Abstract
Background
Glucocorticoid receptors are expressed in white blood cells (WBC’s) and are known to play a role in cell adhesion and WBC’s recruitment from bone marrow. In Cushing’s disease leukocytosis is frequently mentioned as laboratory finding. However, there is no data on the prevalence of this finding among patients, or correlation with disease severity.
Purpose
To investigate the prevalence of leukocytosis in patients with Cushing’s disease, alterations in other blood count parameters and correlation with degree of hypercortisolism.
Methods
Data of 26 patients diagnosed and followed for Cushing’s disease at our clinic was reviewed. Two patients had disease relapse after complete remission and were studied as 2 separate events.
Results
Of the 26 patients, 17 were women (71 %), with a mean age of 39.8 ± 12.7 years. Mean baseline WBC count was 10,500 ± 2,600 cells/μl and dropped to 8,400 ± 1,900 cells/μl (p < 0.05) after treatment, mean neutrophil count at baseline was 7,600 ± 2,600 cells/μl and dropped to 5,300 ± 1,700 cells/μl (p < 0.05), lymphocyte count was 2,000 ± 600 cells/μl and raised to 2,300 ± 600 cells/μl (p < 0.05), hemoglobin was 13.7 ± 1.2 g/dl and dropped to 12.8 ± 1.4 g/dl (p < 0.05), and platelet number did not change. Elevated WBC count was present in 11/28 cases (40 %). Those patients with normal baseline WBC (mean 9,000 ± 1,500 cells/μl) dropped also to 7,700 ± 1,300 cells/μl after treatment (p < 0. 05). There was a significant positive correlation between decrease in UFC secretion and change in WBC’s following treatment (r = 0.67, p < 0.01).
Conclusions
Patients with Cushing’s disease present with leukocytosis in approximately 40 % of cases. In most cases, including those without elevated baseline count, the WBC’s decreased with disease remission, demonstrating the effect of glucocorticoids on these blood cells.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Cushing’s syndrome was first described in 1912 by Harvey Cushing [1]. A variety of clinical features and laboratory findings are attributed to glucocorticoid (GC) excess in Cushing’s syndrome with variable reported proportions, with obesity and weight being the most frequent features, but also diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hirsutism, osteoporosis, hypokalemia, and more [2–4]. The diagnosis is complicated due to high prevalence of similar clinical symptoms and signs in patients without the disorder [4].
One of the characteristic laboratory findings associated with Cushing’s syndrome is elevated white blood cells (WBC) counts, as described early in the 1940s. In a study by de la Blaze et al. [5] ten patients with Cushing’s disease were found to have higher leukocyte counts than normal subjects, with a tendency for higher percentage of polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells and lower percentage of lymphocytes.
However, there is insufficient data regarding the long term effects of GC’s excess on hematologic indices, apart from the observation of high leukocyte counts in patients with Cushing’s syndrome or following exogenous administration of GC’s. Moreover, no data is available regarding the true prevalence of this finding and alterations in other blood components as evaluated by complete blood counts.
We conducted a retrospective study on 26 patients with Cushing’s disease to describe the true prevalence of leukocytosis in Cushing’s disease, to compare alterations in blood cell components before and after treatment for hypercortisolism, and to correlate WBC counts with disease activity.
Methods
We retrospectively studied 26 consecutive cases diagnosed with Cushing’s disease and followed in the Endocrine Institute, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Israel. Demographic information including age at diagnosis, gender, urinary free cortisol levels (UFC), complete blood count (CBC) (hemoglobin, WBC’s, neutrophils, lymphocytes and platelets) at baseline and following treatment were collected. Baseline parameters were collected from the year preceding diagnosis. The study was approved by the ethical institutional board at the Rabin Medical Center.
The diagnosis of Cushing’s disease was confirmed by at least two elevated UFC collections (≥2 times the upper limit of normal; ULN), high or normal range ACTH levels, and a pituitary lesion consistent with an adenoma seen on MRI (in 24/26 of the patients). Remission was defined as at least 2 measurements of UFC within the normal range achieved either by pituitary surgery, medical treatment, or both. Only then WBC’s measurements were performed. In patients who were not in full hormonal remission WBC’s data was collected during the lowest measurements of UFC.
CBC’s were measured using an automatic ABX MicrosCRP 200 analyzer (Clinical Laboratory International, Brussels, Belgium). The within-run CV for WBC was 2.7 % using this assay. UFC was measured using radioimmunoassay for the determination of cortisol in urine (Beckman Coulter) with high antibody specificity for cortisol and low cross reactivity against other naturally occurring steroids. The analytical sensitivity is 10 nM. The intra- and inter-assay CVs were 5.8 and 9.2 %, respectively. Reference levels for 24 h urine collection are 38–208 nmol/24 h.
