Abstract
The Risk Management Index, RMI, proposed in this paper, brings together a group of indicators that measure risk management performance and effectiveness. These indicators reflect the organizational, development, capacity and institutional actions taken to reduce vulnerability and losses in a given area, to prepare for crisis and to recover efficiently from disasters. This index is designed to assess risk management performance. It provides a quantitative measure of management based on predefined qualitative targets or benchmarks that risk management efforts should aim to achieve. The design of the RMI involved establishing a scale of achievement levels or determining the distance between current conditions and an objective threshold or conditions in a reference country, sub-national region, or city. The proposed RMI is constructed by quantifying four public policies, each of which is described by six indicators. The mentioned policies include the identification of risk, risk reduction, disaster management, and governance and financial protection. Risk identification comprises the individual perception, social representation and objective assessment; risk reduction involves the prevention and mitigation; disaster management comprises response and recovery; and, governance and financial protection policy is related to institutionalization and risk transfer. Results at the urban, national and sub-national levels, which illustrate the application of the RMI in those scales, are finally given.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bates FL, Peacock WG (1992) Measuring disaster impact on household living conditions: the domestic assets approach. Int J Mass Emerg Disasters 10(1):133–160
Benson C (2003) Potential approaches to the development of indicators for measuring risk from a macroeconomic perspective. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Briguglio L (2003a) Some considerations with regard to the construction of an index of disaster risk with special reference to islands and small states. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Briguglio L (2003b) Methodological and practical considerations for constructing socio-economic indicators to evaluate disaster risk. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Cardona OD (2001) Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico utilizando Sistemas Dinámicos Complejos. Doctoral Thesis, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona
Cardona OD (2005) Indicators of disaster risk and risk management. Summary report. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management. Inter-American Development Bank, Sustainable Development Department Environment Division, Washington DC
Cardona OD, Hurtado JE, Duque G, Moreno A, Chardon AC, Velásquez LS, Prieto SD (2003a) The notion of disaster risk. Conceptual framework for integrated risk management. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Cardona OD, Hurtado JE, Duque G, Moreno A, Chardon AC, Velásquez LS, Prieto SD (2003b) Indicators for risk measurement: fundamentals for a methodological approach. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Cardona OD, Hurtado JE, Duque G, Moreno A, Chardon AC, Velásquez LS, Prieto SD (2004) Disaster risk and risk management benchmarking: a methodology based on indicators at national level. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Cardona OD, Hurtado JE, Duque G, Moreno A, Chardon AC, Velásquez LS, Prieto SD (2005) System of indicators for disaster risk management: program for Latin America and the Caribbean: main technical report. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Carreño ML (2001) Sistema Experto para la Evaluación del Daño Postsísmico en Edificios. Master thesis, Department of Civil Engineering and Environment, University of Los Andes, Bogota, Colombia
Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2004) Metodología para la evaluación del desempeño de la gestión del riesgo. CIMNE monograph IS-51, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2005) Sistema de indicadores para la evaluación de riesgos. CIMNE monograph, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Carreño ML, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2007) Urban seismic risk evaluation: a holistic approach. Nat Hazards 40:137–172
Comfort LK (1999) Shared risk: complex systems in seismic response. Pergamon, New York
Cutter SL (ed) (1994) Environmental risks and hazards. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Davidson R (1997) An urban earthquake disaster risk index. The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Report No. 121, Stanford
Davis I (2003) The effectiveness of current tools for the identification, measurement, analysis and synthesis of vulnerability and disaster risk. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
ISDR (2003) A framework to guide and monitor disaster risk reduction, http://www.unisdr.org/dialogue/basicdocument.htm draft proposal, ISDR/UNDP
Masure P (2003) Variables and indicators of vulnerability and disaster risk for landuse and urban or territorial planning. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Mitchell T (2003) An operational framework for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction. Benfield Hazard Research Centre Disaster Studies Working Paper 8, London
Munda G (2003) Methodological exploration for the formulation of a socio-economic indicators model to evaluate disaster risk management at the national and sub-national levels. A social multi-criterion model. IDB/IDEA Program on Indicators for Disaster Risk Management, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Manizales, http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Puente S (1999) Social vulnerability to disasters in Mexico City: an assessment method. In: Mitchell JK (ed) Crucibles of hazard: mega-cities and disasters in transition. United Nations University Press, New York
Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill Book Co., NY
Saaty TL (1987) The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model 9:161–176
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1991) Prediction, projection, and forecasting: applications of the analytical hierarchy process in economics, finance, politics, games, and sports. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
SIRE (2005) http://www.sire.gov.co, Bogotá, Colombia
Tucker BE, Erdik MÖ, Hwang CN (eds) (1994) Issues in urban earthquake risk. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
UNDP (2004) Reducing disaster risk: a challenge for development. A Global Report, United Nations Development Program, Disaster Risk Index DRI, Geneva
World Bank (2004) Identification of global natural disaster risk hotspots. Center for Hazard and Risk Research at University of Columbia, Washington
Acknowledgements
The Risk Management Index, RMI herein described, was developed to evaluate risk management performance and effectiveness of countries of Latin America and the Caribbean in the framework of the Disaster Risk Management Indicators Program in Americas (ATN/JF-7907-RG Operation), led by the Institute of Environmental Studies, IDEA, of the National University of Colombia, in Manizales, for the Inter-American Development Bank, IDB. In addition, it was applied to the departments of Colombia and Bogota to illustrate its application at sub-national and local level. Program reports, technical details and the application results for the countries in Americas can be consulted in the following web page: http://www.manizales.unal.edu.co/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
AHP is a technique widely used for multi-attribute decision making (Saaty 1980, 1987; Saaty and Vargas 1991). It enables decomposition of a problem into hierarchy and assures that both qualitative and quantitative aspects of a problem are incorporated in the evaluation process, during which opinion is systematically extracted by means of pairwise comparisons. AHP allows the application of data, experience, knowledge, and intuition of a logical and deep form.
The core of AHP is an ordinal pairwise comparison of attributes, indicators in this context, in which preference statements are addressed. For a given objective, the comparisons are made per pairs of indicators by first posing the question “Which of the two is the more important?” and second “By how much?” The strength of preference is expressed on a semantic scale of 1–9, which keeps measurement within the same order of magnitude. A preference of 1 indicates equality between two indicators while a preference of 9 indicates that one indicator is 9 times larger or more important than the one to which it is being compared. The relative weights of the indicators are calculated using an eigenvector technique. One of the advantages of this method is that it is able to check the consistency of the comparison matrix through the calculation of the eigenvalues.
The matrices allowing the comparison of the assigned relative importance, together with the respective index of consistency and the weights or priority vector, have been obtained for the indicators of each policy for the example of Bogotá (see Tables 13–20).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carreño, M.L., Cardona, O.D. & Barbat, A.H. A disaster risk management performance index. Nat Hazards 41, 1–20 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9008-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-006-9008-y