Abstract
Plants are constantly subjected to variations in their surrounding environment, which affect their functioning in different ways. The influence of environmental factors on the physiology of plants depends on several factors including the intensity, duration and frequency of the variation of the external stimulus. Water deficit is one of the main limiting factors for agricultural production worldwide and affects many physiological processes in plants. The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of different rates of induced water deficit on the leaf photosynthetic responses of soybean (Glycine max L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.). The plants were subjected to two types of water deficit induction: a rapid induction (RD) by which detached leaves were dehydrated by the exposure to air under controlled conditions and a slow induction (SD) by suspending irrigation under greenhouse conditions. The leaf gas exchange, chlorophyll (Chl) a fluorescence, and relative water content (RWC) were analysed throughout the water-deficit induction. V. unguiculata and G. max demonstrated similar dehydration as the soil water percentage declined under SD, with V. unguiculata showing a greater stomatal sensitivity to reductions in the RWC. V. unguiculata plants were more sensitive to water deficit, as determined by all of the physiological parameters when subjected to RD, and the net photosynthetic rate (P N) was sharply reduced in the early stages of dehydration. After the plants exposed to the SD treatment were rehydrated, V. unguiculata recovered 65% of the P N in relation to the values measured under the control conditions (initial watering state), whereas G. max recovered only 10% of the P N. Thus, the better stomatal control of V. unguiculata could enable the maintenance of the RWC and a more efficient recovery of the P N than G. max.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Abbreviations
- E :
-
transpiration rate
- ETR:
-
electron transport rate
- F0 :
-
minimal fluorescence of dark-adapted state
- F0′:
-
minimal fluorescence of light-adapted state
- Fm :
-
maximal fluorescence of dark-adapted state
- Fm′:
-
maximal fluorescence of light-adapted state
- Fs :
-
steady-state fluorescence
- Fv :
-
variable fluorescence
- Fv/Fm :
-
maximum quantum yield of PSII photochemistry
- g s :
-
stomatal conductance
- H2Osoil% :
-
soil water percentage
- NPQ:
-
nonphotochemical quenching
- P N :
-
net photosynthetic rate
- qP :
-
photochemical quenching coefficient
- RD:
-
rapid water-deficit induction
- RWC:
-
relative water content
- SD:
-
slow water-deficit induction
- WUE:
-
water-use efficiency
- ΦPSII :
-
effective quantum yield of PSII photochemistry
References
Biehler, K., Fock, H.: Evidence for the contribution of mehlerperoxidase reaction in dissipating excess electrons in droughtstressed wheat. — Plant Physiol. 112: 265–272, 1996.
Bilger, W., Björkman, O.: Role of the xanthophyll cycle in photoprotection elucidated by measurements of light-induced absorbance changes, fluorescence and photosynthesis in leaves of Hedera canariensis. — Photosynth. Res. 25: 173–185, 1990.
Bota, J., Medrano, H., Flexas, J.: Is photosynthesis limited by decreased Rubisco activity and RuBP content under progressive water stress? — New Phytol.. 162: 671–681, 2004.
Câmara, G.M.S., Heiffig, L.S.: [Physiology, environment and yield of soybean.] — In: Câmara, G.M.S (ed.): Soybean: Production Technology. II.: ESALQ/LPV, Piracicaba 2000. [In Portuguese.]
Čatský, J.: Determination of water deficit in discs cut out from leaf blades. — Biol. Plant. 2: 76–77, 1960.
Catuchi, T. A., Vitolo, H. F., Bertolli, S. C. et al.: Tolerance to water deficiency between two soybean cultivars: transgenic versus conventional. — Ciência Rural 41: 373–378, 2011. [In Portuguese.]
Chaves, M.M., Oliveira, M.M.: Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficit: prospects for water-saving agriculture. — J. Exp. Bot. 55: 2365–2384, 2004.
Cornic, G.: Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. — Trends Plant Sci. 5: 187–188, 2000.
Demmig, B., Björkman, O.: Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution in leaves of higher plants. — Planta 171: 171–184, 1987.
Doss, B.D., Thulow, D.L.: Irrigation, row width and plant population in relation to growth characteristics of two soybean varieties. — Agron. J. 65: 620–623, 1974.
Flexas, J., Bota, J., Galmés, J., Medrano, H., Ribas-Carbo, M.: Keeping positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. — Physiol. Plant. 127: 343–352, 2006.
Genty, B., Briantais, J.M., Baker, N.R.: The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence. — Bioch. Biophys. Acta 990: 87–92, 1989.
Gopefert, H., Rossetti, L.A., Souza, J.: [Generalized events and agricultural security.] — IPEA, Ministério do Planejamento, Brasília 1993. [In Portuguese.]
Harbison, J., Genty, B., Baker, N.R.: The relationship between CO2 assimilation and electron transport in leaves. — Photosyn. Res. 25: 199–212, 1990.
Kaiser, W.M.: Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. — Physiol. Plant. 71: 142–149, 1987.
