Abstract
Background and aims
Seeds are involved in the transmission of microorganisms from one plant generation to another and consequently may act as the initial inoculum source for the plant microbiota. In this work, we assessed the structure and composition of the seed microbiota of radish (Raphanus sativus) across three successive plant generations.
Methods
Structure of seed microbial communities were estimated on individual plants through amplification and sequencing of genes that are markers of taxonomic diversity for bacteria (gyrB) and fungi (ITS1). The relative contribution of dispersal and ecological drift in inter-individual fluctuations were estimated with a neutral community model.
Results
Seed microbial communities of radish display a low heritability across plant generations. Fluctuations in microbial community profiles were related to changes in community membership and composition across plant generations, but also to variation between individual plants. Ecological drift was an important driver of the structure of seed bacterial communities, while dispersal was involved in the assembly of the fungal fraction of the seed microbiota.
Conclusions
These results provide a first glimpse of the governing processes driving the assembly of the seed microbiota.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plants have co-evolved with complex microbial communities which are known collectively as the plant microbiota. The plant microbiota can influence multiple plant traits such as biomass accumulation (Sugiyama et al. 2013), metabolite production (Badri et al. 2013), drought tolerance (Lau and Lennon 2012; Rolli et al. 2015), flowering time (Wagner et al. 2014; Panke-Buisse et al. 2015; Dombrowski et al. 2017) and disease resistance (Busby et al. 2016; Ritpitakphong et al. 2016; Mendes et al. 2011; Santhanam et al. 2015).
Because the microbiota can benefit plant fitness, deciphering the processes that drive microbiota assembly over space and time is of great interest (Paredes and Lebeis 2016). Community assembly processes could be divided into four main forces: dispersal, diversification, ecological drift and selection (Nemergut et al. 2013). Recently, many research groups have investigated the importance of selection in determining community assembly in the rhizosphere and the phyllosphere (Bulgarelli et al. 2013; Müller et al., 2016). For instance, it has been shown that selection by the environment (e.g. soil physiochemical properties) and to a lesser extend selection by the host (e.g. plant genotype) influence the variation of bacterial root microbiota profiles (Bulgarelli et al. 2012; Lundberg et al. 2012; Peiffer et al. 2013; Edwards et al. 2015; Dombrowski et al. 2017). Selection by the environment and the host are also important drivers of leaf-associated microbiota composition (Bodenhausen et al. 2014; Horton et al. 2014; Wagner et al. 2016). In comparison to selection, the relative importance of dispersal, diversification and ecological drift in driving assembly of plant-associated microbiota has not been well investigated. To our best knowledge, only one study has investigated the relative importance of selection, dispersal and ecological drift in the assembly of the leaf microbiota (Maignien et al. 2014). This study found that community membership of the phyllosphere microbiota is shaped by selection, while community composition is driven by dispersal (Maignien et al. 2014).
In comparison to the phyllosphere and the rhizosphere, our knowledge of microbial communities associated to the other plant habitats such as the anthosphere, carposphere and seed habitat is quite limited. However, seed-associated microbial communities are ecologically interesting because they both represent an endpoint and a starting point for community assembly of the plant microbiota (Shade et al. 2017). Moreover seed-associated micro-organisms contribute to seed preservation (Chee-Sanford et al. 2006) and the release of seeds from dormancy (Goggin et al. 2015); they also have been associated with decreased germination rates (Nelson 2004; Munkvold 2009) and enhancement of ear emergence (Mitter et al. 2017). Recent diversity surveys of the seed microbiota revealed a high level of variation in microbial assemblages composition (Lopez-Velasco et al. 2013; Links et al. 2014; Barret et al. 2015; Klaedtke et al. 2016; Rezki et al. 2016). Based on these previous studies, it seems that selection by the host plant is not a major driver of seed community assembly (Barret et al. 2015; Klaedtke et al. 2016). In contrast, selection by the environment has been shown to shape the structure of seed-associated fungal microbiota but not seed-associated bacterial microbiota (Klaedtke et al. 2016). Hence variation in microbiota composition observed across seed samples could be due to other ecological forces such as dispersal, diversification or ecological drift.
Although the contributions of seed-associated microorganisms to the composition of the plant microbiota is mostly unknown, there are observations of seed-associated microorganisms that are conserved across multiple plant generations (Johnston-Monje and Raizada 2011; Hardoim et al. 2015). These observations suggest that some members of the plant microbiota are vertically transmitted. The initial objective of the present work was to assess the heritability of the radish seed microbiota during multiple plant generations. The structure and diversity of seed-associated microbial communities were analysed on radish seed samples collected on individual plants during three successive generations that were grown on the same experimental site. A community profiling approach revealed high variation in community composition across generations and between individuals, suggesting an importance of diversification, dispersal and ecological drift in the assembly of seed-associated microbiota. To assess the relative importance of these neutral processes, we compared the observed distribution of microbial taxa to an estimated distribution predicted with a neutral community model. According to these predictions, seed-associated microbial communities were composed of few dominant taxa that were selected by the host or the environment, as well as multiple rare taxa whose distributions could be explained by neutral processes.
