oxford
Wagner R. K., Torgesen J. K., Rashotte C. A., (1999). The Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processes (CTOPP) PRO-ED Austin, Texas
Wechsler D., (1989). Manual for the Wechsler preschool and primary scale of intelligence-revised Psychological Corporation New York
Whitehurst G. J., (1992). Family reading survey State University of New York Stony Brook
Whitehurst G. J., Lonigan C. J., (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development 69: 848–872
Willcutt, E. G., Betjemann, R. S., Wadsworth, S., Samuelsson, S., Corley, R., DeFries, J. C. et al. (in press). Preschool twin study of the relation between attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and prereading skills. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal
Acknowledgments
This research is being conducted with the support of the Research Council of Norway (154715/330), the Swedish Research Council (345-2002-3701), Stavanger University College, Australian Research Council (A79906201), and National Institutes of Health (2 P50 HD27802 and 1 R01 HD38526). We are grateful to the many twins, their families, and the twins’ teachers for their participation and to the Australian Twin Registry for its assistance. We are also grateful to expert assistance of our project coordinators and testers in Sweden (Inger Fridolfsson), Norway (Bjarte Furnes), the U.S. (Kim Corley, Rachael Cole, Pat Davis, Barb Elliot, Kari Gilmore, Amy Rudolph, Ingrid Simecek, and Angela Villella), and in Australia (Frances Attard, Fiona Black, Rosemary Brown, Marnie Church, Nicole Church, Maretta Coleman, Cara Newman, and Annette Stevenson).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Samuelsson, S., Olson, R., Wadsworth, S. et al. Genetic and environmental influences on prereading skills and early reading and spelling development in the United States, Australia, and Scandinavia. Read Writ 20, 51–75 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9018-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9018-x