Abstract
This paper offers a first approach to the study of citing behaviour in the literature on differential item functioning (DIF) and provides new information about the main characteristics that define that behaviour. With a focus on articles listed in the Web of Science for the period 1975–2000, the present research considers the number of self-citations included in each paper with respect to other bibliometric indicators such as year of publication, the number of signatories to a paper, author’s country of origin and the journal in which it was published. In general terms it can be concluded that in studies of DIF the mean percentage of self-citations is around 11%, this figure remaining stable over time; there is a positive correlation between the number of signatories to an article and the number of self-citations. This paper has offered a first approach to the study of citing behaviour in the literature on DIF.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aksnes D.W.: A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56, 235–246 (2003)
Basulto Santos J., Ortega Irizo F.J.: Modelling citation age data with right censoring. Scientometrics 62(3), 329–342 (2005)
Bonzi S., Snyder H.W.: Patterns of self citations across fields of inquiry. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information and Science 27, 204–207 (1990)
Bonzi S., Snyder H.W.: Motivations for citation: a comparison of self citation and citation to others. Scientometrics 21(2), 245–254 (1991)
Case D.O., Higgins G.M.: How can we investigate citation behavior? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(7), 635–645 (2000)
Dimitroff A., Arlitsch K.: Self-citations in the library and information science literature. J. Doc. 51(1), 44–56 (1995)
Glänzel W., Schoepflin U.: A bibliometric study of reference literature in the sciences and social sciences. Inf. Process. Manag. 35, 31–44 (1999)
Glänzel W., Thijs B.: Does co-authorship inflate the share of self-citations?. Scientometrics 61(3), 395–404 (2004)
Glänzel W., Thijs B., Schlemmer B.: A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics 59(1), 63–77 (2004)
Gómez Benito J., Hidalgo Montesinos M.D., Guilera Ferré G., Moreno Torrente M.: A bibliometric study of differential item functioning. Scientometrics 64(1), 3–16 (2005)
Hyland K.: Self-citation and self-reference: credibility and promotion in academic publication. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 54(3), 251–259 (2003)
Lawani S.M.: On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 33(5), 281–284 (1982)
Phelan T.J.: A compendium of issues for citation analysis. Scientometrics 45(1), 117–136 (1999)
Pichappan P., Sarasvady S.: The other side of the coin: the intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics 54(2), 285–290 (2002)
Shadish W., Tolliver D., Gray M., Gupta S.: Author judgments about works they cite: three studies from psychology journals. Soc. Stud. Sci. 25(3), 477–498 (1995)
Snyder H., Bonzi S.: Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). J. Inf. Sci. 24(6), 431–435 (1998)
Tagliacozzo R.: Self-citations in scientific literature. J. Doc. 33(4), 251–265 (1977)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guilera, G., Gómez-Benito, J. & Hidalgo, M.D. Citation analysis in research on differential item functioning. Qual Quant 44, 1249–1255 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9274-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-009-9274-3