Abstract
Neurotransmitter l-glutamate released at central synapses is taken up and “recycled” by astrocytes using glutamate transporter molecules such as GLAST and GLT. Glutamate transport is essential for prevention of glutamate neurotoxicity, it is a key regulator of neurotransmitter metabolism and may contribute to mechanisms through which neurons and glia communicate with each other. Using immunocytochemistry and image analysis we have found that extracellular d-aspartate (a typical substrate for glutamate transport) can cause redistribution of GLAST from cytoplasm to the cell membrane. The process appears to involve phosphorylation/dephosphorylation and requires intact cytoskeleton. Glutamate transport ligands l -trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dicarboxylate and dl-threo-3-benzyloxyaspartate but not anti,endo-3,4-methanopyrrolidine dicarboxylate have produced similar redistribution of GLAST. Several representative ligands for glutamate receptors whether of ionotropic or metabotropic type, were found to have no effect. In addition, extracellular ATP induced formation of GLAST clusters in the cell membranes by a process apparently mediated by P2 receptors. The present data suggest that GLAST can rapidly and specifically respond to changes in the cellular environment thus potentially helping to fine-tune the functions of astrocytes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Acidic amino acids l-aspartate (l-asp) and l-glutamate (l-glu) act on a set of membrane-located receptors that function as ion-gated channels, changing membrane permeability to Na+ and Ca2+ (“ionotropic glutamate receptors”, iGluR) and depolarizing (“exciting”) the neurons in the central nervous system. In addition, l-glu, but not l-asp, acts on distinct G-protein linked receptors (“metabotropic glutamate receptors”, mGluR) that activate intracellular signalling pathways [1]. Thus l-glu and l-asp, can act as signalling agents in the intercellular communication and, indeed, l-glu appears to be the major neurotransmitter at the excitatory synapses in brain (reviews [2, 3]).
l-Glu is stored in presynaptic vesicles and is released from synaptic nerve endings by depolarization-coupled, Ca2+-dependent mechanisms. Active Na+/K+-dependent transport of l-glu (GluT) provides a mechanism that regulates concentrations of l-glu at the synapse, preventing excessive stimulation of glutamate receptors that could be harmful and cause pathological neurodegeneration [4].
l-Glutamate transport (GluT) in the brain is mediated mainly by glutamate transporters expressed in astrocytes, GLAST and GLT (also known as EAAT1 and EAAT2, respectively; reviews [5–7]). Long-term regulation of GluT, over periods of hours and days involves factors that can change overall levels of GLAST and GLT in astrocytes and are probably mediated by manipulation of protein synthesis [8]. There is, however, evidence that the efficacy of GluT can be strongly influenced by rapid shifts of transporters in and out of plasma membranes [9, 10] (for reviews see [11, 12]) and/or by their clustering in astrocytic processes [13] (for review see [5]). Such movements may occur in response to changes in the activity of glutamatergic synapses and, therefore, activity of l-glu transport could be of importance not only for the normal operation of the synaptic excitation [5] but also as an indicator of local excitatory activity that would have to be matched by local changes in the metabolism and blood flow. Indeed, it has recently been demonstrated that not only pharmacological manipulation of glutamate receptors but, in particular, interference with GluT, can elicit specific metabolic responses in brain tissue [14–17].
In the present study, we have used immunofluorescence labelling combined with deconvolution microscopy to visualize GLAST transporter distribution in cultured astrocytes. We have been investigating changes in the distribution of GLAST in response to compounds known as specific ligands for glutamate receptors or as substrates/inhibitors of glutamate transporters.
Materials and Methods
Cultured Astrocytes
Cultured astrocytes were prepared from neocortices of neonatal (aged up to three postnatal days) Sprague–Dawley rats. The tissue was freed of meninges, sliced with micro-scissors and dissociated with trypsin (0.25% in Hanks balanced salt solution). Cells were maintained in Dulbecco modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS), initially in 25 cm2 flasks (usually 2–3 brains per flask) until confluent (10–14 days), then passaged onto coverslips (13 mm in diameter) and grown for further 12–14 days. At this time, astrocytes were evenly distributed over the area of the coverslips and displayed characteristic astrocyte morphology [18].
All procedures involving animals were carried out in accordance with the guidelines of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and were approved by The University of Sydney Animal Ethics Committee.
