Abstract
Over the past four decades, research has consistently documented negative correlations between the Crowne–Marlowe (CM) social desirability trait scale and numerous measures of sensitive behaviors, conditions, and opinions. These findings have been interpreted as evidence that persons with self-presentation concerns tend to under-report negative information. In contrast to this classic social desirability interpretation, a second perspective, labeled the true-behavior hypothesis, maintains that these correlations in fact reflect accurate reporting of both sets of variables, suggesting that the CM scale is not a sensitive indicator of the social desirability trait. We test these alternative interpretations by examining data from a community survey that collected both self-reports of cocaine use and the biological specimens necessary to validate the self-reports. In bivariate analyses, the CM scale was found to be associated with the concordance of cocaine use reporting and biological assays in a manner consistent with the classic social desirability hypothesis. The CM scale was not found to be associated with actual cocaine use, as measured by drug test assays, a finding inconsistent with the true-behavior hypothesis. After adjusting for other known correlates of substance use in logistic regression models, the CM scale was not associated with cocaine use under-reporting, nor with actual cocaine use behavior. Until further evidence is available, we conclude that the CM may be a questionable indicator of socially desirable reporting behavior in social surveys.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
American Association for Public Opinion Research.: Standard Definitions: Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcomes for Surveys. Ann Arbor, Michigan: American Association for Public Opinion Research (2000)
Barger S. D.: The Marlowe–Crowne affair: short forms, psychometric structure, and social desirability. J. Pers. Assess. 79, 286–305 (2002)
Beretvas S. N., Meyers J. L., Leite W. L.: A reliability generalization study of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 62, 570–589 (2002)
Bishop G. F., Tuchfarber A. J., Oldendick R. W.: Opinions on fictitious issues: the pressure to answer survey questions. Public Opin. Q. 50, 240–250 (1986)
Bonczar, T. P., Beck, A. J.: Lifetime Likelihood of Going to State or Federal Prison. Special Report, U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC (1997). Retrieved October 6, 2003 from http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/llgsfp.pdf
Bradburn N. M., Sudman Seymour and Associates: Reinterpreting the Marlowe-Crown scale. In: Bradburn, N. M. (ed.) Improving Interview Method and Questionnaire Design. Seymour Sudman and Associates, pp. 85–106. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1979)
Bryant B. E.: Respondent selection in a time of changing household composition. J. Mark. Res. 12, 129–135 (1975)
Carr L. G., Krause N.: Social status, psychiatric symptomatology, and response bias. J. Health Soc. Behav. 19, 86–91 (1978)
Carstensen L. L., Cone J. D.: Social desirability and the measurement of psychological well-being in elderly persons. J. Pers. 38, 713–715 (1983)
Ceci S. J.: How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A reassessment of the evidence. Dev. Psychol. 27, 703–722 (1991)
Cicourel A. V.: Method and Measurement in Sociology. Free Press, New York (1964)
Cone E. J.: New developments in biological measures of drug prevalence. In: Harrison, L., Hughes, A. (eds) The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, pp. 108–129. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville (1997)
Couper M. P., Singer E., Tourangeau R.: Understanding the effects of audio-CASI on self-reports of sensitive behavior. Public Opin. Q. 67, 396–406 (2003)
Crowne D. P., Marlowe D.: A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. J. Consult. Psychol. 24, 349–354 (1960)
Crowne D. P., Marlowe D.: The Approval Motive. Wiley, New York (1964)
DeMaio T. J.: Social Desirability and Survey Measurement: A Review. In: Turner, C., Martin, E. (eds) Surveying Subjective Phenomena, pp. 257–282. Russell Sage, New York (1984)
Dijkstra W., Smit J. H., Comijs H. C.: Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Qual. Quan. 35, 107–115 (2001)
Edwards A. L.: The Social Desirability Variable in Personality Assessment and Research. Dryden Press, New York (1957)
Fendrich M., Johnson T. P., Sudman S., Wislar J., Spiehler V.: Validity of drug use reporting in a high-risk community sample: a comparison of cocaine and heroin survey reports with hair tests. Am. J. Epidemiol. 149, 955–962 (1999)
Fleiss, J. L.: Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1981)
Gick M., McLeod C., Hulihan D.: Absorption, social desirability, and symptoms in a behavioral medicine population. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 185, 454–458 (1997)
Gove W. R., McCorkel J., Fain T., Hughes M. D.: Response bias in community surveys of mental health: systematic bias or random noise?. Soc. Sci. Med. 10, 497–502 (1976)
Groves R. M., Couper M. P.: Nonresponse in Household Interview Surveys. Wiley, New York (1998)
Hser Y.-I.: Self-reported drug use: results of selected empirical investigations of validity. In: Harrison, L., Hughes, A. (eds) The Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use: Improving the Accuracy of Survey Estimates, pp. 320–343. National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville (1997)
