Abstract
Abstract. The main type of phonemic analysis skill considered to affect spelling acquisition has been awareness of phoneme quality. However, it is also important to find out whether other measures of phoneme awareness might contribute to literacy acquisition. Thus, the influence of phoneme length and phoneme quality awareness on spelling in Finnish was compared. The Oddity task was used to assess phonemic awareness and spelling skills were investigated by a spelling-to-dictation task. The results showed that length awareness predicted spelling better than quality awareness did. Moreover, length awareness was more strongly related to spelling of long phonemes, which specifically require analysis of phoneme length, than to spelling of phoneme clusters not involving length analysis. Additionally, only length awareness predicted children's general spelling skills. These findings suggest that awareness of length, which is a phonemic attribute of the Finnish language, is connected to children's spelling skills more strongly than awareness of phoneme quality is.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bradley, L. & Bryant, P. (1983). Categorizing sounds and learning to read: A causal connection. Nature, 301, 419–421.
Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751–774.
Cataldo, S. & Ellis, N. (1990). Learning to spell, learning to read. In P.D. Pumfrey & C.D. Elliott (Eds.), Children's difficulties in reading, writing and spelling: Challenges and responses (pp. 101–125). Basingstoke: Falmer Press.
Ho, C. & Bryant, P. (1997). Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese. Developmental Psychology, 33, 946–951.
Holopainen, L., Ahonen, T., & Lyytinen, H. (2001). Predicting delay in reading achievement in a highly transparent language. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 401–413.
Lehtonen, J. (1970). Aspects of quantity in Standard Finnish. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, Å., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159–173.
Lyytinen, H., Leinonen, S., Nikula, M., Aro, M., & Leiwo, M. (1995). In search of the core features of dyslexia: Observations concerning dyslexia in the highly orthographically regular Finnish language. In V. Berninger (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge II: Relationships to phonology, reading and writing (pp. 177–204). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Matilainen, K. (1985). Lukemaanopettamismenetelmien yhteydet oikeinkirjoitustaidon oppimiseen ensimmäisen lukuvuoden aikana [The connection between literacy teaching methods and spelling development during the first school year]. Joensuu: University of Joensuu.
Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L., & Bechennec, D. (1998). Phonological mediation and semantic and orthographic factors in silent reading in French. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 3–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lehtonen, A., Bryant, P. Length awareness predicts spelling skills in Finnish. Reading and Writing 17, 875–890 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2802-6
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-004-2802-6