Immunocytochemistry and Image Analysis
The coverslips with astrocytes were washed in serum-free DMEM (sfDMEM) and incubated with drugs such as GluT substrates and glutamate receptor ligands, dissolved in 500 μl of sfDMEM. Incubations lasted 30 min and were carried out at 37°C in 5% CO2/95% O2. Drug-free sfDMEM was used as a control.
Following the exposure to drugs the coverslips were first washed in 2 ml of phosphate buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) for 5 min, then fixed with paraformaldehyde (2% in PBS) for 10 min and again washed with 2 ml of PBS for 5 min. Fixed cells were then “blocked” with PBS containing 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (PBS/BSA) for 30 min. Astrocytes were double-labelled with antibodies against glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP, marker for astrocytes, mouse monoclonal antibodies, SIGMA Chemical Co.) and antibodies against the glutamate transporter GLAST (polyclonal antibody raised in rabbit [19]). The immunolabelling procedures were similar to those described previously [19]. The antibodies were dissolved in PBS/BSA containing 0.05% saponin and coverslips were exposed to 200 μl of solutions containing the antibodies at dilutions of 1:4,000 (GLAST) and 1:400 (GFAP). The incubations (2 h) were carried out at room temperature in a humidified environment. The coverslips were then washed three times for 5 min with 2 ml of the PBS/BSA solution and exposed to the secondary antibodies.
All procedures involving the fluorescent labelled antibodies were performed in a dark environment. Goat-generated anti-mouse IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (AF 488) was used to visualise GFAP-like immunoreactivity (GFAP-LIR) while goat-generated anti-rabbit IgG conjugated to Alexa Fluor 594 (AF 594) was used to label the anti-GLAST antibody GLAST-like immunoreactivity, GLAST-LIR). Both secondary antibodies were diluted in the PBS/BSA solution, incubations were for 1 h at room temperature and washed as described above for the primary antibodies; three times for 5 min with 2 ml of PBS/BSA.
After washing, the coverslips were carefully blotted to remove excess moisture, mounted upside down, using 50% solution of glycerol in PBS, on slides and secured along the edges with nail polish, to prevent drying out.
Image Analysis
Deconvolution microscope (Axioplan 2, Zeiss) was used for image acquisition. AF 488 was excited at 499 nm (emission at 520 nm, filters used: BP 480/40, 50SLP and BP 535/30), AF 594 was excited at 590 (emission at 618 nm, filters used: BP560/55, 595/LP, BP 645/75). The images were optically sectioned at 0.513 μm intervals and subjected to deconvolution using an inverse filter algorithm to remove out-of-focus (background) signals. Sections from the midplane of the stacks were used for the image analyses. Each image represented a randomly selected single cell.
Images of immunolabelled cells were subjected to “thresholding” to objectively estimate the background [20] while the cells contour was determined using a spline-based “snake” model developed for this project. This model has been derived from the active contour model [21]. It uses an arbitrary closed spline cube as an initial contour rather than an ellipsoidal curve. This allows the model to define a very accurate cell contour. The membrane was defined as the area between the cell contour and a line obtained by “shrinking” the “snake” 1.7 μm inside the contour. Thus, the “thickness” of membrane was taken as constant at 1.7 μm, about 5 times the lateral resolution limit of the deconvolution microscope. This is much greater than the actual thickness of cell membranes (<10 nm [22]). Rather, this value was chosen as corresponding approximately to the size of the clusters of the fluorescence-labelled GLAST-LIR appearing in the membrane following exposure of the astrocytes to GluT substrates so as to capture most of the label typically present in, or, in the immediate vicinity of, the membrane under such experimental conditions.
Mean fluorescent density (MFD) was then determined (using Image-J software, http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/) in both the cytoplasm and membrane (cMFD and mMFD) and the membrane/cytoplasm ratio of fluorescent intensity (RFI = mMFD/cMFD) was used as an index of the distribution of GLAST-LIR between membrane and cytoplasm.
In order to assess the distribution of GLAST-LIR along the plasma membrane, fluorescence intensity was sampled using squares 1.7 × 1.7 μm (10 × 10 pixels) along the membrane, every 8.5 μm (50 pixels). The values were then analysed for Gaussian distribution, using D’Agostino and Pearson normality test (P < 0.05 as a limit) and the distribution was considered “clustered” if it was not normal (Gaussian).
In addition, in some experiments, “compactness” of the cells, defined as a square of the cell perimeter divided by the area [23, 24] was calculated and correlated by linear regression with RFI. There was no correlation (r 2 = 0.1737) indicating that the values of RFI were not influenced by the shape of astrocytes.
