Introduction

With the development of nanoscience and nanotechnology, the ‘Top–Down’ approach has been used to etch small integrated circuit structures for the pursuit of low weight, high speed and other good performances. However, the inability to etch nanostructures by laser with the shorter wavelength has limited how precisely they can design and fabricate nanocircuits on semiconductor material (ITRS 2013). For fabricating nanoelectronic devices, the ‘Bottom–Up’ processes, such as self-assembly, aggregation, or adsorption, are becoming increasingly popular.

The transition metal nanowires are selected as the bridge between nanodevice performances, such as Ag, Au, etc. Considering the excellent electrical and thermal properties, the Ag NWs are considered to be the promising candidates for future electronic circuit. The interconnect technology of Ag NWs will become a prerequisite for the next generation of nanodevices (van de Groep et al. 2012; Curto et al. 2013; Kim et al. 2013). For getting the excellent nanojoining quality between Ag NWs, many innovative microelectronics technologies were directly applied to interconnection, such as fusion welding (Kim and Jang 2005; Xu et al. 2005; Tohmyoh et al. 2007; Cui et al. 2015), brazing (Dockendorf et al. 2007; Wu et al. 2008; Peng et al. 2008), and solid-phase bonding (Duan et al. 2005; Chen et al. 2006; Shen et al. 2009; Guo 2010). According to the latest research progress, the Ag NW and Ag NW can be well connected experimentally with cold welding technology (Lu et al. 2010). And the light-induced self-limited plasmonic welding method of Ag NW junctions was experimentally performed (Garnett et al. 2012). The effective and promising nanojoining technologies were mainly used to join nanowires aiming at the common crossed Ag NWs junctions, experimentally.

Unfortunately, the nanojoining technology lacks sufficient experimental data, and the determination of structures of Ag NWs interconnection is difficult to be verified because of the unclear nanojoining mechanism. However, molecular dynamics (MD) simulation provides a powerful method to investigate the structural and dynamical properties in a realistic manner (Cui et al. 2013a, b, c, 2014a, b; Pereira and Da Silva 2011; Guo et al. 2012). Consequently, for revealing the dominant mechanism and providing a fundamental understanding of how ‘hot’ and ‘cold’ welding technology, respectively, affects the atomic contact configuration, the detailed nanojoining process of the crossed Ag nanowires was simulated as the main research objective in this paper.

Computational methodology

Figure 1 presents the atomic structural model of the crossed Ag NWs on the [1 0 0] plane of Si substrate. For getting accurate and effective physical data to reveal the nanojoining mechanism, the key of MD simulation is the selection of the interatomic force field, which determines the work load, accuracy of simulation results, and the degree of approximation between the calculation model and the real system. So the powerful COMPASS (Condensed-phase Optimized Molecular Potentials for Atomistic Simulation Studies) force field, as a parameterized, tested and validated first ab initio force field, was selected in the MD simulation of nanojoining process, which enables an accurate prediction of condensed matter physics (Sun 1994, 1998; Cui et al. 2013a, b, c, 2014a, b; Yan et al. 2009). In the COMPASS force field, the total potential energy of system includes the valence terms and non-bonded interaction terms, and the valence terms are composed of diagonal term E bond and off-diagonal cross-coupling term E cross, which are given by the following functions.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Different atomic structural views for nanojoining process of the crossed Ag nanowires

