Abstract
A long-period duration of seed dormancy helps to reduce pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) damage in common wheat when a long period of rainfall or high humidity occurs. Identification of genes or loci underlying seed dormancy duration is of high importance for investigating genetic mechanism of PHS tolerance of wheat. In the present study, the germination index (GI) of different mapping populations at 5 days (GI5), 15 days (GI15), and 30 days (GI30) after harvest (DAH) was recorded during the 2011–2012, 2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015 cropping seasons. Field sprouting (FS) values were also determined in 2012–2013 and 2014–2015 cropping seasons. Association analysis was performed in 260 wheat varieties and advanced lines differing in seed dormancy (SD) using 557 SSR and 14 gene-specific markers for PHS/SD-related genes. The result indicated that a total of 47 loci were significantly (P < 0.01) associated with SD using both the general linear model (GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM). Five major loci were consistently detected at different post-ripening stages after harvest, including four for GI5 and GI15 on chromosomes 3AS, 3BL, 5AL, and 5BL responsible for middle-duration SD, and one for GI5, GI15, and GI30 on 2AL associated with longer-duration SD. The major locus on 2AL (designated Qsd.ahau-2AL) is likely to be a novel QTL, which was linked to Xwmc658 by mapping analysis in 165 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from the Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi cross and 728 F2 plants from Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai. Furthermore, a CAPS marker CAPS-2AL was developed for Qsd.ahau-2AL locus and was validated using the 728 F2 plants and 201 accessions of the Chinese mini-core collection. Our results also revealed that the TaMFT-like gene on 3AS had a more significant association with dormancy duration than the other six genes underlying SD/PHS resistance in Chinese wheat germplasm. This study provides useful information for marker-assisted selection in wheat breeding and enhances our understanding of molecular genetics of SD in wheat.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) occurs in the spikes prior to harvest and is seriously detrimental to wheat yield and quality. In China, the vast majority of wheat production areas are affected by PHS, particularly in the Middle and Lower Yangtze River Valley winter wheat region, southwestern winter wheat region, and northeastern spring wheat region (Xiao et al. 2002). This is mainly attributed to a short period of seed dormancy (SD) in wheat varieties (Chen et al. 2008; Hickey et al. 2009; Ogbonnaya et al. 2008; Fofana et al. 2009; Liu et al. 2011). PHS-resistant varieties with a high level of SD can tolerate a longer period of rainfall or high humidity, consequently reducing PHS damage. However, the genetic basis underlying SD remains elusive.
The SD trait is controlled jointly by major and minor genes. Numerous quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for SD or PHS have been identified on nearly all 21 wheat chromosomes (Gao et al. 2013). Several major QTLs have been detected on chromosomes 2BS, 3AS, 3AL, 3BL, 3DL, and 4AL in different populations (Groos et al. 2002; Mori et al. 2005; Kulwal et al. 2005; Liu et al. 2008, 2011; Chen et al. 2008; Ogbonnaya et al. 2008; Fofana et al. 2009; Munkvold et al. 2009; Jaiswal et al. 2012; Somyong et al. 2014; Lin et al. 2015; Albrecht et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2015). Candidate genes in these regions have been identified based on comparative genomics or transcriptomic analysis, such as TaSdr-B1 on 2BS (Zhang et al. 2014), TaPHS1 (a TaMFT-like gene) on 3AS (Liu et al. 2013), TaVp-1 and Tamyb10 on group 3 chromosomes (Yang et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2010a, b, 2011; Himi et al. 2011), PM19-A1 and TaMKK3-A on 4AL (Barrero et al. 2015; Torada et al. 2016). However, their effects on SD are not well understood because the phenotypes detected in these studies were based on GI recorded in a short-period post-maturity, rather than GI values evaluated at longer period after harvest (Groos et al. 2002; Liu et al. 2008; Singh et al. 2010; Kulwal et al. 2012). Seed germination requires a period of post-ripening to break dormancy. Thus, long-period seed dormancy is very useful for decreasing PHS damage because of long-period rainfall or high humidity during maturation of wheat. Identification of genes or loci underlying long-period seed dormancy helps to understand the genetics of PHS.
