Introduction

In flowering plants, the switch from vegetative to reproductive growth in plants is controlled by a number of developmental and environmental signals. Extensive genetic and physiological analyses on Arabidopsis thaliana have revealed that floral induction is regulated by at least four major genetic pathways, namely, long-day, autonomous, vernalization, and gibberellin-dependent pathways (Onouchi et al. 2000; Samach et al. 2000; Wang et al. 2011). All of these four pathways commonly regulate the so-called flowering pathway integrators including FT, SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1 (SOC1), and LFY, and the exact flowering time is determined by the expression level of these integrators (Blázquez and Weigel 2000; Lee et al. 2000; Moon et al. 2005; Ma et al. 2011).

FLC, which encodes a MADS-box transcription factor, functions as a repressor of flowering (Sheldon et al. 1999, 2000; He and Amasino 2005; Barreto et al. 2011). Two flowering-time genes, FT and SOC1, have been reported to be targeted by FLC (Searle et al. 2006). FLC binds to the promoter of SOC1 as well as to the first intron of FT. This binding prevents the transcriptional activation of these genes (Helliwell et al. 2006). The floral meristem identity gene LFY is regulated both by CO, a component of the photoperiod pathway, and GA (Blázquez and Weigel 2000). These act through different motifs within the LFY promoter (Samach et al. 2000).

Constitutive expression of FLC in many plants could delay flowering (Kim et al. 2007; Michaels and Amasino 1999; Sheldon et al. 1999). Meanwhile, overexpression of FLC also caused defects in floral morphology and reproduction. The phenotypes of short stamens, reduced pollen production, and larger carpel were detected, and fertility was slightly reduced in the transgenic lines (Tadege et al. 2001; Hepworth et al. 2002). However, there are no data to show the mechanism by which FLC affects floral morphology and reproduction.

Non-heading Chinese cabbage, which originated in China, is one of the most widely cultivated vegetables in China, especially in the south of the country. Non-heading Chinese cabbage plants remain in the vegetative growth phase until they have experienced prolonged exposure to cold temperature, known as vernalization. This inhibition of flowering is caused by the high levels of FLC expression. To increase the product value of non-heading Chinese cabbage by inhibiting the floral transition, BcFLC1 (not logged), homologous to the AtFLC1 gene, which encodes a floral repressor, was isolated from the non-heading Chinese cabbage “NJ074” (Rong et al. 2010).

In this study, we performed quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments using both a 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line and wild-type A. thaliana, and we report that the expression of filament suppressors, RGA and RGL genes (Tyler et al. 2004; Achard et al. 2006), was remarkably enhanced in 35S::BcFLC1 line, while SEP3 gene, encoding a MADS-box transcription factor involved in flower and ovule development (Kaufmann et al. 2009; Dornelas et al. 2010), was slightly downregulated.

Materials and Methods

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions

Surface-sterilized seeds of A. thaliana cv. Columbia (Col) were placed on sterile horizontal agar plates at 4°C for 5 days and then incubated in environmentally controlled sterile growth chambers at 23/18°C day/night under 60 % relative humidity. Cool white fluorescent lights supplied photons at 120 μmol m−2 s−1 with a 16-h light and 8-h dark photoperiod.

Generation of Transgenic Plants

To express the BcFLC1 genes in Arabidopsis, BcFLC1 gene was inserted into the pEarleyGate103 binary vector along with an herbicide-resistance gene (bar; Interuniversity Institute for Biotechnology; http://www.psb.rug.ac.be/gateway) as a selectable maker using Gateway Technology (Invitrogen; https://www.invitrogen.com) to construct pGate-BcFLC1. The final binary vectors, pGate-BcFLC1, were introduced into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101.

A. thaliana Columbia was transformed with the BcFLC1 construct. Flowers were sprayed with A. tumefaciens GV3101 suspended in 5 % sucrose, and then the plants were incubated in a growth chamber at 25°C and 100 % humidity for 1 day and finally allowed to grow in a growth chamber under a 16-h photoperiod at 23°C. Transgenic plants were confirmed by semiquantitative PCR.

