Abstract
This squib presents a rebuttal to two of King’s (Complex demonstratives: A quantificational account. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2001) arguments that complex demonstratives are quantifier phrases like every man. The first is in response to King’s argument that because complex demonstratives induce weak crossover effects, they are quantifier phrases. I argue that unlike quantifier phrases and like other definite determiner phrases, complex demonstratives in object position can corefer with singular pronouns contained in the subject DP. Although complex demonstratives could undergo LF-movement, the ruling out by weak crossover is empirically undetectable. The second rebuttal is in response to King’s argument that because complex demonstratives allow antecedent-contained deletion, they are quantifier phrases. I present data showing that along with quantifier phrases, complex demonstratives pattern with proper names in allowing ACD with restrictive modification, but usually not with non-restrictive modification.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Baltin M. (1987). Do antecedent-contained deletions exist?. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 279–295
Chomsky N. (1976). Conditions on rules in grammar. Linguistic Analysis 2, 303–351
Emonds J. (1979). Appositive relatives have no properties. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 211–243
Fox D. (2002). Antecedent-contained deletion and the copy theory of movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 63–96
Harley H. (2002). WCO, ACD and QR of DPs. Linguistic Inquiry 33, 659–664
Higginbotham J. (1980). Pronouns and bound variables. Linguistic Inquiry 11, 679–708
Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammer. Oxford, Blackwell
Hornstein N. (1995). Logical form: From GB to minimalism. Oxford, Blackwell
Isac D. (2006). In defense of a quantificational account of definite DPs. Linguistic Inquiry 37, 275–288
Jacobson, P. (1972). Crossover and related phenomena. MA Thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
Jacobson, P. (1977). The syntax of crossing coreference sentences. PhD dissertation, University of California, Berkeley. (Published 1980, Garland Press.)
Johnson K., Lepore E. (2002). Does syntax reveal semantics? A case study of complex demonstratives. Philosophical Perspectives 16, 17–41
Kaplan D. (1977). Demonstratives. In: Almog J., Perry J., Wettstein S. (eds). Themes from Kaplan. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 481-614
King J. (1999). Are complex that phrases devices of direct reference?. Noûs 33, 155–182
King J. (2001). Complex Demonstratives: A quantificational account. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press
King, J. (2002). Author critics. Presented at the American Philosophical Association (APA) meeting in Seattle, Washington, March 27–31, 2002.
Koopman H., Sportiche D. (1982). Variables and the bijection principles. The Linguistic Review 2, 139–160
Lasnik H. (1999). Minimalist analysis. Oxford, Blackwell
May R. (1985). Logical Form: Its structures and derivation. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 12. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press
Poesio M., Modjeska N. (2005). Focus, activation, and this-noun phrases: An empirical study. In Branco A., McEnemy T., Mitkov R. (eds). Anaphora processing: Linguistic cognitive and computational modeling. Amsterdam, John Benjamins, pp. 429-456
Postal P. (1993). Remarks on weak crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 24, 539–556
Potts C. (2001). (Only) some crossover effects repaired. Snippets 3, 13–14
Reinhart T. (1983a). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago, University of Chicago Press
Reinhart T. (1983b). Coreference and anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora question. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47–88
Roberts C. (2002). Demonstratives as definites. In: van Deemter K., Kibble R. (eds). Information sharing. Stanford, CSLI, pp. 89-136
Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass.
Safir K. (1984). Multiple variable binding. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 603–638
Sag, I. (1976). Deletion and logical form. PhD dissertation, MIT Press.
Stowell, T. (2003). Parenthetically. Ms. University of California, Los Angeles.
Wolter, L. (2006). That’s that: The semantics and pragmatics of demonstrative noun phrases. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Wyngaerd, G. V., & Zwart, J. W. (1991). Reconstruction and vehicle change. In F. Drijkoningen & A. van Kemenade (Eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1991. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeevat (1999). Demonstratives in discourse. Journal of Semantics 16, 279–313
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Altshuler, D. WCO, ACD and what they reveal about complex demonstratives. Nat Lang Semantics 15, 265–277 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9018-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-007-9018-7