Abstract
This review presents a broad overview of the research that enabled the structure determination of the bacterial reaction centers from Blastochloris viridis and Rhodobacter sphaeroides, with a focus on the contributions from Duysens, Clayton, and Feher. Early experiments performed in the laboratory of Duysens and others demonstrated the utility of spectroscopic techniques and the presence of photosynthetic complexes in both oxygenic and anoxygenic photosynthesis. The laboratories of Clayton and Feher led efforts to isolate and characterize the bacterial reaction centers. The availability of well-characterized preparations of pure and stable reaction centers allowed the crystallization and subsequent determination of the structures using X-ray diffraction. The three-dimensional structures of reaction centers revealed an overall arrangement of two symmetrical branches of cofactors surrounded by transmembrane helices from the L and M subunits, which also are related by the same twofold symmetry axis. The structure has served as a framework to address several issues concerning bacterial photosynthesis, including the directionality of electron transfer, the properties of the reaction center-cytochrome c 2 complex, and the coupling of proton and electron transfer. Together, these research efforts laid the foundation for ongoing efforts to address an outstanding question in oxygenic photosynthesis, namely the molecular mechanism of water oxidation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Photosynthesis is a biological process that converts sunlight energy into chemical energy and drives biochemical reactions in plants, algae, cyanobacteria, purple bacteria, and green bacteria. The initial discoveries concerning photosynthesis were in the 1600s and 1700s as van Helmont measured the mass of trees as they grew and Priestly discovered the production of oxygen by plants. The term “photosynthesis” was originally called “photosyntax” by (Barnes 1893) and later changed to “photosynthesis” by MacMillan (Gest 2006). Since these initial studies, the pathway of understanding photosynthesis has involved an enormous number of research groups who have unraveled the chemical nature of the reactions as well as the structures of photosynthetic pigment-protein complexes (Blankenship 2002; Govindjee et al. 2006). Photosynthesis can be divided into two general categories, oxygenic as performed by algae, cyanobacteria, and plants, and anoxygenic as performed by bacteria. In this paper, we focus on anoxygenic photosynthesis, in particular on the cyclic pathway carried out in purple bacteria (Blankenship et al. 1995; Hunter et al. 2009). In purple bacteria such as Rhodobacter sphaeroides (formerly Rhodopseudomonas spheroides and Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides), light initially excites bacteriochlorophylls (BChls) in the antenna complexes. The light energy is transferred to the site of the primary photochemistry, the reaction center, leading to the transfer of an electron from the primary electron donor, the bacteriochlorophyll dimer P865, through intermediates to the secondary quinone, QB. After the oxidized bacteriochlorophyll dimer, P865•+, is reduced by cytochrome c 2, it can be excited again by light resulting in the transfer of a second electron to QB, which is coupled with proton transfer. The resulting quinol leaves the reaction center and binds to the cytochrome bc 1 complex, leading to oxidation of the quinol and electron transfer to the hemes and iron-sulfur centers of the cytochrome bc 1 complex. This electron transfer in the cytochrome bc 1 complex results in proton transfer across the cell membrane, which drives the formation of energy-rich compounds such as ATP and NADPH. The cyclic electron transfer pathway is completed by the transfer of electrons from the cytochrome bc 1 complex back to the reaction center through cytochrome c 2.
In this article, we first review some of the historical developments that enabled the determination of the structure, namely the identification of antenna complexes and photosystems as well as the isolation and characterization of the bacterial reaction center. Then, we discuss how biochemical and spectroscopic results facilitated the determination and interpretation of the three-dimensional structures of the reaction center from Blastochloris viridis (formerly Rhodopseudomonas viridis) and R. sphaeroides. Finally, we discuss how the molecular mechanism of reaction centers has been elucidated by a combination of structural, mutagenesis, and spectroscopic experiments with the specific examples of proton transfer to the secondary quinone, electron transfer from the exogeneous cytochrome c 2 to the primary electron donor, and the use of reaction centers as a framework to understand photosystem II.
Identification of pigment-protein complexes in photosynthetic organisms
The development of an instrument that could illuminate samples using flashes of light by Emerson and Arnold (Emerson and Arnold 1932) provided the opportunity to precisely measure oxygen release from photosynthetic organisms due to illumination. One outcome was the postulation of a minimal structural unit capable of performing light-induced electron transfer. Another was the realization that the ratio of oxygen production per chlorophyll molecule was very low, which today is recognized as resulting from the large number of chlorophylls that serve as antenna molecules. These observations led to questions concerning the efficiency of light conversion in photosynthesis. To address those questions, Emerson and coworkers measured the dependence of the efficiency on the excitation wavelength and showed that the photosynthetic rate dramatically dropped with the use of red light, with this effect becoming known as the red drop. Unexpectedly, a dramatic enhancement of the rate was observed when two beams of red light with different wavelengths were used simultaneously (Emerson et al. 1957). The increase in the rate of oxygen production was much higher than the sum of the rates based upon the individual wavelengths and was termed the enhancement effect.
An outcome of these and other experiments was the conceptual formulation that oxygenic photosynthesis uses two sequential photosystems, with one photosystem providing the molecules that serve as substrates for the other (Hill and Bendall 1960). This concept received a key boost by an experimental observation by Duysens and coworkers (Duysens et al. 1961). His laboratory had built sensitive optical spectrometers and demonstrated that the oxidation state of cytochrome f could be measured optically. Cytochrome f was reduced under dark conditions but oxidized under illumination as measured using difference absorption spectra, namely light-minus-dark spectra (Duysens 1954, 1989). The use of different wavelengths for excitation showed a pattern of oxidation of the cytochrome with infrared light but a reduction of the cytochrome with green light (Fig. 1). These opposite outcomes from the different excitation wavelengths, termed the antagonistic effects, were dramatic and provided clear support for the concept of two independent photosystems. The infrared light is largely absorbed by photosystem I resulting in oxidation of cytochrome f with reduction of NADP+. In the red alga Porphyridium cruentum, the antenna complexes preferentially absorb the green light and direct that light energy to photosystem II resulting in oxidization of water with reduction of cytochrome f. The interpretation of these experiments has now been solidified as the Z scheme that links together the involvement of the different pigment-protein complexes in the overall electron transfer pathway.
