Abstract
Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) or Masson tumor has only been reported intracranially in 20 cases and can present as a congenital finding. This pathologic entity is an important diagnostic consideration when evaluating an infant with a congenital intracranial mass. We report a third case of a neonate who presented with the appearance of a metastatic brain tumor involving the orbit, sella, and cerebellum that was ultimately proven to be IPEH. A thorough literature review of IPEH is presented and we discuss this clinical entity and its management.
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia (IPEH) is considered a benign tumor defined as an unusual, exuberant form of nonneoplastic endothelial proliferation found in organizing intravascular thrombi and, uncommonly, in extravascular hematomas [1]. Intracranial examples are very rare and often fail to show an associated vessel or vascular malformation [2]. Only 20 cases have been reported to date. We report a patient who presented shortly after delivery with marked proptosis and multiple intracranial masses.
Case report
The patient presented as a neonate who was born via cesarean at a gestational age of 35 weeks and 4 days to a 23-year-old gravida four para two mother. Apgar scores were 4 at 1 min and 9 at 5 min. The infant demonstrated no significant distress and was noted to have a tense anterior fontanelle measuring 7.5 cm wide. The suture on the vertex was open and extended to the posterior fontanelle. The palate was intact. Significant left proptosis with a grossly normal contralateral right eye was noted. He had normal male features including Tanner 1 genitalia, patent anus, and small sacral dimple. The only skin manifestation was a small blue–grey firm nodule on the anterior left thigh less than 1/4 cm in diameter, thought to be a nevus. No other abnormalities were noted.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a heterogeneous, lobulated, contrast-enhancing suprasellar mass measuring 3.2 × 3.9 × 3.9 cm3. This mass extended along the left optic nerve into the left orbit causing significant proptosis (Fig. 1). The mass extended into the anterior cranial fossa with involvement of the left supraorbital fissure, Meckel cave, and left cavernous sinus. A second contrast-enhancing, heterogeneous mass in the right cerebellum measured 1.8 × 2.0 × 2.0 cm3 with poor formation of the cerebellar vermis and cystic dilation of the fourth ventricle (Fig. 1). MRI of the spine was normal. These findings were suggestive of an aggressive malignant congenital neoplasm.
The initial operation included placement of a right ventriculoperitoneal shunt and biopsy. Orange–brown tumor tissue was obtained from a biopsy through a left supraorbital incision. Histologically, the lesion consisted of fibroblasts and macrophages in a collagen- and vascular-rich stroma. There was no convincing evidence of a neoplastic process identified. Given the radiologic multifocal appearance of the tumor, it was felt that this initial biopsy may not have been a representative specimen and additional biopsy was considered. However, the patient’s family chose not to pursue aggressive therapy or further medical procedures given the expected poor prognosis with the clinical information available. The patient was discharged from the hospital to the care of home hospice without a histopathological diagnosis.
At 9 months of age, the infant was developing significantly better than anticipated. He had only mild delays in growth and development. He was not able to sit on his own or tripod but was able to roll over independently and babble. Repeat imaging revealed that the initial suprasellar mass and orbital component was significantly decreased in size (Fig. 2). Remarkably, the cerebellar “metastasis” had nearly resolved (Fig. 3). Given the clinical course, the patient was referred to oculoplastic surgery for diagnostic tumor excision of the orbit. Ophthalmic examination revealed massive proptosis of the left eye with severe keratinization and opacification of the cornea. Severe chemosis with injection and dessication of the conjunctiva were also present. Examination of the right eye demonstrated normal globe anatomy with nystagmus and subnormal acuity, presumptively secondary to the intracranial pathology. Enucleation with debulking of the orbital tumor was offered to improve comfort and reevaluate the histopathologic findings. Because the suprasellar portion of the mass continued to involve the left cavernous, clinoid, and supraclinoid portions of the internal carotid artery, proximal left middle cerebral artery, and bilateral anterior cerebral artery branches, it was deemed prudent not to attempt surgical removal of the intracranial portion of the lesion with the surgery. Findings at the time of surgery included a grossly small eye with opaque microcornea and firm intraconal orbital tumor.