Analysis of Gene Expression

Total RNA was isolated from plant leaves by the RNeasy plant mini kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cDNA production, 4 μg of total RNA was reverse transcribed with oligo(dT)18 primer (Fermentas) in a 20 μL reaction mixture using RevertAid M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Fermentas). After heat inactivation, total volume of the reaction mixture was diluted in 580 μL of sterilized water, and 4 μL was used for the real-time quantitative reverse-transcription (RT)-PCR. All quantitative RT-PCR analyses were performed by iQ5 multicolor real-time PCR detection system (Bio-Rad) using 2× SYBR Green SuperMix (Bio-Rad 170-8882). We adopted the guidelines for the experimental design and statistical analysis of quantitative RT-PCR data (Rieu and Powers 2009). The PCR condition was as follows: 40 cycles of PCR (95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 20 s) after the initial denaturation step of 2 min at 95°C. Data were collected at 72°C in each cycle, and the expression levels of genes were calculated by iQ5 optical system software version 2.0 using TUB2 as the reference gene. The quantitative RT-PCR analysis was biologically repeated three times, and each time consisted of three technical replicates. Real-time RT-PCR primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Primers used in this study

Results

Constitutive Expression of BcFLC1 Genes Delays Flowering in Transgenic Arabidopsis

Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia was transformed with A. tumefaciens GV3101 containing the pGate-BcFLC1 vector (Fig. 1). Twelve independent lines of transgenic plants with BcFLC1 (T1 generation) were obtained by using two applications of herbicide (Basta, 0.3 % solution), and transgenic plants of the T2 generation were confirmed by semiquantitative PCR (Fig. 2). Among them, one line (named OE5) having high expression of BcFLC1 was chosen for further experiments.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Construction of plant expression vector. LB left border, RB right border, P35S cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, attR1 and attR2 attachment regions, BcFLC1 gene from B. campestris ssp. chinensis Makino, T35S CaMV 35S terminator, Bar Pnos-phosphinotricin acetyltransferase gene-Tnos

Fig. 2
figure 2

Semiquantitative PCR analysis of transgenic Arabidopsis plants transformed with BcFLC1. CK nontransgenic plant. OE 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12 correspond to transgenic plants, respectively

T2 plants derived from parental lines that showed late flowering produced many rosette leaves (up to 52 leaves) and uniformly showed a late-flowering phenotype (Fig. 3a). Transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing the BcFLC1 gene flowered approximately 15–30 days later than nontransgenic plants (data not shown). Some transgenic plants failed to flower during the experiment. This result indicated that BcFLC1 affected flowering time in the next generation.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Comparison of Col and 35S::BcFLC1 lines. a Effects of BcFLC1 overexpression on the flowering time of transgenic A. thaliana Columbia-ecotype lines. b Effects of BcFLC1 overexpression on the fertility of transgenic A. thaliana Columbia-ecotype lines. c The number of mature seeds in the silique of Col. d The number of mature seeds in the silique of 35S::BcFLC1. e The length of anther filaments in Col. f The length of anther filaments in 35S::BcFLC1. g Comparison of the number of seeds between Col and 35S::BcFLC1 line

Fertility Associated with Overexpression of BcFLC1

Overexpression of BcFLC1 affected floral morphology and reproduction. As shown in Fig. 4, the phenotype of the reduced number of siliques and small siliques were detected in 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line (Fig. 3b). Meanwhile, in 35S::BcFLC1, the number of mature seeds in a silique is less (about ten seeds) than that in Col (Fig. 3c, d, and g). This result indicated that fertility is reduced in the transgenic lines. Next, we detected the morphology of flowers in Col and 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line. Comparing to Col, shortening of anther filaments were found in transgenic lines (Fig. 3e and f). Meanwhile, some flowers of transgenic Arabidopsis plants produced anthers with little pollen. So we suggest BcFLC1 affects not only flowering time, but also floral morphology and reproduction in the next generation.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Effect of BcFLC1 on genes expression in 35S::BcFLC1 line. Expression levels of RGA, RGL, GAMYB, and SEP3 were determined by quantitative RT-PCR. Col Columbia type, 35S::BcFLC1-5 OE5. The error bars represent SD

GA Pathway Was Affected in 35S::BcFLC1 Overexpression Line

The flc-11 overexpression mutant in Arabidopsis requires more GA3 to flower than the parental C24 (Sheldon et al. 1999). This suggested that FLC may have a quantitative effect on GA action or biosynthesis. In this study, to address the relationship between the overexpression of BcFLC1 and reproduction in transgenic lines, we used qRT-PCR assays detecting the expression of RGA and RGL, anther filaments suppressor involving in GA pathway (Tyler et al. 2004; Achard et al. 2006), and GAMYB and SEP3, involving in anthers and ovule development (Kaufmann et al. 2009; Dornelas et al. 2010). In qRT-PCR assays, the expression level of RGA and RGL mRNA were upregulated (Fig. 4). Meanwhile, the expression of SEP3 was slightly downregulated (Fig. 4). However, the GAMYB expression level was not obviously changed (Fig. 4). This result indicated that BcFLC1 affected GA action and SEP3 transcription in 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line.