Over the same period of time, the photosynthetic process in anoxygenic prokaryotes was being investigated. In addition to his work on oxygenic photosynthesis, Duysens characterized purple bacteria using the optical spectroscopy techniques (Duysens 1951, 1952). This research provided direct evidence of light-induced changes in the optical spectrum that later were identified as arising from the reaction center. Through these studies, it was found that the efficiency of energy transfer could be estimated by comparing the amplitudes of the fluorescence spectrum to the absorption spectrum. By measuring the fluorescence as a function of temperature in R. sphaeroides, the efficiency of energy transfer from antenna pigments to the reaction centers was determined to be nearly 100 % (van Grondelle et al. 1978). The antenna pigments were later found to be BChl cofactors of the light-harvesting I and II complexes (Cogdell et al. 1999).
Isolation and characterization of bacterial reaction centers
Clayton began an investigation of the light-induced optical changes of R. sphaeroides around 1960 (Clayton 1988, 2002). Chance and Nishimura had shown that the light-dependent oxidation of cytochrome in Chromatium vinosum still occurred at liquid nitrogen temperatures (Chance and Nishimura 1960). For these early studies, experiments were performed on membrane fragments termed chromatophores, which are small vesicles formed after the cells are broken by a French press or other device. To examine the effect of low temperatures, chromatophores from different purple bacteria were measured and light-induced absorption changes were observed even at liquid helium temperatures (Arnold and Clayton 1960). The absorption spectrum of chromatophores from R. sphaeroides showed a large number of light-induced spectral changes in the light-minus-dark difference spectrum, notably including an absorption decrease at 865 nm (Fig. 2). These spectral differences were assigned as arising from oxidation of BChl and cytochrome and reduction of quinone. These findings were in agreement with earlier observations of samples from R. rubrum that showed light-induced absorption changes at ~870 nm (Duysens 1952). The studies by Clayton were boosted by the development of a carotenoid-less mutant, termed R-26, which has a simpler optical spectrum than wild type due to the lack of one of the light-harvesting complexes (Clayton and Smith 1960) and was found to be easier to work with biochemically. The name reaction center was proposed by Clayton (Clayton 1963) as the complex that catalyzed the light-driven photosynthetic electron transfer.
Beginning in 1968, Feher started research on bacterial photosynthesis after a career in solid state physics that included experiments using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and the development of electron-nuclear double resonance (ENDOR) spectroscopy (Feher 1998). These techniques proved to be very suitable for examining photosynthetic processes as they are sensitive probes of cofactors, such as the primary electron donor and electron acceptors, when they are oxidized or reduced. His laboratory obtained cultures of R. sphaeroides R-26 and characterized the reaction centers using EPR spectroscopy (McElroy et al. 1969). The major light-induced changes in the EPR spectrum and the absorption at 865 nm in the optical spectrum were assigned to the primary electron donor, P865. Similar conclusions were also reached by Loach and Sekura (1967), Parson (1968), and Clayton and coworkers (Bolton et al. 1969).
The early experiments were limited by the use of chromatophores, which have reaction centers as well as other complexes such as the light-harvesting antenna and cytochrome bc 1 complex. The many spectroscopic signatures provided the opportunity to determine the conditions needed to isolate pure and active reaction centers. By treating chromatophores of R. sphaeroides with Triton X-100, Clayton and Reed successfully isolated the first batch of crude reaction centers (Reed and Clayton 1968). Feher replaced Triton X-100 with another detergent, lauryldimethylamine oxide, which resulted in a significantly improved preparation of the reaction centers (Feher 1971). Modifications of these initial preparations led to the ability to obtain large quantities of very pure protein (Clayton and Wang 1971; Feher and Okamura 1978). The availability of pure preparations of reaction centers from purple bacteria led to these reaction centers being intensively studied and consequently serving as a model system for photosystems I and II, which have many more cofactors and protein subunits.
The availability of purified reaction centers enabled one of the notable discoveries using EPR, namely the identification of the primary electron donor as a BChl dimer. Due to the unpaired electron, the oxidized primary electron donor has an EPR signal (Fig. 3). In 1971, Norris measured the EPR signals from chloroplasts and chromatophores from different organisms and noted that the narrower linewidths observed for oxidized BChls and Chls in photosynthetic systems compared to isolated BChl+ or Chl+ in solution could be explained as arising from the unpaired electron being shared over two tetrapyrroles rather than residing on only one tetrapyrrole (Norris et al. 1971). This postulate was confirmed with ENDOR experiments showing a reduction of the hyperfine couplings that was consistent with the distribution of electrons over two BChls (Feher et al. 1975; Norris et al. 1975). Thus, the combination of EPR and ENDOR revealed P865 to be a BChl dimer.
The three-dimensional structures of bacterial reaction centers
The primary structure of the reaction center was obtained by sequencing the genes encoding the protein subunits. Through a collaboration between Feher and Steiner, the amino-terminal regions of the three subunits of reaction centers from R. sphaeroides were determined, allowing the construction of oligonucleotide probes that were used to identify the genes (Sutton et al. 1982; Williams et al. 1983, 1984, 1986). At the same time, the sequences of the genes encoding the reaction centers from Rhodobacter capsulatus (formerly Rhodopseudomonas capsulata) were determined by Youvan and coworkers (Youvan et al. 1984). For reaction centers from both organisms, the sequences of the L and M subunits each showed the presence of very hydrophobic regions of 20–25 amino acid residues consistent with the presence of five transmembrane helices. The H subunit showed a much different sequence, with only one long hydrophobic stretch of amino acid residues followed by a water-soluble domain. Also revealed was a sequence homology of the L and M subunits of reaction centers with the D1 and D2 subunits of photosystem II, demonstrating an evolutionary relationship between anoxygenic and oxygenic photosynthesis (Williams et al. 1983; Youvan et al. 1984).