Material & methods
Seed collection
Experiments were carried out for 3 consecutive years (2013–2015) on the same experiment plot located at the FNAMS experimental station (47°28′12.42″ N, 0°23′44.30″ W, Brain-sur-l’Authion, France). Daily rainfall and temperature and were recorded (Fig. S1). Radish seeds (Raphanus sativus var. Flamboyant5) were sown in March at a density of 10 seeds per linear meter with 0.8 m between rows. At the end of August, some plants were hand-collected and placed in individual paper bags. To limit border effect, plants located at the border of the experimental plot were not sampled. Nine, 32 and 32 plants were hand-collected in 2013, 2014 and 2015. Paper bags were stored for one week at 9 °C at a relative humidity of 60%. Mature pods were removed from each plant, crushed and placed on three cleaning sieves with different mesh sizes, resulting in 500 to 1000 seeds per plant. The remaining seeds in the experimental plot were mechanically-harvested with a thresher. Seed samples that were mechanically-harvested were stored at 9 °C at a relative humidity of 60% for 6 months. Mechanically-harvested seeds were used for sowing in the following season.
DNA extraction was performed on 73 hand-harvested seed samples and 3 subsamples of 1000 seeds for each mechanically-harvested seed sample, resulting in 82 samples. Seeds were soaked in 25 mL of phosphate buffer saline (PBS) supplemented with 0.05% (v/v) of Tween® 20 during 2 h and 30 min at room temperature under constant agitation (140 rpm). Suspensions were collected and centrifuged (6000×g, 10 min, 4 °C). Pellets were suspended in approximately 2 ml of supernatant and transferred in PowerBeads tubes of the Power Soil DNA Kit (MoBio Laboratories). DNA extractions were performed with the Power Soil DNA kit using the manufacturer’s protocol with the following modifications. PowerBeads tubes were placed in mixer (Retsch – MM301) and shook twice (30 Hz, 2 min, room temperature). DNA elution was performed with 60 μl of C6 solution of the Power Soil DNA kit.
Libraries construction and sequencing
Amplifications of one bacterial marker (gyrB) and one fungal marker (ITS1) were performed with the primer sets gyrB_aF64/gyrB_aR353 (Barret et al. 2015) and ITS1F/ITS2 (Buée et al. 2009) following procedures described earlier (Barret et al. 2015). Amplicon libraries were mixed with 5% PhiX control according to Illumina’s protocols. A total of three sequencing runs was performed for this study with MiSeq Reagent Kits v3 (600 cycles).
Data analysis
The choice of gyrB as a bacterial molecular marker was dictated by its lowest taxonomic resolution (species-level) in comparison to classic molecular markers based on the hypervariable regions of the 16S rRNA gene (Barret et al. 2015). The gyrB database is composed of 30,525 sequences retrieved from 30,175 genomic sequences available in the IMG database v4 (Markowitz et al. 2012). According to the gANI cliques defined previously by Varghese and collaborators (Varghese et al. 2015), the gyrB marker has the best precision (0.964) and sensitivity (0.955) at a genetic distance of 0.02 (Barret et al. 2015).
Sequence analyses were performed as described earlier by Barret et al. 2015 using a sequence curation pipeline (Kozich et al. 2013) within mothur 1.36.1 (Schloss et al. 2009). Briefly, gyrB sequences were aligned against a gyrB reference alignment composed of 10,427 haplotypes. Chimeric sequences were detected and removed from the dataset using the command chimera.uchime (Edgar et al. 2011). Taxonomic affiliation of gyrB sequences was performed with a Bayesian classifier (Wang et al. 2007) implemented in the classify.seqs command against an in-house gyrB database containing 30,525 representative sequences at a 80% bootstrap confidence score. All sequences not affiliated at the phylum level and containing a predicted stop codon were discarded from the dataset. A de novo clustering method (i.e. average-linkage clustering at a 98% identity cut-off) was performed with the cluster.split command for assigning gyrB sequences to operational taxonomic units (OTUs).
The variable ITS1 regions of the fungal internal transcribed spacer were extracted with the Perl-based software ITSx 1.0.4 (Bengtsson-Palme et al. 2013). Reference-based clustering was performed with UCLUST 1.2.22 algorithm (Edgar 2010) at a 97% identity cut-off against the UNITE 7.1 database (Abarenkov et al. 2010).
Observed richness (number of OTUs) and evenness (estimated with Simpson’s reciprocal index) were calculated with the R package phyloseq (McMurdie and Holmes 2013) on OTU tables rarefied to 5000 sequences per sample. Differences in richness and evenness between variables were assessed by one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey’s HSD test.
