Abstract
Dietary glutamate is extensively oxidized in enterocytes during its trans-cellular journey from the intestinal lumen to the blood. This corresponds to high energy requirement for the absorptive function and renewal of the epithelium. Excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1) is known to be the major transporter of glutamate in the intestine. The present study was conducted in Huanjiang mini-piglets which represent a valuable agronomical model for pig production and also extrapolation to human intestinal physiology in order: (i) to determine the amino acid sequence of EAAC1; (ii) to measure the ontogenic expression profiles of jejunal EAAC1 during the suckling period and (iii) to evaluate the influence of low body weight at birth on the expression of EAAC1. For such a purpose, we cloned EAAC1 from Huanjiang mini-pig and used real-time RT-PCR method and Western blotting analysis. Our results show that EAAC1 in the mini-pig encoded a predicted 524-AA protein with eight putative trans-membrane domains. The expression in mRNA and protein of EAAC1 in jejunum was increasing from birth up to 14 days of age and then decreased at 21 days. Piglets with small BW had lower jejunal EAAC1 protein content between birth and after 7 days suckling. These findings indicate that the expression of the EAAC1 in jejunum is much depending on the stage of piglet development and that low BW at birth is associated with lower expression of this carrier in the early suckling period. Then, it can be hypothesized that lower expression of the intestinal glutamate carrier may decrease the availability of glutamate to enterocytes, thus challenging the optimal absorptive function of the small intestine and normal mucosal growth.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Low birth weight in piglets correlates with lower survival rates, permanent negative growth performance and sub-optimal carcass quality [1, 2] thus representing a serious agronomical problem. Remarkably, genetic selection has resulted in an increase proportion of piglets with low birth weight over the last decade. Piglets with a birth weight close to the mean body weight (BW) (±0.5 SD) are identified as normal BW animals while piglets with a mean −2 SD lower BW (−30 %) are considered as piglets with intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) [3]. IUGR is known to reduce the thickness and weight of stomach, small intestine and colon, as well as the density and length of small intestine and colon, which result in a reduction in the intestinal surface area for absorption [4–6]. In addition, the intestinal functions have been reported to be impaired in piglets with low BW at birth with lower lactase and aminopeptidase N activities in intestine, as well as lower relative weight of pancreas [6]. Intestinal mucosal growth is known to be very intense after birth in normal BW piglets [7].
Glutamate is one of the major oxidative fuel for the intestine, but also serves as an important precursor for other biologically active molecules, such as glutathione, arginine, proline, alanine, aspartate, ornithine, citrulline and N-acetylglutamate [8–11]. Energy metabolism is particularly high in enterocytes. Indeed, although the intestine represents only about 5 % of BW, it utilizes about 20 % of whole-body oxygen consumption [12]. It is widely accepted that gastrointestinal tissues derive their oxidative energy mainly from the catabolism of amino acids (AA), rather than from glucose or fatty acids oxidation [13]. The main AA catabolized in the gut are glutamate, glutamine and aspartate [14]. Mucosal glutathione is mainly metabolized from enteral l-glutamate in fed piglets and inhibition of mucosal glutathione synthesis is associated with intestinal dysfunction which can be restored by giving glutathione monoester orally [15].
The first step of glutamate metabolism is transport across the apical brush border membrane from the gastrointestinal lumen. The high-affinity X −AG system involved in transport of both l-glutamate and l-aspartate is the most important transport system of l-glutamate. Excitatory amino acid carrier 1 (EAAC1), as the most abundant member of the X −AG system, is mainly expressed in the small intestine (especially jejunum) [16]. EAAC1 was found to be expressed in the brush-border membrane of isolated epithelial cells from both villus and crypt origin [17, 18]. The efficiency and capacity of transport of luminal L-glutamate across the apical membrane are regulated by changes in the expression of EAAC1 [17]. In that overall context, the present study was conducted with suckling Huanjiang mini-pig as animal model to test the hypothesis that marked differences in jejunal EAAC1 expression profiles in piglets can be associated with large body weight (LBW) or small body weight (SBW). Previous work from our laboratories have shown that piglet with low BW at birth are characterized by low expression of the B0AT1, ASCT2 and b°,+ transporter in the jejunum [19, 20]. The objective of the present work was to clone the sequences of EAAC1 from Huanjiang mini-pig, and to measure the expression profile of the jejunal EAAC1 in the newborn and suckling piglets with LBW or SBW.