The neuropathologist (JB) performed standard histopathological slides, and additional immunocytochemistry to conclude that this mass was an IPEH. As seen in Fig. 4, the mass was composed of fibrovascular tissue with numerous large, anomalous blood vessels. Towards the center of the tissue were areas of increased cellularity rimmed by thickened walls of larger blood vessels, suggesting that the proliferation is predominantly within larger vascular structures. In areas, distinct finger-like papillary structures were seen with a thin endothelial lining and dehyalinized cores. Staining for CD34 and CD31 highlighted endothelial cells lining innumerable small vascular channels within the larger blood vessels. There is increased Ki-67 labeling within the cellular areas. Numerous scattered cells within the tissue showed positive staining for factor XIIIa. Stains for CD56, cytokeratin, and myogenin are negative.
Progress after enucleation and tumor debulking was uneventful. The child appeared more comfortable and the anophthalmic socket was fitted for a prosthetic. As the lesion appeared nonmalignant, aggressive intracranial excision of tumor was not offered. The clinical plan was serial monitoring of the intracranial lesion with MRI. Lesions remained stable. The patient progressed well until sudden death occurred approximately 6 months later. Autopsy was refused by the family. Acute intracranial hemorrhage from the intracranial lesion was suspected as the cause of death.
Discussion
First recognized by Pierre Masson [3] in 1923, intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia was believed to represent a true endothelial neoplasm. The diagnosis of IPEH has been documented in the literature to be found in a variety of locations such as the lung, liver, uterus, urethra, gastrointestinal tract, etc. Extracranial IPEH usually presents as a slow-growing nodule that may be somewhat painful. Although the pathogenesis of IPEH continues to be debated, this growth is often associated with thrombosis, either in a normal vessel or in a preexisting vascular lesion. As in our case, IPEH may sometimes be confused clinically and radiologically with a neoplastic process. The lesion histologically consists of an intravascular proliferation of numerous papillae that are composed of a core of connective tissue and an endothelial surface with no malignant features.
IPEH presenting as an intracranial lesion is very rare, with approximately twenty cases reported in the literature (Table 1) [2, 4–17]. This is the third case reported in a neonate, and the clinical and diagnostic findings illustrate the difficult diagnostic course as well as the importance of differentiating IPEH from a malignant neoplastic lesion. From a review of the literature, there appears to be a female predominance (female/male ratio, 18:3). However, intracranial IPEH does not seem to be associated with a specific age group; the age of presentation ranged from 2 days to 75 years. Our case was only one of three males reported with intracranial IPEH. Additionally, only two other cases have been reported to present in the neonatal period. Increased intracranial pressure led to the diagnosis in all three cases. The mass in our patient was quite extensive and precluded adequate surgical resection. In addition, our case also suggests that some of these lesions may spontaneously regress over time.
Signs and symptoms of intracranial IPEH are location dependent and typical of an intracranial space-occupying lesion. Clinical findings are commonly nonspecific as are radiographic findings. Hemorrhage is commonly present. Most cases of IPEH show enhancement on CT or MRI mimicking high-grade tumors. In our case, T1 with contrast demonstrates intense enhancement of the orbital mass and right cerebellar mass (see Fig 1). This imaging appearance is difficult to distinguish from an aggressive malignant neoplasm of the brain. Congenital brain tumors of the central nervous system include highly aggressive malignant tumors such as atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (ATRT), malignant teratomas, and benign or malignant astrocytomas. The clinical presentation and MRI or CT imaging may not adequately distinguish a benign tumor from a malignant tumor, especially where IPEH is considered in the differential diagnosis. Because the imaging appearance of congenital tumors can be quite variable and misleading, obtaining appropriate diagnostic tissue can be the key to the correct diagnosis and management.
When diagnostic tissue is obtained, histologic appearance of IPEH is that of microscopically short blunted papillary projections with a hyalinized core. The projections may be associated with thrombotic material and are covered by a single layer of plump endothelial cells that lack anaplasia, pleomorphism, or significantly elevated mitotic activity. The benign appearance of the endothelial cells differentiates IPEH lesions from angiosarcomas. [13] Immunohistochemistry plays an essential role in establishing the vascular nature of IPEH, but may not play a major role for differential diagnosis among other vascular tumors.
In general, IPEH is considered a benign nonrecurring process, and the literature suggests that it can often be cured with complete surgical excision. However, lesions within the cranium can be difficult to remove in their entirety. In patients with residual disease or recurrence, the role of radiation or chemotherapy is unclear. It is interesting to note that the cerebellar lesion in our patient showed marked regression without treatment, suggesting that this vascular tumor may involute over time in some instances.