Differences in community membership and composition between plant generations were assessed with Jaccard and Bray-Curtis resemblance, respectively. Jaccard and Bray-Curtis resemblance were calculated on OTU tables transformed to even sampling depth (OTU count divided by the number of reads per sample and multiply by 1000,000). Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) was used for ordination of Jaccard and Bray-Curtis resemblances. Permutated multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; Anderson 2001, implemented with the adonis function in the vegan package in R) was used to assess the importance of the plant generation on seed-associated microbial community profiles. To quantify the contribution of the plant generation in microbial community profiles, canonical analysis of principal coordinates was performed with the function capscale of the R package vegan 2.4.2 (Oksanen et al. 2017) followed by PERMANOVA. Changes in relative abundance of OTUs between the different plant generations (2013, 2014 and 2015) were assessed with likelihood ratio test (LRT) with the R package DESeq2 1.14.1 (Anders and Huber 2010). OTU with a corrected p-value <0.01 and a log2FC > |2| were considered as differentially abundant between the different plant generations.
Testing the importance of neutral processes in community assembly
To investigate the relative role of dispersal and ecological drift in shaping seed-associated microbial community, we used a conceptual framework based on neutral theory. In this conceptual framework, a seed sample harvested from an individual plant represents a local community that is part of a larger metacommunity. The metacommunity includes all seed samples collected from different plants of the same generation. As the neutral hypothesis assumes that community members are ecological equivalents, changes in structure of the local community is attributed to the death of an individual that can either be replaced by an immigrant from the metacommunity or by local reproduction.
We assessed the fit of the Sloan neutral community model to estimate expectations in OTU abundances and frequencies. This model estimates the rate of immigration (m) into the local community by comparing OTU frequency across multiple samples (Sloan et al. 2007). The Sloan model predicts that abundant entities in the large community are widespread across samples because their dispersal could occur by chance, while rare members are more likely to be lost by ecological drift in the local community. We used a custom R script written by Burns and collaborators for fitting the Sloan neutral community model to OTU distribution (Burns et al. 2016). Goodness of fit of was assessed with root mean squared errors (RMSE) and compared with the fit of a binomial distribution model using the Akaike information criterion (AIC). The binomial distribution model is used for assessing the importance of random sampling on community structure in absence of drift and dispersal limitation (Sloan et al. 2007). Calculations of 95% confidence intervals for the Sloan neutral community model were used to detect OTUs that were more and less frequent than expected.
The validity of neutral models predictions for sequencing datasets has been recently assessed by Sommeria-Klein and collaborators (Sommeria-Klein et al. 2016). According to this study, neutral-model inference is affected by the number of reads per sample, which should be smaller than the number of individuals observed (Sommeria-Klein et al. 2016). This limitation can be easily tested by subsampling the number of reads and assessing whether the model immigration terms are unchanged. We rarefied the number of sequences per sample either to 1000 or 5000 counts before fitting the Sloan neutral community model. Because both rarefaction procedures did not significantly impact the estimated migration term, the largest dataset (5000 counts per sample) was used in subsequent analyses.
Results
The assembly of radish seed-associated microbial communities was monitored across three plant generations (2013, 2014 and 2015) through a community profiling approach. Bacterial and fungal assemblage profiles were estimated after assignment of gyrB and ITS1 sequences to operational taxonomic units (OTUs). Overall, 43,102 bacterial OTUs and 25,618 fungal OTUs were detected across all seed samples. While the number of observed bacterial OTUs was not significantly different between hand- and mechanically-harvested seed samples, fungal richness was significantly higher in mechanically-harvested seed samples (P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test, Fig. S2). However, higher fungal richness did not impact evenness (as assessed with Simpson’s reciprocal index, Fig. S2). Because alpha-diversity of the mechanically-harvested seed samples used for sowing was comparable to that of seed samples collected from individual plants, we concluded that the harvesting method was negligible for explaining the variation of microbial community composition across years. For consistency, we considered hand-harvested seed samples in the subsequent analyses.
Assembly of the seed microbiota over successive plant generations
The assembly patterns of radish seed microbiota was monitored from hand-harvested samples in 2013, 2014 and 2015. First, we compared microbial richness and evenness over the three plant generations (Fig. 1). A significant increase in bacterial and fungal richness (Fig. 1a and b) was observed for samples collected in 2015 vs. those collected the previous years (P < 0.01, one-way ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s HSD test). However, this increase in microbial richness was not associated with differences in microbial evenness over the successive plant generations (Fig. 1c and d).
Similarity in community membership and community composition was estimated through calculation of Jaccard and Bray-Curtis similarities, respectively. Ordination of Jaccard and Bray-Curtis similarity with principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) revealed a clustering of seed-associated fungal communities according to the plant generation (PERMANOVA, P < 0.001; Fig. 2a and b). In contrast, seed-associated bacterial communities were only significantly clustered for the third plant generation (P < 0.001; Fig. 2c and d). Jaccard ordinations had higher explanatory value and more discrete clustering by year than Bray-Curtis, suggesting that inter-annual differences in community structure can be attributed to patterns in the presence and absence of taxa (e.g. many taxa observed exclusively in one year). The relative contribution of the plant generation in community profiles was further investigated through canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP) followed by PERMANOVA. According to CAP, the plant generation explained 22% and 32% of variation in bacterial and fungal community membership and 27% and 39% of bacterial and fungal community composition (PERMANOVA, P < 0.001).
