Abstract
Eliciting people’s value is a central pursuit in health economics. We explored approaches to valuing a health state on a visual analog scale (VAS). Additionally, we examined whether dual processing (an interaction between automatic and controlled information processing) occurred during VAS valuation. In the first experiment, respondents were probed for their approach after valuation on a VAS. After inductive generalization, we grouped the approaches: (1) ‘Sort-of ’ (automatic processing), (2) ‘Bisection of line first’, (3) ‘Numerical expression’, and (4) ‘Dividing into smaller segments’. In the second experiment, a short questionnaire followed the VAS in which these approaches were systematically assessed, as was awareness of the approach used, intention to re-use the approach the next time (confidence), and basis of the approach. Data showed that the ‘Sort-of’ approach was used most often, followed by the ‘Bisection-first’ approach. We argue that dual processing occurs during performance on the VAS. Awareness of the approach used was lower when an intuitive approach was used. A reasoned approach had a higher correlation with confidence. Thus, awareness of approach may improve reliability. Reducing the number of health states to be valued concurrently diminishes the complexity of the task; this may enhance the validity of the VAS.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- VAS:
-
visual analog scale
References
NJ Devlin P Hansen C Selai (2004) ArticleTitleUnderstanding health state valuations: A qualitative analysis of respondents’ comments Qual Life Res 13 1265–1277 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:QURE.0000037495.00959.9b Occurrence Handle15473505
H Pashler JC Johnston E Ruthruff (2001) ArticleTitleAttention and performance Annu Rev Psychol 52 629–651 Occurrence Handle10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.629 Occurrence Handle11148320 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mzptlaqtg%3D%3D
A Robinson P Dolan A Williams (1997) ArticleTitleValuing health status using VAS and TTO: What lies behind the numbers? Soc Sci Med 45 IssueID8 1289–1297 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00057-9 Occurrence Handle9381241 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FitVygtw%3D%3D
L Feldman Barrett MM Tugade RW Engle (2004) ArticleTitleIndividual differences in working memory capacity and dual-process theories of the mind Psychol Bull 130 IssueID4 553–573
JM Jansma NF Ramsey HA Slagter RS Kahn (2001) ArticleTitleFunctional anatomical correlates of controlled and automatic processing J Cogn Neuro 13 IssueID6 730–743 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3Mrhs1Kmtg%3D%3D
R Sun P Slusarz C Terry (2005) ArticleTitleThe interaction of the explicit and the implicit in skill learning: A dual-process approach Psychol Rev 112 IssueID1 159–192 Occurrence Handle15631592
AS Reber (1989) ArticleTitleImplicit learning and tacit knowledge J Exp Psychol Gen 118 IssueID3 219–235
JR Winquist JR Larson (1998) ArticleTitleInformation pooling: When it impacts group decision making J Pers Soc Psychol 74 IssueID2 371–377
JW Payne JR Bettman DA Schkade (1999) ArticleTitleMeasuring constructed preferences: Towards a building code J Risk Uncer 19 IssueID1–3 243–270
P Dolan (1997) ArticleTitleModeling valuations for EuroQol health states Med Care 35 1095–1108 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-199711000-00002 Occurrence Handle9366889 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FjtlKrtg%3D%3D
H Bleichrodt M Johannesson (1997) ArticleTitleAn experimental test of a theoretical foundation for rating-scale valuations Med Decis Making 17 IssueID2 208–216 Occurrence Handle9107617 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB287mvFQ%3D
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van Osch, S.M.C., Stiggelbout, A.M. Understanding VAS Valuations: Qualitative Data on the Cognitive Process. Qual Life Res 14, 2171–2175 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-6808-6
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-6808-6