Most of loci for seed dormancy or PHS tolerance are identified by QTL mapping in previous reports. Compared with linkage mapping, in which only two alleles at each locus are evaluated, the association mapping based on linkage disequilibrium is an effective approach for identifying abundant genetic loci for complex traits (such as SD/PHS) in diverse natural populations (Rehman Arif et al. 2012; Kulwal et al. 2012; Jaiswal et al. 2012; Albrecht et al. 2015). Combination of linkage and association mapping cannot only mitigate the limitations of each but also increase the power to detect true associations and verify the results (Hendricks et al. 2009; Korir et al. 2013; Korte and Farlow. 2013). Therefore, the objectives of the present study were to (1) identify loci conferring SD at 5, 15, and 30 days after harvest (DAH) and field sprouting (FS) in a panel of Chinese wheat varieties by association analysis, (2) evaluate the effects of functional genes for seed dormancy/PHS tolerance in Chinese wheat germplasm, and (3) detect novel loci for long-period seed dormancy and validate their effects.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
Two hundred and sixty wheat varieties and advanced lines with different PHS resistance (Wang et al. 2014; Zhu et al. 2014) were used for association analysis, including 179 from Yellow and Huai Valley winter wheat region, 30 from southwestern winter wheat region, 22 from Middle and Lower Yangtze River Valley winter wheat region, 21 from northern winter wheat region, and 8 from other countries (Table S1). Two hundred and one accessions from the Chinese mini-core wheat collection were used to validate the association of a cleaved amplified polymorphic sequence (CAPS) marker (CAPS-2AL) for the major locus on chromosome 2AL (Table S2). One hundred and sixty-five F2:8 RILs developed by a single-seed descent method from the Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi cross, and 728 F2 plants from the Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai cross were also used to validate the novel locus for SD on 2AL. Wanxianbaimaizi and Suiningtuotuomai are white-grained landraces with relatively high levels of SD, whereas Jing 411 and Jimai 20 are white-grained varieties with low and moderate levels of SD, respectively (Chang et al. 2010a, b, 2011, Table S3).
Field trials
The 260 wheat varieties/lines were planted at the experimental station of Anhui Agricultural University in Hefei (31°58′N, 117°240′E) during the 2011–2012, 2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015 cropping seasons; 201 accessions of the Chinese mini-core wheat collection were grown at the experimental station during the 2013–2014 and 2014–2015 cropping seasons, and the RILs derived from the Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi cross and F2 population from Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai were planted at the experimental station during the 2014–2015 cropping season. Field trials were conducted in plots with double 4-m rows and 25 cm between rows in randomized complete blocks with two replications. Field management followed local agricultural practice.
Heading date was scored when 50% of spikes in a plot were emerged. Sixty spikes of each plot were collected at physiological maturity, naturally air dried for 4 days, hand threshed to avoid damage to the embryos and seed coat, and then stored at −20 °C until all were harvested. After all lines were threshed, they were stored at room temperature (25 °C) for subsequent germination assay.
Germination index assay
Seed dormancy duration was revealed by germination index (GI) at 5, 15, and 30 DAH. The GI was assayed following Chang et al. (2010a, b). For 260 wheat varieties, GI was evaluated at 5 DAH (designated 12GI5, 13GI5, 14GI5, and 15GI5), 15 DAH (designated 12GI15, 13GI15, 14GI15, and 15GI15), and 30 DAH (designated 12GI30, 13GI30, 14GI30, and 15GI30) in 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015, respectively. The GI of 201 accessions of the Chinese mini-core collection (CMCC) was tested at 5 and 15 DAH in 2014 and 2015 (designated 14GI5-CMCC, 14GI15-CMCC, 15GI5-CMCC, and 15GI15-CMCC, respectively). The Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi and Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai populations were assayed for GI at 5 and 15 DAH in 2015 (designated 15GI5-JW, 15GI15-JW, 15GI5-JS, and 15GI15-JS, respectively).