To determine if some OTUs were specifically associated with one particular generation, we performed likelihood ratio tests (LRT) with DESeq2 on OTU table. LRT revealed that the relative abundances of 25 bacterial OTUs were significantly different (p-value ≤0.01 and log2FC ≥ |2|) between the first and second plant generations (Fig. S3A). The number of differentially abundant bacterial OTUs with differences was 62 between the second and third plant generation (Fig. S3E). Changes in relative abundances of 69 and 125 fungal OTUs were also detected between 2013 vs 2014 and 2014 vs 2015, respectively (Fig. S3B and Fig. S3F). In conclusion, differences in richness, diversity, community membership, community composition and OTU relative abundances’ indicated a contribution of plant generation and/or harvest year on the structure of seed-associated microbial communities.
Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities among individual plants within the same harvest year
Moving forward from our results that plant generation and/or harvest year are important drivers of the structure of the seed microbiota, we wanted to understand the variation in richness (Fig. 1) and community composition (Fig. 3) of the radish seed microbiota collected within the same year but on distinct individual plants. Overall, the radish seed microbiota is mainly composed of 2 bacterial genera, namely Pantoea and Pseudomonas (Fig. 3a), and 2 fungal genera: Alternaria and Cladosporium (Fig. 3b). These genera were consistently detected across individual plants, but had variable relative abundances (Fig. 3a and b).
To further evaluate variation in community membership and composition of the radish seed microbiota, we counted the number of OTUs that were conserved among all individual plants (core microbiota, Shade and Handelsman 2012). Among the 43,102 bacterial OTUs detected in the gyrB dataset, only three were observed in all seed communities. These three bacterial OTUs are affiliated to Pantoea agglomerans, Pseudomonas viridiflava and Erwinia tasmaniensis (Table 1). For the fungal communities, nineteen fungal OTUs among 25,618 OTUs detected were conserved in all seed samples. Among these 19 fungal OTUs, 14 were affiliated to the Alternaria genus (Table 1).
Although the core fraction of the radish seed microbiota had few OTUs, these taxa were highly abundant and represented an average of 70% and 87% of all bacterial and fungal reads, respectively. Despite this strong conservation in detection across individuals, the relative abundance of the core members of the radish seed microbiota varied greatly between seed samples (Fig. S4). For instance the relative abundance of bacterial OTU00001, which is affiliated to P. agglomerans, ranged from 7 to 82% within seed samples collected in 2014 (Fig. S4A). There were also shifts in the relative abundances of fungal OTUs between seed samples, with variation ranging from 4 to 43% for OTU00002 (Cladosporium) in 2014 (Fig. S4B). The high variability of seed community composition collected from the same plant genotype and grown on the same experimental plot suggested that non-selective processes such as dispersal, drift and diversification may be involved in community assembly of the seed microbiota.
Neutral processes are involved in intra-annual community assembly of the seed microbiota
The fit of the Sloan neutral model to the observed OTU distribution was used to assess the relative importance of dispersal limitation and ecological drift. Based on RMSE values, frequency of bacterial and fungal OTUs occurrence within local community was adequately described by the neutral model for seed collected in 2014 and 2015 (Fig. 4). Larger differences between observed OTUs occurrence and predicted OTUs occurrence were reported for microbial communities associated to seed harvested in 2013 (RMSE = 0.12 and 0.14 for bacterial and fungal OTU datasets, respectively). This increase in RMSE values could be explained by the limited number of samples employed (n = 9) in 2013. Overall, the estimated migration rate (m) was more important for seed fungal communities in comparison to seed bacterial communities (Table 2).
To estimate the effect of dispersal and ecological drift on local microbial community structure, we compared the fit of the Sloan model to the fit of a binomial distribution model that is used for assessing the importance of random sampling on community structure (Sloan et al. 2007). According to AIC, both models performed equally well (Table 2), therefore suggesting that dispersal, ecological drift and random sampling were involved in local assembly of seed-associated bacterial communities.
Although the distribution of the vast majority of the OTUs were adequately predicted by the Sloan model, some OTUs were outside the 95% confidence interval of the model (Fig. 4). These OTUs that were found more and less frequently than estimated, and could represent microbial taxa that were positively and negatively selected by the host or the environment. Interestingly, only a subset of microbial taxa consistently diverged from neutral expectations across the three plant generation (Table 3). A total of three bacterial OTUs related to the Pseudomonas fluorescens group were less frequently observed than expected (Table 3), and could represent taxa that are under negative selection. In contrast, one bacterial and five fungal OTUs had a higher observed frequency for each plant generation. These putative positively-selected taxa corresponded to one bacterial endophyte affiliated to Plantibacter flavus and 5 OTUs related to the Alternaria genus (Table 3). These taxa that were not determined to be part of the radish seed core microbiota.
