Abstract
In this paper we provide an account of the structural underpinnings of self-awareness. We offer both an abstract, logical account – by way of suggestions for how to build a genuinely self-referring artificial agent – and a biological account, via a discussion of the role of somatoception in supporting and structuring self-awareness more generally. Central to the account is a discussion of the necessary motivational properties of self-representing mental tokens, in light of which we offer a novel definition of self-representation. We also discuss the role of such tokens in organizing self-specifying information, which leads to a naturalized restatement of the guarantee that introspective awareness is immune to error due to mis-identification of the subject.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anderson, M. L. 2003a. Embodied cognition: A field guide. Artificial Intelligence 149(1): 91–130.
Anderson, M. L. 2003b. Representations, symbols and embodiment. Artificial Intelligenc. 149(1): 151–156.
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1963. Intention, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ballard, D. H., Hayhoe, M. M., Pook, P. K. and Rao, R. P. N. 1997. Deictic codes for the embodiment of cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20(4): 723–742.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1989. The autistic child's theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 30: 285–297.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1991. Precursors to a theory of mind: understanding attention in others. In: A. Whiten (ed), Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development, and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, pp. 233–251. New York: Blackwell.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1994. How to build a baby that can read minds: Cognitive mechanisms in mindreading. Current Psychology of Cognition 13: 513–552.
Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bermúdez, J. L. 1998. The Paradox of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Botvinick, M. and Cohen, J. 1998. Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes can see. Nature 391: 756.
Brooks, R. 1991. Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence 47: 139–160.
Carrozzo, M., McIntyre, J., Zago, M. and Lacquaniti, F. 1999. Viewer-centered and body-centered frames of reference in direct visuomotor transformations. Experimental Brain Research 129(2): 201–210.
Carruthers, P. 1996a. Autism as mind-blindness: An elaboration and partial defence. In: P. Carruthers and P. K. Smith (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind, pp. 257–273. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Carruthers, P. 1996b. Simulation and self-knowledge: A defence of theory-theory. In: P. Carruthers and P. K. Smith (eds), Theories of Theories of Mind, pp. 22–38. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Carruthers, P. 2002. The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25(6).
Castañeda, H.-N. 1966. ‘He’: a study in the logic of self-consciousness. Ratio 8: 130–157.
Chalmers, D. 1995a. Absent qualia, fading qualia, dancing qualia. In: T. Metzinger (ed), Conscious Experience. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Chalmers, D. 1995b. Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2: 200–219.
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. 1979. On cognitive structures and their development: A reply to Piaget. In: M. Piattelli-Palmarini (ed), Language and Learning – The Debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Chrisley, R. 2003. Embodied AI. Artificial Intelligence 149(1): 131–150.
Craig, J. C. and Rollman, G. B. 1999. Somesthesis. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 305–331.
Edelman, S. 2002. Constraints on the nature of the neural representations of the visual world. Trends in Cognitive Science 6: 125–131.
Ehrsson, H. H. 2002. Awareness of limb movement: Illusory sensations in the primary motor cortex. Proceedings of Tucson 2002: Towards a Science of Consciousness, pp. 65–66.
Fodor, J. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Frege, G. 1960. On sense and reference. In: P. Geach and M. Black (eds), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, pp. 56–78. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Gallagher, S. 1986. Body image and body schema: A conceptual clarification. Journal of Mind and Behavior 7: 541–554.
Gallagher, S. 2001. The practice of mind: Theory, simulation, or interaction? Journal of Consciousness Studies 8(5–7): 83–108.
Gallagher, S. 2003. Bodily self-awareness and object perception. Theoria et Historia Scientarum: International Journal for Interdisciplinary Studies 7(1): 53–68.
Gallagher, S. 2004. Understanding interpersonal problems in autism: Interaction theory as an alternative to theory of mind. Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology 11(3): 199–217.
Gallistel, C. R. 1990. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ghez, C., Gordon, J. and Ghilardi, M. F. 1995. Impairments of reaching movements in patients without proprioception. ii. effects of visual information on accuracy. Journal of Neurophysiology 73: 361–372.
Goldman, A. I. 1989. Interpretation psychologized. Mind and Language 4: 161–185.
Gordon, R. M. 1986. Folk psychology as simulation. Mind and Language 1: 158–171.