Field sprouting test
In 2013 and 2015, the rainfall occurred for over a week during the harvest season (Tables S4 and S5), resulting in severe PHS in the field. For the 260 wheat varieties, 165 RILs from Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi and two parents, 10 spikes of each plot were left in the field for 7 and 8 days in 2013 and 2015, respectively, and then collected and dried immediately in an oven (105 °C for 2 h) for FS test. Sprouted grains were scored, in which the pericarp over the embryo was ruptured. The FS value was determined based on the averaged sprouted grains of 20 spikes collected from two plots of each line. The FS values of 260 wheat varieties tested in 2013 and 2015 were designated 13FS and 15FS, respectively; those of Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi population were designated 15FS-JW in 2015.
Genotyping
Genomic DNA was isolated from undamaged dry kernels following Zhu et al. (2014). A total of 557 highly polymorphic SSR markers, selected from 1723 SSRs including Xbarc, Xwmc, Xgwm, Xcfa, Xcfd, and Xgdm (GrainGenes, http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/GG2/index.shtm/), were used to genotype the 260 wheat varieties. PCR was performed in a 10-μL volume following Zhu et al. (2014). To validate the genotyping results, SSR markers with abundant polymorphisms at 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) were conducted again using Fragment Analyzer™ Automated CE System (including mixture of dsDNA 800 Separation Gel and intercalating Dye (20:1), fivefold diluted capillary conditioning solution, a deep 96-well plate of fivefold diluted 930 dsDNA inlet buffer, a 96-well plate reusable oil-sealed markers (35 and 500 bp), and a 96-well sample plate). Following the user’s instructions, 3 μL of PCR products mentioned above was diluted using 20 μL of 1 × TE buffer and transferred to another 96-well sample plate (1–95th wells). The 96th well was added 75–400 bp DNA ladder as marker. After filling fresh gel in 96 capillaries and voltage separation pre-run (6.0 kV, 30s), markers and samples were voltage injected in 5.0 kV for 15 s and 9.0 kV for 15 s, respectively, and then separated in 9.0 kV for 1 h. Genotyping was performed using ProSize 2.0 software following the manufacturer’s directions (www.aati-us.com).
Fourteen gene-specific markers from seven candidate genes related to SD or PHS resistance, including Sdr2B for TaSdr-B1 (Zhang et al. 2014), TaMFT-3A, TaMFT-A1, SNP_646, and SNP_666 for a TaMFT-like gene (Nakamura et al. 2011; Lei et al. 2013; Liu et al. 2013, 2015), Vp1B3, Vp1-b2, and A17–19 for TaVp-1 (Yang et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2010a, 2011), Tamyb10-A1, Tamyb10-B1 and Tamyb10-D1 for Tamyb10 (Himi et al. 2011), TaDFR-B for TaDFR (Bi et al. 2014), PM19-A1 for TaPM19-A1 (Barrero et al. 2015), and MKKAC for TaMKK3-A (Torada et al. 2016), were used for association analysis together with SSR markers. PCR and gel electrophoresis were performed following previous studies mentioned above except for MKKAC.
A dCAPS marker (designated MKKAC) was developed for TaMKK3-A using the software Primer premier 5.0 (www.PremierBiosoft.com) to genotype the 260 wheat lines based on a SNP (A/C) located at 660 bp downstream of the initiation codon (Fig. S1). The first PCR was conducted using the TaMKK3-A genome-specific primer A3 (Torada et al. 2016), the PCR amplification consisted of an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of 40 s at 94 °C, 40 s at 61 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and a final step of 8 min at 72 °C. The second PCR with dCAPS primers (F: CACATCCTCTTCCTTTCA, R: TTTGCTTCGCCCTTAAC) was performed using the first PCR product as template DNA in a total volume of 10 μL, including 1.0 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 200 μM of dNTPs, 4 pmol of each primer, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 100 ng of template DNA. The PCR included an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 58 °C for 30 s with a decrease of 0.2 °C per cycle, and 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. Then, the second PCR product was digested with HpyCH4IV for 3 h (restriction site: A/CGT, http://www.neb-china.com) according to the manufacturer’s directions and separated by 6% denaturing PAGE as described by Zhu et al. (2014) (Fig. S1).