Materials and methods
Animals and tissue sample collection
Twenty litters of Huangjiang mini-pigs were spontaneously delivered from sows at term (~114 days of gestation). At birth, two piglets (one with the largest BW and another with the smallest BW) were selected from each of the 20 litters and weighed immediately. On day 0, five LBW and five SBW piglets were pairs from the same five litters, and these piglets were not allowed to suckle milk from the sows up to euthanasia. The rest of the selected piglets (15 LBW and 15 SBW) were positioned in the second teat pairs for suckling from their own mother and used at the different time points that are days 7, 14 and 21. Suckling piglets were helped for fixing nipple to prevent fight during suckling. Piglets then get used to fix a given nipple during the suckling period. These suckling piglets were weighted 1 h after the last suckling (see Table 1), and anaesthetized prior to tissue recovery and euthanasia. General anaesthesia was obtained via intravenous injection of 4 % sodium pentobarbital solution (40 mg/kg BW) and killed by jugular puncture [21]. Samples of anterior jejunum (5 cm, after cleaning by ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline) were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C until analysis. This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and all procedures involving animal subjects were approved by the animal welfare committee of the Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences [22].
Cloning of the EAAC1 cDNA
Total RNA was extracted from jejunum using TRIZOL Reagent (Invitrogen, CA, USA). The integrity of the RNA was verified by electrophoresis in 1 % agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The quality and quantity of RNA were determined by ultraviolet spectroscopy using a NanoDrop® ND-1000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, DE, USA). Total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the random primer Oligo-dT18 and Moloney Murine Leukemia Virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, WI, USA). Primers used to recognize the EAAC1 cDNA sequence of Huanjiang mini-pig were designed using Oligo 6.0 software based on the human and mouse EAAC1 cDNA sequences. The full-length cDNA of EAAC1 was amplified from the jejunum cDNA by RT-PCR using EAAC1 primers [1] (Table 2) and 2× Taq PCR Master Mix (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). The PCR program consisted of 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 2 min. The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 2 % agarose. The purified PCR product was cloned into the pGEM-T easy Vector (Promega, USA) and sequenced at Beijing Genomics Institute [23, 24].
Relative quantification of EAAC1 gene expression
Primers for selected genes (Table 2) were designed using Oligo 6.0 software. Real-time quantitative PCR analyses were performed with 5 ng of reverse-transcribed RNA and both sense and anti-sense primers in a final volume of 10 μl using SYBR Green I as a PCR core reagent. After a pre-denaturation program (10 s at 95 °C), forty cycles of amplification were conducted with each cycle consisting of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 20 s, and following by a melting curve program (60–99 °C with heating rate of 0.1 °C/s and fluorescence measurement). The amplification of GAPDH was used for each sample to normalize the expression of the selected genes.
Determination of EAAC1 protein quantity
Frozen samples were powdered under liquid nitrogen, and lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 % Triton X-100, 0.5 % sodium deoxycholate, 0.1 % SDS, 50 mM Tris–HCl at pH 7.4, plus a protease inhibitor cocktail purchased from Roche, Shanghai, China). After centrifugation at 10,000×g and 4 °C for 10 min, the protein concentration in the supernatant fluid was determined using the Bicinchoninic Acid assay (Beyotime biotechnology, China). All samples were adjusted to an equal protein concentration and then diluted with 2× loading buffer (0.63 ml of 0.5 M Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 0.42 ml 75 % glycerol, 0.125 g sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), 0.25 ml β-mercaptoethanol, 0.2 ml 0.05 % solution of bromphenol blue, and 1 ml water) to a final volume of 2.5 ml and heated in boiling water for 5 min. After boiling, the samples were cooled on ice and used for Western blot analysis.