Sources of Materials
(RS)-α-Amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA), d-aspartic acid, dl-threo-3-benzyloxyaspartic acid (dl-TBOA), (2S,3S,4R)-carboxy-4-(1-methylethenyl)-3-pyrrolidineacetic acid (kainic acid), 8,8′-[carbonylbis[imino-3,1-phenylenecarbonylimino(4-methyl-3,1-phenylene)carbonylimino]]bis-1.3.5-naphtalenetrisulphonate hexasodium (suramin), 6-chloro-3,4-dihydro-3-(2-norbornen-5-yl)-2H-1,2,4-benzothaidiazine-7-sulphonamide-1,1-dioxide (cyclothiazide), 9,10-deepithio-9,10-didehydroacanthofolicin (okadaic acid), (2S,2′R,3′R)-2-(2′,3′-dicarboxycyclopropyl)glycine (DCG IV), (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG), l-trans-pyrrolidine-2,4-dihydroxylic acid (l-t-PDC), l-anti,endo-3,4-methanopyrrolidinedicarboxylic acid (a,e-MPDC) and (RS)-(tertrazol-5-yl)glycine (TZG) were purchased from Tocris Cookson Ltd, Northpoint, Fourth Way, Avonmouth, Bristol, BS11 8TA, UK; 1-[6-[(3-Acetyl-2,4,6-trihydroxy-5-methylphenyl)methyl]-5,7-dihydroxy-2,2-dimethyl-2H-1-benzopyran-8-yl]-3-phenyl-2-propen-1-one) (rottlerin) came from Calbiochem (EMD Biosciences, Inc., 10394 Pacific Center Court, San Diego, CA 92121, USA); bovine serum albumin (BSA), antirabbit and antimouse secondary antibodies, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and uridine triphosphate (UTP) came from Sigma-Aldrich Pty Ltd, Unit 2/14 Anella Ave, Castle Hill, NSW 2154, Australia; materials for cell culturing originated from Gibco, purchased via Invitrogen Corporation, 1600 Faraday Avenue, P.O. Box 6482 Carlsbad, California 92008, USA or BioScientific Pty. Ltd, P.O. Box 78, Gymea, NSW 2227, Australia, except for foetal bovine serum: Cosmic Calf Serum, Progen, Global Science & Technology Ltd, P.O. Box 101253 North Shore Mail Centre, Auckland, New Zealand.
Results
The presence of a typical transporter substrate d-asp caused a significant shift of GLAST towards the cell membrane (Fig. 1a, b), with RFI about double the control value (Fig. 2). The effect of d-asp was inhibited by cytochalasin D (Fig. 2), by the phosphatase 1/2A inhibitor okadaic acid (Figs. 1c, 2) and by PKC-delta inhibitor rottlerin (data not shown; cf. [25]).
Synthetic ligands for the glutamate transporter binding site l-tPDC [26], and dl-TBOA [27, 28] but not a,e-MPDC [26] significantly changed the distribution of GLAST-LIR in a manner similar to that observed in the presence of d-asp (Figs. 1d–f, 2). In contrast, none of the ligands for iGluR or mGluR had any effect either on RFI (Fig. 2) or on the distribution of GLAST-LIR within the membrane (data not shown): (tetrazol-5-yl)-glycine (TZG, neurotoxic agonist on NMDA receptors [29, 30]), kainic acid, AMPA (whether alone or in the presence of cyclothiazide to slow down the receptor desensitization [31]), dihydroxyphenylglycine (DHPG, specific activator of metabotropic GluR of group I [32]) and DCG IV (specific activator of metabotropic GluR of group II [1, 33]).
Cells exposed to ATP displayed a characteristic distribution of GLAST-LIR along the membrane (Fig. 3a). The effect was inhibited by suramin (Fig. 3b) and it could not be reproduced by UTP (Fig. 3c, d). In addition to the increased frequency of clusters the presence of ATP resulted in a net redistribution of GLAST in the direction of cell membrane but the effect was much smaller than that observed with d-aspartate (Fig. 3c).