Based on a SNP (BS00019095_51) on chromosome 2AL significantly associated with SD in 192 wheat varieties tested by an Illumina 90K Chip (P < 0.001; data not shown), a CAPS marker was developed, designated CAPS-2AL (F: CCCTGATGTCAAATACGGC, R: CAACTTGTAGT GCTCGGTGA), with the software Primer premier 5.0. PCR was performed in a total volume of 10 μL, including 1.0 μL of 10 × PCR buffer, 200 μM of dNTPs, 4 pmol of each primer, 0.5 U Taq DNA polymerase, and 100 ng of template DNA. The PCR profile included a denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 30 s with a decrease of 0.1 °C per cycle, and 72 °C for 30 s and a final extension at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were digested with NsiI for 3 h (restriction site: ATGCA/T, http://www.neb-china.com) according to the manufacturer’s directions and separated on 1.5% agarose gel (Figs. S2 and S3).
Population structure and association analysis
The population structure of the 260 wheat varieties was investigated according to the Bayesian clustering approach (Evanno et al. 2005) using the software STRUCTURE version 2.3.4 (Pritchard et al. 2000). Marker-trait associations (MTAs) were analyzed using both the general linear model (GLM) and mixed linear model (MLM) implemented in TASSEL 2.1 (Bradbury et al. 2007). For MLM analysis, marker-based kinship matrix (K) obtained using TASSEL was used along with the Q matrix to correct for both family and population structure. The significance of marker-trait association was described using P values (P < 0.01 for significant markers). The MTAs determined by several markers within 10 cM were assumed in one locus.
Identification of favorable alleles and their carriers
Favorable alleles of SD loci and their carriers were analyzed according to Breseghello and Mark (2006). Allele effects were estimated through comparison between the average phenotypic value of accessions with a specific allele and that of accessions with the null allele, and then the average positive or negative allele effect of the locus was calculated over the estimated phenotypic effects of all positive or negative alleles. Favorable alleles with significant effects in reducing GI were selected to identify typical carriers.
Linkage mapping and QTL analysis
Linkage mapping and QTL analysis were performed using QTL IciMapping 3.3 (Wang et al. 2013, http://www.isbreeding.net). A threshold of LOD ≥3.0 was used to construct the linkage map. Inclusive composite interval mapping (ICIM) was performed and LOD threshold value was set using 1000 random permutations (P < 0.05, Churchill and Doerge 1994).
Statistical analysis
The SPSS software was used for data analysis, and correlation coefficients were estimated by the Pearson method, and t-tests were performed using the independent-samples t test (19.0 version, www.spss.com).
Results
Statistical analysis of SD data
Means across 4 years of the association mapping panel for GI5, GI15, and GI30 were 0.46, 0.60, and 0.78, respectively, ranging from 0.05 to 0.80, 0.14 to 0.90, and 0.44 to 0.96, respectively, whereas FS was 0.22 averaged over 2 years, ranging from 0.00 to 0.70. The averages of GI5-CMCC and GI15-CMCC for 201 CMCC accessions were 0.30 and 0.44, ranging from 0.02 to 0.93 and 0.01 to 0.99 in 2014 and 2015, respectively (Table S6).
Significant and positive correlations were detected among GI values at 5, 15, and 30 DAH and FS across environments in both the panels of 260 wheat varieties and 201 CMCC accessions, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.25 to 0.95 (P < 0.01). A notable result was that FS showed more significant correlation with GI5 (0.43–0.61, 0.49) and GI15 (0.28–0.60, 0.43) than with GI30 (0.26–0.47, 0.33) (Tables S7 and S8).