In reviewing the literature (Table 1), 57% (12) had subtotal resection or biopsy and 43% (9) achieved complete resection. Of the patients who achieved complete resection, no recurrences were reported. For those with subtotal resection, 42% (5) had recurrence or progression of tumor. However, all but two were still alive with a combination of surgery, radiation, and/or chemotherapy. Although complete resection is preferred, many patients achieve significant long-term survival with subtotal resection. Recurrences can occur late and have been reported 9 years after initial treatment.
In conclusion, we present a case of IPEH presenting as a congenital intracranial tumor with evidence of spontaneous regression. The radiological appearance often appears malignant. Although intracranial IPEH is extraordinarily rare, it should be considered in the differential as prognostic implications differ significantly from malignant congenital tumors. Intracranial IPEH should be considered a “benign” tumor, and complete surgical resection seems to afford the best prognosis. In patients where complete resection is not possible, close observation with serial imaging may be indicated as lesions may stabilize or regress spontaneously without adjuvant therapy. In cases of progression or recurrence, postoperative radiotherapy or radiosurgery should be considered as the main adjuvant therapy for patients and may be effective. Although chemotherapy has been utilized, its clinical effect remains unclear and should be reserved for recurrent or refractory cases, following radiotherapy. Extended long-term followup should be advocated in all patients.
References
Requena L, Sangueza OP (1997) Cutaneous vascular proliferation. Part II. Hyperplasias and benign neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 37(6):887–919;quiz 920–922
Lesley WS, Kupsky WJ, Guthikonda M (2000) Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia arising within a posteroinferior cerebellar artery aneurysm: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 47(4):961–965;discussion 966
Masson M (1923) L’Hemangioendotheliome intravasculaire. Ann. Anat Pathol 93:517
Avellino AM et al (1999) Recurrent intracranial Masson’s vegetant intravascular hemangioendothelioma. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 91(2):308–312
Baylor JE et al (1998) Facial palsy from Masson’s vegetant intravascular hemangioendothelioma. Ear Nose Throat J 77(5):408–410 415–417
Cagli S et al (2004) Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia of the central nervous system–four case reports. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 44(6):302–310
Chen TJ, Kuo T (1984) Giant intracranial Masson’s hemangioma. Report of a fatal case. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108(7):555–556
Duong DH et al (1997) Multiple intracerebral intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139(9):883–886
Izukawa D, Lach B, Benoit B (1987) Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia in an intracranial cavernous hemangioma. Neurosurgery 21(6):939–941
Kristof RA et al (1997) Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia of the sellar region. Report of three cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 86(3):558–563
Nagib MG, Sung JH, Seljeskog EL (1982) Neurocutaneous Masson’s vegetant intravascular hemangioendothelioma. Neurosurgery 11(6):800–803
Patt S, Kaden B, Stoltenburg-Didinger G (1992) Intravascular papillary endothelial hyperplasia at the fissura orbitalis superior: a case report. Clin Neuropathol 11(3):128–130
Sickler GK, Langford LA (1990) Intracranial tumor-forming papillary endothelial hyperplasia–a case report. Clin Neuropathol 9(3):125–128
Stoffman MR, Kim JH (2003) Masson’s vegetant hemangioendothelioma: case report and literature review. J Neurooncol 61(1):17–22
Tsuji N et al (1994) Arteriovenous malformation occluded by Masson’s vegetant intravascular haemangioendothelioma and complicated with intracerebral haematoma. Neurol Res 16(2):148–150
Wen DY et al (1991) Elevated intracranial pressure from cerebral venous obstruction by Masson’s vegetant intravascular hemangioendothelioma. Case report. J Neurosurg 75(5):787–790
Zhang R et al (2005) Papillary endothelial hyperplasia (Masson tumor) of the petrous and jugulare region: case report and literature review. Surg Neurol 64(1):55–60;discussion 60
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Terry Vik and Dr. James Croop at the Indiana University School of Medicine for their instruction and constructive feedback on this manuscript. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shih, CS., Burgett, R., Bonnin, J. et al. Intracranial Masson tumor: case report and literature review. J Neurooncol 108, 211–217 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0799-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0799-2