Discussion
The present data demonstrate that GluT substrates, in particular d-asp can cause significant changes on the distribution of GLAST-LIR in astrocytes cultured from brains of neonatal rats. The process appears to be dependent on the intact cytoskeleton as evidenced by the inhibitory effect of cytochalasin D and might involve phosphorylation as indicated by the effect of 1/2A phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid. Okadaic acid has been shown to have no effect on GluT in glioma C6 cells where the principal glutamate transporter is EAAC1 [34]. In the present studies okadaic acid did inhibit the effect of d-asp on the distribution of GLAST and this is consistent with phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of GLAST being involved in the mechanism of the rapid regulation of GluT. This is in accordance with the findings obtained using glial plasmalemmal vesicles [35] or astrocytes where GLAST is known to be the principal glutamate transporter [8, 36]. The present observations are also consistent with the effect of the PKC-delta inhibitor rottlerin [37]. PKC and PKC-delta in particular might play a role in the regulation of GluT [11, 38], however, rottlerin has recently been reported to act on the subcellular distribution of GLAST via a PKC-independent mechanism [10] and the mechanism by which it inhibits the effect of d-asp on GLAST redistribution may not be exclusively dependent on phosphorylation by protein kinases [25].
Available data seem to suggest no great difference between the affinities of d-aspartate and l-tPDC on GLAST [26] whereas ae-MPDC seems to be a rather poorly transportable inhibitor of GluT in synaptosomes [39]. More recent experiments in cultured cells which, on other evidence, appear to express GLAST as the main glutamate transporter indicate little if any difference in the potencies of the presently used compounds as substrates or inhibitors of GluT. The inhibitory potencies (expressed as IC50 or K i values, μM) are, in human fibroblasts [40]: d-asp 17.6, l-tPDC 36.8; in human astrocytoma line (U373 [41]): d-asp 29.8, l -tPDC 17.6, ae-MPDC 30.1; in primary murine astrocytes [42]: dl-TBOA 40.6, l -tPDC 74.1, ae-MPDC 87.5; in EAAT1 transfected COS-1 cells [28]: dl-TBOA 33.0. In a fluorescent assay, using EAAT1 transfected HEK293 cells [43], the values were reported as K m for transportable substrates d-aspartate (25 μm) and l-tPDC (20 μm) and K i for dl-TBOA (2.9 μm). In particular, the observed ability of the GluT ligands to cause redistribution of GLAST does not appear to be related to whether they are substrates or inhibitors of GluT. Data obtained in GLAST-expressing primary cultures of astrocytes (similar to the presently used experimental model), indicated that l-tPDC was transported as a substrate while dl-TBOA and ae-MPDC were transported only poorly or not at all [42]. Thus there seems to be no simple correlation between the potencies of the substrates/inhibitors of GluT on GLAST redistribution (Fig. 2) and their actions on GluT as reported in the literature, particularly when these are likely to be mediated by GLAST (EAAT1; for additional discussion of the affinities of the abovementioned substrates/inhibitors of GluT see [12, 18, 26, 44]). The best correlation with the present data seems to be offered by a set of IC50 values obtained in [3H]l-aspartate binding studies using fresh/frozen sections of rat brain (summarized in [45]): d-aspartate (IC50~0.3–1.4 μm) is about 10 times more potent than l-tPDC (less potent than d-aspartate in the present study, Fig. 2) and about 100 times more potent than ae-MPDC (no significant effect, Fig. 2). Interestingly, the distribution of [3H]l-aspartate binding in rat brain closely resembles that of GLAST: it is significantly greater in the cerebellar cortex than in the forebrain regions [45, 46]. As the binding to GLAST in frozen tissue is not likely to involve any active substrate transport, the most parsimonious conclusion from the observed correlation would seem to be that high affinity for the substrate binding site on GLAST is more important in the mechanism of the substrate-assisted redistribution of GLAST in astrocytes than the ability of the substrates to be actually transported.
It is remarkable that none of the glutamate receptors tested produced any effect. Glutamate receptors have been shown to exist on astrocytes [47, 48] but the present results suggest that none are likely to play a prominent part in the distribution of GLAST. The lack of effect of receptor ligands also implies that the changes in the distribution of GLAST are not influenced by variations of intracellular pH; kainic acid that causes decrease in cytoplasmic pH similar to that observed after the application of d-asp [49], had no effect.