While the sequences delineated the general organization of the protein in the cell membrane, determination of the three-dimensional organization of the protein and cofactors required the use of X-ray diffraction. At that time, these experiments were considered to be not feasible as they make use of crystals and despite success with hundreds of water-soluble proteins, no membrane protein had been successfully crystallized. A critical reason for the lack of crystals of membrane proteins was the difficulty in obtaining the abundant amounts of pure protein needed for the trial-and-error approach of crystallization experiments. The availability of pure preparations of bacterial reaction centers that could be isolated in large quantities from bacterial cultures provided the opportunity to test numerous combinations of conditions allowing the crystallization of bacterial reaction centers to be pursued in several laboratories. In 1982, Michel reported the crystallization of reaction centers from B. viridis (Michel 1982) that was soon followed by the crystallization of reaction centers from R. sphaeroides (Allen and Feher 1984). These efforts demonstrated the feasibility of crystallizing membrane proteins using combinations of detergents to solubilize membrane proteins and small amphiphiles to supplement the detergents (Michel 1983).
With the availability of the crystals, the determination of the three-dimensional structures of the reaction centers from B. viridis and R. sphaeroides fell into place (Fig. 4) (Deisenhofer et al. 1985, 1995; Allen et al. 1987a, 1987b; Chang et al. 1991). The three-dimensional structure revealed the presence of five long helices, in each of the L and M subunits, that correspond to the long regions of hydrophobic residues, thus the identification of the helices as being transmembrane was straightforward (Yeates et al. 1987). The H subunit has a large hydrophilic domain on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane while the reaction centers from B. viridis also have a large tetraheme subunit on the periplasmic side of the membrane. One of the striking features of the structures is the approximate twofold symmetry axis of the reaction center. The cofactors are arranged into two branches with the symmetry axis passing from the primary electron donor to the non-heme iron. The symmetry axis also relates the long transmembrane helices of the L and M subunits. For both reaction centers, the cofactors are buried in the L and M subunits that form the core of the protein. For their efforts in the elucidation of the structure of the reaction center from B. viridis, Deisenhofer, Huber, and Michel received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1985.
A number of predictions concerning the reaction center were directly confirmed by the structures (Feher et al. 1989). For example, an early outcome from EPR and ENDOR experiments was that the primary donor is a BChl dimer. The structure clearly shows the presence of two BChls that closely overlap at the ring A position and are separated by only ~3 Å (Fig. 5). The structural arrangement of P865 next to a BPhe, followed by the primary quinone and QB, was consistent with the electron transfer pathway predicted from spectroscopic measurements. These structures also confirmed the predictions of long transmembrane helices and that the L and M subunits form the core of the protein (Williams et al. 1983, 1984, 1986; Youvan et al. 1984; Debus et al. 1985).
The strong structural homology between the reaction centers from B. viridis and R. sphaeroides (Fig. 4) suggested that the core of the L subunit, M subunit, and cofactors was structurally conserved in reaction centers from other bacteria. The combination of the structural studies with comparisons of the sequences of the reaction center and photosystem II led to the postulate that the D1 and D2 subunits constitute the core of photosystem II with a similar structural arrangement as found for the reaction center (Trebst 1987; Michel and Deisenhofer 1988). This idea was soon verified by several experiments, including the isolation of a core complex of photosystem II consisting of the D1, D2, and cytochrome b559 subunits (Nanba and Satoh 1987).
The presence of two symmetry-related branches was an unexpected outcome and raised questions about the directionality of electron transfer along the two branches. The structures also provided the framework for addressing outstanding questions concerning the function of the reaction center, including the coupling of proton transfer with electron transfer and the molecular nature of the reaction center-cytochrome c 2 complex. Investigations into these topics were facilitated by use of site-directed mutagenesis in which amino acid residues near the cofactors were altered. Since these types of mutations often result in decreased electron transfer rates and yields, mutants are grown under non-photosynthetic conditions to prevent selection for other more efficient reaction centers. The organisms R. capsulatus and R. sphaeroides are able to grow in the dark by respiration but suitable conditions for B. viridis were not established (Williams and Taguchi 1995). Consequently, mutagenesis studies on reaction centers from B. viridis were minimal despite its prominence in the earlier structural work. The utilization of structures and mutants with spectroscopic measurements to address these questions is presented below, followed by a discussion of current research into how these insights into the structure and function of the reaction center are being used to probe the mechanism of water oxidation by photosystem II.
Directionality of electron transfer
The structural arrangement of the cofactors raised the question of whether electron transfer proceeds along one or two of the symmetrically arranged branches of cofactors (Woodbury and Allen 1995). The primary evidence is provided by the optical monitoring of the two BPhe cofactors that have distinct optical absorption bands (Kellogg et al. 1984; Breton et al. 1986; Kirmaier and Holten 1987; Lockhart et al. 1990). These measurements showed that the absorption of light energy from the surrounding antenna complexes results in the excitation of P865. Within a few picoseconds, an electron is transferred from the excited state of P865, P865*, through the BChl monomer on the A branch to the BPhe on the A branch, and then to the primary quinone and finally to QB with a quantum yield of nearly 100 %. Despite the near symmetry of the two branches of cofactors, these optical measurements demonstrated that electron transfer in wild-type reaction centers proceeds along only the A branch cofactors with no measureable electron transfer along the B branch.