Statistical analysis
Continuous data are presented as means and standard deviations. Continuous variables were compared using Student’s t test or Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. The relationships between UFC and blood count components were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation. Analysis was performed using SPSS software (Version 20; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). A p value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Patients’ characteristics
The study included 26 patients with Cushing’s disease, 19 females and 7 males, with a mean age at presentation of 39.8 ± 12.7 years; 16 patients had microadenomas, 8 had macroadenomas, and in two cases there was no visible adenoma on MRI (Table 1). All patients except two had transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). The two patients who did not have surgery were treated medically. Twenty patients achieved remission, including two patients who experienced transient remission. The mean baseline UFC levels was 5.4 ± 6.9 × ULN and dropped to 1 ± 1.1 × ULN following treatment.
Blood count changes
Mean WBC’s before treatment was 10,500 ± 2,600 cells/μl (normal <10,800 cells/μl) with 40 % having elevated WBC’s, and dropped to 8,400 ± 1,900 cells/μl (p < 0.05), with 11 % having elevated WBC’s after treatment. The mean neutrophil count was 7,600 ± 2,600 cells/μl before treatment and dropped to 5,300 ± 1,700 cells/μl after treatment (p < 0.05), and the mean lymphocyte count was 2,000 ± 600 cells/μl at baseline and increased to 2,300 ± 600 cells/μl following treatment (p < 0.05). Hemoglobin was 13.7 ± 1.2 g/dl at baseline and decreased to 12.8 ± 1.4 g/dl (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1).
There was no correlation between pre-treatment UFC and baseline WBC’s levels (Fig. 2). However, there was a significant positive correlation between decrease in UFC secretion (ΔUFC) and change in WBC’s (ΔWBC) following treatment (r = 0.67, p < 0.01, 2-tailed). It is of note that this strong correlation is mostly due to one patient (Fig. 2, right column) who had very high UFC levels before treatment (up to 34 × ULN) together with high WBC counts, and who went into remission following treatment with normalization of his WBC levels. Upon further analysis of this case, there were 14 pre-treatment CBC’s showing consistently high WBC levels (>15,000/μl), and 7 post-therapy CBC’s showing consistently normal WBC levels (<10,000/μl) upon normalization of UFC levels. According to this data, the patient’s change in WBC levels was definitely attributable to the change in UFC.
Subgroup analysis
We performed sub-group analysis for the cohort of patients with elevated baseline WBC count (defined as ≥10,800 WBC’s/μl; n = 11) and patients with normal baseline WBC count (n = 15). There was no difference in age, gender, or adenoma size between the two groups, and the mean baseline UFC was not significantly different.
Mean WBC’s in the group with elevated baseline count was 12,970 ± 2,260 cells/μl and dropped to 9,620 ± 2,000 cells/μl (p < 0.05) following successful treatment (Fig. 3a). Baseline neutrophil count was 9,700 ± 2,600 cells/μl and dropped to 6,300 ± 1,600 cells/μl (p < 0.05). There were no significant alterations in lymphocytes and platelets counts or hemoglobin concentrations (Fig. 3a).
In the group with normal baseline counts, the mean WBC’s was 9,000 ± 1,400 cells/μl and dropped to 7,700 ± 1,300 cells/μl (p < 0.05); neutrophil count was 6,200 ± 1,500 cells/μl and dropped to 4,600 ± 1,400 cells/μl (p < 0.05); the lymphocyte count raised from 1,800 ± 580 cells/μl at presentation to 2,280 ± 580 cells/μl after treatment (p < 0.05); hemoglobin was 13.7 ± 1.2 g/dl and decreased to 12.8 ± 1.4 g/dl (p < 0.05) following treatment (Fig. 3b). Platelets count didn’t change significantly.
In a separate analysis of patients who were in remission (n = 20) and those who did not achieve cortisol normalization (n = 8, including 2 patients with disease relapse), the baseline UFC was 4 ± 3.8 × ULN and 8 ± 10 × ULN, respectively; the mean lowest UFC after treatment was 0.6 ± 0.3 × ULN and 2 ± 1.4 × ULN, respectively. There was no significant difference in mean WBC’s at baseline between patients who achieved remission and those who did not, nor a difference in the magnitude of the post treatment change.
Discussion
We studied the effects of high cortisol levels on the different blood cell components in patients with Cushing’s disease. Leukocytosis was present in 40 % of our cohort patients, and there was a significant decrease of 20 % in WBC’s and 30 % in neutrophil counts upon UFC decrease following surgical and/or medical treatments. Moreover, there was a significant correlation between the decrease in cortisol secretion and change in WBC’s counts. These CBC alterations in patients with Cushing’s disease could potentially serve as another marker for hormonal response to treatment, and remission during follow-up. However, many factors including infections, stress, medications, physiological fluctuations and others can affect WBC counts making this measurement a non-accurate tool for assessing treatment efficacy or disease relapse.