ATP had only a small influence on the actual distribution of GLAST between cytoplasm and cell membrane. The presence of ATP, however, resulted in the appearance of distinct clusters of GLAST-LIR that were found mainly in the astrocytic processes. Several findings seem to suggest that it is the distribution of glutamate transporters along the membrane that is decisive for the role of GluT in the regulation of glutamate in the vicinity of glutamatergic synapses [5]. Such perisynaptic and/or clustered distributions have been described mainly for GLT [13, 50] (for reviews and additional references see [5, 12]). It has been suggested that the degree of utilization of GluT (particularly that portion mediated by GLAST) could act as a sensor of glutamatergic excitation, translate, via a coupled Na+, K+-dependent ATPase, the variations in the synaptic activity into changes in the astrocytic metabolism and eventually regulate glucose uptake from blood [51–53]; see also [54–56]). However, as indicated by the sensitivity to inhibition by suramin, the ATP effect on GLAST distribution seems to be mediated by P2 receptors. The Na+, K+-dependent ATPase inhibitor oubain (100 μM) had little or no effect on the ATP-linked redistribution of GLAST-LIR (results not shown). Additional experiments have, however, indicated, that ouabain at that concentration was not a strong inhibitor of Na+, K+-dependent ATPase in membranes prepared from the cultured astrocytes (KTD Nguyen, unpublished) implying that the expression of Na+, K+-ATPase protein subunits conferring inhibitor sensitivity on the enzyme is, in presently used astrocytic cultures, different from that in other types of cultured astrocytes [51]. Release of glutamate by astrocytes has been reported to be linked to P2X7 receptors [57]. The release may have been mediated by a glutamate transporter such as GLAST that could be, in situ, subject to a feedback regulation by extracellular ATP which is also released, as a signalling compound, by astrocytes [58]. The GLAST shifts in the membrane would thus contribute to mechanisms involved in the communications among astrocytes [59] or to a feedback mechanism in a process by which astrocytes communicate with neurones [60].
One limitation of the present study is the low resolution of the immunolabelled cell images, even when using deconvolution microscopy. The “artificial” membrane thickness (1.7 μm) is about two orders of magnitude greater than the actual thickness of the plasma membrane. Thus we may have included, as “membrane-bound”, also GLAST molecules not yet incorporated into the membrane but merely transferred to the immediate vicinity of it (so close that they are fixed to it during the exposure to paraformaldehyde).
In summary, using fluorescence immunocytochemistry and a computer-assisted image analysis of deconvolution microscopy we have demonstrated that the glutamate transporter GLAST expressed in astrocytes cultured from neonatal rat brain can be redistributed from the cytoplasm to the cell membrane (or its immediate vicinity) by substrates of glutamate transport. The process appears to be phosphorylation/dephosphorylation dependent and requires intact cytoskeleton. In addition, ATP, acting in a suramin-sensitive (P2 recepotor-like) manner, was found to induce formation of distinct clusters in the astrocytic membranes. The present data indicate that glutamate transport in astrocytes can rapidly respond to the changes in cell environment possibly as a part of mechanisms fine-tuning the functions of the astrocytic metabolic compartment in brain tissue.
References
Conn PJ (2003) Physiological roles and therapeutic potential of metabotropic glutamate receptors. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1003:12–21. doi:10.1196/annals.1300.002
Bennett MR, Balcar VJ (1999) Forty years of amino acid transmission in brain. Neurochem Int 35:269–280. doi:10.1016/S0197-0186(99)00068-6
Watkins JC, Jane DE (2006) The glutamate story. Br J Pharmacol 147(S1):S100–S108
Sheldon AL, Robinson MB (2007) The role of glutamate transporters in neurodegenerative diseases and potential opportunities for intervention. Neurochem Int 51:333–355. doi:10.1016/j.neuint.2007.03.012
Danbolt NC (2001) Glutamate uptake. Prog Neurobiol 65:1–105. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(00)00067-8