To address the question of why electron transfer occurs only along one of the two branches, the amino acid residues surrounding P865, the BChl monomers, and the BPhe monomers were altered using site-directed mutagenesis, and the electron transfer properties of the mutants were characterized, primarily using transient optical spectroscopy. For example, the removal of one of the histidines coordinating P865, either His L173 or His M202, results in formation of a BChl–Bphe heterodimer (Bylina and Youvan 1988; Allen et al. 1996). Despite large changes in the distribution of electrons over the BChl–BPhe heterodimer compared to the BChl homodimer found in wild type and the corresponding alterations of energetics, the directionality of electron transfer remained largely unchanged compared to wild type (Kirmaier et al. 1988; McDowell et al. 1991). Nor was there any significant directionality change observed when the introduction of a His near the active BPhe resulted in the incorporation of a BChl in this position (Kirmaier et al. 1991). However, a combination of such mutations with the placement of several charged residues along the A branch resulted in measurable electron transfer along the B branch (Heller et al. 1995). Together, these experiments revealed that the asymmetry of electron transfer is primarily due to differences in the energetics of the different BChl cofactors as well as the protein dynamics that can limit the electron transfer process (Wang et al. 2007).
In the three-dimensional structures of the reaction center, a BChl monomer is located in a position where it can bridge electron transfer from P865* to the BPhe along the A branch (Fig. 5). After the determination of the structures, two possible mechanisms for the role of the BChl monomer were extensively discussed. In one mechanism, the BChl monomer served as a true intermediate electron acceptor, and in the second the BChl monomer primarily facilitated the coupling between P865* and BPhe. Resolving this question was made difficult by the complexity of the changes in the optical spectra immediately after excitation, with no significant optical signal associated with a reduced BChl during the initial electron transfer (Kirmaier and Holten 1987; Woodbury and Allen 1995). Careful analysis of spectra obtained using improved spectrometers yielded the conclusion that the formation of the intermediate P865+BChl− state was occurring (Zinth and Wachtveitl 2005). The electron transfer rate from BChl− to BPhe can be construed as being much faster than the rate from P865* to BChl, resulting in the loss of the P865+BChl− state before it can accumulate. Thus, the amount of this state during electron transfer is always small. Subsequently, alteration of the binding site of the active BChl monomer by mutagenesis resulted in loss of this cofactor and electron transfer proceeded through the normally inactive BChl monomer to the BPhe on the B branch (Carter et al. 2012). The initial electron transfer process continues to be probed through the combination of mutagenesis studies and transient optical spectrometers with improved sensitivities.
Proton-coupled electron transfer
Another outstanding question was how electron transfer was coupled to proton transfer in reaction centers (Okamura and Feher 1995). The energy from light is converted into proton transport across the cell membrane due to proton-coupled electron transfer involving the reaction center. Light absorbed by the reaction center results in the transfer of an electron from P865 to QB, resulting in a charge separation across a distance of approximately 22 Å (Fig. 5). The characteristics of QB have been examined in detail using optical spectroscopy by the laboratories of Feher/Okamura and Wraight (Okamura et al. 2000; Wraight and Gunner, 2009). These studies established that the primary quinone served as a shuttle between the BPhe monomer and QB while QB served as a two-electron gate, with the second electron transfer being coupled with proton transfer. However, the molecular mechanism of coupling electron and proton transfer remained elusive until the determination of the structure that revealed the interactions between QB and the surrounding protein environment. The keto groups of the quinone form hydrogen bonds with the side chains of Ser L223 and His L190, which also serves as a ligand for the non-heme iron (Fig. 6). The binding site for QB is hydrophilic, with several protonatable amino acid residues, namely His L190, Glu L212, Asp L213, and Ser L223, that each could serve as proton donor groups.
To understand the role of the protonatable residues in electron transfer, the amino acid residues found in the binding site of QB were systematically altered using site-directed mutagenesis, and the mutants were characterized using optical and EPR spectroscopy. A reduction in the electron transfer rate from the primary quinone to Q •−B was observed when either Glu L212 or Asp L213 was altered showing that these residues play critical roles in the protonation of QB during electron transfer (Paddock et al. 1989, 1994; Takahashi and Wraight 1990, 1991). Many of the amino acid residues further away from QB were then mutated and in a number of cases the mutants showed pronounced decreases in the rates, consistent with loss of the proton pathway from the cytoplasmic environment to QB. The presence of well-defined proton pathways was confirmed by the observation of a Zn2+ binding site on the surface of the protein, which when occupied blocked proton transfer (Utschig et al. 1998; Axelrod et al. 2000). All of these studies present a picture of a complex mechanism of electron transfer involving not only the properties of the electron donor and acceptor but also interactions with the amino acid residues forming the cofactor binding sites.
Electron transfer from cytochrome c 2
Although the structures of the reaction centers helped in the unraveling of electron and proton transfer within the reaction center, how electrons were transferred from cytochrome c 2 to the reaction center remained an unsolved question at a molecular level. In R. sphaeroides, cytochrome c 2 serves as the secondary electron donor to P865•+ while in other purple bacteria, such as B. viridis, a bound tetraheme cytochrome serves as the secondary donor. The initial observations of cytochrome oxidation upon illumination were in the 1950s (Vernon and Kamen 1953; Duysens 1954; Chance and Smith 1955) but the determination that cytochrome c 2 serves as the secondary electron donor was not achieved until time-resolved optical spectroscopic experiments by Parson demonstrated that the fast oxidation of BChl was followed by its reduction in 2 μs by cytochrome (Parson 1968). Since cytochrome c 2 is water soluble and not bound to the reaction center, the rate of electron transfer is limited by the binding of the cytochrome to the reaction center, which is embedded in the cell membrane (Crofts and Wraight 1983).
