Abstract
Background and aims
Phytolacca americana, a globally invasive species, is able to flourish in heavy metal-contaminated habitats. To improve understanding of the adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of plants under heavy metal stress, we investigated key factors contributing to variation in leaf manganese (Mn) content in P. americana.
Methods
Genetic surveys and common garden experiments were conducted simultaneously in an analysis of P. americana populations growing on Mn-contaminated and uncontaminated soil.
Results
Our field survey detected a significant relationship between leaf Mn concentrations in P. americana and concentrations in the soils from which plants were collected. Microsatellite analyses identified low levels of genetic diversity within and between populations; 32 of 39 populations (82 %) were genetically monomorphic. No genetic differentiation was detected between populations from contaminated and uncontaminated soils. Our common garden experiments showed that Mn concentrations in P. americana were related only to the growth habitat, regardless of the origin of the seeds.
Conclusions
Combining the results of our ecological and genetic analyses, we concluded that genetic variation is not likely to be responsible for the wide ecological distribution of P. americana in China. Rather, phenotypic plasticity is probably the major contributor to its successful colonisation of stressful habitats, such as heavy metal-contaminated soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Heavy metal contamination of soil has received considerable public attention over recent decades. Contamination may be naturally caused or results from anthropogenic activities, such as mining, agriculture, industrial processes and traffic (Baker 1987; Muller et al. 2004). In comparison with plants found at uncontaminated sites, those growing on heavy metal-contaminated soils frequently accumulate elevated levels of the contaminating metals in their tissues (Antonovics et al. 1971; Brooks et al. 1992; Reeves 2003; Pollard et al. 2014). Some species that evolved on uncontaminated soils have developed tolerant genotypes, which have persisted in toxic environments and expanded their distributions to soils with high concentrations of heavy metals (Kruckeberg 1967). Heavy metal contamination in soil acts as a selective pressure to promote such evolutionary differentiation (Antonovics et al. 1971; Reznick and Ghalambor 2001).
Plants able to accumulate extraordinarily high concentrations of heavy metals in their aerial organs and grow well on metalliferous soils are categorised as hyperaccumulators (Baker and Brooks 1989; Brooks 1998; Krämer 2010; Pollard et al. 2014). The threshold concentration for leaf hyperaccumulation is 2–3 orders of magnitude higher than those in the leaves of most species growing on normal soils and at least one order of magnitude greater than the usual range found in plants from metalliferous soils. Currently, more than 500 plant species are recognised as hyperaccumulators of heavy metals (zinc [Zn], nickel [Ni], manganese [Mn], cobalt [Co], copper [Cu], cadmium [Cd]), metalloids (arsenic [As]) and nonmetals (selenium [Se]) (Verbruggen et al. 2009; van der Ent et al. 2013). These hyperaccumulators may be useful for the removal of toxic metals from contaminated soils; after accumulation in live tissues, the toxins can be removed from the habitat by harvesting metal-rich aboveground plant parts (Baker et al. 2000; Pollard et al. 2002; McGrath et al. 2002; Pilon-Smits 2005; van der Ent et al. 2013). The physiological, molecular and genetic bases of hyperaccumulation have been examined in previous works (Pollard et al. 2002; Macnair 2003; Verbruggen et al. 2009; Krämer 2010). However, the adaptive evolutionary mechanisms of hyperaccumulation under heavy metal stress remain unclear (Pollard et al. 2002; Verbruggen et al. 2009; Cappa and Pilon-Smits 2014). The capacity to tolerate and accumulate metals varies greatly between populations of the same hyperaccumulator species (Pollard et al. 2002; Verbruggen et al. 2009). Studies on phenotypic and genetic variation within/among hyperaccumulator populations will contribute to improved understanding of the evolutionary mechanism(s) underlying heavy metal tolerance (Pollard et al. 2002; Wójcik et al. 2013). The variability of hyperaccumulator populations growing separately in habitats with normal and high concentrations of heavy metals makes these species good models for studying evolution by natural selection.
Genetic differentiation and phenotypic plasticity are two mechanisms by which plants adapt to variable environments (Williams et al. 2008). The genetic variation mechanism operates in species with high genetic diversity; these are able to adapt to local habitats by rapid genetic differentiation; i.e. they are able to evolve (Ward et al. 2008; Bossdorf et al. 2010). The phenotypic plasticity mechanism operates in species whose members are able to shift their phenotypes to adapt to local circumstances without any corresponding genotypic shifts (Bossdorf et al. 2008; Richards et al. 2012). Rapid genetic evolution may occur in only a few generations under the high selection pressure exerted by extreme environmental conditions (Ernst 2006), and the ability of plants to tolerate heavy metals can evolve over relatively short time periods (Bone and Farres 2001). Toxin tolerance and hyperaccumulation ability are at least in part under independent genetic controls (Macnair et al. 1999; Macnair 2002; Assunção et al. 2003) and may vary significantly among and within populations (Escarré et al. 2000; Dechamps et al. 2005; Meyer et al. 2010). Heavy metal-contaminated sites may be considered as ecological islands in which strong selection pressure results in the genetic differentiation of different ecotypes (Lefèbvre and Vernet 1990; Pollard et al. 2002; Muller et al. 2004). A range of studies has identified within-species molecular differences between populations of metal accumulating plants, such as Silene paradoxa (Mengoni et al. 2000), Sedum alfredii (Deng et al. 2007) and Viola riviniana (Kuta et al. 2014). In the field, individual plants of a hyperaccumulating species are often very phenotypically variable, even within a single population (Bert et al. 2002). Phenotypic plasticity reportedly allows plants with the same genotype to cope effectively with environmental heterogeneity (Williams et al. 2008; Richards et al. 2012) and may also contribute to the development of metal tolerance (Bert et al. 2002; Macnair 2002). Possible examples include Arabidopsis halleri (Macnair 2002) and Thlaspi caerulescens (Baker et al. 1994; Jiménez-Ambriz et al. 2007).