Balcar VJ (2002) Molecular pharmacology of the Na+-dependent transport of acidic amino acids in the mammalian central nervous system. Biol Pharm Bull 25:293–400. doi:10.1248/bpb.25.291
Shigeri Y, Seal RP, Shimamoto K (2004) Molecular pharmacology of glutamate transporters, EAATs and VGLUTs. Brain Res Brain Res Rev 45:250–265. doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2004.04.004
Figiel M, Maucher T, Rozyczka J, Bayatti N, Engele J (2003) Regulation of glial glutamate transporter expression by growth factors. Exp Neurol 183:124–135. doi:10.1016/S0014-4886(03)00134-1
Poitry-Yamate CL, Vutskits L, Rauen T (2002) Neuronal-induced and glutamate-dependent activation of glial glutamate transporter function. J Neurochem 82:987–997. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.01075.x
Susarla BTS, Robinson MB (2003) Rottlerin, an inhibitor of protein kinase C-δ (PKC-δ), inhibits astrocytic glutamate transport activity and reduces GLAST immunoreactivity by a mechanism that appears to be PKC-δ-independent. J Neurochem 86:635–645. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01886.x
Robinson MB (2002) Regulated trafficking of neurotransmitter transporters: common notes but different melodies. J Neurochem 80:1–11. doi:10.1046/j.0022-3042.2001.00698.x
Beart PM, O’Shea RD (2007) Transporters for l-glutamate: an update on their molecular pharmacology and pathological involvement. Br J Pharmacol 150:5–17. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0706949
Minelli A, Barbaresi P, Reimer RJ, Edwards RJ, Conti F (2001) The glial glutamate transporter GLT is localized both in the vicinity and at distance from axon terminals in the rat cerebral cortex. Neuroscience 108:51–59. doi:10.1016/S0306-4522(01)00375-X
Rae C, Moussa CE-H, Griffin JL, Bubb WA, Wallis T, Balcar VJ (2005) Group I and II metabotropic glutamate receptors alter brain cortical metabolic and glutamate/glutamine cycle activity: a 13C NMR spectroscopy and metabolomic study. J Neurochem 92:405–416. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2004.02880.x
Rae C, Moussa CE-H, Griffin JL, Parekh SB, Bubb WA, Hunt NH, Balcar VJ (2006) A metabolomic approach to ionotropic glutamate receptor subtype function: a nuclear magnetic resonance in vitro investigation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26:1005–1017. doi:10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600257
Moussa CE-H, Mitrovic AD, Vandenberg RJ, Provis T, Rae C, Bubb WA, Balcar VJ (2002) Effects of l-glutamate transport inhibition by a conformationally restricted glutamate analogue (2S, 1′S, 2′R)-2-(carboxycyclopropyl)glycine (l-CCG III) on metabolism in brain tissue in vitro analysed by NMR spectroscopy. Neurochem Res 27:27–35. doi:10.1023/A:1014842303583
Moussa CE-H, Rae C, Bubb WA, Griffin JL, Deters NA, Balcar VJ (2007) Inhibitors of glutamate transport modulate distinct patterns in brain metabolism. J Neurosci Res 85:342–350. doi:10.1002/jnr.21108
Hertz L, Juurlink BHJ, Hertz E, Fosmark H, Schousboe A (1989) Preparation of primary cultures of mouse (rat) astrocytes. In: Shahar A, de Vellis J, Vernadakis A, Haber B (eds) A dissection and tissue culture manual of the nervous system. New York, Alan R. Liss Inc., pp 105–108
Scott HL, Pow DV, Tanneberg AE, Dodd PR (2002) Aberrant expression of glutamate transporter EAAT1 in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci 22:RC206
Otsu N (1979) A thresholding selection method from grey-level histogram. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 9:62–66. doi:10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310076
Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D (1987) Snakes: active contour models. Int J Comput Vis 1:321–331. doi:10.1007/BF00133570
Curtis H, Barnes SN (1989) Biology, 5th edn. Worth Publishers, New York
DeFife KM, Jenney CR, Colton E, Anderson JM (1999) Disruption of filamentous actin inhibits human macrophage fusion. FASEB J 13:823–832
Bard F, Mazelin L, Pechoux-Longin C, Malhotra V, Jurdic P (2003) Src regulates golgi structure and KDEL receptor-dependent retrograde transport to the endoplasmic reticulum. J Biol Chem 278:46601–46606. doi:10.1074/jbc.M302221200
Balcar VJ, Nguyen KTD, Shin JW, Rae C, Nanitsos EK, Acosta GB, Pow DV, Bennett MR (2004) Rottlerin inhibits (Na+,K+)-ATPase activity but does not cause redistribution of glutamate transporter GLAST in cultured astrocytes. Abstracts of 44th annual meeting of The American Society for Cell Biology, Washington DC, USA, 2004, p 494a, Abstr. No. 1893