Krall, J.P., Edwards, G.E.: Relationship between photosystem II activity and CO2 fixation in leaves. — Physiol. Plant 86: 180–187, 1992.
Krause, G.H.: Photoinhibition of photosynthesis: an evaluation of damaging and protective mechanisms. — Physiol. Plant. 74: 566–574, 1988.
Lawlor, D.W., Cornic, G.: Photosynthetic carbon assimilation and associated metabolism in relation to water deficits in higher plants. — Plant Cell Environ. 25: 275–294, 2002.
Lawlor, D.W., Tezara, W.: Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: a critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. — Ann. Bot. 103: 561–579, 2009
Leshem, Y.Y., Shewfelt, R.L., Willmer, C.M. et al.: Plant membranes: A biophysical approach to structure, development and senescence. — Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht 1992.
Matos, M.C., Campos, P.S., Passarinho, J.A. et al.: Drought effect on photosynthetic activity, osmolyte accumulation and membrane integrity of two Cicer arietinum genotypes. — Photosynthetica 48: 303–312, 2010.
Miyashita, K., Tanakamaru, S., Maitani, T., Kimura, K.: Recovery responses of photosynthesis, transpiration, and stomatal conductance in kidney bean following drought stress. — Environ. Exp. Bot. 53: 205–214, 2005.
Ögren, E.: Evaluation of chlorophyll fluorescence as a probe for drought stress in willow leaves. — Plant Physiol. 93: 1280–1285, 1990.
Oliveira, M.N.S., Oliva, M.A., Martinez, C.A. et al.: [Stomatal sensitivity to ABA related to pH and NO−3, PO4 −3 and Ca+2 levels of xylem sap.] — Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 14: 117–123, 2002. [In Portuguese.]
Parry, M.A. J., Andralojc, P.J., Khan, S. et al.: Rubisco activity: effects of drought stress. — Ann. Bot. 89: 833–839, 2002.
Pinheiro, C., Chaves, M.M.: Photosynthesis and drought: can we make metabolic connections from avaiable data? — J. Exp. Bot. 62: 869–882, 2011.
Raven, J.A.: The cost of photoinhibition. — Physiol. Plant. 142: 87–104, 2011.
Reynolds, M.P., Mujeeb-Kazi, A., Sawkins, M.: Prospects for utilizing plant-adaptive mechanisms to improve wheat and other crops in drought- and salinity-prone environments. — Ann. Appl. Biol. 146: 239–259, 2005.
Saccardy, K., Pineau, B., Roche, O. et al.: Photochemical efficiency of photosystem II and xanthophyll cycle components in Zea mays leaves exposed to water stress and high light. — Photosynth. Res. 56: 57–66, 1998.
Scholes, J.D., Press, M.C., Zipperlen, S.W.: Differences in light energy utilisation and dissipation between dipterocarp rain forest tree seedlings. — Oecologia. 109: 41–48, 1997.
Shangguan, Z.P., Shao, M.G., Dyckmans, J.: Effects of nitrogen nutrition and water deficit on net photosynthetic rate and chlorophyll fluorescence in winter wheat. — J. Plant Physiol. 156: 46–51, 2000.
Silva, J.M., Arrabaça, M.C.: Photosynthesis in the waterstressed C4 grass Setaria sphacelata is mainly limited by stomata with both rapidly and slowly imposed water deficits. — Physiol. Plant. 121: 409–420, 2004.
Singh, S. K., Reddy, K. R.: Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) under drought. — J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 105: 40–50, 2011.
Souza, R.P., Machado, E.C., Silva, J.A. et al.: Photosynthetic gas exchange, chlorophyll fluorescence and some associated metabolic changes in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) during water stress and recovery. — Environ. Exp. Bot. 51: 45–56, 2004.
Subbarao, G.V., Johansen, C., Slinkard, A.E. et al.: Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. — Critical Rev. Plant Sci. 14: 469–529, 1995.
Tezara, W., Martínez, D., Rengifo, E. Herrera, A.: Photosynthetic responses of the tropical spiny shrub Lycium nodosum (Solanaceae) to drought, soil salinity and saline spray. — Ann. Bot. 92: 757–765, 2003.
Wingler, A., Quick, W.P., Bungard, R.A. et al.: The role of photorespiration during drought stress: an analysis utilizing barley mutants with reduced activities of photorespiratory enzymes. — Plant Cell Environ. 22: 361–373, 1999.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Acknowledgments: This study was supported by Fundação de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Brazil (FAPESP 2008/57571-1). GM Souza was supported by fellowship granted by CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Tecnológico, Brazil) and SC Bertolli and GL Rapchan were supported by fellowships granted by FAPESP.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bertolli, S.C., Rapchan, G.L. & Souza, G.M. Photosynthetic limitations caused by different rates of water-deficit induction in Glycine max and Vigna unguiculata . Photosynthetica 50, 329–336 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0036-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0036-4