To elucidate the nature of the reaction center-cytochrome complex, models were proposed based upon the individual structures of the reaction center and cytochrome c 2 (Salemme et al. 1973; Axelrod et al. 1994). The periplasmic surface of the reaction center contains many negatively-charged residues that can serve as the binding interface for the positively-charged residues found on the heme edge of cytochrome c 2. The models placed the cytochrome c 2 onto this binding interface by adjusting the orientations to maximize the interactions between the positively- and negatively-charged residues (Allen et al. 1987b; Tiede 1987; Adir et al. 1996). These models had different positions and orientations of the cytochrome c 2 as each model also incorporated some additional information, for example the model by Tiede made use of the relative orientations of the heme compared to P865 based upon optical measurements (Tiede 1987). The precise arrangement of the two proteins was established with the determination of the three-dimensional structure of the reaction center-cytochrome complex using protein crystallography (Axelrod et al. 2002). The cytochrome is positioned in the center of the periplasmic surface of the reaction center with the solvent-exposed heme positioned directly over P865 (Fig. 7). This heme position is similar to the location of the heme closest to the BChl dimer in B. viridis (Fig. 4).
With the structure of the complex determined, the role of different interactions in binding the cytochrome was investigated by site-directed mutagenesis of the amino acid residues at the binding interface (Axelrod and Okamura 2005). These studies were performed using cytochrome c 2 and reaction centers from R. sphaeroides as the three-dimensional structure of the complex provided a platform for using mutagenesis to investigate a range of interactions at the binding interface, including charge–charge interactions, hydrogen bonding, and hydrophobic interactions. Electrostatic interactions were shown to play a key role as changes of charged residues at the binding site resulted in large decreases in the binding affinity of the cytochrome to the reaction center. Computational simulations of the association process identified transition states with cytochrome orientations that differ compared to the final active state of the complex and established the involvement of water molecules (Autenrieth et al. 2004; Miyashita et al. 2004, 2005). These studies provide a general picture of how water-soluble proteins interact with membrane-bound proteins in photosynthetic as well as other organisms.
Implications for water oxidation
While many questions concerning the bacterial reaction center have now been answered, the mechanism of water oxidation remains one of the major unsolved questions in photosynthesis (Wydrzynski and Satoh 2005). As was true for bacterial photosynthesis, the development of optical spectrometers and transient flash light sources provided the experimental means to investigate oxygenic photosynthesis. For example, experiments in the laboratories of Joliot and Kok led to an understanding that water oxidation proceeds by the accumulation of four-oxidizing equivalents that are driven by a series of four excitations of the primary electron donor, P680, in what is termed the S cycle (Joliot et al. 1969; Kok et al. 1970). Investigations into the mechanism of water oxidation are now reaping the benefits of the determination of three-dimensional structures for photosystem II from the cyanobacteria Thermosynechococcus elongatus and Thermosynechococcus vulcanus (Zouni et al. 2001; Ferreira et al. 2004; Loll et al. 2005; Yano et al. 2006; Umena et al. 2011). These structures show that the complex can be thought to have an outer domain that harvests light and surrounds a core domain that performs the primary electron transfer reactions and contains the cofactors involved in the primary photochemistry. The core domain is formed by two protein subunits, D1 and D2, that are evolutionarily related to the L and M subunits of the reaction center and exhibit the same pattern of five transmembrane helices related by a twofold symmetry axis (Fig. 8). One of the remarkable aspects is the strong structural conservation of the arrangement of the D1 and D2 subunits of photosystem II compared to the L and M subunits as well as the organization of the cofactors into two branches.
Deciphering the mechanism of water oxidation involves spectroscopic investigations while using the three-dimensional structure as the foundation to investigate the impact of altering amino acid residues that interact with the cofactors. The key cofactor is the Mn4Ca cluster that is located approximately 10 Å from P680, with a redox active tyrosine, termed Y Z, serving as a bridging cofactor (Tommos and Babcock 2000; Rappaport and Diner 2008). The Mn4Ca cluster is the site of water oxidation and collects the four electron equivalents during the S cycle. The Mn4Ca cluster has a distorted cubane configuration and is coordinated by several carboxylates, histidines, and four bound water molecules. These amino acid residues have been altered and their roles in electron transfer are being investigated (Debus 2001).
The close structural similarity of the core complexes of reaction centers and photosystem II provides the opportunity to modify the reaction center such that it gains the functional properties of photosystem II. The reaction center has been altered to be highly oxidizing with a mononuclear manganese cofactor located at the position analogous to that of the Mn4Ca cofactor in photosystem II (Thielges et al. 2005; Allen et al. 2012). Upon illumination, the Mn-cofactor serves as a rapid secondary electron donor to P865•+. Using X-ray diffraction, the structure of the reaction center with the bound manganese cofactor has been determined and found to bind the manganese at the designed site with carboxylate and histidine ligands (Fig. 9). Research is underway to develop reaction centers with more complex manganese cofactors to provide an alternative means to investigate how such cofactors perform multielectron transfer that is coupled with proton transfer.
Using the spectroscopic and biochemical techniques pioneered by Duysens, Clayton, and Feher, the properties of photosystem II are being unraveled (McEvoy and Brudvig 2006; Rivalta et al. 2012). These ongoing studies should provide insight into how the Mn4Ca cluster of photosystem II efficiently oxidizes water. In addition, the studies of reaction centers and photosystem II should yield insight into the evolutionary process by which ancient primitive phototrophs, which performed anoxygenic photosynthesis, evolved into organisms containing complexes capable of performing water oxidation. These studies will not only benefit our fundamental understanding of photosynthesis, but also potentially lead to bio-inspired development of solar devices that can efficiently convert light energy into fuels such as hydrogen and oxygen.
