Abstract
A series of studies have distinguished two types of but, namely, corrective and counterexpectational. The difference between these two types has been considered largely semantic/pragmatic. This article shows that the semantic difference also translates into a different syntax for each type of but. More precisely, corrective but always requires clause-level coordination, with apparent counterexamples being derived through ellipsis within the second conjunct. On the other hand, counterexpectational but is not restricted in this way, and offers the possibility of coordination of both clausal and subclausal constituents. From this difference, it is possible to derive a number of syntactic asymmetries between corrective and counterexpectational but.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, and Oswald Ducrot. 1977. Deux mais en français? Lingua 43: 23–40.
Barwise, Jon, and Robin Cooper. 1981. Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics & Philosophy 4: 159–219.
Bianchi, Valentina, and Roberto Zamparelli. 2004. Edge coordinations: focus and conjunction reduction. In Peripheries: syntactic edges and their effects, eds. David Adger, Cécile de Cat, and George Tsoulas, 313–328. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Blackmore, Diane. 1989. Denial and contrast: a Relevance Theoretic account of but. Linguistics & Philosophy 12: 15–37.
Blackmore, Diane. 2000. Indicators and procedures: nevertheless and but. Journal of Linguistics 36: 463–486.
Bosque, Ignacio. 1980. Sobre la negación. Madrid: Cátedra.
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional categories: a cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Culicover, Peter, and Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler syntax. Oxford: Blackwell.
Depiante, Marcela. 2000. The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: a study of null complement anaphora and stripping/bare argument ellipsis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Depiante, Marcela. 2004. Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística 1: 53–69.
Drubig, Hans Bernhard. 1994. Island constraints and the syntactic nature of focus and association with focus. Arbeitspapiere des SFB 340, n. 51, Tübingen.
Evans, Gareth. 1980. Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 337–362.
Fox, Danny. 1999. Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196.
Fukui, Naoki, and Hiromu Sakai. 2003. The visibility guideline for functional categories: verb raising in Japanese and related issues. Lingua 113: 321–375.
Gallego, Ángel. 2004. Minimalist edge coordinations. Manuscript Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts, eds. Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan, 43–58. New York: Academic Press.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Constraints on deletion in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, Yale University.
Horn, Laurence. 1989. A natural history of negation. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kennedy, Christopher, and Jason Merchant. 2000. Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 18: 89–146.
Laka, Itziar. 1990. Negation in syntax: on the nature of functional categories and projections. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Lakoff, Robin. 1971. If’s, and’s and but’s about conjunction. In Studies in linguistic semantics, eds. Charles Fillmore and D. Terence Langendoen, 114–149. New York: Holt.
Langacker, Ronald. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In Modern studies in English, eds. Sanford Schane and David Reibel, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Lasnik, Howard. 1972. Analyses of negation in English. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of NELS 31, eds. Kim Minjoo and Uri Strauss, 301–320. Amherst: GLSA.
McCawley, James. 1991. Contrastive negation and metalinguistic negation. In CLS 27: the parasession on negation, eds. Lise Dobrin, Lynn Nichols, and Rosa Rodríguez, 189–206. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2004a. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics & Philosophy 27: 661–738.
Merchant, Jason. 2004b. Remarks on stripping. Ms., University of Chicago.
Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Topics in ellipsis, ed. Kyle Johnson, 132–153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion of ‘sentence’. In Issues in linguistics: papers in honor of Henry and Renée Kahane, eds. Braj Kachru, Robert Lees, Yakov Malkiel, Angelina Pietrangeli, and Sol Saporta, 719–751. Urbana–Champaign: UIUC Press.
Munn, Alan. 1993. Topics in the syntax and semantics of coordinate structures. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Nykiel, Joanna, and Ivan Sag. 2009. Sluicing and stranding. In Handout, 2009 LSA Annual Meeting.
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word order and clause structure in Spanish and other Romance languages. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998a. Structure for coordination, Part I. GLOT International 3: 3–6.
Progovac, Ljiljana. 1998b. Structure for coordination, Part II. GLOT International 3: 3–9.
Reinhart, Tanya. 1991. Elliptical conjunctions: non-quantificational LF. In The Chomskyan turn, ed. Asa Kasher, 360–384. Oxford: Blackwell.
Repp, Sophie. 2005. Interpreting ellipsis: the changeable presence of negation in gapping. Doctoral dissertation, Humboldt Universität, Berlin.
Rodrigues, Cilene, Andrew Nevins, and Luis Vicente. 2009. Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and preposition stranding. In Romance languages and linguistic theory 2006, eds. Danièle Torck and W. Leo Wetzels, 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Romero, Maribel. 1998. Focus and reconstruction effects in wh- phrases. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Ross, John. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
Ross, John. 1969. Guess who? In Proceedings of CLS 5, ed. Robert Binnick, 252–286.
Sag, Ivan, Gerald Gazdar, Tom Wasow, and Steven Weisler. 1985. Coordination and how to distinguish categories. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3: 117–171.
Sauerland, Uli. 1996. Guess how? In Proceedings of ConSOLE 4, eds. João Costa, Rob Goedemans, and Ruben van de Vijver, 297–309. Leiden: SOLE.
Soltan, Usama. 2007. On formal feature licensing in minimalism: aspects of Standard Arabic morphosyntax. Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park.
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and thoughts: subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ticio, Emma. 2003. On the structure of DPs. Doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Toosarvandani, Maziar. 2009. Contrastive ‘but’ involves gapping not in Farsi but in English. In Handout, LSA 2009 annual meeting.
Umbach, Carla. 2005. Contrast and information structure: a focus-based analysis of but. Linguistics 43: 207–232.
van Koppen, Marjo. 2005. One probe, two goals: aspects of agreement in Dutch dialects. Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University.
van der Wouden, Ton. 1997. Negative contexts. Doctoral dissertation, University of Groningen.
Vicente, Luis. 2006. Short negative replies in Spanish. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 23, eds. van de Weijer, Jeroen, and Bettelou Los, 199–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Vicente, Luis. 2008. Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Manuscript University of California, Santa Cruz.
von Fintel, Kai. 1994. Restrictions on quantifier domains. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2008. Nor: neither disjunction nor paradox. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 511–522.
Zeijlstra, Hedde. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vicente, L. On the syntax of adversative coordination. Nat Lang Linguist Theory 28, 381–415 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9094-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-010-9094-0