Abstract
This paper provides an analysis of articles in two unrelated languages: St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish) and English child language. The article systems in these two languages display striking parallels, diverging in similar ways from that of English adult language. Our analysis involves a parametric difference between English and St’át’imcets. While in English adult language, article distinctions rely on the state of the common ground between speaker and hearer, in St’át’imcets they rely on speaker beliefs. Despite the similarities between the patterns of article use in St’át’imcets and child English, we propose that English-acquiring children set the parameter correctly for the English value very early, but that they initially lack a pragmatic concept requiring them to distinguish systematically between their own beliefs and the belief state of their interlocutor. This neutralizes the distinction between the two parameter values, causing the article system of English-speaking children to optionally resemble that of St’át’imcets adults. In terms of language acquisition theory, our study supports a revised version of the Strong Continuity Hypothesis, according to which children obey all principles of Universal Grammar and set parameters as soon as the relevant input is available. Any structures deviating from target language structures result from an immature pragmatic system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sergic. 2000. Grammatical Features and the Acquisition of Reference. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Mark Baker (1996) The Polysynthesis Parameter Oxford University Press New York
Hagit Borer (1983) Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages Foris Dordrecht
Hagit Borer Kenneth Wexler (1987) ‘The Maturation of Syntax’ T. Roeper E. Williams (Eds) Parameter Setting Reidel Dordrecht 123–172
Borer, Hagit and Kenneth Wexler. 1988. ‘The Maturation of Grammatical Principles’, ms., University of California, Irvine, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Roger Brown (1973) A First Language Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
Chierchia, Gennaro, Stephen Crain, Maria Terese Guasti and Rosalind Thornton. 1997. ‘‘‘Some’’ and ‘‘Or’’: A Study on the Emergence of Logical Form’, in 22nd Annual Boston University Conference on Child Language Development, Boston, MA.
Noam Chomsky (1993) ‘A Minimalist Program for Linguistic Theory’ K. Hale S.J. Keyser (Eds) The View from Building 20 MIT Press Cambridge MA 1–52
Harald Clahsen (1992) ‘Learnability Theory and the Problem of Development in Language Acquisition’ J. Weissenborn H. Goodluck T. Roeper (Eds) Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 53–76
Conti, Rachel. 1999. ‘Presupposition Violations’, ms., University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Davis, Henry. 1999. ‘Pronominal Determiners’, in Ben-Gurion University of the Negev.
Davis, Henry. 2001. ‘Is there a Pronominal Argument Parameter?’, in Utrecht OTS Workshop on Argument and Agreement.
Molly Diesing (1992) Indefinites MIT Press Cambridge, MA
Mürvet Enç (1991) ArticleTitle‘The Semantics of Specificity’ Linguistic Inquiry 22 1–25
Sascha Felix (1987) Cognition and Language Growth Foris Dordrecht.
Fukui, Naoko. 1986. A Theory of Category Projection and its Applications, Ph.D dissertation, MIT.
Naoko Fukui Margaret Speas (1986) ArticleTitle‘Specifiers and Projections’ MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 8 128–172
Talmy Givón (1978) ‘Definiteness and Referentiality’ J. Greenberg (Eds) Universals of Human Language 4 Stanford University Press Stanford 291–330
Helen Goodluck (1991) Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Introduction Basil Blackwell Cambridge, MA
John Hawkins (1978) Definiteness and Indefiniteness Croom Helm London
John Hawkins (1991) ArticleTitle ‘On (In)definiteness and Articles: Implicatures and (Un)grammaticality Prediction’ Journal of Linguistics 27 405–442
Heim, Irene. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst (Garland, New York, 1988).
Irene Heim Angelika Kratzer (1998) Semantics in Generative Grammar Blackwell Oxford
Hollebrandse, Bart. 1998. ‘On the Relation Between the Acquisition of a Theory of Mind and Sequence of Tense’, Proceedings of the 22nd annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Cascadilla Press, Somerville, MA, pp. 374–384.
Hyams, Nina. 1983. The Acquisition of Parametrized Grammars, Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.