The denatured proteins (25 μg per sample) were separated using SDS-PAGE (4–12 % gradient gel), transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA) overnight at 12 V using the Bio-Rad Transblot apparatus (Hercules, CA). The membranes were blocked in 5 % fat-free milk in Tris-Tween buffered saline (TTBS; 20 mM Tris/150 mM NaCl, pH 7.5, and 0.1 % Tween-20) for 3 h and then incubated with EAAC1 or β-actin antibody (Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4 °C overnight with gentle rocking. After washing three times with TTBS, the membranes were incubated at room temperature for 3 h with horseradish peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). The primary antibody and secondary antibody were used at dilutions of 1:1,000 and 1:3,000, respectively. Finally, the membranes were washed with TTBS, followed by development using Supersignal West Dura Extended Duration Substrate according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Pierce, Rockford, IL). The images were detected on chemiluminescence (Applygen Technologies Inc., Beijing, China). Multiple exposures of each Western blot were performed to ensure linearity of chemiluminescence signals. Western blots were quantified by measuring the intensity of correctly sized bands using AlphaImager 2200 (Alpha Innotech Corporation, CA, USA) software.
Bioinformatics analysis
Sequences were aligned with the multiple alignment program Clustal W. The putative extra-cellular N-glycosylation sites, deduced protein kinase C phosphorylation sites and potential cAMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation sites were analyzed in silico by PIR (http://pir.georgetown.edu/pirwww/search/pattern.shtml). The trans-membrane helices were predicted by TMHMM (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/). The AA sequences were analyzed using MotifScan (http://myhits.isb-sib.ch/cgi-bin/motifscan). The putative signal peptides were predicted by Signal P 3.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/SignalP/) and the putative cut sites of signal peptides predicted by ProP 1.0 Server (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/ProP/). Phyre (http://www.sbg.bio.ic.ac.uk/~phyre/index.cgi) was used to predict the tertiary structure. The hydrophobicity of deduced protein was analyzed by Protscale (http://www.expasy.ch/tools/protscale.html). MEGA 5 was used for phylogenetic analysis.
Statistical analysis
All data were subjected to paired t test using the SAS version 9.2 Programme (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Data are presented as mean ± SEM and differences with P values <0.05 were considered as being statistically significant.
Results
Identification and characterization of EAAC1 cDNA in Huanjiang mini-pig
The ORF of EAAC1 cDNA in Huanjiang mini-pig was 1,575 bp in length encoding a 524-AA polypeptide (Fig. 1). The cDNA sequence shared 99.30 and 99.43 % identity with Tibet pig and common pig, and shared 89.97 and 84.13 % with human and mouse, respectively. Three putative extra-cellular N-glycosylation sites and one deduced cAMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation site were identified (Fig. 1). Analysis of the AA sequence suggested the presence of a N-terminus signal peptide (Fig. 2), which was confirmed by the putative cut site (between Glu31 and Ile32) predicted by ProP 1.0 Server. Eight proposed trans-membrane domains were identified (Fig. 2), in good agreement with the hydrophobicity analysis (Fig. 3a). Two proposed “Sodium: dicarboxylate symporter family signature” were found to be highly conserved when compared with other animal models (Fig. 2). The predicted three dimensional structure was constructed (Fig. 3b) and the phylogenetic analysis of the AA sequence was performed. As shown on Fig. 4, the neighbor-joining tree showed that the Huanjiang mini-pig had a closer genetic relationship with cow when compared with the other animals examined.
Body weights of LBW and SBW piglets
As indicated on Table 1, the procedure of piglet selection, according to their BWs at birth, allowed to show that the initial reduction of the BW in the SBW group (i.e. 56 % of the mean BW in the LBW group) was maintained during all the suckling period averaging 55 % at day 7, 55 % at day 14, and 50 % at day 21.,
Expression level and amount of jejunal EAAC1 in suckling Huanjiang mini-piglets with LBW or SBW
As indicated in Fig. 5, the measurement in the jejunum of the expression profile of EAAC1 mRNA in LBW piglets revealed that there was a modest increased expression of the carrier between birth and after 7 days of suckling. In contrast, a spectacular increase of EAAC1 expression (more that fivefold increase) was recorded between days 7 and 14 of the suckling period. Then, the expression of the carrier tended to decrease between days 14 and 21. The pattern of expression was found to be similar in SBW animals. However, in the SBW animals, the initial low expression of the EAAC1 carrier was maintained during the suckling period up to day 14. The measurement of the expression of EAAC1 as protein in piglet jejunum revealed that in LBW the protein expression follows the mRNA expression with protein expression being similar between birth and after 7 days of suckling; but major increase between days 7 and 14 animals (Fig. 6). In SBW piglets, the pattern of EAAC1 protein expression was similar when compared with LBW animals, with the carrier being much less expressed in SBW animals both at birth and after 7 days sucking.