Population structure
A set of 84 unlinked SSR markers distributed evenly on 21 wheat chromosomes was used to investigate the population structure of the 260 wheat varieties. The population could be divided into four sub-groups (K = 4) based on the rate of change in the log probability of data between successive K values (Fig. 1).
Significant marker-trait associations for SD
In total, 108 MTAs at 47 loci for GI5, GI15, GI30, and FS were identified using both GLM and MLM approaches (P < 0.01). Among them, 72 MTAs at 41 loci were for GI5; 72 at 41 loci were for GI15; 67 at 36 loci were for GI30; and 25 at 15 loci were for FS.
Of the 47 loci, 13 were consistently associated with GI5, GI15, GI30, and FS, which were distributed on chromosomes 1AS, 1BL, 2AS, 2AL, 2BS, 3AS, 3AL, 3BL, 4BL, 5AS, 5AL, 5BL, and 7DL, respectively (Tables S9, S10, S11, S12, and S13). In particular, four loci (TaMFT-3A on 3AS, Xgwm299 on 3BL, Xbarc360 on 5AL, and Xwmc160 on 5BL) stably associated with GI5 and GI15 in 4 years and one locus (Xwmc658 on 2AL) consistently associated with GI5, GI15, and GI30 in 4 years, were considered major loci, explaining 4.12–17.55% of the phenotypic variation based on GLM; these were assigned to five chromosome regions, viz. END–3AS-4(0.45), 3BL-7(0.63)–END, C–5AL-12(0.35), 5BL-1(0.55)–5BL-14(0.75), and 2AL-1(0.85)–END (Table 1; Table S14).
Association analysis of 14 gene-specific markers with SD
Of 14 gene-specific markers for 7 candidate genes underlying SD/PHS resistance, 9 markers (TaMFT-3A, SNP_646, SNP_666, Vp1-b2, Vp1B3, Tamyb10-A1, TaDFR-B, PM19-A1, and MKKAC) showed significant association with SD at different stages of DAH, whereas the other 5 markers (Sdr2B, A17–19, Tamyb10-B1, Tamyb10-D1, and TaMFT-A1) were not associated with SD. TaMFT-3A was significantly associated with eleven SD traits across four environments, followed by SNP_646 associated with eight SD traits in four environments and SNP_666 associated with six SD traits in four environments; yet the other six markers were detected as associated with only one to four SD traits in one to three environments (Table 2). The result indicated TaMFT-3A was more closely associated with long-period seed dormancy than other genes in previous reports.
Identification of favorable alleles at major loci for SD
In total, seven, four, six, and four alleles at Xwmc658 on 2AL, Xgwm299 on 3BL, Xbarc360 on 5AL, and Xwmc160 on 5BL were present in 260 wheat varieties, respectively. Of these alleles, Xwmc658-A154 (8, 3%), Xwmc658-A161 (5, 2%), Xgwm299-A200 (89, 34%), Xbarc360-A261 (4, 2%), and Xwmc160-A138/125 (9, 3%) had significant effects on reducing GI and FS values (Table S15). In particular, Xwmc160-A138/125 had highest effects on reducing GI and FS values with an averaged GI5 of 0.32, GI15 of 0.31, and GI30 of 0.17 in 4 years and an averaged FS of 0.20 in 2 years, respectively. These favorable alleles showed lower distributions in Chinese varieties (2–34%). Additive effects and typical carriers of the above alleles were listed in Table S15.
Validation of the effect of favorable alleles at Xwmc658 on SD by QTL mapping and a CAPS marker development
The PHS-tolerant varieties Wanxianbaimaizi and Suiningtuotuomai had the favorable alleles Xwmc658-A161 and Xwmc658-A154, respectively. Analysis of 165 RILs from Jing 411 × Wanxianbaimaizi showed that a major QTL for 15GI5-JW, 15GI15-JW, and 15FS-JW was linked with Xwmc658, explaining 21.1%, 20.1%, and 9.1% of the phenotypic variations, respectively. The test of 728 F2 plants from Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai showed that a major QTL (designated Qsd.ahau-2AL) for 15GI5-JS and 15GI15-JS was also linked with Xwmc658, explaining 29.5% and 38.8% of the phenotypic variation, respectively. Additionally, a CAPS marker CAPS-2AL from SNP BS00019095_51 was also linked with Xwmc658 and located at the major QTL (Qsd.ahau-2AL) for 15GI5-JS and 15GI15-JS on 2AL in Jimai 20 × Suiningtuotuomai population. However, there was no polymorphism between Jing 411 and Wanxianbaimaizi (Fig. 2a, b; Fig. S2; Table S16).