Neutral molecular markers, such as microsatellites, are likely to be useful in identifying metal-accumulative population differences within a species (Mengoni et al. 2001; Pauwels et al. 2005; Jiménez-Ambriz et al. 2007). Quantitative trait analyses through ecological experiments are also likely to provide useful information on the selective forces promoting genetic differentiation, which cannot be obtained by neutral marker analysis (McKay et al. 2001; McKay and Latta 2002; Bekessy et al. 2003). Therefore, neutral molecular markers and ecological experiments have been combined to study adaptive genetic differentiation among populations (McKay and Latta 2002; Conner and Hartl 2004; Geng et al. 2007).
Phytolacca americana is reportedly a Mn/Cd hyperaccumulator (Tie et al. 2005; Peng et al. 2006, 2008; Gao et al. 2013). The species is a native perennial herb in North America but has become a common invasive alien on metal-contaminated and normal soils in China (Armesto et al. 1983; Pollard et al. 2009). Because of its known history in China, P. americana may be used as a model species for studying adaptive evolution under heavy metal stress. In this study, we determined whether the variability in leaf manganese content in P. americana results from genetic variation or phenotypic plasticity. We used a combination of ecological experiments and genetic surveys to study adaptive genetic differentiation among populations.
Materials and methods
Sample collection
P. americana was sampled from heavy metal-contaminated and uncontaminated sites. We selected 42 sites (41 sites in six Chinese provinces and 1 site in Japan) in which to collect P. americana leaves and soil samples (Table 1). Approximately 30 individuals were collected at each sampling site; the distances between neighbouring plants exceeded 10 m. Portions of the leaf samples were dried with silica gel in preparation for the molecular survey. The remaining leaf samples were washed carefully in tap water, rinsed in deionised water, blotted with tissue paper and dried at 80 °C to constant weight; dry weights were recorded for the chemical analysis. Soil located near the roots of each sampled individual of P. americana was also collected for chemical analyses. Soil samples were collected in the 0–20 cm depth range below the surface.
Common garden experiments
Common garden experiments were set up to study Mn uptake by different populations of P. americana. All seeds of P. americana were grown in a greenhouse operated by Nanjing Agricultural University (average temperature 30/25 °C [day/night]; relative humidity 60–80 %; photoperiod 14/10 h [day/night]). Seeds of P. americana were collected from five sites; of these, two were contaminated (TG, TS), two were uncontaminated (MX, JT) (Table 1) and the fifth, an uncontaminated plot (YS) in Yongshun county, was used as the baseline site for the Xiangxi region (total soluble manganese [TSMn] = 495 mg kg−1; Peng et al. 2008). Polluted habitats were partitioned by their soil Mn concentrations. The unpolluted habitats were defined as the soil with Mn concentrations lower than 1800 mg kg−1 in our field surveys and common garden experiments, which is in accordance with the standards issued by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment, Thailand (PCD 1995). We used the Thai soil quality standard for Mn because no equivalent standard exists in China. Healthy, uniform seeds of P. americana were selected and germinated in a mixture of perlite and vermiculite held in plastic plates and soaked with tap water for 15 days. After germination, the seedlings were transplanted to plastic buckets containing 2.5 L of half-strength Hoagland nutrient solution (Hoagland nutrient solution: 1 mmol L−1 KNO3, 5 mmol L−1 Ca(NO3)·4H2O, 5 mmol L−1 KH2PO4, 2 mmol L−1 MgSO4·7H2O, 46.26 μmol L−1 H3BO3, 9.15 μmol L−1 ZnSO4·7H2O, 0.77 μmol L−1 MnCl2·4H2O, 0.32 μmol L−1 H3MoO4·H2O, 0.12 μmol L−1 CuSO4·5H2O, 20.01 μmol L−1 FeSO4·7H2O, 20.03 μmol L−1 EDTA-2Na·2H2O) and cultivated for 12 days. The seedlings were subsequently treated with three concentrations of Mn (as MnCl2): 9.1 μM (control), 2000 μM and 10,000 μM. Each treatment was replicated in three different plastic buckets, and in each plastic bucket, we planted five seedlings of P. americana. We renewed the Hoagland nutrient solution every other day. After 20 days of treatment with Mn, the seedlings were harvested. The lengths of the roots were measured, after which shoots and roots were separated and washed thoroughly with tap water, rinsed in deionised water, blotted with tissue paper and dried at 80 °C to constant weight; dry weights were recorded.
