Abstract
Purpose: Preferences are known to vary by individuals’ personal experience with a health state, but variation among respondents’ scoring of the same hypothetical state is unproven but relevant to the use of community-perspective preference scores. This research explored the systematic contribution of respondents’ age, race and gender to variability in community perspective preferences for hypothetical health states. Methods: Data from four community samples were pooled for the analysis. Linear regression modeling was used to test for the effect of respondent age, race and gender on preference scores while controlling for health state severity. Results: In this sample of 956 preference scores from 390 individuals across 4 studies, older respondents provided lower preference scores for the same hypothetical health state compared with younger respondents (regression coefficient for 1 year of age = −0.002, p < 0.001), and white individuals provided higher preference scores for the same states compared with non-white individuals (regression coefficient = 0.056, p = 0.014). Conclusion: Preferences for hypothetical health states may vary by the age and race of the respondent providing the score. Community-perspective preferences should thus be elicited from large, random samples of the relevant population to ensure variation on these as well as other yet-unidentified characteristics that may affect scores.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
PA Ubel G Loewenstein C Jepson (2003) ArticleTitleWhose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public Qual Life Res 12 599–607 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1025119931010 Occurrence Handle14516169
E Wittenberg EP Winer JC Weeks (2005) ArticleTitlePatient utilities for advanced cancer: Effect of current health on values Med Care 43 IssueID2 173–181 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200502000-00011 Occurrence Handle15655431
P Dolan (1999) ArticleTitleWhose preferences count? Med Decis Making 19 482–486 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvkvV2qtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10520686
NF Boyd HJ Sutherland KZ Heasman DL Trichler BJ Cummings (1990) ArticleTitleWhose utilities for decision analysis? Med Decis Making 10 58–67 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3itValuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle2182963
MR Gold JE Siegel LB Russell MC Weinstein (Eds) (1996) Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine Oxford University Press New York
EP Havranek JF Steiner (2005) ArticleTitleValuation of health states in the US versus UK: Two measures divided by a common language? Med Care 43 201–202 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.mlr.0000157214.08791.6a Occurrence Handle15725976
AMC O’Connor NF Boyd P Warde L Stolback JE Till (1987) ArticleTitleEliciting preferences for alternative drug therapies in oncology: Influence of treatment outcome description, elicitation technique and treatment experience on preferences J Chron Dis 40 IssueID8 811–18 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(87)90133-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiiB2M7hvV0%3D Occurrence Handle3597681
HA Llewellyn-Thomas HJ Sutherland A Ciampi J Etezadi-Amoli NF Boyd JE Till (1984) ArticleTitleThe assessment of values in larangeal cancer: Reliability of measurement methods J Chron Dis 37 283–291 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0021-9681(84)90136-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL2c7os1Sgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle6715494
HA Llewellyn-Thomas HJ Sutherland DL Tritchler GA Lockwood JE Till A Ciampi JF Scott LA Lickley EB Fish (1991) ArticleTitleBenign and malignant breast disease: The relationship between women’s health status and health values Med Decis Making 11 180–188 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3MzltFSgsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle1881274
SJT Jansen AM Stiggelbout PP Wakker MA Nooij EM Noordijk J Kievit (2000) ArticleTitleUnstable preferences: A shift in valuation or an effect of the elicitation procedure? Med Decis Making 20 62–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7gt1SktA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10638538
S Cykert JD Joines G Kissling CJ Hansen (1999) ArticleTitleRacial differences in patients’ perceptions of debilitated health states J Gen Intern Med 14 IssueID4 217–22 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.00320.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3itFyiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10203633
P Dolan (2000) ArticleTitleEffect of age on health state valuations J Health Serv Res Policy 5 IssueID1 17–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M%2Fgt1Oguw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10787582
M Cappelli L Surh L Humphreys et al. (2001) ArticleTitleMeasuring women’s preferences for breast cancer treatments and BRCA1/BRCA2 testing Qual Life Res 10 IssueID7 595–607 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1013123915272 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FptlyhtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11822793
SA Ibrahim CJ Burant LA Siminoff EP Stoller CK Kwoh (2002) ArticleTitleSelf-assessed global quality of life: A comparison between African-American and white older patients with arthritis J Clin Epidemiol 55 IssueID5 512–517 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0895-4356(01)00501-7 Occurrence Handle12007555
