Abstract
Among the most widely used instruments to assess quality of life (QOL) in patients with cancer are the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer core questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy, cancer instrument (FACT-G). This study compared these approaches in patients who had undergone esophagectomy for cancer. The EORTC core questionnaire and esophageal module and the FACT-G and esophageal scale were completed by 57 patients. Missing data, relationships between QOL scales and analyses of patients’ preferences were examined. There were 14/2736 (0.5%) missing items from EORTC questionnaires and 45/2565 (1.8%) from FACT instruments (p < 0.01). Relationships between corresponding generic EORTC and FACT scales were average to good (r 0.57) except for the social function scale (r = 0.01). EORTC symptom scores were moderately correlated with the FACT general scale, but poorly related to the FACT esophageal scale (r < 0.28). EORTC swallowing scores were moderately correlated with all FACT scales. The FACT-E and EORTC QLQ-C30 measure assess similar generic aspects of QOL (except social function). EORTC esophageal symptom scores relate poorly to FACT esophageal scales, except for swallowing. Choice of QOL measure after esophagectomy for cancer depends upon outcomes of interest. Future studies will determine which instruments are appropriate in each context.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
NK Aaronson S Ahmedzai B Bergman et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85 365–376 Occurrence Handle10.1093/jnci/85.5.365 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC28vivVc%3D Occurrence Handle8433390
DF Cella DS Tulsky G Gray et al. (1993) ArticleTitleThe Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 11 570–579 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1cjmvFc%3D Occurrence Handle8445433
G Kemmler B Holzner M Kopp et al. (1999) ArticleTitleComparison of two quality of life instruments for cancer patients: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30. J Clin Oncol 17 2932–2940
M Kopp H Schweigkofler B Holzner et al. (2000) ArticleTitleEORTC QLQ-C30 and FACT-BMT for the measurement of quality of life in bone marrow transplant recipients: A comparison. Eur J Haematol 65 97–103
B Holzner G Kemmler B Sperner-Unterweger et al. (2001) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement in oncology–a matter of the assessment instrument? Eur J Cancer 37 2349–2356
JM Blazeby D Alderson K Winstone et al. (1996) ArticleTitleDevelopment of a EORTC questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessment for patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 32 1912–1917
JM Blazeby T Conroy E Hammerlid et al. (2003) ArticleTitleClinical and psychometric validation of an EORTC questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-OES18, to assess quality of life in patients with oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cancer 39 1384–1394
Cella D. Manual of the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Measurement System Version 4. Center on Outcomes, Research and Education (CORE), Evanston Northwestern Healthcare and Northwestern University, 1997.
JM Blazeby MH Williams ST Brookes D Alderson JR Farndon (1995) ArticleTitleQuality of life measurement in patients with oesophageal cancer. Gut 37 505–508
JA Brooks KA Kesler CS Johnson D Ciaccia JW Brown (2002) ArticleTitleProspective analysis of quality of life after surgical resection for esophageal cancer: Preliminary Results. J Surg Oncol 81 185–194
Fayers P, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual. 3rd, 0–86. 2001.
JM Blazeby JR Farndon JL Donovan D Alderson (2000) ArticleTitleA prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer 88 1781–1787 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000415)88:8<1781::AID-CNCR4>3.3.CO;2-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3isFGrug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10760752
AJ McLarty C Deschamps VF Trastek MS Allen PC Pairolero WS Harmsen (1997) ArticleTitleOesophageal resection for cancer of the oesophagus: Long-term function and quality of life. Ann Thor Surg 63 1568–1572
SB Detmar MJ Muller JH Schornagel LD Wever NK Aaronson (2002) ArticleTitleHealth-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. J Am Med Assoc 288 3027–3034
SM Griffin CS. Robertson (1993) ArticleTitleNon-surgical treatment of cancer of the oesophagus. Br J Surg 80 412–413
AM Cull (1992) ArticleTitleThe sssessment of sexual function in cancer patients. Eur J Cancer 28A IssueID10 1680–1688
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blazeby, J.M., Kavadas, V., Vickery, C.W. et al. A prospective comparison of quality of life measures for patients with esophageal cancer. Qual Life Res 14, 387–393 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0622-4
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-004-0622-4