Gordon, R. M. 1995. Simulation without introspection or inference from me to you. In: M. Davies and T. Stone (eds), Mental Simulation: Evaluations and Applications. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Hari, R., Hanninen, R., Makinen, T., Jousmaki, V., Forss, N., Seppa, M. and Salonen, O. 1998. Three hands: Fragmentation of human bodily awareness. Neuroscience Letters 240: 131–134.
Heal, J. 1986. Replication and runctionalism. In: J. Butterfield (ed), Language, Mind, and Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heal, J. 1998a. Co-cognition and off-line simulation: Two ways of understanding the simulation approach. Mind and Language 13: 477–498.
Heal, J. 1998b. Understanding other minds from the inside. In: A. O'Hear (ed), Current Issues in Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hogan, M. and Martin, R. 2001. Introspective misidentification. In: A. Brook and R. DeVidi (eds), Self-reference and Self-awareness, pp. 205–213. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Humphrey, N. 1992. A History of the Mind. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Hurford, J. R. 2003. The neural basis of predicate argument structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(6).
Kirsh, D. 1991. Today the earwig, tomorrow man? Artificial Intelligence 47(3): 161–184.
Leslie, A. M. 1994. ToMM, ToBy and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In: L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, pp. 119–148. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leslie, A. M. 2000. How to acquire a ‘representational theory of mind’. In: D. Sperber (ed), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, pp. 197–223. Ablex Publishing.
Marr, D. 1982. Vision: A Computational Investigation into the Human Representation and Processing of Visual Information. New York: W.H. Freeman.
Millikan, R. G. 1990. The myth of the essential indexical. Noûs. 24: 723–734.
Millikan, R. G. 1996. Pushmi-pullyu representations. In: L. May and M. Friedman (eds), Mind and Morals, pp. 145–161. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nicolelis, M., Ghazanfar, A., Stambaugh, C., Oliveira, L., Laubach, M., Chapin, J., Nelson, R. and Kaas, J. 1998. Simultaneous encoding of tactile information by three primate cortical areas. Nature Neuroscience 1(7): 621–630.
O'Donovan-Anderson, M. 1997. Content and Comportment: On Embodiment and the Epistemic Availability of the World. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
O'Shaugnessy, B. 1980. The Will: A Dual Aspect Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Perlis, D. 1997. Consciousness as self-function. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4(5/6): 509–525.
Perlis, D. 2000. The role(s) of belief in AI. In: J. Minker (ed), Logic-based AI: Proceedings of The Workshop on Logic-Based Artificial Intelligence. Chapter 14.
Perry, J. 1977. The problem of the essential indexical. Noûs 13: 3–21. Reprinted in A. Brook and R. DeVidi Self-reference and Self-awareness, pp. 143–159. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishers, 2001.
Perry, J. 1990. Self-notions. Logos 1990: 17–31.
Perry, J. 1993. The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perry, J. 1995. Rip van Winkle and other characters. The European Review of Analytical Philosophy. 2: 13–39.
Perry, J. 1998. Myself and “I”. In: M. Stamm (ed), Philosophie in Synthetischer Absicht, pp. 83–103. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.
Pinker, S. 1994. The Language Instinct. New York: Harper Perennial.
Rosenberg, G. and Anderson, M. L. 2004. A brief introduction to the guidance theory of representation. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. http://www.cogsci.northwestern.edu/cogsci2004/papers/paper122.pdf.
Rosenberg, G. and Anderson, M. L. (forthcoming). Content and action: The guidance theory of representation. http://www.cs.umd.edu/~anderson/papers/CNA.pdf.
Scholl, B. J. and Leslie, A. M. 1999. Modularity, development and ‘theory of mind’. Mind and Language 14(1): 131–153.
Seager, W. 2001. The constructed and the secret self. In: A. Brook and R. DeVidi (eds), Self-reference and Self-awareness, pp. 247–268. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Shoemaker, S. 1968. Self-reference and self-awareness. Journal of Philosophy 65: 555–567.
Spelke, E. S. 1990. Principles of object perception. Cognitive Science 14: 29–56.
Trevarthen, C. 1979. Communication and cooperation in early infancy: A description of primary intersubjectivity. In: M. Bullowa (ed), Before Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anderson, M.L., Perlis, D.R. The roots of self-awareness. Phenom Cogn Sci 4, 297–333 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4068-0
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4068-0