Discussion
The mini-pig models are catching an increasing attention from the community of physiologists because its anatomical, physiological and metabolic characteristics are more similar to human than other animal models like rodents [25]. In addition, this animal is convenient to manipulate and less expensive compared with large domestic animals, because of its small size [26]. Thus, the mini-pig is a timely model for research on intestinal physiology and development. Huanjiang mini-pig is a Chinese indigenous breed of pig, which is mainly distributed in Huanjiang county, Guangxi province [27]. It has thus been widely used for basic research [28–30] and attracted strong agronomic interests due to the high quality carcass, which is relatively rich in proteins and low in fat [25, 31].
In order to measure the expression profiles of intestine EAAC1 in pigs with different BW during suckling period, we first cloned the sequence of EAAC1 from Huanjiang mini-pig by PCR method. Molecular cloning found that the ORF of EAAC1 cDNA sequence in Huanjiang mini-pig was 1,575 bp, which encoded a deduced protein with 524 AA. The deduced protein has the same size with human [32] and cow [33], and one more AA than mouse [34] and rat [35]. The EAAC1 carrier of Huanjiang mini-pig belongs to the sodium: dicarboxylate symporter family and has two sodium: dicarboxylate symporter family signatures, an information that was predicted by MotifScan and confirmed by PIR programs [36, 37]. The structure of the member in this family usually has 8–10 trans-membrane regions. In accord with these characteristics, the EAAC1 of Huanjiang mini-pig was found to possess eight putative trans-membrane domains with the same number of mouse and rat, and one more than human and cow as predicted by TMHMM 2.0 program [38]. The function of glutamate transporter can be regulated by phosphorylation and glycosylation [39], and all of its members share two evolutionarily conserved glycosylation sites with some members having one more or one less site [35]. Three potential N-linked glycosylation sites were identified, including two conserved sites. Protein kinase C and cAMP/cGMP-dependent protein kinase are known to be involved in regulating the activity of glutamate transporter [40, 41], and potential phosphorylation sites were identified in EAAC1. Meanwhile, the phylogenetic tree showing that Huanjiang mini-pig had a closer relationship with human than mouse and rat, indicates that Huanjiang mini-pig is likely a better model than mouse and rat for the study of the function of EAAC1.
Immediately after birth, the suckling period is a very critical time for mammals, with important consequences for the growth and further development of cells, tissues and organs including particularly the intestines. The intestine of suckling neonates with low BW shows different pattern of maturation when compared with the neonates with normal BW [6]. It is quite clear that the intestine of neonates with low BW is associated with important changes of the morphology, physiology and metabolism [5, 42], but the concomitant changes at the molecular level remain unclear. The present study showed that, compared with the LBW pigs, Huanjiang mini-pigs with SBW expressed a lower level of EAAC1 mRNA and protein in jejunum after the first week of birth, such period being considered as critical for further development. Considering that EAAC1 is the key transporter for glutamate [17], and that glutamate, apart from its function of a building block for protein synthesis and as precursor of AA and glutathione de novo biosynthesis; is one of the most important fuel for pig enterocytes [43, 44]; the abnormal expression of EAAC1 in SBW piglets may be associated in a vicious cycle with abnormal intestinal growth development and abnormal absorptive functions. Further work which is out of the scope of the present study should be conducted to test whether the reduction of the expression of EAAC1 in the jejunum of SBW piglets play a major role and is causally linked with delay in the development of the SBW piglets. In addition, in order to fully evaluate the consequence of presumed limited glutamate supplying to enterocytes, one should evaluate the supplying of other energy substrate (e.g. glutamine) to the intestinal epithelial cells. Regarding this latter point, it is worth to consider that, at difference with glutamate which is transaminated in the presence of oxaloacetate and pyruvate to alpha-ketoglutarate (and respectively aspartate and alanine) before entry of alpha-ketoglutarate into mitochondria for utilization in the TCA cycle; glutamine must firstly enter the mitochondria and be degraded to ammonia and glutamate by the phosphate-dependent glutaminase before export of glutamate into the cytosol where this amino acid is converted to alpha-ketoglutarate before finally reentering the mitochondria and the TCA cycle [8]. In other words, the utilization of glutamine as energy substrate in enterocytes implies more metabolic steps than the utilization of glutamate for ATP production.