Cortisol exerts its main effects through binding to the nuclear glucocorticoid receptor, inducing a cascade of intra-cellular signaling and leading to protein synthesis [6]. Cortisol is secreted in response to stress and pain signaling and due to cytokine stimulation, resulting in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal activation. Cortisol binds with high affinity to the glucocorticoid receptor and this complex inhibits inflammation both through genomic and nongenomic mechanisms. The rise in cortisol levels in the absence of active inflammation, like in Cushing’s syndrome, can cause immune suppression associated with susceptibility to severe infections [7]. This is associated with lymphopenia seen after administration of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH), as reported many years ago [8].
Glucocorticoid-induced leukocytosis has been attributed to several mechanisms including increased release of PMN’s from bone marrow to the circulation [9], delayed neutrophil apoptosis in the circulation [10], and reduced cell transfer from blood vessels into tissues [11]. Another mechanism playing a role is an influx of PMN’s from the intravascular marginated pools of PMN’s [9]. These cells are found in the lungs, liver, spleen and bone marrow, in close contact with the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Stress signals like cortisol and catecholamines can activate mature granulocytes in these marginated pools to undergo rapid demargination, resulting in acute elevation of circulating leukocytes. Cortisol results also in prolongation of their intravascular half-life and delays their disappearance from the circulation [9]. Some of the effects of GC’s on blood cells are recognized as their clinical use is very common, but their long-term effects were not carefully investigated, and most published studies on their hematological effects were designed to show acute effects. Administration of dexamethasone intravenously or orally to healthy subjects results in an increase of neutrophil count and lymphopenia, the increment is in a linear relation to the dose introduced intravenously but not orally [12]. The long-term effect of GC’s on blood counts shown in our Cushing’s patients argues against the demargination effect theory of GC’s on granulocytes that was shown shortly after a single dose of dexamethasone [9, 12], and supports other studies displaying direct effects of stimulatory factors on bone marrow release of new PMN’s [13].
Importantly, patients with unexplained persistent leukocytosis are often studied extensively for various hematological diseases, sometimes without success. These patients should be referred also for cortisol measurements, and Cushing’s syndrome should be part of the regular work-up for patients with unexplained leukocytosis, as our series reveals.
The action of GC’s on lymphoid cells is well known and they are used successfully in the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma with high lymphocyte counts [14]. In vitro studies demonstrated that GC’s induce apoptosis of human mature T lymphoid cells [15]. In our cohort lymphocyte counts increased following cortisol normalization, in line with the known effects of elevated cortisol on human lymphocytes. Effects of GC’s on platelets are not well recognized and in some reports patients with elevated cortisol did not show significant alterations in their platelet counts [16], whereas other series showed increased numbers of platelets in Cushing’s patients [17]. Although it was previously thought that platelet cells lack GC’s receptors as they lack a nucleus, it is now well recognized that GC’s affect platelet function through binding to the GC receptors expressed in human platelets [18], activating nongenomic processes.
The role of GC’s administration in aplastic anemia and other forms of non-immune hemolytic anemia implies a direct effect on bone marrow erythropoiesis [19]. GC’s exert their effects on the erythroid line by enhanced response of red blood cells to erythropoietin or directly by stimulating cell proliferation [13]. In our cohort, hemoglobin levels significantly decreased following treatment to normalize cortisol secretion, in agreement with these observations.
Like other features of Cushing’s syndrome such as overweight, diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, plethora or edema which severity is not linearly related to serum cortisol or UFC levels, we were not able to show any correlation between pre-treatment UFC levels and baseline WBC’s counts (Fig. 2). This can be partially explained by GC’s receptor polymorphism which may result in relative resistance or sensitivity to GC’s [20], leading to a different in vivo response to cortisol. This is also a well-known phenomenon in the response to GC’s treatment in autoimmune diseases [21].
Our study has several limitations. First, it is a retrospective study, and the blood tests were done routinely and not for the study. Also, the number of blood tests available for each subject varied between patients. Second, a relatively small number of patients are included in the study due to the rarity of the disease, and that may cause the lack of correlation between baseline WBC counts and disease severity. Third, the study includes only patients with Cushing’s disease, so any conclusion can’t be instantly drawn to patients with ACTH-independent Cushing’s syndrome, although previous studies showed that exogenous administration of GC’s exert the same effects on blood cell counts.