Chemical analyses of soils and plants
Dried plant materials were ground in an agate mortar and digested with concentrated HNO3 and HClO4 (87:13, v/v). Soil materials were air-dried at room temperature and further dried at 105 °C for 6 h before subjection to digestion. A mixture of concentrated HF:HNO3:HClO4 (4:1:1, v/v/v) was used to digest the soil materials. The total Mn concentrations in the solutions were determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES, Optima 3300 DV, Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
Five samples were selected randomly from each population for the determination of CaCl2-extractable Mn concentrations in the soils. Air-dried soil materials were mixed with 10 mM CaCl2 for 1 h and then centrifuged (1157×g, 15 min). The supernatant solution was mixed with HNO3 (10:1, v/v) after filtration through paper and subsequently analysed for CaCl2-extractable Mn by ICP-AES (Optima 3300 DV, Perkin-Elmer).
To determine the concentrations of chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments, the photosynthetic pigments were first extracted by macerating 0.10 g of leaves in a mortar and pestle containing 10 mL 95 % ethanol. The absorptions of the extracts at 470, 649 and 665 nm were measured spectrophotometrically (UV-2450, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). The concentrations (mg g−1 fresh leaf mass) of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total carotenoids were then calculated using the equations of Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983).
An ANOVA test was used to distinguish the effects of habitat type (H) and populations (P) on Mn accumulation in leaves. Two habitat group levels were identified using the Thai soil quality standards for habitat and agriculture. SPSS software (ver. 17.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the ANOVA. Data were analysed for correlations, and significant differences among means were determined using the LSD test at P < 0.05.
Molecular surveys
Development of microsatellite markers
We isolated microsatellite regions from P. americana using the compound microsatellite marker technique (Lian et al. 2006). In total, 168 sequences were found to contain (AC)6 (AG) n or (TC)6 (AC) n compound simple sequence repeat (SSR) motifs, of which 90 possessed unique sequences with sufficient flanking regions for designing specific primers. A specific primer (IP1) was designed from the sequence flanking the compound SSR, and primer pairs, including a specific primer (IP1) and the corresponding compound SSR primer (AC)7(AG)3 or (TC)7(AC)3, were used as pairs of compound SSR markers. To examine polymorphisms with these designed primer pairs, one or two individuals of P. americana were chosen randomly from the 39 populations sampled. PCR amplification was performed with Biotaq DNA polymerase (Bioline Ltd., London, UK) in a 5 μL reaction mixture containing ~30 ng template DNA, 2 mM dNTP, 1× NH4 reaction buffer, 1.35 mM MgCl2, 0.2 U of Biotaq, 0.5 μM of IP1 and 0.5 μM of Texas Red-labelled compound SSR primer, i.e. (AC)7(AG)3 or (TC)7(AC)3. The PCR cycling conditions were as follows: 1 min at 94 °C, followed by 30 cycles of 30 s at 94 °C, 30 s at the annealing temperature for each designed specific primer, 1 min at 72 °C and a 5 min extension at 72 °C for the final cycle. The reaction products were electrophoresed on a 6 % Long Ranger sequencing gel (FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME, USA) using an SQ-5500E sequencer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The electrophoretic patterns were analysed using Fraglys software (ver. 3; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). Ultimately, only five polymorphic SSR loci were found, and these were used for molecular variation analyses of the 39 populations (Table S1).
Molecular variation analysis
nSSR genotyping
We investigated molecular variation within and among the 39 populations using five pairs of SSR loci (Table S1). About 30 individual plants were selected randomly from each population, and 821 of these were genotyped. The PCR analyses were performed as described above.
Genetic diversity
To characterise the microsatellite loci in P. americana, we used Cervus software (ver. 3.0; Kalinowski et al. 2007) to calculate the following parameters for each locus: the number of alleles (Na), observed heterozygosity (Ho) and expected heterozygosity (He). The number of observed alleles per population (N A), observed (Ho) and expected (He) heterozygosities were calculated with GenAlEx software (ver. 6.5; Peakall and Smouse 2012).
Population genetic structure
A hierarchical analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) performed with ARLEQUIN software (ver. 3.5; Excoffier and Lischer 2010) was used to partition the molecular variance within and among populations and among different groups of populations. Fixation indices were computed and tested by permutations for each hierarchical level in the genetic structure: F IS for variation among individuals with populations, F SC for variation among populations within groups and F CT for variation between groups of populations. The significance of each variance component was tested by iterations through 10,000 permutations. To characterise population structure, we performed Bayesian clustering (implemented in Structure ver. 2.3 software; Pritchard et al. 2010) on the entire nSSR dataset through 100,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) cycles (after discarding the first 10,000 cycles as burn-in); we used the admixture model with independent allele frequencies. Ten replications were performed for each K (in the range: K = 1–10), and the optimal K was estimated (following Evanno et al. (2005)) based on the parameter ΔK, which evaluates the second-order rate of change of the likelihood function with respect to K.