Discussion
We investigated the structure of microbial communities associated to several seed samples collected on different plant individuals during three successive generations. Based on the molecular markers employed in this work, seed microbiota composition and structure were distinct between plant generations. Overall, only three bacterial OTUs and 19 fungal OTUs were detected in all seed samples. These core OTUs were affiliated to bacterial (e.g. Pantoea agglomerans or Pseudomonas viridiflava) and fungal taxa (Alternaria or Cladosporium) that are frequently associated with seeds of various plant species (Barret et al. 2015; Hodgson et al. 2014; Links et al. 2014; Rezki et al. 2016; Truyens et al. 2015). Altogether, these results suggest a low heritability of the seed microbiota across plant generations. Limited heritability was observed previously for bacterial communities associated with seeds and rhizosphere of maize (Johnston-Monje and Raizada 2011 and Peiffer et al. 2013, respectively), and was attributed to site-specific variation. In the present work, geographic distance was not involved in the observed variability of community composition, as all plants were grown in the same experimental plot. However, annual fluctuations in local weather conditions (Fig. S1) could contribute to differences in community structure across successive plant generations. Indeed, it is well accepted that climatic changes influence the composition of soil and plant-associated microbial communities (Compant et al. 2010; Classen et al. 2015). Other variables such as the type of cultivated plants that surrounded the experimental plots could also contribute to observed variation in seed community composition. Recent work indicates that emigration of epiphytic bacteria and fungi from plants surfaces are important local sources of airborne micro-organisms (Lymperopoulou et al. 2016). Although the same experimental plot was employed over the course of this study, other cultivated plant species in the immediate vicinity of the radish plants were not controlled between the different years.
While generation-specific variation was observed within seed-associated microbiota, the highest variation was found between seed samples collected within the same year but on different individual plants. As most diversity surveys of seed-associated microbial communities are performed on seed samples consisting of multiple plant entities (Barret et al. 2015; Links et al. 2014: Klaedtke et al. 2016), this source of variation is usually ignored. The fluctuations in microbial community composition observed between seed samples collected on different individual plants were partly explained by neutral processes. The Sloan neutral model predicted the distribution of microbial taxa across seed-associated microbial communities, suggesting that ecological drift and dispersal explained a significant amount of diversity. Given the small value of estimated migration rate for seed-associated bacterial communities (m = 0.04), ecological drift was deduced as an important driver of bacterial community assembly. The importance of ecological drift in community assembly has been previously reported in communities (i) under weak host selection and (ii) where the vast majority of taxa are in low relative abundances (Nemergut et al. 2013). These two features are frequently encountered in seed-associated bacterial communities. Indeed, the overall composition of seed-associated bacterial communities is not shaped by the host genotype (Barret et al. 2015; Klaedtke et al. 2016). Moreover, seed-associated microbial communities are composed of few abundant entities and a multitude of low-abundance members (Rezki et al. 2016) that may be prone to local extinction.
In contrast to the seed bacterial communities, high migration rates (m > 0.4) were estimated for fungal communities at each harvesting year. Hence, loss of a fungal entity within local community may be replaced by immigration of an individual from the regional metacommunity. Fungal communities usually display strong biogeographical patterns as a result of dispersal limitation at regional scale (Peay et al. 2016). For instance, it has been shown that the geographic location of the production region shapes the structure of seed fungal communities (Klaedtke et al. 2016). However, passive dispersal of fungal entities occurred frequently at short-distances via aerial movement of spores. Indeed, most fungal spores can disperse from centimeters to meters (Norros et al. 2012). Taken together, the predicted importance of dispersal for seed fungal community assembly and the observed differences in fungal diversity and composition within the same experimental plot are indicative of historical contingency (Fukami 2015). In historical contingency, the order of species arrival impacts the final composition of the community. Hence the first fungal taxa that colonize the seed may have a competitive advantage over fungi that require the same resources but arrive subsequently.
Though most microbial OTUs followed the expectation of the Sloan neutral model, some OTUs deviated clearly. The taxa that were more widespread than expected could represent microbial entities that are positively selected by the host or the environment. Positive-selection of these microbial taxa by the host would suggest that they possess properties beneficial to plant. Among those taxa, one bacterial OTU and 5 fungal OTUs were consistently overrepresented in every plant generation. The bacterial OTU was related to Plantibacter flavus, a bacterial endophyte belonging to several plant families including Asteraceae, Fabaceae and Poaceae (Lumactud et al. 2016) that possesses 1-aminocyclopropane-1 carboxylate activity (Lumactud et al. 2017), which reduces stress ethylene production in plant. All fungal OTUs were related to the Alternaria genus, more precisely to the section Alternata and Infectoria (Woudenberg et al. 2013). Although these fungal taxa are usually described as plant pathogens (Woudenberg et al. 2013), their prevalence in symptomless seeds (Links et al. 2014; Barret et al. 2015) and their potential selection by the host plant may indicate plant-beneficial traits.