Abbreviations
- P865:
-
Bacteriochlorophyll dimer in reaction centers from R. sphaeroides
- BChl:
-
Bacteriochlorophyll
- BPhe:
-
Bacteriopheophytin
- P680:
-
Primary electron donor in photosystem II
- QB :
-
Secondary quinone
- EPR:
-
Electron paramagnetic resonance
- ENDOR:
-
Electron nuclear double resonance
References
Adir N, Axelrod HL, Beroza P, Isaacson RA, Rongey SH, Okamura MY, Feher G (1996) Co-crystallization and characterization of the photosynthetic reaction center–cytochrome c 2 complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 35:2535–2547
Allen JP, Feher G (1984) Crystallization of reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides: preliminary characterization. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 81:4795–4799
Allen JP, Feher G, Yeates TO, Komiya H, Rees DC (1987a) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the cofactors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:5730–5734
Allen JP, Feher G, Yeates TO, Komiya H, Rees DC (1987b) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: the protein subunits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6162–6166
Allen JP, Artz K, Lin X, Williams JC, Ivancich A, Albouy D, Mattioli TA, Fetsch A, Kuhn M, Lubitz W (1996) Effects of hydrogen bonding to a bacteriochlorophyll-bacteriopheophytin dimer in reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 35:6612–6619
Allen JP, Olson TL, Oyala P, Lee WJ, Tufts AA, Williams JC (2012) Light-driven oxygen production from superoxide by Mn-binding bacterial reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:2314–2318
Arnold W, Clayton RK (1960) The first step in photosynthesis: evidence for its electronic nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:769–776
Autenrieth F, Tajkhorshid E, Schulten K, Luthey-Schulten Z (2004) Role of water in transient cytochrome c 2 docking. J Phys Chem B 108:20376–20387
Axelrod HL, Okamura MY (2005) The structure and function of the cytochrome c 2: reaction center electron transfer complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Photosyn Res 85:101–114
Axelrod HL, Feher G, Allen JP, Chirino AC, Day MW, Hsu BT, Rees DC (1994) Crystallization and X-ray structure determination of cytochrome c 2 from Rhodobacter sphaeroides in three crystal forms. Acta Cryst D 50:596–602
Axelrod HL, Abresch EC, Paddock ML, Okamura MY, Feher G (2000) Determination of the binding sites of the proton transfer inhibitors Cd2+ and Zn2+ in bacterial reaction centers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:1542–1547
Axelrod HL, Abresch EC, Okamura MY, Yeh AP, Rees DC, Feher G (2002) X-ray structure determination of the cytochrome c 2: reaction center electron transfer complex from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. J Mol Biol 319:501–515
Barnes CR (1893) On the food of green plants. Bot Gar 18:403–411
Blankenship RE (2002) Molecular mechanisms of photosynthesis. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Blankenship R, Madigan MT, Bauer CE (eds) (1995) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht
Bolton JR, Clayton RK, Reed DW (1969) An identification of the radical giving rise to the light-induced electron spin resonance signal in photosynthetic bacteria. Photochem Photobiol 9:209–218
Breton J, Martin JL, Migus A, Antonetti A, Orszag A (1986) Femtosecond spectroscopy of excitation energy transfer and initial charge separation in the reaction center of the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:5121–5125
Bylina EJ, Youvan DC (1988) Directed mutations affecting spectroscopic and electron transfer properties of the primary donor in the photosynthetic reaction center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7226–7230
Carter B, Boxer SG, Holten D, Kirmaier C (2012) Photochemistry of a bacterial photosynthetic reaction center missing the initial bacteriochlorophyll electron acceptor. J Phys Chem B 116:9971–9982
Chance B, Nishimura M (1960) On the mechanism of chlorophyll-cytochrome interaction: the temperature insensitivity of light-induced cytochrome oxidation in Chromatium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 46:19–24
Chance B, Smith L (1955) Respiratory pigments of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Nature 175:803–806
Chang CH, El-Kabbani O, Tiede D, Norris JR, Schiffer M (1991) Structure of the membrane-bound protein photosynthetic reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochemistry 30:5352–5360
Clayton RK (1963) Toward the isolation of a photochemical reaction center in Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. Biochim Biophys Acta 75:312–323
Clayton RK (1988) Memories of many lives. Photosynth Res 19:207–224
Clayton RK (2002) Research on photosynthetic reaction centers from 1932 to 1987. Photosynth Res 73:63–71
Clayton RK, Smith C (1960) Rhodopseudomonas spheroides: high catalase and blue-green double mutants. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 3:143–145
Clayton RK, Wang RT (1971) Photochemical reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. Methods Enzymol 23:696–704
Cogdell RJ, Isaacs NW, Howard TD, McLuskey K, Fraser NJ, Prince SM (1999) How photosynthetic bacteria harvest solar energy. J Bacteriol 181:3869–3879
Crofts AR, Wraight CA (1983) The electrochemical domain of photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 726:149–185
Debus RJ (2001) Amino acid residues that modulate the properties of tyrosine YZ and the manganese cluster in the water oxidizing complex of photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 1503:164–186
Debus RJ, Feher G, Okamura MY (1985) LM complex of reaction centers from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26: characterization and reconstitution with the H subunit. Biochemistry 24:2488–2500
Deisenhofer J, Epp O, Miki K, Huber R, Michel H (1985) Structure of the protein subunits in the photosynthetic reaction centre of Rhodopseudomonas viridis at 3 Å resolution. Nature 318:618–624
Deisenhofer J, Epp O, Sinning I, Michel H (1995) Crystallographic refinement at 2.3 Å resolution and refined model of the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. J Mol Biol 246:429–457
Duysens LNM (1951) Transfer of light energy within the pigment systems present in photosynthesizing cells. Nature 168:548–550
Duysens LNM (1952) Transfer of excitation energy in photosynthesis. The University of Utrecht, Utrecht