Results
Manganese accumulation in populations of P. americana from contaminated and uncontaminated sites
We found considerable variation in leaf and soil Mn among the 42 sites (Table 1). The maximum and minimum Mn levels in the soils were 178,000 mg kg−1 (at site GP) and 136 mg kg−1 (at site ZJ), respectively. Although the Mn concentrations in the soils at some sites were high, no Mn toxicity symptoms were seen in P. americana. The Mn concentrations in the leaves of different populations also varied greatly between a maximum of 14,900 mg kg−1 in the XL population and a minimum of 114 mg kg−1 in the ZJ population. On a logarithmic scale, the concentration of Mn in the leaves was significantly correlated with the total concentration of Mn in the soils (Fig. 1, R 2 = 0.3907, P < 0.0001). The relationship between Mn concentration in the leaves and CaCl2-extractable Mn in the soils was also significant (R 2 = 0.6590, P < 0.0001).
The bioaccumulation factor (BAF) is the ratio of metal concentration in the dry plant shoot to that in the soil in which the plant grows. P. americana had high BAF ratios. The mean Mn BAF for the 42 sites was 1.58, and BAF values in 38 % of the populations were >1.0 (Table 1). The BAF ratio decreased significantly with increasing Mn concentration in the soils (Fig. 1, R 2 = 0.6154, P < 0.0001).
We found a significant effect of Mn habitat type (H) on the Mn concentration in leaves collected by field survey (ANOVA). In general, plants from high-Mn habitats had significantly higher leaf Mn concentrations than those from ‘normal’ habitats (F = 195.00; P < 0.01). We also found a significant effect of populations (P) on the Mn concentration in the leaves (F = 50.70; P < 0.01).
Plant growth and Mn accumulation in common garden experiments
The Mn concentrations in leaves, stems and roots of all five populations increased markedly with increasing soil Mn concentration (Fig. 2a). At all levels of Mn treatment, the leaves from all five populations accumulated more Mn than the stems or roots. The highest Mn concentration in the leaves of P. americana (29,985 mg kg−1 dry wt.) occurred in plants from the JT population subjected to the 10 mM Mn treatment. We detected no significant differences in the Mn concentrations of roots, stems or leaves among the five populations. In contrast, the effects of Mn treatments on growth were not consistent among the five populations (Fig 2b, c). The 2 mM Mn treatment inhibited root elongation in YS but had an enhancing effect on root growth in the remaining four populations. The biomass of the roots and shoots subjected to this treatment increased in the YS and TS populations but decreased in the other three. Root elongation was reduced in the YS and JT populations but enhanced in the other three populations subjected to 10 mM Mn treatment. The biomasses of roots decreased in all of five populations subjected to this treatment; shoot biomasses increased in the MX and JT populations but decreased in the other three populations. The concentrations of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoid pigments of all five populations decreased with increasing Mn concentrations in the nutrient solutions (Fig 2d).
Molecular variation analysis
In total, we assessed 821 individuals from 39 populations of P. americana by microsatellite analysis. We detected a total of 17 alleles in the survey of five microsatellite loci; 2–4 alleles were detected for each locus (Table S1) and 16 genotypes identified (Table S2). The expected (He) heterozygosity of the loci estimated across all populations ranged from 0.045 to 0.094. Among the 39 populations, 32 (82 %) were monomorphic for one dominant genotype (A). The remaining seven populations had more than one genotype (Table S3). The observed heterozygosity was zero in all populations; thus, all alleles within the individuals were homozygous. Across all populations, population MX had the largest number of alleles per locus (2.8) and the highest expected heterozygosity (0.53).
The AMOVA tested whether population groupings based on geographical distributions or on habitat pollution were related to an uneven distribution in genetic variance (Table 2). To group the 39 populations geographically, we divided them into seven groups by subordinate provinces and counties. We classified populations into two habitat pollution groups: polluted and unpolluted, based on the Mn concentrations in the soils. We found no significant genetic variance attributable to grouping based on geographic location (P = 0.061) or habitat pollution (P = 0.828). A hierarchical AMOVA demonstrated that only a small proportion of genetic variance (0.35 %) was explained by grouping into polluted and unpolluted habitats, compared to 44.65 % of variance among populations within these habitat groups (P < 0.001) and 55.00 % within populations (P < 0.001). We estimated a moderate proportion genetic variance (21.25 %) attributable to grouping into seven geographical categories.
In our structure analysis, the number of clusters (K) in the data should have been four since the ΔK statistic of Evanno et al. (2005) allows detection of a rate change in ln p(D) corresponding to K = 4 (Fig. 3a). All individuals were assigned to four clusters (clusters 1 [red], 2 [green], 3 [blue] and 4 [yellow]) (Fig. 3b). Most individuals (93.7 %) from the 42 sites fell within clusters 1 (28 %), 2 (36 %) and 3 (36 %). Some individuals from the MX and GL populations were assigned to cluster 4, and they accounted for 51.3 and 15 % of individuals in these two populations, respectively. Most individuals in the QZ population (96.4 %) were assigned to cluster 1. When combined with the results of the AMOVA, this procedure demonstrated that there was no correlation between the clusters by structure analysis or by pollution habitat.