$$E_{\text{total}} = E_{\text{valence}} + E_{\text{non - bond}} = E_{\text{bond}} + E_{\text{cross}} + E_{\text{non - bond}}$$
(1)
$$\begin{aligned} E_{\text{bond}} =\, & E_{b} + E_{\theta } + E_{\phi } + E_{\chi } \\ = & \sum\limits_{b} {\left[ {K_{2} (b - b_{0} )^{2} + K_{3} (b - b_{0} )^{3} + K_{4} (b - b_{0} )^{4} } \right]} \\ {\kern 1pt} & + \sum\limits_{\theta } {\left[ {H_{2} (\theta - \theta_{0} )^{2} + H_{3} (\theta - \theta_{0} )^{3} + H_{4} (\theta - \theta_{0} )^{4} } \right]} \\ & + \sum\limits_{\phi } {\left[ {V_{1} (1 - \cos \phi ) + V_{2} (1 - \cos 2\phi ) + V_{3} (1 - \cos 3\phi )} \right]} \\ & + \sum\limits_{\chi } {K_{\chi } } (\chi - \chi_{0} )^{2} \\ \end{aligned}$$
(2)
$$\begin{aligned} E_{cross} =\, & E_{bb'} + E_{b\theta } + E_{b\phi } + E_{\theta \theta '} + E_{\theta \theta '\phi } \\ {\kern 1pt} = & \sum\limits_{b,b'} {F_{b,b'} } (b - b_{0} )(b^{'} - b_{0}^{'} ) \\ & + \sum\limits_{b,\theta } {F_{b,\theta } } (b - b_{0} )(\theta - \theta_{0} ) \\ & + \sum\limits_{b,\phi } {(b - b_{0} )\left[ {F_{b,\phi }^{(1)} (1 - \cos \phi ) + F_{b,\phi }^{(2)} (1 - 2\cos \phi ) + F_{b,\phi }^{(3)} (1 - 3\cos \phi )} \right]} \\ & + \sum\limits_{\theta ,\theta '} {F_{\theta ,\theta '} (\theta - \theta_{0} )} (\theta^{'} - \theta_{0}^{'} ) \\ & + \sum\limits_{\theta ,\theta '\phi } {F_{\theta ,\theta '\phi } (\theta - \theta_{0} )} (\theta^{'} - \theta_{0}^{'} )\cos \phi \\ \end{aligned}$$
(3)
$$E_{\text{non - bond}} = E_{{\text{LJ}}} + E_{{\text{elec}}} = \sum\limits_{i,j} {\varepsilon_{ij} } \left[ {2\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{ij}^{0} }}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{9} - 3\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{ij}^{0} }}{{r_{ij} }}} \right)^{6} } \right] + \sum\limits_{i,j} {\frac{{q_{i} q_{j} }}{{\varepsilon_{0} r_{ij} }}}$$
(4)

here E b , E θ , E ϕ , and E χ represents bond, angle, torsion, and out-of-plane angle coordinates, and E bb, E , E , E θθ, and E θθϕ give cross-coupling term between internal coordinates, respectively. The non-bonded term E non-bond includes Lennard–Jones (LJ) 9–6 potential function for the vdW interaction E LJ and a Coulomb term for electrostatic interactions. And it is used for interaction between pairs of atoms that are separated by three or more intervening atoms, or those that belong to different molecules. Thereinto, the LJ potential parameters are listed in Table 1, and the ε represents the bonding strength between atoms and σ gives the atomic interaction radius (Timpel et al. 1997).

Table 1 Sets of Lennard–Jones (LJ) potential parameters

Results and discussion

In the MD simulation, the nanojoining process was performed under the constant NVT ensemble with the Andersen thermostat. The initial velocities of all atoms were set as Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution, and the Velocity Verlet was selected as integration method. Taking into account the nanojoining simulation that aims to explore contact behavior of Ag NWs and interfacial characteristics based on the nanometer size effect, the positions of all Si atoms were constrained in the x, y and z direction based on the characteristics of macro silicon substrate material. And non-period boundary conditions were imposed on the three directions of the total simulation system due to the size effect of Ag NWs with the diameter of 2 nm.

During the simulation process of nanojoining, the atomic configuration and energy should be equilibrated to a stable state for getting accurate atomic physical information. So Fig. 2 gives the potential energy evolution of the total system with the simulation time of 1 ns at the different temperatures. The result shows that the fluctuation depends on temperature. Larger energy fluctuation exists at the higher temperature and vice versa. This is because the initial Ag atoms are applied at the high random velocities in the thermostat with high temperature, and more vigorous movement appears subsequently. The average atomic volume increases based on the vigorous movement, which causes the dramatical augment of potential energy. However, as for the potential energy, it needs to take a long time to fall for keeping the minimization of system energy. So the simulation system will also take a long time to reach the steady state for obtaining the final accurate atomic configurations with the interaction of the atoms. Namely, at the lower temperature, the potential energy will quickly achieve the stable state with small fluctuation from the relatively earlier simulation time. And the potential energy takes about 450 ps to reach approximate equilibrium state at the higher temperature of 800 K. From the stable equilibrium state of potential energy in Fig. 2, the values of potential energy seem to be close at the relatively lower and higher temperatures. But, based on the average atomic volume at the different temperature, the final stable potential energy subsequently increases as the temperature rises. Then, the final accurate atomic configuration can be got in the stable condition at different temperatures. Considering the nanojoining temperature, the simulation time was set to 1 ns during the nanojoining process of the crossed Ag NWs.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Potential energy evolution of the total system with simulation time at the different temperature during nanojoining process with 1 ns