From an agronomical perspective, the piglets with low birth weight are often eliminated for their increased susceptibility to the onset of organ dysfunction, permanent impaired growth and sub-optimal carcass quality [2, 45] representing an important commercial concern. We propose that the low birth weight of piglets may thus restrict the intestinal capacity to transport glutamate and this might further limit the development and absorptive functions of the intestine and thus play a role in the delayed growth of piglets with an already lower birth weight. More research is needed in order to test new strategies aiming at improving expression of EAAC1 in piglets born with a SBW and testing it for its capacity to ameliorate intestinal absortive functions and growth.
Abbreviations
- AA:
-
Amino acid
- EAAC1:
-
Excitatory amino acid carrier 1
- LBW:
-
Large body weight
- SBW:
-
Small body weight
- IUGR:
-
Intrauterine growth retardation
References
Milligan BN, Dewey CE, de Grau AF (2002) Neonatal-piglet weight variation and its relation to pre-weaning mortality and weight gain on commercial farms. Prev Vet Med 56:119–127
Rehfeldt C, Kuhn G (2006) Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. J Anim Sci 84:113–123
Wu GY, Bazer FW, Wallace JM, Spencer TE (2006) Intrauterine growth retardation: implications for the animal sciences. J Anim Sci 84:2316–2337
Xu RJ, Mellor DJ, Birtles MJ, Reynolds GW, Simpson HV (1994) Impact of intrauterine growth retardation on the gastrointestinal tract and the pancreas in newborn pigs. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 18:231–240
Wang T, Huo YJ, Shi F, Xu RJ, Hutz RJ (2005) Effects of intrauterine growth retardation on development of the gastrointestinal tract in neonatal pigs. Biol Neonate 88:66–72
Morise A, Louveau I, Le Huërou-Luron I (2008) Growth and development of adipose tissue and gut and related endocrine status during early growth in the pig: impact of low birth weight. Animal 2:73–83
Widdowson EM, Crabb DE (1976) Changes in the organs of pigs in response to feeding for the first 24 h after birth. Biol Neonate 28:261–271
Blachier F, Boutry C, Bos C, Tomé D (2009) Metabolism and functions of l-glutamate in the epithelial cells of the small and large intestines. Am J Clin Nutr 90:814S–821S
Reeds PJ, Burrin DG, Stoll B, Jahoor F (2000) Intestinal glutamate metabolism. J Nutr 9:S78–S82
Chen LX, Yin YL, Jobgen WS, Jobgen SC, Knabe DA, Hu WX, Wu GY (2007) In vitro oxidation of essential amino acids by jejunal mucosal cells of growing pigs. Livest Sci 109:19–23
Chen LX, Li P, Wang JJ, Li XL, Gao HJ, Yin YL, Hou YQ, Wu GY (2009) Catabolism of nutritionally essential amino acids in developing porcine enterocytes. Amino Acids 37:143–152
Vaugelade P, Posho L, Darcy-Vrillon B, Bernard F, Morel MT, Duée PH (1994) Intestinal oxygen uptake and glucose metabolism during nutrient absorption in the pig. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 207:309–316
Stoll B, Burrin DG (2006) Measuring splanchnic amino acid metabolism in vivo using stable isotopic tracers. J Anim Sci 84:E60–E72
Burrin DG, Janeczko MJ, Stoll B (2008) Emerging aspects of dietary glutamate metabolism in the developing gut. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17(Suppl 1):368–371
Reeds PJ, Burrin DG, Stoll B, Jahoor F, Wykes L, Henry J, Frazer ME (1997) Enteral glutamate is the preferential source for mucosal glutathione synthesis in fed piglets. Am J Physiol 273:E408–E415