In conclusion, the present work shows a low heritability of the seed microbiota during successive plant generations. This low level of heritability is explained in part by the importance of neutral based processes in community assembly. Neutral processes related to ecological drift are important for the structure of seed-associated bacterial communities, while dispersal was involved in assembly of the fungal fraction of the seed microbiota.
References
Abarenkov K, Nilsson R, Larsson K, Alexander I, Eberhardt U, Erland S, Hoiland K, Kjoller R, Larsson E, Pennanen T, Sen R, Taylor A, Tedersoo L, Ursing B, Vralstad T, Liimatainen K, Peintner U, Koljalg U (2010) The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi - recent updates and future perspectives. New Phytol 186:281–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03160.x
Anders S, Huber W (2010) Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol 11:R106
Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46
Badri D, Zolla G, Bakker M, Manter D, Vivanco J (2013) Potential impact of soil microbiomes on the leaf metabolome and on herbivore feeding behavior. New Phytol 198:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12124
Barret M, Briand M, Bonneau S, Preveaux A, Valiere S, Bouchez O, Hunault G, Simoneau P, Jacques M (2015) Emergence shapes the structure of the seed microbiota. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:1257–1266. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03722-14
Bengtsson-Palme J, Ryberg M, Hartmann M, Branco S, Wang Z, Godhe A, De Wit P, Sanchez-Garcia M, Ebersberger I, de Sousa F, Amend A, Jumpponen A, Unterseher M, Kristiansson E, Abarenkov K, Bertrand Y, Sanli K, Eriksson K, Vik U, Veldre V, Nilsson R (2013) Improved software detection and extraction of ITS1 and ITS2 from ribosomal ITS sequences of fungi and other eukaryotes for analysis of environmental sequencing data. Methods Ecol Evol 4:914–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12073.
Bodenhausen N, Bortfeld-Miller M, Ackermann M, Vorholt JA (2014) A synthetic community approach reveals plant genotypes affecting the phyllosphere microbiota. PLoS Genet 10:e1004283
Buée M, Reich M, Murat C, Morin E, Nilsson R, Uroz S, Martin F (2009) 454 Pyrosequencing analyses of forest soils reveal an unexpectedly high fungal diversity. New Phytol 184:449–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03003.x
Bulgarelli D, Rott M, Schlaeppi K, van Themaat EVL, Ahmadinejad N, Assenza F, Rauf P, Huettel N, Reinhardt R, Schmelzer E, Peplies J, Gloeckner FO, Amann R, Eickhorst T, Schulze-Lefert P (2012) Revealing structure and assembly cues for Arabidopsis root-inhabiting bacterial microbiota. Nature 488:91–95
Bulgarelli D, Schlaeppi K, Spaepen S, van Themaat EVL, Schulze-Lefert P (2013) Structure and functions of the bacterial microbiota of plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 64:807–838
Burns AR, Stephens WZ, Stagaman K, Wong S, Rawls JF, Guillemin K, Bohannan BJ (2016) Contribution of neutral processes to the assembly of gut microbial communities in the zebrafish over host development. ISME J 10:655–664
Busby P, Ridout M, Newcombe G (2016) Fungal endophytes: modifiers of plant disease. Plant Mol Biol 90:645–655. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-015-0412-0
Chee-Sanford JC, Williams II MM, Davis AS, Sims GK (2006) Do microorganisms influence seed-bank dynamics? Weed Sci 54:575–587
Classen A, Sundqvist M, Henning J, Newman G, Moore J, Cregger M, Moorhead L, Patterson C (2015) Direct and indirect effects of climate change on soil microbial and soil microbial-plant interactions: What lies ahead? Ecosphere 6:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES15-00217.1
Compant S, van der Heijden M, Sessitsch A (2010) Climate change effects on beneficial plant-microorganism interactions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 73:197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00900.x
Dombrowski N, Schlaeppi K, Agler MT, Hacquard S, Kemen E, Garrido-Oter R, Wunder J, Coupland G, Schulze-Lefert P (2017) Root microbiota dynamics of perennial Arabis alpina are dependent on soil residence time but independent of flowering time. ISME J 11:43–55
Edgar R (2010) Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460–2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
Edgar R, Haas B, Clemente J, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27:2194–2200. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381
Edwards J, Johnson C, Santos-Medellín C, Lurie E, Podishetty NK, Bhatnagar S, Eisen JA, Sundaresan V (2015) Structure, variation, and assembly of the root-associated microbiomes of rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:911–920
Fukami T (2015) Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 46:1–23
Goggin DE, Emery RJ, Kurepin LV, Powles SB (2015) A potential role for endogenous microflora in dormancy release, cytokinin metabolism and the response to fluridone in Lolium rigidum seeds. Ann Bot 115:293–301
Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttila AM, Compant S, Campisano A, Doring M, Sessitsch A (2015) The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 79:293–320
Hodgson S, de Cates C, Hodgson J, Morley N, Sutton B, Gange A (2014) Vertical transmission of fungal endophytes is widespread in forbs. Ecol Evol 4:1199–1208. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.953
Horton M, Bodenhausen N, Beilsmith K, Meng D, Muegge B, Subramanian S, Vetter M, Vilhjalmsson B, Nordborg M, Gordon J, Bergelson J (2014) Genome-wide association study of Arabidopsis thaliana leaf microbial community. Nat Commun 5:5320
Johnston-Monje D, Raizada MN (2011) Conservation and diversity of seed associated endophytes in zea across boundaries of evolution, ethnography and ecology. PLoS One 6:e20396
Klaedtke S, Jacques M, Raggi L, Preveaux A, Bonneau S, Negri V, Chable V, Barret M (2016) Terroir is a key driver of seed-associated microbial assemblages. Environ Microbiol 18:1792–1804. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12977
Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120
Lau J, Lennon J (2012) Rapid responses of soil microorganisms improve plant fitness in novel environments. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:14058–14062. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1202319109.