Discussion
We used a combination of ecological experiments and genetic analyses to study the major factors influencing heavy metal variation in the leaves of P. americana. We found no genetic variation between populations of P. americana from contaminated and uncontaminated sites. Leaf Mn concentrations were related to habitat conditions and not to the provenance of the seeds.
Our field surveys showed that P. americana is highly adapted to a wide range of soil Mn concentrations. In the XL population, leaf Mn concentrations reached 14,900 mg kg−1. A comparison with the range of foliar Mn levels across diverse plant species (Reeves and Baker 2000; Epstein and Bloom 2005; Marschner 2011) leaves no doubt that P. americana is highly tolerant of heavy metal contamination. The species is also highly tolerant of cadmium pollution (Liu et al. 2010). Persistence under these adverse conditions may reflect adaptive evolution in P. americana.
Our genetic diversity survey aimed to determine whether there was a relationship between genetic variation and P. americana adaptation to Mn-contaminated habitats. We designed and tested many primers; however, only five pairs of microsatellite primers were polymorphic. We found little or no genetic diversity among the populations of P. americana we studied in China. With the exception of the MX population (H E = 0.53), little genetic diversity was observed in either contaminated or uncontaminated populations. Most populations contained only one widely distributed genotype (A). All 821 individuals in the 39 populations examined were homozygotic, suggesting that selfing may be the main mating system of P. americana, as reported in previous studies; clonal reproduction also occurs, but apomixis has not been observed (Armesto et al. 1983).
Outcrossing alien species that have been introduced to new locations on multiple occasions generally have extensive genetic variation from which locally adapted ecotypes differentiate in a wide range of habitats under the influence of natural selection (Bossdorf et al. 2010). In contrast, some invaders with fewer introductions, inbreeding and clonal reproduction usually have low levels of genetic variation. Meanwhile, Dlugosch and Parker (2008) found that a decrease in genetic variance did not reduce the species’ phenotypic variance in their study. Based on the structure analysis, we concluded that P. americana in China originated from four ancestral gene pools. Three (clusters 1, 2 and 3) had already been mixed in a single pool by hybridisation before the species was introduced to China. Most of the populations in China were members of this mixing pool and had representative genotype A; the MX population came from another ancestral gene pool (cluster 4). Thus, P. americana in China may have been introduced on only a few occasions, perhaps just one. According to existing records, native North American P. americana was introduced into China less than a century ago (Pollard et al. 2009; Qiang unpublished information). The founding populations in China may contain only subset of the genetic diversity in North American populations. Extant Chinese populations of P. americana growing in different habitats may represent genetically identical clonal offspring of a single ancestor.
Baker (1965) was the first to indicate that some colonising species may possess ‘general-purpose genotypes’. Bossdorf et al. (2008) further suggested that these species are able to thrive in a wide range of environmental conditions through adaptive phenotypic or developmental plasticity. Phenotypic plasticity can increase fitness and may contribute to plant persistence in a wide range of habitats (Richards et al. 2008, 2012). Genotype A of P. americana may also be a general-purpose genotype. In such clonally invasive species, plasticity may emerge as the primary strategy for coping with conditions in a wide range of habitats (Geng et al. 2007). The phenotypic variation among P. americana individuals that we encountered in the field may be attributed to phenotypic plasticity, rather than ecotypic differentiation. Thus, even though surprisingly large losses of heterozygosity have occurred in P. americana, phenotypic plasticity may contribute to the persistence of this species in adverse environments, such as a heavy metal-contaminated habitats. Moreover, P. americana has traits that favour range expansion, including features that promote long distance dispersal of seeds by birds; these traits contribute to overcoming the disadvantage of limited genetic variation (Armesto et al. 1983; Orrock 2005). Thus, P. americana has become a successful invader in China and has adapted to a range of heavy metal-contaminated environments.
On their own, the data obtained from microsatellite marker analysis do not discount the possibility of a genetic strategy for evolutionary adaptation to local habitats because microsatellites are neutral molecular markers that may not capture the genetic differentiation of an ecologically important quantitative trait (McKay et al. 2001; Bekessy et al. 2003). Thus, common garden experiments were also necessary to provide a robust test able to differentiate potential plasticity from genetic variation strategies of P. americana. In our comparison of Mn uptake by five P. americana populations from different habitats grown together in common garden experiments, we found that the Mn concentrations in the roots and shoots of all five populations increased markedly with increasing Mn concentration in the growth medium. No significant differences in plant tissue Mn concentrations were found between the five populations. The Mn concentrations in P. americana were related only to the Mn concentrations in the habitat, regardless of the origin of the seeds. Thus, we found no ecotype differentiation across the populations of P. americana from different habitats. Pollard et al. (2009) reported that P. americana populations in the native range in the southeastern USA also have a latent physiological ability to hyperaccumulate Mn.