Burrin DG, Stoll B (2009) Metabolic fate and function of dietary glutamate in the gut. Am J Clin Nutr 90:S850–S856
Fan MZ, Matthews JC, Etienne NM, Stoll B, Lackeyram D, Burrin DG (2004) Expression of apical membrane l-glutamate transporters in neonatal porcine epithelial cells along the small intestinal crypt-villus axis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 287:G385–G398
Iwanaga T, Goto M, Watanabe M (2005) Cellular distribution of glutamate transporters in the gastrointestinal tract of mice: an immunohistochemical and in situ hybridization approach. Biomed Res 26:271–278
Yang HS, Fu DZ, Shao H, Kong XF, Wang WC, Yang XJ, Nyachoti CM, Yin YL (2012) Impacts of birth weight on plasma, liver and skeletal muscle neutral amino acid profiles and intestinal amino acid transporters in suckling Huanjiang mini-piglets. PLoS One 7(12):e50921
Wang WC, Blachier F, Fu DZ, Pan J, Yang HS, Guo JP, Chu WY, Kong XF, Yin YL (2013) Ontogenic expression of the amino acid transporter b°,+ in suckling Huanjiang piglets: effect of intrauterine growth restriction. Br J Nutr. doi:10.1017/S0007114512005843
Kong XF, Wu GY, Liao YP, Hou ZP, Liu HJ, Yin FG, Li TJ, Huang RL, Zhang YM, Deng D, Kang P, Wang RX, Tang ZY, Yang CB, Deng ZY, Xiong H, Chu WY, Ruan Z, Xie MY, Yin YL (2007) Effects of Chinese herbal ultra-fine powder as a dietary additive on growth performance, serum metabolites and intestinal health in early-weaned piglets. Livest Sci 108:272–275
Kong XF, Wu GY, Liao YP, Hou ZP, Liu HJ, Yin FG, Li TJ, Huang RL, Zhang YM, Deng D, Xie MY, Deng ZY, Xiong H, Ruan Z, Kang P, Yang CB, Yin YL, Fan MZ (2007) Dietary supplementation with Chinese herbal ultra-fine powder enhances cellular and humoral immunity in early-weaned piglets. Livest Sci 108:94–98
Wang WC, Shi CY, Zhang JS, Gu WT, Li TJ, Geng MM, Chu WY, Huang RL, Liu YL, Hou YQ, Li P, Yin YL (2009) Molecular cloning, distribution and ontogenetic expression of the oligopeptide transporter PepT1 mRNA in Tibetan suckling piglets. Amino Acids 37:593–601
Yang HS, Li FN, Kong XF, Yuan XX, Lian GQ, Geng MM, Li TJ, Yin JD, Yin YL (2012) Molecular cloning, tissue distribution and ontogenetic expression of Xiang pig chemerin and its involvement in regulating energy metabolism through Akt and ERK1/2 signaling pathways. Mol Biol Rep 39:1887–1894
Luo G, Zhang L, Liu LS, Li Y, Wei H, Yuan J (2004) The applied research prospects of laboratory mini-pig in China. Lab Anim Sci Manag 21:37–38
Bollen P, Ellegaard L (1997) The Gottingen minipig in pharmacology and toxicology. Pharmacol Toxicol 80:3–4
Zhao DS (2008) Characteristic and feeding management of fragrant pigs. Livest Poult Husb 3:16–17
Yao SK, Zhang Q, Sun FZ, Liu PQ (2006) Genetic diversity of seven miniature pig breeds (strains) analyzed by using microsatellite markers. Yi Chuan 28:407–412
Wang XL, Wu KL, Li N, Li CL, Qiu XM, Wang AH, Wu CX (2006) Analysis of expressed sequence tags from skeletal muscle-specific cDNA library of Chinese native Xiang pig. Yi Chuan Xue Bao 33:984–991
Yuan B, Zhang YR, Zhao Z, Wu DL, Yuan LZ, Wu B, Wang LS, Huang J (2008) Treatment of chronical myocardial ischemia by adenovirus-mediated hepatocyte growth factor gene transfer in mini-pigs. Sci China C Life Sci 51:537–543
Zhang M, Jing RB, Cui HB (1996) The investigation of growth development, reproductive characteristics and experimental animalization in fragrant pigs. Swine Prod 2:30–32
