Abstract
This paper analyzes verbs that can enter into a transitive (The students wrote a lab report), benefactive double object (The students wrote their professor a lab report) and particle verb (The students wrote up a lab report) construction. The analysis is situated within the Distributed Morphology framework. It argues for the presence of a small clause structure only in the particle verb construction and not in the benefactive construction; the particle merges directly with the Root while the benefactive possessive element merges with an already categorized verb. The benefactive differs from the better researched dative in that the dative does involve a caused possession small clause structure. Particle verbs can occur in double object constructions, but they involve a benefactive-like syntax and not a caused possession small clause analysis. Furthermore, I argue that the Roots that underlie these verbs are relationless and underspecified with respect to meaning, supporting the idea that the functional vocabulary introduces arguments and fully specifies the meaning of the Roots. However, rather than adopting the position that an object is introduced at only one point in the derivation, this analysis shows that an object can be introduced at several different points within the derivation. Finally, this paper shows that argument merger is sensitive to the phase structure of the clause.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Arad, Maya. 2003. Locality constraints on the interpretation of Roots: The case of Hebrew denominal verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(4): 737–778.
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring sense. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5(3): 167–218.
Bošković, Željko. 2004. Be careful where you float your quantifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 22(4): 681–742.
Bresnan, Joan, and Lioba Moshi. 1993. Object asymmetries in comparative Bantu syntax. In Theoretical aspects of Bantu grammar, ed. Sam A. Mchombo, 47–91. Stanford: CSLI.
Cappelle, Bert. 2002. And up it rises: Particle preposition in English. In Verb-particle explorations, eds. Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre, and Silke Urban, 43–66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A life in language, ed. Michael Kenstowicz, 1–52. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Diesing, Molly, and Eloise Jelinek. 1995. Distributing arguments. Natural Language Semantics 3(2): 123–176.
den Dikken, Marcel. 1995. Particles: On the syntax of verb-particle, triadic, and causative constructions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 355–392.
Embick, David, and Rolf Noyer. 2004. Distributed morphology and the syntax/morphology interface. Manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press.
Farrell, Patrick. 2005. English verb-preposition constructions: Constituency and order. Language 81(1): 96–137.
Folli, Rafaella, and Heidi Harley. 2005. Flavors of v. In Aspectual inquiries, eds. Paula Kempchinsky and Roumyana Slabakova, 95–120. Dordrecht: Springer.
Fraser, Bruce. 1978. The verb-particle combination in English. New York: Academic Press.
Halle, Morris, and Alec Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The view from Building Twenty: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, eds. Ken Hale and Samuel J. Keyser, 111–176. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi. 1995. Subjects, events and licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Harley, Heidi. 2002. Possession and the double object construction. In Linguistic variation yearbook 2, ed. Pierre Pica, 31–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Harley, Heidi. 2007. The bipartite structure of verbs crosslinguistically. Manuscript, University of Arizona.
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74: 101–139.
Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9(4): 577–636.
Kayne, Richard. 1985. Principles of particle constructions. In Grammatical representation, eds. Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer, and Jean-Yves Pollock, 101–140. Dordrecht: Foris.
Keyser, S. Jay, and Thomas Roeper. 1992. Re: The abstract clitic hypothesis. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 89–125.
Kiparsky, Paul. 1997. Remarks on denominal verbs. In Complex predicates, eds. Alex Alsina, Joan Bresnan, and Peter Sells, 473–499. Stanford: CSLI.
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase structure and the lexicon, eds. Johan Rooryck and Laurie Zaring, 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kratzer, Angelika. 2000. Building statives. In BLS 26: Proceedings of the 26th annual meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, eds. Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Darya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf, and Alan C.L. Yu, 385–399. Berkeley: BLS.
Levin, Beth. 1993. English verb classes and alternations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Levin, Beth and Malka Rappaport Hovav. 1995. Unaccusativity: At the syntax/lexical semantics interface. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Marantz, Alec. 1996. “Cat” as a phrasal idiom: Consequences of late insertion in Distributed Morphology. Manuscript, MIT.
Marantz, Alec. 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. In University of Pennsylvania working papers in linguistics: Proceedings of the 21st annual penn linguistics colloquium, eds. Alexis Dimitriadis, Laura Siegel, Clarissa Surek-Clark, and Alexander Williams, 201–225. Philadelphia: PWPL.
Marantz, Alec. 2000. Roots: The Universality of Root and Pattern Morphology. Paper presented at the conference on Afro-Asiatic languages, University of Paris VII.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Event paths, conflation, argument structure and VP shells. Linguistics 42(3): 523–571.
McIntyre, Andrew. 2007. Silent possessive PPs: English double objects. Handout of an invited talk, University of Geneva.
Neeleman, Ad. 2002. Particle placement. In Verb-particle explorations, eds. Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre, and Silke Urban, 141–164. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pesetsky, David. 1989. The earliness principle. Manuscript, MIT.
Pinker, Steven. 1999. Words and rules. London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson.
Pylkkänen, Lina. 2002. Introducing arguments. Unpublished PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ramchand, Gillian. 2006. First phase syntax. Manuscript, University of Tromsø.
Ramchand, Gillian, and Peter Svenonius. 2002. Lexical syntax and lexical semantics of the Verb-particle construction. In WCCFL 21: Proceedings of the 21st west CoaSt conference on formal linguistics, eds. Line Mikkelsen and Christopher Potts, 387–400. Somerville: Cascadilla Press.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 1998. Building verb meanings. In The projection of arguments: Lexical and syntactic constraints, eds. Miriam Butt and Wilhelm Geuder, 97–134. Stanford: CSLI.
Rappaport Hovav, Malka, and Beth Levin. 2008. The English dative alternation: The case for verb sensitivity. Journal of Linguistics 44: 129–167.
Ritter, Elizabeth, and Sara Thomas Rosen. 1999. Event structure and ergativity. In Events as grammatical objects, eds. Carol Tenny and James Pustejovsky, 187–238. Stanford: CSLI.
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. In Nordyld 32(2), ed. Peter Svenonius, 205–252. Tromsø: CASTL.
van Hout, Angeliek. 2000. Event semantics in the lexicon-syntax interface: Verb frame alternations in Dutch and their acquisition. In Events as grammatical objects, eds. Carol L. Tenny and James Pustejovsky, 239–282. Stanford: CSLI.
Van Valin, Robert, and Randy LaPolla. 1997. An introduction to syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2000. The structure(s) of particle verbs. Manuscript, McGill University.
Zeller, Jochen. 1996. On verbal modifiers and their thematic properties. Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Zeller, Jochen. 2001. Particle verbs and local domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Zeller, Jochen. 2002. Particle verbs are heads and phrases. In Verb-particle explorations, eds. Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre, and Silke Urban, 233–267. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zhang, Niina. 2006. Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basilico, D. Particle verbs and benefactive double objects in English: high and low attachments. Nat Language Linguistic Theory 26, 731–773 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9057-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-008-9057-x