Most known Mn hyperaccumulators are woody species (Reeves and Baker 2000). Fernando et al. (2007) studied the natural variability in leaf Mn accumulation in the tree species Gossia bidwillii, which is a Mn hyperaccumulator, and demonstrated that Mn hyperaccumulation occurred across multiple populations over a large region regardless of the substrate Mn supply. These data, in combination with a genetic diversity experiment, suggest that genetic variation is unlikely to account for the abundance of P. americana across a wide range of habitats in China. Thus, phenotypic plasticity may be the major contributor to the success of P. americana in colonising stressful habitats, such as heavy metal-contaminated soils. Similar patterns have been reported in Thlaspi caerulescens; Jiménez-Ambriz et al. (2007) found that the divergent selection pressure exerted by soil toxicity played a predominant role in shaping life history differences between ecotypes of T. caerulescens in southern France. Gene flow weakly opposed local adaptation, despite the geographical proximity of populations studied.
Several recent investigations have shown that phenotypic plasticity can be mediated through epigenetic effects (Scoville et al. 2011; Kilvitis et al. 2014). Epigenetic states may be altered when organisms are exposed to stressful or novel environments, and these epigenetic shifts can rapidly generate a source of phenotypic variation without any change in genetic variation, thereby ultimately affecting the evolution of populations (Bossdorf et al. 2008; Richards et al. 2012). For a better understanding of adaptive evolution in P. americana, future analyses of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and methylation sensitive-AFLP (MS-AFLP) will be combined to compare genetic and epigenetic diversity between heavy metal-contaminated and normal habitats.
Conclusions
Mn concentrations in P. americana leaves were found to be largely dependent on soil Mn concentration. Under common hydroponic conditions, populations collected from uncontaminated and contaminated sites accumulated similar amounts of Mn in their leaves, suggesting that ecotype differentiation had not occurred among the populations of P. americana growing in different habitats. We detected limited genetic variation among populations in China and no genetic differentiation between populations from contaminated and uncontaminated soil. Thus, genetic variation may not account for the success of P. americana across a wide range of habitats in China. The plasticity of ecologically relevant traits, such as Mn accumulation, plays a major role in the success of this invasive species in colonising heavy metal-contaminated environments.
References
Antonovics J, Bradshaw AD, Turner RG (1971) Heavy metal tolerance in plants. Adv Ecol Res 7:2–85
Armesto JJ, Cheplick GP, McDonnell MJ (1983) Observations on the reproductive biology of Phytolacca americana (Phytolaccaceae). J Torrey Bot Soc 110:380–383
Assunção AGL, Ten Bookum WM, Nelissen HJM, Vooijs R, Schat H, Ernst WHO (2003) A cosegregation analysis of zinc (Zn) accumulation and Zn tolerance in the Zn hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens. New Phytol 159:383–390
Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: Baker HG, Stebbins GL (eds) The genetics of colonizing species. Academic, New York, pp 147–168
Baker AJM (1987) Metal tolerance. New Phytol 106:93–111
Baker AJM, Brooks R (1989) Terrestrial higher plants which hyperaccumulate metallic elements. A review of their distribution, ecology and phytochemistry. Biorecovery 1:81–126
Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Hajar ASM (1994) Heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in British populations of the metallophyte Thlaspi caerulescens J. & C. Presl (Brassicaceae). New Phytol 127:61–68
Baker AJM, McGrath SP, Reeves RD, Smith JAC (2000) Metal hyperaccumulator plants: a review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. Phytoremediation of contaminated soil and water 8: 85–107
Bekessy SA, Ennos RA, Burgman MA, Newtonc AC, Ades PK (2003) Neutral DNA markers fail to detect genetic divergence in an ecologically important trait. Biol Conserv 110:267–275
Bert V, Bonnin I, Saumitou-Laprade P, de Laguérie P, Petit D (2002) Do Arabidopsis halleri from nonmetallicolous populations accumulate zinc and cadmium more effectively than those from metallicolous populations? New Phytol 155:47–57
Bone E, Farres A (2001) Trends and rates of microevolution in plants. Genetica 112:165–182
Bossdorf O, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2008) Epigenetics for ecologists. Ecol Lett 11:106–115
Bossdorf O, Arcuri D, Richards CL, Pigliucci M (2010) Experimental alteration of DNA methylation affects the phenotypic plasticity of ecologically relevant traits in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evol Ecol 24:541–553
Brooks RR (1998) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals ed. CAB International
Brooks RR, Reeves RD, Baker AJM (1992) The serpentine vegetation of Goiás State, Brazil. In The Vegetation of Ultramafic (Serpentine) Soils. Intercept Ltd., U.K., pp 67–81
Cappa JJ, Pilon-Smits EAH (2014) Evolutionary aspects of elemental hyperaccumulation. Planta 239:267–275