Discussion

Constitutive expression of BcFLC1 causes late flowering in Arabidopsis (Fig. 3). Some transgenic plants failed to flower during the experiment. These results indicated that BcFLC1 have effects on flowering time similar to AtFLC (Tadege et al. 2001). Semiquantitative analysis was performed to confirm the BcFLC1 expression levels in the transgenic Arabidopsis plants. Transgenic plants with the highest BcFLC1 expression showed a severe late-flowering phenotype, whereas transgenic plants that flowered similarly to the wild-type control plants showed much lower BcFLC1 transcript levels (Fig. 2). These results indicated that the BcFLC1 transcript level was very closely correlated with the timing of flowering in these transgenic plants.

Morphological changes in floral organs with the overexpression of FLC have been reported in Arabidopsis and Brassica napus (Tadege et al. 2001; Hepworth et al. 2002). Tadege et al. (2001) reported the stamens of the sterile transgenic plants were shorter than the carpel, and the anthers remained below the stigma making self-pollination difficult. This is consistent with our result that RGA and RGL, inhibitors of anther filaments elongation, were upregulated (Fig. 4). Some of the flowers of transgenic Arabidopsis plants produced anthers with little or no pollen and produced petioles at the bases of the mature siliques and inflorescences inside some siliques (Hepworth et al. 2002). Shore and Sharrocks (1995) reported that these morphological changes could be explained by ectopic expression of MADS-box gene which causes abnormal plant developments, especially in floral organs, possibly because of disruption of MADS-box protein complexes. Deng et al. (2011) suggested that FLC is involved in floral pattern regulation. FLC, which binds to a CArG box 2.7 kb upstream of the translation start of SEP3, involving in flower development, affected floral morphology and reproduction. SEP3, involving in anthers and ovule development, was slightly downregulated in 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line (Fig. 4). The reduced SEP3 and shortening of anther filaments may explain the cause of defects in fertility (Fig. 3).

Meanwhile, some papers showed the flc-11 overexpression mutant in Arabidopsis requires more GA3 to flower than the parental C24 (Sheldon et al. 1999). This suggested that FLC may have a quantitative effect on GA action or biosynthesis. The abnormality of GA action or biosynthesis affects flower development (Fig. 5). Currently, it is not clear how FLC regulates GA; thus, it would be worthwhile to determine whether FLC affects GA action or biosynthesis.

Fig. 5
figure 5

The mechanism by which FLC affects fertility (model 1) in FLC overexpression plants. Arrows indicates promotion and inverted T bars indicate repression. Broken lines indicate that further research is needed

Seo et al. (2009) suggested the soc1-2 mutants, which have relatively higher CBF1, CBF2, CBF3, and COR15a expression, showed enhanced resistance to cold resistance. However, the soc1-101D mutants, which have a higher SOC1 expression, showed much weaker induction of COR15a expression compared with wild type. This result suggests that SOC1 attenuates the induction of COR15a gene in response to cold. The same as Seo et al. (2009), in 35S::BcFLC1 overexpression line, the expression of SOC1 was repressed, and then the CBFs expression was increased (data not shown). Achard et al. (2006) concludes that CBF1 enhances RGA and RGL accumulation and, thereby, inhibits GA bioactive. RGA and RGL, belonging to DELLAs (Silverstone et al. 2001; Lee et al. 2002; Wen and Chang 2002), are key components of the GA-signaling pathway. GA promotes growth by overcoming DELLA-mediated growth restraint (Dill and Sun 2001; King et al. 2001; Silverstone et al. 2001; Harberd 2003). Accordingly, we speculated 35S::BcFLC1 transgenic plants that enhanced CBFs accumulate less bioactive GA and, as a consequence, exhibit shortening of anther filaments and reduced fertility (model 1, Fig. 5).