Nina Hyams (1992) ‘The Genesis of Functional Categories’ J. Meisel (Eds) The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Development Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht 371–400
Nina Hyams (1996) ‘The Underspecification of Functional Categories in Early Grammar’ H Clahsen R. Hawkins (Eds) Generative Approaches to First and Second Language Acquisition John Benjamins Amsterdam 91–127
Annette Karmiloff-Smith (1979) A Functional Approach to Child Language Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Annette Karmiloff-Smith (1985) ArticleTitle‘Language and Cognitive Processes from a Developmental Perspective’ Language and Cognitive Processes 1 61–85
S. Klein (1982) Syntactic Theory and the Developing Grammar: Re-establishing the Relationship between Linguistic Theory and Data from Language Acquisition University of California Los Angeles
Giuseppe Longobardi (1994) ArticleTitle‘Reference and Proper Names: A Theory of N-Movement in Syntax and Logical Form’ Linguistic Inquiry 25 609–665
Barbara Lust Margarita Suner John Whitman (Eds) (1994) Syntactic Theory and First Language Acquisition: Cross-Linguistic Perspectives (Volume I) Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
Michael Maratsos (1974) ArticleTitle‘Preschool Children’s Use of Definite and Indefinite Articles’ Child Development 45 446–455
Michael Maratsos (1976) The Use of Definite and Indefinite Reference in Young Children Cambridge University Press Cambridge
Lisa Matthewson (1998) Determiner Systems and Quantificational Strategies: Evidence From Salish Holland Academic Graphics The Hague
Lisa Matthewson (1999) ArticleTitle‘On the Interpretation of Wide-Scope Indefinites’ Natural Language Semantics 7 79–134
Matthewson, Lisa, Tim Bryant and Thomas Roeper. 2001. ‘A Salish Stage in the Acquisition of English Determiners: Unfamiliar ‘‘Definites’’, The Proceedings of SULA: The Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas, University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 25, pp. 63–71.
Lisa Matthewson Henry Davis (1995) ‘The Structure of DP in St’át’imcets (Lillooet Salish)’ University of Victoria Victoria 54–68
Otsu, Yukio. 1981. Universal Grammar and Syntactic Development in Children: Toward a Theory of Syntactic Development, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Steven Pinker (1984) Language Learnability and Language Development Harvard University Press Cambridge, MA
David Poeppel Kenneth Wexler (1993) ArticleTitle‘The Full Competence Hypothesis of Clause Structure in Early German’ Language 69 1–33
Ellen Prince (1981) ‘Toward a Taxonomy of Given-New Invormation’ P Cole (Eds) Radical Pragmatics Academic Press New York 223–255
Ellen Prince (1992) ‘The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-Status’ S Thompson W Mann (Eds) Discourse Descriptions John Benjamins Philadelphia/Amsterdam 295–325
Janet Randall (1990) ArticleTitle‘Catapults and Pendulums: The Mechanisms of Language Acquisition’ Linguistics 28 1381–1406
Roberts, Craige. 1993. ‘Uniqueness Presuppositions in Definite Noun Phrases’, ms., The Ohio State University.
Schafer, Robin J. and Jill de Villiers. 2000. ‘Imagining Articles: What a and the Can Tell Us about the Emergence of DP’, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 609–620.
Jeannette Schaeffer (1997) Direct Object Scrambling in Dutch and Italian Child Language University of California Los Angeles
Schaeffer, Jeannette. 1999. Articles in English Child Language, in LSA, Los Angeles.
Schaeffer Jeannette (2000) The Acquisition of Direct Object Scrambling and Clitic Placement: Syntax and Pragmatics John Benjamins Amsterdam
Robert. Stalnaker (1974) ‘Pragmatic Presuppositions’ MK Munitz PK Unger (Eds) Semantics and Philosophy New York University New York 197–213
Robert Stalnaker (1978) ‘Assertion’ P Cole (Eds) Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics Academic Press New York, 313–332
F Peter Strawson (1952) Introduction to Logical Theory Methuen London
Jan Eijk Particlevan (1997) The Lillooet Language: Phonology, Morphology, Syntax University of British Columbia Press Vancouver
Jan Eijk Particlevan Williams Lorna (1981) Cuystwí Malh Ucwalmícwts: Lillooet Legends and Stories Ts’zil Publishing House Mount Currie
Juergen Weissenborn Goodluck Helen Roeper Tom (Eds) (1992) Theoretical Issues in Language Acquisition: Continuity and Change in Development Lawrence Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ
Wexler Kenneth (1998) ArticleTitleVery Early Parameter Setting and the Unique Checking Constraint: A New Explanation of the Optional Infinitive Stage Lingua 106 23–79
Lydia White (1981) The Responsibility of Grammatical Theory to Acquisitional Data N Hornstein D Lightfoot (Eds) Explanation in Linguistics Longman London 241–271
M Zehler annette William F Brewer (1982) ArticleTitleSequence and Principles in Article System Use: An Examination of A, The, and Null Acquisition Child Development 53 1268–1274
Ofelia Zepeda (1983) The Papago Language University of Arizona Press Tucson
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
For St’át’imcets data we are very grateful to Beverley Frank, Gertrude Ned, Laura Thevarge and Rose Whitley. We are also very grateful to Ariel Cohen, Henry Davis, Marcel den Dikken, Irene Heim, Nina Hyams, Tova Rappoport, Nomi Shir, and three anonymous reviewers for many helpful comments. St’át’imcets fieldwork was supported by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schaeffer, J., Matthewson, L. Grammar and Pragmatics in the Acquisition of Article Systems . Nat Lang Linguist Theory 23, 53–101 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-5540-1
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11049-004-5540-1