Links M, Demeke T, Grafenhan T, Hill J, Hemmingsen S, Dumonceaux T (2014) Simultaneous profiling of seed-associated bacteria and fungi reveals antagonistic interactions between microorganisms within a shared epiphytic microbiome on Triticum and Brassica seeds. New Phytol 202:542–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12693
Lopez-Velasco G, Carder P, Welbaum G, Ponder M (2013) Diversity of the spinach (Spinacia oleracea) spermosphere and phyllosphere bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 346:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12216
Lumactud R, Shen SY, Lau M, Fulthorpe R (2016) Bacterial endophytes isolated from plants in natural oil seep soils with chronic hydrocarbon contamination. Front Microbiol 7:755
Lumactud R, Fulthorpe R, Sentchilo V, van der Meer JR (2017) Draft genome sequence of Plantibacter flavus strain 251 isolated from a plant growing in a chronically hydrocarbon-contaminated site. Genome Announc 5:e00276–e00217
Lundberg DS, Lebeis SL, Paredes SH, Yourstone S, Gehring J, Malfatti S, Tremblay J, Engelbrektson A, Kunin V, dela Rio TG, Edgar RC, Eickhorst T, Ley RE, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Dangl JL (2012) Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 488:86–90
Lymperopoulou D, Adams R, Lindow S (2016) Contribution of vegetation to the microbial composition of nearby outdoor air. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3822–3833. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00610-16
Maignien L, DeForce E, Chafee M, Eren A, Simmons S (2014) Ecological succession and stochastic variation in the assembly of arabidopsis thaliana phyllosphere communities. MBio 5:e00682–e00613
Markowitz V, Chen I, Palaniappan K, Chu K, Szeto E, Grechkin Y, Ratner A, Jacob B, Huang J, Williams P, Huntemann M, Anderson I, Mavromatis K, Ivanova N, Kyrpides N (2012) IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system. Nucleic Acids Res 40:D115–D122. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkr1044
McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) phyloseq : an R package for reproductible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS ONE 8(4):e61217
Mendes R, Kruijt M, de Bruijn I, Dekkers E, van der Voort M, Schneider J, Piceno Y, DeSantis T, Andersen G, Bakker P, Raaijmakers J (2011) Deciphering the rhizosphere microbiome for disease-suppressive bacteria. Science 332:1097–1100. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1203980
Mitter B, Pfaffenbichler N, Flavell R, Compant S, Antonielli L, Petric A, Berninger T, Naveed M, Sheibani-Tezerji R, von Maltzahn G, Sessitch A (2017) A new approach to modify plant microbiomes and traits by introducing beneficial bacteria at flowering into progeny seeds. Front Microbiol 8:11
Munkvold GP (2009) Seed pathology progress in academia and industry. Annu Rev Phytopathol 47:285–311
Nelson E (2004) Microbial dynamics and interactions in the spermosphere. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:271–309. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.121603.131041
Nemergut D, Schmidt S, Fukami T, O'Neill S, Bilinski T, Stanish L, Knelman J, Darcy J, Lynch R, Wickey P, Ferrenberg S (2013) Patterns and processes of microbial community assembly. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77:342–356. https://doi.org/10.1128/MMBR.00051-12
Norros V, Penttilä R, Suominen M, Ovaskainen O (2012) Dispersal may limit the occurrence of specialist wood decay fungi already at small spatial scales. Oikos 121:961–974
Oksanen J, Blanchet FG, Friendly M, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, O’Hara MPR, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Vegan : community ecology package. Ordination methods, diversity analysis and other function for community and vegetation ecologists. R package version 2.4–2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan)
Panke-Buisse K, Poole A, Goodrich J, Ley R, Kao-Kniffin J (2015) Selection on soil microbiomes reveals reproducible impacts on plant function. ISME J 9:980–989. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2014.196
Paredes SH, Lebeis SL (2016) Giving back to the community: microbial mechanisms of plant-soil interactions. Funct Ecol 30:1043–1052
Peay K, Kennedy P, Talbot J (2016) Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:434–447. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59
Peiffer JA, Spor A, Koren O, Jin Z, Tringe SG, Dangl JL, Buckler ES, Ley RE (2013) Diversity and heritability of the maize rhizosphere microbiome under field conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6548–6553