To further validate the association of the CAPS-2AL with SD, we analyzed 201 CMCC accessions representing more than 70% of the genetic diversity of Chinese wheat germplasm. A significant difference (P < 0.01) between the two genotypes was identified in both GI5-CMCC and GI15-CMCC across environments. The allele CAPS-2AL-b was significantly associated with lower GI compared with CAPS-2AL-a. Association analysis indicated that the Qsd.ahau-2AL locus explained 7.7–9.0% of the phenotypic variation in GI5-CMCC and GI15-CMCC in 2014 and 2015 (Table 3).
Discussion
Phenotypic evaluation of SD
We assayed GI at different post-ripening stages after harvest during 2011–2012, 2012–2013, 2013–2014, and 2014–2015 and FS values during 2012–2013 and 2014–2015 in 260 wheat varieties and advanced lines. The GI5, GI15, GI30, and FS values showed significant correlation across environments, confirming that seed dormancy is closely associated with intact spike sprouting which occurred in the field. Additionally, GI5 generally had more significant relationship with FS than GI15 and GI30 in different environments, suggesting that GI5 estimation is an important indicator of SD of wheat varieties. However, the breakage of seed dormancy requires a period of post-ripening, and thus, the combination analysis of GI5, GI15, GI30, and FS will be more reliable for evaluating SD duration.
Major loci for SD
For reducing the probability of false positives, both the GLM and MLM approaches were used to detect MTAs associated with SD in this study (Yu et al. 2006; Kulwal et al. 2012). In total, five major loci for SD were detected at different post-ripening stages after harvest in the present study. Particularly, the Qsd.ahau-2AL locus was identified to have a significant effect on maintaining longer-duration SD. Mares et al. (2002) identified a QTL located in the proximal region of chromosome 2A using a doubled haploid (DH) population derived from the cross Cranbrook × Halberd. Kumar et al. (2015) also found a QTL for GI7 on 2AL (interval Xgwm294–Xcfa2058) in the chromosome bins C–2AL-1(0.85) in only one environment. However, the Qsd.ahau-2AL locus identified in our study was near the distal end of chromosome 2AL in the region 2AL-1(0.85)–END according to Somers et al. (2004) and Sourdille et al. (2004). Therefore, we assumed that the Qsd.ahau-2AL locus is possibly novel. The two markers linked to Qsd.ahau-2AL, Xwmc658, and CAPS-2AL had a stable association with long duration of SD in different environments and genetic backgrounds of wheat. Therefore, the novel locus can be used for enhancing SD duration and PHS tolerance in wheat breeding. The result does not only provide a useful information for fine mapping and subsequent cloning of candidate genes responsible for longer-duration SD in the future but also contribute to the development of varieties with a longer period of SD in areas where prolonged rainy weather occurs frequently at harvest.
In addition, four major loci for GI5 and GI15 were also responsible for maintaining middle-duration SD. Among them, TaMFT-3A (Nakamura et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2013, 2015) and Xgwm299 (Gelin et al. 2006) were confirmed to be associated with SD/PHS resistance in previous studies. Although Xwmc160 on 5BL was not reported previously, the adjacent marker Xgwm499 on 5BL had been identified to be associated with SD/PHS resistance in a previous study (Tan et al. 2006). However, in the present study, Xgwm499 was associated with four SD traits compared with Xwmc160 associated with ten SD traits, indicating that the Xwmc160 may be more closely linked to the target gene underlying SD on 5BL. Notably, the Xbarc360 locus on 5AL and their adjacent markers identified here were also not reported previously, and it is likely a novel locus associated with SD. It is necessary to note that favorable alleles for reducing GI and FS have lower frequency distributions in Chinese wheat varieties. These alleles can be used for multi-gene pyramiding breeding for PHS resistance improvement in Chinese cultivars.