Kanai Y, Stelzner M, Nussberger S, Khawaja S, Hebert SC, Smith CP, Hediger MA (1994) The neuronal and epithelial human high affinity glutamate transporter. J Biol Chem 296:20599–20606
Zimin AV, Delcher AL, Florea L, Kelley DR, Schatz MC, Puiu D, Hanrahan F, Pertea G, Van Tassell CP, Sonstegard TS, Marçais G, Roberts M, Subramanian P, Yorke JA, Salzberg SL (2009) A whole-genome assembly of the domestic cow Bos taurus. Genome Biol 10:R42
Tanaka K (1993) Cloning and expression of a glutamate transporter from mouse brain. Neurosci Lett 159:183–186
Bjørås M, Gjesdal O, Erickson JD, Torp R, Levy LM, Ottersen OP, Degree M, Storm-Mathisen J, Seeberg E, Danbolt NC (1996) Cloning and expression of a neuronal rat brain glutamate transporter. Mol Brain Res 36:163–168
Pagni M, Ioannidis V, Cerutti L, Zahn-Zabal M, Jongeneel CV, Hau J, Martin O, Kuznetsov D, Falquet L (2007) MyHits: improvements to an interactive resource for analyzing protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 35:W433–W437
Winona CB, John SG, Huang HZ, Peter BM, Bruce CO, Geetha YS, Xiao CL, Yeh LL, Robert SL, Joseph FJ, Friedhelm P, Hans-Werner M, Akira T, Wu C (2000) The protein information resource (PIR). Nucleic Acids Res 28:41–44
Möller S, Croning MD, Apweiler R (2001) Evaluation of methods for the prediction of membrane spanning regions. Bioinformatics 17:646–653
Gegelashvili G, Schousboe A (1997) High affinity glutamate transporters: regulation of expression and activity. Mol Pharmacol 52:6–15
Casado M, Bendahan A, Zafra F, Danbolt NC, Aragon C, Gimenez C, Kanner BI (1993) Phosphorylation and modulation of brain glutamate transporters by protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 268:27313–27317
Hertz L, Bock E, Schousboe A (1978) GFA content, glutamate uptake and activity of glutamate metabolizing enzymes in differentiating mouse astrocytes. Dev Neurosci 1:226–238
D’Inca R, Kloareg M, Gras-Le Guen C, Le Huërou-Luron I (2010) Intrauterine growth restriction modifies the developmental pattern of intestinal structure, transcriptomic profile, and bacterial colonization in neonatal pigs. J Nutr 140:925–931
Blachier F, Guihot-joubrel G, Vaugelade P, Le Boucher J, Bernard F, Duée PH, Cynober L (1999) Portal hyperglutamatemia after dietary supplementation with monosodium glutamate in pigs. Digestion 60:349–357
Newsholme P, Procopio J, Lima MM, Pithon-Curi TC, Curi R (2003) Glutamine and glutamate-their central role in cell metabolism and function. Cell Biochem Funct 21:1–9
Da Silva-Buttkus P, van den Hurk R, Velde ERT, Taverne MAM (2003) Ovarian development in intrauterine growth-retarded and normally developed piglets originating from the same litter. Reprod 126:249–258
Acknowledgments
This study was jointly supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30901040 and 31110103909).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Additional information
Dezhi Fu and Huansheng Yang contributed equally to this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, D., Yang, H., Kong, X. et al. Molecular cloning and expression profiling of excitatory amino acid carrier 1 in suckling Huanjiang mini-piglets with large or small body weight at birth. Mol Biol Rep 40, 3341–3350 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2409-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-012-2409-y