Duysens LNM (1954) Reversible changes in the absorption spectrum of Chlorella upon irradiation. Science 120:353–354
Duysens LNM (1989) The study of reaction centers and of the primary and associated reactions of photosynthesis by means of absorption difference spectrophotometry: a commentary. Biochim Biophys Acta 1000:395–400
Duysens LNM, Amesz J, Kamp BM (1961) Two photochemical systems in photosynthesis. Nature 190:510–511
Emerson R, Arnold W (1932) The photochemical reaction in photosynthesis. J Gen Physiol 16:191–205
Emerson R, Chalmers R, Cederstrand C (1957) Some factors influencing the long-wave limit of photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 43:133–143
Feher G (1971) Some chemical and physical properties of a bacterial reaction center particle and its primary photochemical reactants. Photochem Photobiol 14:373–387
Feher G (1998) Three decades of research in bacterial photosynthesis and the road leading to it: a personal account. Photosynth Res 55:1–40
Feher G, Okamura MY (1978) Chemical composition and properties of reaction centers. In: Clayton RK, Sistrom WR (eds) The photosynthetic bacteria. Plenum, New York/London, pp 349–386
Feher G, Hoff AJ, Isaacson RA, Ackerson LC (1975) ENDOR experiments on chlorophyll and bacteriochlorophyll in vitro and in the photosynthetic unit. Ann NY Acad Sci USA 244:239–259
Feher G, Allen JP, Okamura MY, Rees DC (1989) Structure and function of bacterial photosynthetic reaction centres. Nature 339:111–116
Ferreira KN, Iverson TM, Maghlaoui K, Barber J, Iwata S (2004) Architecture of the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving center. Science 303:1831–1838
Gest H (2006) History of the word photosynthesis and evolution of its definition. In: Beatty T, Gest H, Allen JF, Govindjee (eds) Discoveries in photosynthesis. Springer, Dordecht, pp 39–42
Govindjee, Beatty T, Gest H, Allen JF (eds) (2006) Discoveries in photosynthesis. Springer, Dordecht
Heller BA, Holten D, Kirmaier C (1995) Control of electron transfer between the L- and M-sides of photosynthetic reaction centers. Science 269:940–945
Hill R, Bendall F (1960) Function of the two cytochrome components in chloroplasts: a working hypothesis. Nature 186:136–137
Hunter CN, Daldal F, Thurnauer MC, Beatty JT (eds) (2009) The purple phototrophic bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg
Joliot P, Barbieri G, Chabaud R (1969) Un nouveaux modele des centres photochimiques du système II. Photochem Photobiol 10:309–329
Kellogg EC, Kolaczkowski S, Wasielewski MR, Tiede DM (1984) Measurement of the extent of electron transfer to the bacteriopheophytin in the M-subunit in reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas viridis. Photosynth Res 22:47–59
Kirmaier C, Holten D (1987) Primary photochemistry of reaction centers from the photosynthetic purple bacteria. Photosynth Res 13:225–260
Kirmaier C, Holten D, Bylina EJ, Youvan DC (1988) Electron transfer in a genetically modified bacterial reaction center containing a heterodimer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:7562–7566
Kirmaier C, Gaul D, DeBey R, Holten D, Schenck CC (1991) Charge separation in a reaction center incorporating bacteriochlorophyll for photoactive bacteriopheophytin. Science 251:922–927
Kok B, Forbuch B, McGloin M (1970) Cooperation of charges in photosynthetic O2 evolution: a linear four step mechanism. Photochem Photobiol 11:457–475
Loach PA, Sekura DL (1967) A comparison of decay kinetics of photo-produced absorbance, EPR, and luminescence changes in chromatophores of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Photochem Photobiol 6:381–393
Lockhart DJ, Kirmaier C, Holten D, Boxer SG (1990) Electric field effects on the initial electron-transfer kinetics in bacterial photosynthetic reaction centers. J Phys Chem 94:6987–6995
Loll B, Kern J, Saenger W, Zouni A, Biesiadka J (2005) Towards complete cofactor arrangement in the 3.0 Å resolution structure of photosystem II. Nature 438:1040–1044
McDowell LM, Gaul D, Kirmaier C, Holten D, Schenck CC (1991) Investigation into the source of electron transfer asymmetry in bacterial reaction centers. Biochemistry 30:8315–8322
McElroy D, Feher G, Mauzerall DC (1969) On the nature of the free radical formed during the primary process of bacterial photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 172:180–183
McEvoy JP, Brudvig GW (2006) Water-splitting chemistry of photosystem II. Chem Rev 106:4455–4483
Michel H (1982) Three-dimensional crystals of a membrane protein complex: the photosynthetic reaction centre from Rhodopseudomonas viridis. J Mol Biol 158:567–572
Michel H (1983) Crystallization of membrane proteins. Trends Biol Sci 8:56–59
Michel H, Deisenhofer J (1988) Relevance of the photosynthetic reaction center from purple bacteria to the structure of Photosystem II. Biochemistry 27:1–7
Miyashita O, Onuchic JN, Okamura MY (2004) Transition state and encounter complex for fast association of cytochrome c 2 with bacterial reaction center. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:16174–16179
Miyashita O, Okamura MY, Onuchic JN (2005) Interprotein electron transfer from cytochrome c 2 to photosynthetic reaction center: tunneling across an aqueous interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:3558–3563
Nanba O, Satoh K (1987) Isolation of a photosystem II reaction center consisting of D-1 and D-2 polypeptides and cytochrome b-559. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:109–112
Norris JR, Uphaus RA, Crespi HL, Katz JJ (1971) Electron spin resonance of chlorophyll and the origin of signal I in photosynthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 68:625–628
Norris JR, Scheer H, Katz JJ (1975) Models for antenna and reaction center chlorophylls. Ann NY Acad Sci USA 244:260–280
Okamura MY, Feher G (1995) Proton-coupled electron transfer reactions of QB in reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT, Bauer CE (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 577–594
Okamura MY, Paddock ML, Graige MS, Feher G (2000) Proton and electron transfer in bacterial reaction centers. Biochim Biophys Acta 1458:148–163
Paddock ML, Rongey SH, Feher G, Okamura MY (1989) Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: replacement of glutamic acid 212 in the L subunit by glutamine inhibits quinone (secondary acceptor) turnover. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:6602–6606