Bridges RJ, Kavanaugh MP, Chamberlain AR (1999) A pharmacological review of competitive inhibitors and substrates of high affinity, sodium dependent glutamate transport in the central nervous system. Curr Pharm Des 5:363–379
Shimamoto K, LeBrun B, Yasuda-Kamatani Y, Sakaitani M, Shigeri Y, Yumoto N, Nakajima T (1998) dl-threo-β-benzyloxyaspartate, a potent blocker of excitatory amino acid transporters. Mol Pharmacol 53:195–201
Shimamoto K, Sakai R, Takaoka K, Yumoto N, Nakajima T, Amara SG, Shigeri Y (2004) Characterization of novel l-threo-benzyloxyaspartate derivatives, potent blockers of the glutamate transporters. Mol Pharmacol 65:1008–1015. doi:10.1124/mol.65.4.1008
Schoepp DD, Smith CG, Lodge D, Miller JD, Leander JD, Sacaan AI, Lunn WHW (1991) dl-(Tetrazol-5-yl) glycine: a novel and highly potent NMDA receptor agonist. Eur J Pharmacol 203:237–243. doi:10.1016/0014-2999(91)90719-7
Ong WY, Motin LG, Hansen MA, Dias LS, Bennett MR, Balcar VJ (1997) A P2 purinoceptor blocker suramin antagonizes NMDA receptors and protects against excitatory behaviour caused by NMDA receptor agonist (RS)-(Tetrazol-5-yl)-glycine in rats. J Neurosci Res 49:627–638. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4547(19970901)49:5<627::AID-JNR13>3.0.CO;2-S
Yamada KA, Tang C-M (1993) Benzothiadiazides inhibit rapid glutamate desensitization and enhance rapid glutamatergic synaptic currents. J Neurosci 13:3904–3915
Schoepp DD, Goldsworthy J, Johnson B, Salhoff CR, Baker SR (1994) 3,5-Dihydroxyphenylglycine is a highly selective agonist for phosphoinositide-linkedmetabotropic glutamate receptors in the rat hippocampus. J Neurochem 63:769–772
Shimamoto K, Ohfune Y (1996) Syntheses and conformational analyses of glutamate analogs: 2-(2-carboxy-3-substituted-cyclopropyl)glycines as useful probes for excitatory amino acid receptors. J Med Chem 39:407–423. doi:10.1021/jm9502908
Dowd LA, Robinson MB (1996) Rapid stimulation of EAAC1-mediated Na+-dependent l-glutamate transport activity in C6 glioma cells by phorbol esters. J Neurochem 67:508–516
Daniels KK, Vickroy TW (1999) Reversible activation of glutamate transport in rat brain glia by protein kinase C and an okadaic acid-sensitive phosphoprotein phosphatase. Neurochem Res 24:1017–1025. doi:10.1023/A:1021004809991
Kimmich GA, Roussie J, Manglapus M, Randles J (2001) Characterization of Na+-coupled glutamate aspartate transport by rat brain astrocyte line expressing GLAST and EAAC1. J Membr Biol 182:17–30
Kontny E, Kurowska M, Szczepanska K, Maslinski W (2000) Rottlerin, a PKC isozyme-selective inhibitor, affects signalling events, cytokine production in human monocytes. J Leukoc Biol 67:249–258
Bull ND, Barnett NL (2002) Antagonists of protein kinase C inhibit rat retinal glutamate transport activity in situ. J Neurochem 81:472–480. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2002.00819.x
Koch HP, Kavanaugh MP, Esslinger CS, Zerangue N, Humphrey JM, Amara SG, Chamberlin AR, Bridges RJ (1999) Differentiation of substrate and nonsubstrate inhibitors of the high-affinity, sodium-dependent glutamate transporters. Mol Pharmacol 56:1095–1104
Cooper B, Chebib M, Shen J, King NJC, Darvey IG, Kuchel PW, Rothstein JD, Balcar VJ (1998) Structural selectivity and molecular nature of l-glutamate transport in cultured human fibroblasts. Arch Biochem Biophys 353:356–364. doi:10.1006/abbi.1998.0626
Dunlop J, Lou Z, McIlvain HB (1999) Properties of excitatory amino acid transport in the human U373 astrocytoma cell line. Brain Res 839:235–242. doi:10.1016/S0006-8993(99)01714-X
Anderson CM, Bridges RJ, Chamberlin AR, Shimamoto K, Yasuda-Kamatani Y, Swanson RA (2001) Differing effects of substrate and non-substrate transport inhibitors on glutamate uptake reversal. J Neurochem 79:1207–1216. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2001.00668.x
Jensen AA, Brauner-Osborne H (2004) Pharmacological characterization of human excitatory amino acid transporters EAAT1, EAAT2 and EAAT3 in a fluorescence-based membrane potential assay. Biochem Pharmacol 7:2115–2127. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.013
Bridges RJ, Esslinger CS (2005) The excitatory amino acid transporter: pharmacological insights on substrate and inhibitor specificity of the EAAT subtypes. Pharmacol Ther 107:271–285. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2005.01.002