Johnson T. P., Bowman P. J.: Cross-cultural sources of measurement error in substance use surveys. Subst. Use Misuse 38, 1447–1490 (2003)
Klassen D., Hornstra R. K., Anderson P. B.: Influence of social desirability on symptom and mood reporting in a community survey. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 43, 448–452 (1975)
Kozma A., Stones M. J.: Social desirability in measures of subjective well-being: a systematic evaluation. J. Gerontol. 42, 56–59 (1987)
Krosnick J. A.: The impact of cognitive sophistication and attitude importance on response-order and question-order effects. In: Schwarz, N., Sudman, S. (eds) Context Effects in Social and Psychological Research, pp. 203–218. Springer-Verlag, New York (1992)
Levy P. S., Lemeshow S.: Sampling of Populations. Methods and Applications. Wiley, New York (1991)
Linehan M. M., Nielson S. L.: Social desirability: its relevance to the measurement of hopelessness and suicidal behavior. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51, 141–143 (1983)
McCrae R. R.: Well-being scales do not measure social desirability. J. Gerontol. 41, 390–392 (1986)
McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr.: Social desirability scales: more substance than style. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 51, 882–888 (1983)
Magura S., Kang S.-Y.: The validity of self-reported drug use in high risk populations: a meta-analytic review. Subst. Use Misuse 31, 1131–1153 (1996)
Moorman R. H., Podsakoff P. M.: A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 65, 131–149 (1992)
Narayan S., Krosnick J. A.: Education moderates some response effects in attitude measurement. Public Opin. Q. 60, 58–88 (1996)
Office of Applied Studies: Summary of Findings from the 1999 National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. DHHS Publication No. SMA 00-3466, NHSDA Series H-12. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2000)
Office of Applied Studies: Development of Computer-Assisted Interviewing Procedures for the National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. DHHS Publication No. SMA 01-3514, Methodology Series: M-3. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2001)
Paulhus D. L.: Measurement and control of response bias. In: Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. (eds) Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes, pp. 17–59. Academic Press, San Diego (1991)
Paulhus D. L.: Paulhus Deception Scales (PDS): The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding-7, User’s Manual. Multi-Health Systems, Inc., North Tonawanda, NY (1998)
Phillips D. L., Clancy K. J.: Response biases in field studies of mental illness. Am. Sociol. Rev. 35, 503–515 (1970)
Phillips D. L., Clancy K. J.: Some effects of ‘Social desirability’ in survey studies. AJS 77, 921–940 (1972)
Pleck J. H., Sonenstein F. L., Ku L.: Black-white differences in adolescent males’ substance use: are they explained by underreporting by Blacks?. J. Gend. Cult. Health 1, 247–265 (1996)
Roscoe M., Morton R.: “Disproportionate Minority Confinement.” Fact Sheet #11. U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, Washington, DC (1994). Retrieved from October 6, 2003 from http://www.ncjrs.org/txtfiles/fs-9411.txt
Ross C. E., Mirowsky J.: The worst place and the best face. Soc. Forces 62, 529–536 (1983)
Ross C. E., Mirowsky J.: Socially-desirable response and acquiescence in a cross-cultural survey of mental health. J. Health Soc. Behav. 25, 189–197 (1984)
Stone C.: Race, crime, and the administration of justice. Nat. Inst. Justice J. 239, 26–32 (1999)
Strahan R., Gerbasi K. C.: Short, homogeneous versions of the Marlowe–Crowne social desirability scale. J. Clin. Psychol. 28, 191–193 (1972)
Strosahl K. D., Chiles J. A., Linehan M. M.: Will the real social desirability please stand up? Hopelessness, depression, social desirability, and the prediction of suicidal behavior. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 52, 449–457 (1984)
Tourangeau R., Smith T. W.: Asking sensitive questions: the impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opin. Q. 60, 275–304 (1996)
Turner C. F., Ku L., Rogers S. M., Lindberg L. D., Pleck J. H., Sonenstein F. L.: Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science 280, 867–873 (1998)
Warnecke R. B., Johnson T. P., Chavez N., Sudman S., O’Rourke D. P., Lacey L., Horm J.: Improving question wording in surveys of culturally diverse populations. Ann. Epidemiol. 7, 334–342 (1997)
Watten R. G.: Coping styles in abstainers from alcohol. Psychopathology 29, 340–346 (1996)
Welte J. W., Russell M.: Influence of socially desirable responding in a study of stress and substance abuse. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 17, 758–761 (1993)
Wolff K., Farrell M., Marsden J., Montiero M. G., Ali R., Welch S., John S.: A review of biological indicators of illicit drug use, practical considerations and clinical usefulness. Addiction 94, 1279–1298 (1999)
Yoshino A., Kato M.: Influence of social desirability response set on self-report for assessing the outcome of treated alcoholics. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 19, 1517–1519 (1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnson, T.P., Fendrich, M. & Mackesy-Amiti, M.E. An evaluation of the validity of the Crowne–Marlowe need for approval scale. Qual Quant 46, 1883–1896 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9563-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9563-5