Abstract
This paper enters the continuing fray over the semantic significance of Donnellan’s referential/attributive distinction. Some holdthat the distinction is at bottom a pragmatic one: i.e., that the difference between the referential use and the attributive use arises at the level of speaker’s meaning rather the level of sentence-or utterance-meaning. This view has recently been challenged byMarga Reimer andMichael Devitt, both of whom argue that the fact that descriptions are regularly, that is standardly, usedto refer defeats the pragmatic approach. The present paper examines a variety of issues bearing on the regularity in question: whether the regularity would arise in a Russellian language, whether the regularity is similar to the standard use ofcomplex demonstratives, and whether the pragmatic approach founders on the problem of dead metaphors. I argue that the pragmatic approach can readily explain all of these facets ofthe referential use of descriptions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
K. Bach (1987) Thought and Reference Oxford University Press Oxford
K. Bach M. Harnish (1979) Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts MIT Press Cambridge, MA
P. Bloom (2000) How Children Learn the Meanings of Words MIT Press Cambridge, MA
Bontly, T. (forthcoming): ‘Modified Occam’s Razor: Parsimony Arguments, Pragmatic Explanations, and the Acquisition of Word Meaning’, Mind and Language
W. Davis (1998) Implicature Cambridge University Press Cambridge
M. Devitt (1981) ‘Donnellan’s Distinction’ P. French T. Uelhling H. Wettstein (Eds) Midwest Studiesin Philosophy, Vol. VI: The Foundations of Analytic Philosophy University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis 511–524
Devitt, M. (forthcoming): ‘The Case for Referential Descriptions’, in A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.), Descriptions: Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress.
K. Donnellan (1966) ArticleTitle‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’ Philosophical Review 75 281–304
P. Grice (1961) ArticleTitle‘The Causal Theory of Perception’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35 IssueIDsuppl. 121–152
P. Grice (1969) ‘Vacuous Names’ D. Davidson J. Hintikka (Eds) Words and Objections Reidel Dordrecht
P. Grice (1975) ‘Logic and Conversation’ P. Cole J. Morgan (Eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3: SpeechActs Academic Press New York
P. Grice (1978) ‘Further Notes on Logic and Conversation’ P. Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9: Pragmatics Academic Press New York
S. Kripke (1977) ‘Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference’ P. French T. Uehlingand H. Wettstein (Eds) MidwestStudies in Philosophy, Vol. 2:Contem-poraryPerspectives in the Philosophy of Language Universityof Minnesota Press Minneapolis
R. Larson G. Segal (1995) Knowledge of Meaning MIT Press Cambridge, MA
E. Lepore K. Ludwig (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Semantics and Pragmatics of Complex Demonstratives’ Mind 109 199–240 Occurrence Handle10.1093/mind/109.434.199 Occurrence HandleMR1759899
S. Levinson (1983) Pragmatics Cambridge University Press Cambridge
T. Mintz E. Newport T. Bever (2002) ArticleTitle‘The Distributional Structure of Grammatical Categories in Speech to Young Children’ Cognitive Science 26 393–424 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0364-0213(02)00072-1
J. Morgan (1978) ‘Two Types of Convention in Indirect Speech Acts’ P. Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 9 Pragmatics Academic Press New York 261–280
S. Neale (1990) Descriptions MIT Press Cambridge, MA
S. Neale (1992) ArticleTitle‘Paul Grice and the Philosophy of Language’ Linguistics and Philosophy 15 509–559 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00630629
M. Redington N. Chater (1997) ArticleTitle‘Probabilistic and Distributional Approaches to Language Acquisition’ Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 273–281 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01081-4
M. Reimer (1998) ArticleTitle‘Donnellan’s Distinction/Kripke’s Test’ Analysis 58 89–100 Occurrence Handle10.1111/1467-8284.00108 Occurrence HandleMR1635828
B. Russell (1905) ArticleTitle‘On Denoting’ Mind 14 IssueIDNew Series 479–493
J. Saddock (1978) ‘On Testing for Conversational Implicature’ P. Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9, Pragmatics Academic Press New York 281–297
J. Saffran R. Aslin E. Newport (1996) ArticleTitle‘Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants’ Science 274 1926–1928 Occurrence Handle10.1126/science.274.5294.1926 Occurrence Handle8943209
N. Salmon (1982) ArticleTitle‘Assertion and Incomplete Definite Descriptions’ Philosophical Studies 42 37–45 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00372838
D. Stampe (1974) ‘Attributives and Interrogatives’ M. Munitz P. Unger (Eds) Semantics and Philosophy Academic Press New York
H. Wettstein (1981) ArticleTitle‘Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions’ Philosophical Studies 40 241–257 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00353794
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bontly, T.D. Conversational Implicature And The Referential Use of Descriptions. Philos Stud 125, 1–25 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7784-y
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-005-7784-y