For studying the ‘hot’ nanowelding between the crossed Ag NWs, Fig. 3 firstly displays the final atomic configurations with the simulation time of 1 ns at the different temperatures. As the initial atomic configuration, the two nanowires have the perfect crossed configuration without nanojoining operation. Increasing the nanojoining temperature to 500 K and 800 K, the corresponding final atomic configurations were got with achieving the nanointerconnect operation between nanowires. As the atomic configuration at the temperature of 500 K, the Ag NWs nanoconnection quality is relatively perfect with keeping its shape. By contrast, at the temperature of 800 K, although the Ag NWs are connected with the diffusion effect of Ag atoms at the crossed area, the nanostructures of Ag NWs have been seriously deformed with shorter length and larger diameter, showing relatively obvious melting characteristics with the chaotic atomic structures based on our previous researches (Cui et al. 2013a, b, c, 2014a, b). For studying the thermodynamical behavior of Ag atoms in detail, Fig. 4 shows the different atomic configurations at the different simulation times. At the shorter time of 10 ps, Ag NWs maintain good overall 1-D structures with larger length and smaller diameter. The two Ag NWs are connected together through the interaction and interpenetration of Ag NWs between lower part of upper nanowire and upper part of lower nanowire. At the same time, the larger interstice exists between the upper nanowire and lower nanowire. As time goes on, the interstice gradually becomes small, which mainly depends on the motion direction of Ag atoms of the upper Ag NW. And during the nanojoining process of the crossed Ag NWs, the Ag atoms of the upper Ag NW at the position of the interstice can be subjected to the interactive forces from the Si atoms of substrate and the Ag atoms of the lower Ag NW. Then, some Ag atoms can move toward the substrate surface, and they also lead to the downward movement of the neighboring Ag atoms due to the strong effect of metal bonds, with the interstice becoming smaller. In addition, with diffusion effect of Ag atoms at the crossed junction, the contact area gradually increases, comparing the small contact area at the relatively earlier simulation time. As the final atomic configuration at 1 ns, the upper and lower Ag NWs are nearly in the same plane. So the quality of connection region is becoming better as time goes on, but with the defect of self-appearance of Ag NWs. When the time is 1 ns, the final atomic configuration is formed. The interstice disappears and the nanowires have been seriously deformed in Fig. 4c. Then, combining the final configuration formation phenomenon and the irregular structures of surface atoms, it indicates that the Ag NWs are in the molten state, showing the obvious flow and wetting characteristics.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Time-averaged nanojoining configurations of the crossed Ag nanowires with the simulation time of 1 ns at the different temperature

Fig. 4
figure 4

Snapshots for instantaneous configurations of the crossed Ag nanowires with the simulation time of 1 ns at the temperature of 800 K

To further study the effect of temperature on the nanojoining and discuss the thermodynamical behavior of Ag NWs, Fig. 5 gives the radial distribution function (RDF) curves of the crossed Ag NWs at the different temperatures, which is widely used to describe the structural characteristics of liquid and amorphous state and it is defined as:

$$\rho g(r) = N^{ - 1} \left[ {\sum\limits_{i \ne j} {\delta (r + R_{i} - R_{j} )} } \right]$$
(5)

where ρ is the average density of the system, r represents the distance between atoms, δ gives the Dirac delta function, and N is the total number of atoms. And g(r) reflects the distribution of an atom surrounded by other atoms, which is the probability of another atom found within the spatial extent of radius r + δ(r) when an atom is identified as the center. In the nanojoining simulations, at the temperature of 300 K, the RDF curve has the highest and most sharp peaks, which indicates the Ag NWs are in the solid state. When the temperature increases to 500 K, each peak of RDF curve is relatively high and sharp and the atomic arrangement of surface Ag atoms is not regular, which shows that the Ag NWs may be in the premelting state of surface structures and the solid state of internal structures, accompanying that Ag atoms vibrate and rotate near the balance position under the role of metal bonds with volume expansion of Ag NWs. So the Ag NWs as a whole show the characteristics of solid state. Increased to 800 K, the peaks of the RDF curve are gradually wakened and disappear while the grooves are filled to tend to the straight line direction, indicating that the Ag NWs have melted in the liquid state. So, as the final atomic configuration in Fig. 4c shows, the Ag NWs are in the melting state. If the adhesive force is ignored, with the effect of surface tension, the two Ag NWs will melt and form a similar circular structure in accordance with the behavior trends of the all Ag atoms. And even considering the effect of adhesion between Ag NWs and Si substrate, the similar circular configuration is also easily formed at the higher temperature, such as 1000 K. Consequently, the high temperature is not suitable for nanojoining process.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Radial distribution function curves of the crossed Ag nanowires at different temperature