Balcar VJ, Takamoto A, Yoneda Y (2001) Neurochemistry of l-glutamate transport in the CNS: a review of thirty years of progress. Collect Czech Chem Commun 66:1315–1340. doi:10.1135/cccc20011315
Takamoto A, Quiggin LB, Lieb I, Shave E, Balcar VJ, Yoneda Y (2002) Differences between d- and l-aspartate binding sites on glutamate transporters in frozen sections of rat brain. Life Sci 70:991–1001. doi:10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01478-3
Condorelli DF, Dell’Albani P, Corsaro M, Barresi V, Giuffrida-Stella AM (1993) AMPA-selective glutamate receptor subunits in astroglial cultures. J Neurosci Res 36:344–356. doi:10.1002/jnr.490360312
Porter JT, McCarthy KD (1997) Astrocytic neurotransmitter receptors in situ and in vivo. Prog Neurobiol 51:439–455. doi:10.1016/S0301-0082(96)00068-8
Rose CR, Ransom BR (1996) Mechanism of H+ and Na+ changes induced by glutamate, kainate and d-aspartate in rat hippocampal slices. J Neurosci 16:5393–5404
Sullivan R, Rauen T, Fischer F, Wießner M, Grewer C, Bicho A, Pow DV (2004) Cloning, transport properties and differential localization of two splice variants of GLT-1 in the rat CNS: implications for CNS glutamate homeostasis. Glia 45:155–169. doi:10.1002/glia.10317
Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ (1997) Glutamate uptake stimulates Na+, K+-ATPase activity in astrocytes via activation of a distinct subunit highly sensitive to ouabain. J Neurochem 69:2132–2137
Cholet N, Pellerin L, Magistretti PJ, Hamel E (2002) Similar perisynaptic glial localization for the Na+, K+-ATPase alpha 2-subunit and the glutamate transporters GLAST and GLT in the rat somatosensory cortex. Cereb Cortex 12:515–525. doi:10.1093/cercor/12.5.515
Cholet N, Pellerin L, Welker E, Lacombe P, Seylaz J, Magistretti PJ, Bonvento G (2001) Local injection of antisense oligonucleotides targeted to the glial glutamate transporter GLAST decreases the metabolic response to somatosensory activation. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 21:404–412. doi:10.1097/00004647-200104000-00009
Nanitsos EK, Acosta GB, Saihara Y, Stanton D, Liao LP, Shin JW, Rae C, Balcar VJ (2004) Effects of glutamate transport substrates and glutamate receptor ligands on the activity of Na+/K+-ATPase in brain tissue in vitro. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 31:762–769. doi:10.1111/j.1440-1681.2004.04090.x
Gottlieb M, Wang Y, Teichberg VI (2003) Blood-mediated scavenging of cerebrospinal fluid glutamate. J Neurochem 87:119–126. doi:10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01972.x
Teichberg VI, Cohen-Kashi-Malina K, Cooper I, Zlotnik A (2009) Homeostasis of glutamate in brain fluids: an accelerated brain-to-blood efflux of excess glutamate is produced by blood glutamate scavenging and offers protection from neuropathologies. Neuroscience 158:301–308. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.02.075
Duan S, Anderson CM, Keung EC, Chen Y, Swanson RA (2003) P2X7 receptor mediated release of excitatory amino acids from astrocytes. J Neurosci 23:1320–1328
Coco S, Calegari F, Pravettoni E, Pozzi D, Taverna E, Rosa P, Matteoli M, Verderio C (2003) Storage and release of ATP from astrocytes in culture. J Biol Chem 278:1354–1362. doi:10.1074/jbc.M209454200
Cornell-Bell AH, Finkbeiner SM, Cooper MS, Smith SJ (1990) Glutamate induces calcium waves in cultured astrocytes: long-range glial signalling. Science 247:470–473. doi:10.1126/science.1967852
Haydon PG, Carmignoto G (2006) Astrocyte control of synaptic transmission and vascular coupling. Physiol Rev 86:1009–1031. doi:10.1152/physrev.00049.2005
Acknowledgments
The project was supported by a grant from the Australian Health Management Fund (VJB) and by a Sydney University Sesquicentennial Grant (VJB).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The authors J.-W. Shin and K. T. D. Nguyen have contributed equally.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shin, JW., Nguyen, K.T.D., Pow, D.V. et al. Distribution of Glutamate Transporter GLAST in Membranes of Cultured Astrocytes in the Presence of Glutamate Transport Substrates and ATP. Neurochem Res 34, 1758–1766 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-009-9982-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11064-009-9982-z