In conclusion, elevated WBC’s is common in patients with Cushing’s disease. During remission or hormonal control of the disease there is significant decrease in neutrophil counts and in hemoglobin concentration together with a rise in lymphocyte numbers. These parameters may help to identify a trend towards improvement or deterioration in cortisol control. A larger study may clarify the effects of these changes on disease prognosis and other features of Cushing’s syndrome.
References
Cushing HW (1932) The basophil adenomas of the pituitary body and their clinical manifestations. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp 50:137–195
Newell-Price J, Trainer P, Besser M, Grossman A (1998) The diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Cushing’s syndrome and pseudo-Cushing’s states. Endocr Rev 19:647–672
Lindholm J, Juul S, Jørgensen JO, Astrup J, Bjerre P, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Hagen C, Jørgensen J, Kosteljanetz M, Kristensen L, Laurberg P, Schmidt K, Weeke J (2001) Incidence and lateprognosis of cushing’s syndrome: a population-based study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:117–123
Pecori Giraldi F, Moro M, Cavagnini F (2003) Gender-related differences in the presentation and course of Cushing’s disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88:1554–1558
Dela Balze FA, Reifenstein EC Jr, Albright F (1946) Differential blood counts in certain adrenal cortical disorders (Cushing’s syndrome, Addison’s disease and panhypopituitarism). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 6:312–319
Rhen T, Cidlowski JA (2005) Antiinflammatory action of glucocorticoids—new mechanisms for old drugs. N Engl J Med 353:1711–1723
Lionakis MS, Kontoyiannis DP (2003) Glucocorticoids and invasive fungal infections. Lancet 362:1828–1838
Dougherty TF, Abraham W (1944) Influence of hormones on lymphoid tissue structure and function. The role of the pituitary adrenotrophic hormone in the regulation of the lymphocytes and other cellular elements of the blood. Endocrinology 35:1–14
Nakagawa M, Terashima T, D’yachkova Y, Bondy GP, Hogg JC, van Eeden SF (1998) Glucocorticoid-induced granulocytosis: contribution of marrow release and demargination of intravascular granulocytes. Circulation 98:2307–2313
Cox G (1995) Glucocorticoid treatment inhibits apoptosis in human neutrophils. Separation of survival and activation outcomes. J Immunol 154:4719–4725
Dale DC, Fauci AS, Wolff SM (1974) Alternate-day prednisone. Leukocyte kinetics and susceptibility to infections. N Engl J Med 291:1154–1158
Mishler JM, Emerson PM (1977) Development of neutrophilia by serially increasing doses of dexamethasone. Br J Haematol 36:249–257
Grafte-Faure S, Leveque C, Vasse M, Soria C, Norris V, Vannier JP (1999) Effects of glucocorticoids and mineralocorticoids on proliferation and maturation of human peripheral blood stem cells. Am J Hematol 62:65–73
Shipman GF, Bloomfield CD, Gajl-Peczalska KJ, Munck AU, Smith KA (1983) Glucocorticoids and lymphocytes. III. Effects of glucocorticoid administration on lymphocyte glucocorticoid receptors. Blood 61:1086–1090
Brunetti M, Martelli N, Colasante A, Piantelli M, Musiani P, Aiello FB (1995) Spontaneous and glucocorticoid-induced apoptosis in human mature T lymphocytes. Blood 86:4199–4205
Deutsch V, Lerner-Geva L, Reches A, Boyko V, Limor R, Grisaru D (2007) Sustained leukocyte count during rising cortisol level. Acta Haematol 118:73–76
Sato T, Hiramatsu R, Iwaoka T, Fujii Y, Shimada T, Umeda T (1984) Changes of platelets, serum lactic dehydrogenase, gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase, choline esterase and creatine phosphokinase levels in patients with Cushing’s syndrome. Tohoku J Exp Med 142:195–200
Moraes LA, Paul-Clark MJ, Rickman A, Flower RJ, Goulding NJ, Perretti M (2005) Ligand-specific glucocorticoid receptor activation in human platelets. Blood 106:4167–4175
Bagby GC Jr, Goodnight SH, Mooney WM, Richert-Boe K (1979) Prednisone-responsive aplastic anemia: a mechanism of glucocorticoid action. Blood 54:322–333
Manenschijn L, van den Akker EL, Lamberts SW, van Rossum EF (2009) Clinical features associated with glucocorticoid receptor polymorphisms. An overview. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1179:179–198
Yang N, Ray DW, Matthews LC (2012) Current concepts in glucocorticoid resistance. Steroids 77:1041–1049
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Masri-Iraqi, H., Robenshtok, E., Tzvetov, G. et al. Elevated white blood cell counts in Cushing’s disease: association with hypercortisolism. Pituitary 17, 436–440 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-013-0522-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-013-0522-0