D Kahneman A Tversky (1979) ArticleTitleProspect theory: An analysis of decision under risk Econometrica 47 IssueID2 263–291
A Tversky D Kahneman (1992) ArticleTitleAdvances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty J Risk Uncertain 5 297–323 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00122574
P Dolan (1996) ArticleTitleThe effect of experience of illness on health state valuations J Clin Epidemiol 49 IssueID5 551–564 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0895-4356(95)00532-3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283ktVCquw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8636729
GC Brown (1999) ArticleTitleVision and quality-of-life Transactions of the American Opthamological Society 97 473–511 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7mslOrtg%3D%3D
EZ Oddone RD Horner DC Johnston et al. (2002) ArticleTitleCarotid endarterectomy and race: Do clinical indications and patient preferences account for differences? Stroke 33 IssueID12 2936–2943 Occurrence Handle10.1161/01.STR.0000043672.42831.EB Occurrence Handle12468794
BL Thompson D Lawson M Croughan-Minihane M Cooke (1999) ArticleTitleDo patients’ ethnic and social factors influence the use of do-not-resuscitate orders? Ethn Dis 9 IssueID1 132–139 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M3otFKisQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10355482
CE Gessert NM Curry A Robinson (2001) ArticleTitleEthnicity and end-of-life care: The use of feeding tubes Ethn Dis 11 IssueID1 97–106 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7pvFejsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11289258
JW Shaw JA Johnson SJ Coons (2005) ArticleTitleUS valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model Med Care 43 203–220 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003 Occurrence Handle15725977
Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C, Harper R, Booth A. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess 1999; 3: ch. 4.
LA Prosser KM Kuntz A Bar-Or MC Weinstein (2003) ArticleTitlePatient and community preferences for treatments and health states in multiple sclerosis Multiple Sclerosis 9 311–319 Occurrence Handle10.1191/1352458503ms903oa Occurrence Handle12814182
SJ Walters JE Brazier (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D Qual Life Res 14 1523–1532 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11136-004-7713-0 Occurrence Handle16110932
KW Wyrwich M Bullinger N Aaronson RD Hays DL Patrick T, Symonds (2005) ArticleTitleEstimating clinically significant differences in quality of life outcomes Qual Life Res 14 285–295 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11136-004-0705-2 Occurrence Handle15892420
GH Guyatt D Osoba AW Wu KW Wyrwich GR Norman (2002) ArticleTitleClinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group. Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures Mayo Clin Proc 77 371–383 Occurrence Handle11936935 Occurrence Handle10.4065/77.4.371
HJ Schuenemann GH Guyatt (2005) ArticleTitleCommentary – Goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res 40 593–597 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.0k375.x
MF Drummond (2001) ArticleTitleIntroducing economic and quality of life measures into clinical studies Ann Med 33 344–349 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvksFWqsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11491193
SAS 9.1, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, 2002–2003.
H Bleichrodt C Herrero JL Pinto (2002) ArticleTitleA proposal to solve the comparability problem in cost-utility analysis J Health Econ 21 IssueID3 397–403 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00136-9 Occurrence Handle12022265
JA Johnson N Luo JW Shaw P Kind SJ Coons (2005) ArticleTitleValuations of the EQ-5D health states: Are the United States and United Kingdom different? Med Care 43 221–228 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004 Occurrence Handle15725978
P Dolan J Roberts (2002) ArticleTitleTo what extent can we explain time trade-off values from other information about respondents? Soc Sci Med 54 919–929 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00066-1 Occurrence Handle11996025
J Flynn P Slovic CK Mertz (1994) ArticleTitleGender, race and perception of environmental health risks Risk Analysis 14 1101–1108 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7kvV2jtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle7846319
I Savage (1993) ArticleTitleDemographic influences on risk perceptions Risk Analysis 13 IssueID4 413–420 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2Flt1yqsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle8234949
JS Mandelblatt J Hadley J Kerner et al. (2000) ArticleTitlePatterns of breast carcinoma treatment in older women. Patient preference and clinical and physician influences Cancer 89 561–573 Occurrence Handle10.1002/1097-0142(20000801)89:3<561::AID-CNCR11>3.0.CO;2-A Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvgt1arsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10931455
ML Margolis JD Christie GA Silvestri S Santiago J Hansen-Flaschen (2003) ArticleTitleRacial differences pertaining to a belief about lung cancer surgery. Results of a multicenter survey Ann Intern Med 139 IssueID7 558–563 Occurrence Handle14530226
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wittenberg, E., Halpern, E., Divi, N. et al. The Effect of Age, Race and Gender on Preference Scores for Hypothetical Health States. Qual Life Res 15, 645–653 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3514-3
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-3514-3