Rezki S, Campion C, Iacomi-Vasilescu B, Preveaux A, Toualbia Y, Bonneau S, Briand M, Laurent E, Hunault G, Simoneau P, Jacques M, Barret M (2016) Differences in stability of seed-associated microbial assemblages in response to invasion by phytopathogenic microorganisms. PeerJ 4:e1923. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1923
Ritpitakphong U, Falquet L, Vimoltust A, Berger A, Metraux J, L'Haridon F (2016) The microbiome of the leaf surface of Arabidopsis protects against a fungal pathogen. New Phytol 210:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13808
Rolli E, Marasco R, Vigani G, Ettoumi B, Mapelli F, Deangelis ML, Gandolfi C, Casati E, Previtali F, Gerbino R, Cei FP, Borin S, Sorlini C, Zocchi G, Daffonchio D (2015) Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root-associated microbiome as a water stress-dependent trait. Environ Microbiol 17:316–331
Santhanam R, Luu V, Weinhold A, Goldberg J, Oh Y, Baldwin I (2015) Native root-associated bacteria rescue a plant from a sudden-wilt disease that emerged during continuous cropping. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E5013–E5020. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505765112
Schloss P, Westcott S, Ryabin T, Hall J, Hartmann M, Hollister E, Lesniewski R, Oakley B, Parks D, Robinson C, Sahl J, Stres B, Thallinger G, Van Horn D, Weber C (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:7537–7541. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01541-09
Shade A, Handelsman J (2012) Beyond the Venn diagram: the hunt for a core microbiome. Environ Microbiol 14:4–12
Shade A, Jacques M-A, Barret M (2017) Ecological patterns of seed microbiome diversity, transmission, and assembly. Curr Opin Microbiol 37:15–22
Sloan WT, Woodcock S, Lunn M, Head IM, Curtis TP (2007) Modeling taxa-abundance distributions in microbial communities using environmental sequence data. Microb Ecol 53:443–455
Sommeria-Klein G, Zinger L, Taberlet P, Coissac E, Chave J (2016) Inferring neutral biodiversity parameters using environmental DNA data sets. Sci Rep 6:35644
Sugiyama A, Bakker M, Badri D, Manter D, Vivanco J (2013) Relationships between Arabidopsis genotype-specific biomass accumulation and associated soil microbial communities. Botany-Botanique 91:123–126. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjb-2012-0217.
Truyens S, Weyens N, Cuypers A, Vangronsveld J (2015) Bacterial seed endophytes: genera, vertical transmission and interaction with plants. Environ Microbiol Rep 7:40–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-2229.12181
Varghese NJ, Mukherjee S, Ivanova N, Konstantinidis KT, Mavrommatis K, Kyrpides NC, Pati A (2015) Microbial species delineation using whole genome sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 43:6761–6771
Wagner M, Lundberg D, Coleman-Derr D, Tringe S, Dangl J, Mitchell-Olds T (2014) Natural soil microbes alter flowering phenology and the intensity of selection on flowering time in a wild Arabidopsis relative. Ecol Lett 17:717–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12276
Wagner M, Lundberg D, del Rio T, Tringe S, Dangl J, Mitchell-Olds T (2016) Host genotype and age shape the leaf and root microbiomes of a wild perennial plant. Nat Commun 7:12151
Wang Q, Garrity G, Tiedje J, Cole J (2007) Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:5261–5267. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00062-07
Woudenberg JHC, Groenewald JZ, Binder M, Crous PW (2013) Alternaria redefined. Stud Mycol 75:171–212
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by grant awarded by the Region des Pays de la Loire (metaSEED, 2013 10080) and the Michigan State University Plant Resilience Institute. The authors wish to thanks Gloria Torres-Cortes for manuscript assessment, Emmanuelle Laurent, Julie Gombert and Vincent Odeau (Fédération Nationale des Agriculteurs Multiplicateurs de Semences - FNAMS) for their help with all the field experiments, Aude Rochefort for the preparation of the sequencing library and Muriel Bahut from the platform ANAN of SFR Quasav for launching the MiSeq runs.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eric B. Nelson.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(PDF 546 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rezki, S., Campion, C., Simoneau, P. et al. Assembly of seed-associated microbial communities within and across successive plant generations. Plant Soil 422, 67–79 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3451-2