To solve the problems caused by high temperature, the nanojoining temperature should be reduced. For studying the nanojoining characteristics and ‘cold’ welding at the lower temperature, the evolution of atomic configuration was performed at 300 K in Fig. 6. Overall, as the atomic configurations of crossed Ag NWs during nanojoining, the lower blue Ag nanowire was almost unchanged practically. By comparison, the atomic structures of upper green nanowire changed obviously. As is shown by the nanojoining simulation of the initial atomic configuration in Fig. 1, at the time of 10–100 ps, the upper green nanowire structures become more compact toward the vertical blue nanowire due to the interaction of the two Ag nanowires, which also depends on metal bonds effect of all atoms to minimize the energy of the system. However, when the simulation time is 200, 500 ps and 1 ns, the total length of upper nanowire was further reduced, accompanying that the left half is shorter and thicker than the right half in surface profile, primarily because the spatial position of the two Ag NWs is not strictly symmetrical and small distance changes will affect the Van der Waals force between atoms, going with changing the motion of atoms and showing different morphologies.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Snapshots for instantaneous configurations of the crossed Ag nanowires with the simulation time of 1 ns at the temperature of 300 K

In order to further investigate the formation and characteristics of nanojunction of the crossed Ag NWs during the nanojoining process, Fig. 7 represents the instantaneous atomic configurations in xz plane. At the low temperature of 300 K, the two nanowires are well connected as time goes on, and the interstices gradually become smaller. In addition, because the thermal motion and diffusion of atoms are weak at the low temperature, the interstices always exist between the Si surface and the upper Ag nanowire, and the two nanowires are partially contacted with partial mixture of Ag atoms, which is different from the nanojoining atomic configuration at the high temperature in Fig. 4c. During the nanojoining process, the profile of the left interstice is basically similar to the right part as the initial atomic configuration. However, the profile difference appears from 10 to 500 ps with similar morphologies of different sizes, such as the difference between the interstice in the red circle and the interstice in the red rectangle in Fig. 7f, the reason of which also lies in the effect of Van der Waals force induced by the spatial position of the atoms. And when the time is relatively long at 500 ps and 1 ns, the contour size no longer changes in the Fig. 7f and g, getting the final nanojoining atomic configuration. The phenomenon that Ag nanowires gradually become shorter and thicker can also be clearly seen from the nanojoining configurations in xz plane. However, the obvious dislocation phenomenon appears at low temperature during nanojoining process, such as the dislocations in Fig. 7c. And over time, the dislocations will evolve with that in Fig. 7c changing into ones in Fig. 7g. The dislocation phenomenon is determined by the spatial position and thermal dynamic performance of atoms. As for the spatial position of the two Ag NWs, the interstice can provide more movement space for the Ag atoms of the upper nanowire. Subsequently, the nanojoining temperature empowers the Ag atoms to possess the strong thermal dynamic properties. With the strong effect of metal bonds at the same time, Ag atoms close to the central position can move a greater distance, comparing the initial and final atomic configurations. Due to the larger differences of displacements at the different positions, the dislocations always persist in the nanojoining process. All in all, the Ag NWs can be well connected with a small amount of dislocations at low temperature as cold welding. In addition, if we want to improve the nanojoining efficiency under the premise of getting the quality of nanojunction, the interconnect temperature can be appropriately increased under premise of ensuring that the Ag NWs are not damaged.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Snapshots for instantaneous configurations (xz plane) of the crossed Ag nanowires with the simulation time of 1 ns at the temperature of 300 K

Conclusions

The investigation of the nanojoining of the crossed Ag NWs was carried out using molecular dynamics simulation. Through the detailed atomic evolution configurations, the nanojoining process could be accomplished with different nanojunction characteristics at high and low temperature, respectively. When the nanojoining temperature is high, although the Ag NWs are connected with the diffusion effect of Ag atoms at the crossed nanojunction area, the nanostructures of Ag NWs have been seriously deformed with shorter length and larger diameter, showing relatively obvious melting characteristics based on the chaotic atomic structures. Thus, high temperature is not suitable for nanojoining. If the temperature is reduced to 300 K as cold welding, the crossed Ag NWs can be partially contacted with partial mixture of Ag atoms, and the interstices always exist between the Si surface and the upper Ag nanowire. In addition, the obvious dislocation phenomenon will appear and evolve as times go on. If we want to improve the nanojoining efficiency under the premise of getting the quality of nanojunction, the interconnect temperature can be appropriately increased, in the case of ensuring that the Ag NWs are not damaged. All in all, the Ag NWs can be well connected with a small amount of dislocations at low temperature as cold welding. And the elimination methods of dislocation need to be further studied for the better mechanical, thermal and electrical properties.