Conner JK, Hartl DL (2004) A primer of ecological genetics. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland
Dechamps C, Roosens NH, Hotte C, Meerts P (2005) Growth and mineral element composition in two ecotypes of Thlaspi caerulescens on Cd contaminated soil. Plant Soil 273:327–335
Deng J, Liao B, Ye M, Deng D, Lan C, Shu W (2007) The effects of heavy metal pollution on genetic diversity in zinc/cadmium hyperaccumulator Sedum alfredii populations. Plant Soil 297:83–92
Dlugosch KM, Parker IM (2008) Founding events in species invasions: genetic variation, adaptive evolution, and the role of multiple introductions. Mol Ecol 17:431–449
Epstein E, Bloom AJ (2005) Mineral nutrition of plants: principles and perspectives, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, USA
Ernst WHO (2006) Evolution of metal tolerance in higher plants. For Snow Landsc Res 80:251–274
Escarré J, Lefèbvre C, Gruber W, Leblanc M, Lepart J, Rivière Y, Delay B (2000) Zinc and cadmium hyperaccumulation by Thlaspi caerulescens from metalliferous and nonmetalliferous sites in the Mediterranean area: implications for phytoremediation. New Phytol 145:429–437
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010) Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10:564–567
Fernando DR, Woodrow IE, Bakkaus EJ, Collins RN, Bakerm AJM, Batianoff GN (2007) Variability of Mn hyperaccumulation in the Australian rainforest tree Gossia bidwillii (Myrtaceae). Plant Soil 293:145–152
Gao L, Peng KJ, Xia Y, Wang GP, Niu LY, Lian CL, Shen ZG (2013) Cadmium and manganese accumulation in Phytolacca americana L. and the roles of non-protein thiols and organic acids. Int J Phytoremediat 15:307–319
Geng YP, Pan XY, Xu CY, Zhang WJ, Li B, Chen JK, Lu BR, Song ZP (2007) Phenotypic plasticity rather than locally adapted ecotypes allows the invasive alligator weed to colonize a wide range of habitats. Biol Invasions 9:245–256
Jiménez‐Ambriz G, Petit C, Bourrié I, Dubois S, Olivieri I, Ronce O (2007) Life history variation in the heavy metal tolerant plant Thlaspi caerulescens growing in a network of contaminated and noncontaminated sites in southern France: role of gene flow, selection and phenotypic plasticity. New Phytol 173:199–215
Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC (2007) Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Mol Ecol 16:1099–1106
Kilvitis HJ, Alvarez M, Foust CM, Schrey AW, Robertson M, Richards CL (2014) Ecological epigenetics. In: Landry CR, Aubin-Horth N (eds) Ecological genomics. Springer, New York, pp 191–210
Krämer U (2010) Metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 61:517–534
Kruckeberg AR (1967) Ecotypic response to ultramafic soils by some plant species of northwestern United States. Brittonia 19:133–151
Kuta E, Jędrzejczyk-Korycińska M, Cieślak E, Rostański A, Szczepaniak M, Migdałek G, Wąsowicz P, Suda J, Combik M, Słomka A (2014) Morphological versus genetic diversity of Viola reichenbachiana and V. riviniana (sect. Viola, Violaceae) from soils differing in heavy metal content. Plant Biol 16:925–934
Lefèbvre C, Vernet P (1990) Microevolutionary processes on contaminated deposits. In: Shaw J (ed) Heavy metal tolerance in plants: evolutionary aspects. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 286–297
Lian CL, Abdul Wadud M, Geng Q, Shimatani K, Hogetsu T (2006) An improved technique for isolating codominant compound microsatellite markers. J Plant Res 119:415–417
Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 603:591–593
Liu XQ, Peng KJ, Wang AG, Lian CL, Shen ZG (2010) Cadmium accumulation and distribution in populations of Phytolacca americana L. and the role of transpiration. Chemosphere 78:1136–1141
Macnair MR (2002) Within and between population genetic variation for zinc accumulation in Arabidopsis halleri. New Phytol 155:59–66
Macnair MR (2003) The hyperaccumulation of metals by plants. Adv Bot Res 40:63–105
Macnair MR, Bert V, Huitson SB, Saumitou-Laprade P, Petit D (1999) Zinc tolerance and hyperaccumulation are genetically independent characters. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 266:2175–2179
Marschner H (2011) Marschner's mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press
McGrath SP, Zhao J, Lombi E (2002) Phytoremediation of metals, metalloids, and radionuclides. Adv Agron 75:1–56
McKay JK, Latta RG (2002) Adaptive population divergence: markers, QTL and traits. Trends Ecol Evol 17:285–291
McKay JK, Bishop JG, Lin JZ, Richards JH, Sala A, Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rockcress. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:1715–1721
Mengoni A, Gonnelli C, Galardi F, Gabbrielli R, Bazzicalupo M (2000) Genetic diversity and heavy metal tolerance in populations of Silene paradoxa L. (Caryophyllaceae): a random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis. Mol Ecol 9:1319–1324
Mengoni A, Barabesi C, Gonnelli C, Galardi F, Gabbrielli R, Bazzicalupo M (2001) Genetic diversity of heavy metal‐tolerant populations in Silene paradoxa L. (Caryophyllaceae): a chloroplast microsatellite analysis. Mol Ecol 10:1909–1916