Paddock ML, Rongey SH, McPherson PH, Juth A, Feher G, Okamura MY (1994) Pathway of proton transfer in bacterial reaction centers: role of aspartate L213 in proton transfers associated with reduction of quinone to dihydroquinone. Biochemistry 33:734–745
Parson WW (1968) The role of P870 in bacterial photosynthesis. Biochim Biophys Acta 153:248–259
Rappaport F, Diner BA (2008) Primary photochemistry and energetics leading to the oxidation of the (Mn)4Ca cluster and to the evolution of molecular oxygen in photosystem II. Coord Chem Rev 252:259–272
Reed DW, Clayton RK (1968) Isolation of a reaction center fraction from Rhodopseudomonas spheroides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 30:471–475
Rivalta I, Brudvig GW, Batista VS (2012) Oxomanganese complexes for natural and artificial photosynthesis. Curr Opin Chem Biol 16:11–18
Salemme FR, Freer ST, Xuong NH, Alden RA, Kraut J (1973) The structure of oxidized cytochrome c 2 of Rhodospirillum rubrum. J Biol Chem 248:3910–3921
Stowell MHB, McPhillips TM, Rees DC, Soltis SM, Abresch E, Feher G (1997) Light-induced structural changes in photosynthetic reaction center: implication for mechanism of electron-proton transfer. Science 276:812–816
Sutton MR, Rosen D, Feher G, Steiner LA (1982) Amino-terminal sequences of the L, M and H subunits of reaction centers from the photosynthetic bacterium Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26. Biochemistry 21:3842–3849
Takahashi E, Wraight CA (1990) A crucial role for Asp L213 in the proton transfer pathway to the secondary quinone of reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Biochim Biophys Acta 1020:107–111
Takahashi E, Wraight CA (1991) Small weak acids stimulate proton transfer events in site-directed mutants of the two ionizable residues, Glu L212 and Asp L213, in the QB-binding site of Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction center. FEBS Lett 283:140–144
Thielges M, Uyeda G, Camara-Artigas A, Kálmán L, Williams JC, Allen JP (2005) Design of a redox-linked active metal site: manganese bound to bacterial reaction centers at a site resembling that of photosystem II. Biochemistry 44:7389–7394
Tiede DM (1987) Cytochrome c orientation in electron-transfer complexes with photosynthetic reaction centers of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and when bound to the surface of negatively charged membranes: characterization by optical linear dichroism. Biochemistry 26:397–410
Tommos C, Babcock GT (2000) Proton and hydrogen currents in photosynthetic water oxidation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1458:199–219
Trebst A (1987) The three-dimensional structure of the herbicide binding niche on the reaction center polypeptides of Photosystem II. Z Naturforsch C 42:742–750
Umena Y, Kawakami K, Shen JR, Kamiya N (2011) Crystal structure of oxygen-evolving photosystem II at a resolution of 1.9 Å. Nature 473:55–61
Utschig LM, Ohigashi Y, Thurnauer MC, Tiede DM (1998) A new metal-binding site in photosynthetic bacterial reaction centers that modulates QA to QB electron transfer. Biochemistry 37:8278–8281
van Grondelle R, Holmes NG, Rademaker H, Duysens LNM (1978) Bacteriochlorophyll fluorescence of purple bacteria at low redox potentials: the relationship between reaction center triplet yield and the emission yield. Biochim Biophys Acta 503:10–25
Vernon LP, Kamen MD (1953) Studies on the metabolism of photosynthetic bacteria. XV. Photoautooxidation of ferrocytochrome c in extracts of Rhodospirillum rubrum. Arch Biochem Biophys 44:298–311
Wang H, Lin S, Allen JP, Williams JC, Blankert S, Laser C, Woodbury NW (2007) Protein dynamics control the kinetics of initial electron transfer in photosynthesis. Science 316:747–750
Williams JC, Taguchi AKW (1995) Genetic manipulation of purple photosynthetic bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT, Bauer C (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 1029–1065
Williams JC, Steiner LA, Ogden RC, Simon MI, Feher G (1983) Primary structure of the M subunit of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 80:6505–6509
Williams JC, Steiner LA, Feher G, Simon MI (1984) Primary structure of the L subunit of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81:7303–7307
Williams JC, Steiner LA, Feher G (1986) Primary structure of the reaction center from Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides. Proteins 1:312–325
Woodbury NW, Allen J (1995) The pathway and thermodynamics of electron transfer in wild type and mutant reaction centers of purple non sulfur bacteria. In: Blankenship RE, Madigan MT, Bauer C (eds) Anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 527–557
Wraight CA, Gunner MR (2009) The acceptor quinones of purple photosynthetic bacteria- structure and spectroscopy. In: Hunter CN, Daldal F, Thurnauer MC, Beatty JT (eds) The purple phototrophic bacteria. Plenum, New York, pp 379–405
Wydrzynski TJ, Satoh K (eds) (2005) Photosystem II: The light-induced water: plastoquinone oxidoreductase. Springer, Dordrecht
Yano J, Kern J, Sauer K, Latimer MJ, Pushkar Y, Biesiadka J, Loll B, Saenger W, Messinger J, Zouni A, Yachandra VK (2006) Where water is oxidized to dioxygen: structure of the photosynthetic Mn4Ca cluster. Science 314:821–825
Yeates TO, Komiya H, Rees DC, Allen JP, Feher G (1987) Structure of the reaction center from Rhodobacter sphaeroides R-26: membrane-protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84:6438–6442
Youvan DC, Bylina EJ, Alberti M, Begusch H, Hearst JE (1984) Nucleotide and deduced polypeptide sequences of the photosynthetic reaction center, B870 antenna, and flanking polypeptides from R. capsulata. Cell 37:949–957
Zinth W, Wachtveitl J (2005) The first picoseconds in bacterial photosynthesis- ultrafast electron transfer for the efficient conversion of light energy. ChemPhysChem 6:871–880
Zouni A, Witt HT, Kern J, Fromme P, Krauss N, Saenger W, Orth P (2001) Crystal structure of photosystem II from Synechococcus elongatus at 3.8 Å resolution. Nature 409:739–743
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Grant CHE 1158552 from the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Olson, T.L., Williams, J.C. & Allen, J.P. The three-dimensional structures of bacterial reaction centers. Photosynth Res 120, 87–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9821-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-013-9821-6