Meyer CL, Kostecka AA, Saumito-Laprade P, Créach A, Castric V, Pauwels M, Frérot H (2010) Variability of zinc tolerance among and within populations of the pseudometallophyte species Arabidopsis halleri and possible role of directional selection. New Phytol 185:130–142
Muller LAH, Lambaerts M, Vangronsveld J, Colpaert JV (2004) AFLP-based assessment of the effects of environmental heavy metal pollution on the genetic structure of pioneer populations of Suillus luteus. New Phytol 164:297–303
Orrock JL (2005) The effect of gut passage by two species of avian frugivore on seeds of pokeweed, Phytolacca americana. Can J Bot 83:427–431
Pauwels M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Holl AC, Petit D, Bonnin I (2005) Multiple origin of metallicolous populations of the pseudometallophyte Arabidopsis halleri (Brassicaceae) in central Europe: the cpDNA testimony. Mol Ecol 14:4403–4414
PCD (Pollution Control Department, Thailand) (1995) Notification of National Environmental Board No. 10, B.E 2538 (1995) under the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act B.E.2535 (1992), published in the Royal Government Gazette No. 112 Part 52 dated May 25, B.E.2538. http://www.pcd.go.th/infoserv/en reg std airsnd01.html
Peakall R, Smouse PE (2012) GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 28:2537–2539
Peng K, Li X, Luo C, Shen Z (2006) Vegetation composition and heavy metal uptake by wild plants at three contaminated sites in Xiangxi area, China. J Environ Sci Health Pt A 41:65–76
Peng K, Luo C, You W, Lian C, Li X, Shen Z (2008) Manganese uptake and interactions with cadmium in the hyperaccumulator-Phytolacca americana L. J Hazard Mater 154:674–681
Pilon-Smits E (2005) Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 56:15–39
Pollard AJ, Powell KD, Harper FA, Smith JAC (2002) The genetic basis of metal hyperaccumulation in plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 21:539–566
Pollard AJ, Stewart HL, Roberson CB (2009) Manganese hyperaccumulation in Phytolacca americana L. from the Southeastern United States. Northeast Nat 16:155–162
Pollard AJ, Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2014) Facultative hyperaccumulation of heavy metals and metalloids. Plant Sci 217:8–17
Pritchard JK, Wen X, Falush D (2010) Documentation for Structure software. Version 2.3. University of Chicago, Chicago. Available at http://pritch.bsd.uchicago.edu/structure.html. Accessed 01 Dec 2014
Reeves RD (2003) Tropical hyperaccumulators of metals and their potential for phytoextraction. Plant Soil 249:57–65
Reeves RD, Baker AJM (2000) Metal-accumulating plants. In: RaskinI EBD (ed) Phytoremediation of toxic metals: using plants to clean up the environment. Wiley, New York, pp 193–229
Reznick DN, Ghalambor CK (2001) The population ecology of contemporary adaptations: what empirical studies reveal about the conditions that promote adaptive evolution. Genetica 112:183–198
Richards CL, Walls RL, Bailey JP, Parameswaran R, George T, Pigliucci M (2008) Plasticity in salt tolerance traits allows for invasion of novel habitat by Japanese knotweed sl (Fallopia japonica and F. × bohemica, Polygonaceae). Am J Bot 95:931–942
Richards CL, Schrey AW, Pigliucci M (2012) Invasion of diverse habitats by few Japanese knotweed genotypes is correlated with epigenetic differentiation. Ecol Lett 15:1016–1025
Scoville AG, Barnett LL, Bodbyl-Roels S, Kelly JK, Hileman LC (2011) Differential regulation of a MYB transcription factor is correlated with transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of trichome density in Mimulus guttatus. New Phytol 191:251–263
Tie BQ, Yuan M, Tang MZ (2005) Phytolacca americana L.: a new manganese accumulator plant. J Agro Environ Sci 24:340–341
Van der Ent A, Baker AJM, Reeves RD, Pollard AJ, Schat H (2013) Hyperaccumulators of metal and metalloid trace elements: facts and fiction. Plant Soil 362:319–334
Verbruggen N, Hermans C, Schat H (2009) Molecular mechanisms of metal hyperaccumulation in plants. New Phytol 181:759–776
Ward SM, Reid SD, Harrington J, Sutton J, Beck KG (2008) Genetic variation in invasive populations of Yellow Toadflax (Linaria vulgaris) in the western United States. Weed Sci 56:394–399
Williams JL, Auge H, Maron JL (2008) Different gardens, different results: native and introduced populations exhibit contrasting phenotypes across common gardens. Oecologia 157:239–248
Wójcik M, Dresler S, Jawor E, Kowalczykb K, Tukiendorf A (2013) Morphological, physiological, and genetic variation between metallicolous and nonmetallicolous populations of Dianthus carthusianorum. Chemosphere 90:1249–1257
Compliance with ethical standards
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31400328), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20140697), China’s Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2014 M560428) and Postdoctoral Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (1402155C).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, C., Zhang, H., Wang, A. et al. Phenotypic plasticity accounts for most of the variation in leaf manganese concentrations in Phytolacca americana growing in manganese-contaminated environments. Plant Soil 396, 215–227 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2581-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2581-7