Effects of seven PHS/SD-related genes on SD
Our findings indicated that except for the TaMFT-like gene on chromosome 3AS (Nakamura et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2013, 2015), the TaVp-1 (Yang et al. 2007; Chang et al. 2010a, 2011), Tamyb10 (Himi et al. 2011), and TaDFR (Bi et al. 2014) on group 3 as well as TaPM19-A1 (Barrero et al. 2015) and TaMKK3-A (Torada et al. 2016) on group 4 showed relatively unstable effects on SD. Moreover, TaSdr, an ortholog of OsSdr4, which is responsible for SD in wheat (Zhang et al. 2014), was not identified in this study. The reason may be due to specific genetic backgrounds of materials used. Together, our results suggest that the TaMFT-like gene is probably more useful for PHS resistance improvement in Chinese cultivars.
Possibility of PHS resistance genes independent of grain color in 3AL chromosome region
The relationship between grain color and PHS resistance may be due either to the pleiotropic effect of the R gene controlling red seed coat or to linkage between this gene and other genes underlying PHS resistance (Soper et al. 1989; Flintham 2000; Groos et al. 2002; Torada and Amano 2002; Kottearachchi et al. 2006). However, Himi et al. (2002) stated that the R gene may only play a minor role in grain dormancy, which tends to favor tight linkage between the R gene and candidate genes underlying PHS resistance. In this study, Tamyb10, as a strong candidate for the R gene, had a minor effect on SD, suggesting the presence of candidate genes underlying PHS resistance independent of the Tamyb10 gene.
Fofana et al. (2009) identified a QTL within Xcfa2193–Xwmc594 on 3AL for both sprouting index and seed coat color using a DH population from the cross AC Domain (red grains) × White-RL4137 (white grains). Similarly, in this study, the two markers (Xcfa2193 and Xwmc594) were all significantly associated with eight SD traits, but the marker Tamyb10-A1 for seed coat color on 3AL was only associated with three SD traits. Moreover, the above two markers and Tamyb10-A1 were assigned to different regions, viz. C–3AL-3(0.42) (Xcfa2193 and Xwmc594) and 3AL-5(0.78)–END (Tamyb10-A1) according to microsatellite and genetic-physical maps (Somers et al. 2004, Sourdille et al. 2004, Qi et al. 2004). Fakthongphan et al. (2016) also reported that chromosome 3A possibly carried additional loci (independent of grain color) affecting PHS resistance except for TaPHS1 gene. These results not only provide direct evidence for possible PHS resistance genes independent of the Tamyb10 in the 3AL chromosome region, but also verify the previous implication that the red-grained phenotype alone does not guarantee effective resistance because the marker Tamyb10-B1 on 3BL and Tamyb10-D1 on 3DL were not detected in this study (Flintham and Gale 1988; Kettlewell et al. 1999). Cloning of the candidate gene underlying SD/PHS resistance linked with Tamyb10 would be beneficial for breeding varieties with PHS resistance.
Conclusion
We identified 108 MTAs at 47 loci for SD using both GLM and MLM approaches. Five major loci were significantly associated with SD at different post-ripening stages, including three loci on chromosomes 3AS, 3BL, and 5BL reported previously and two novel loci on chromosomes 2AL and 5AL. The novel locus on 2AL was further validated using three populations. A CAPS marker CAPS-2AL at the major locus on 2AL (designated Qsd.ahau-2AL) and a dCAPS marker MKKAC were developed to discriminate the allelic variations for Qsd.ahau-2AL and TaMKK3-A, respectively. These markers can be used for the evaluation of PHS in wheat breeding.
References
Albrecht T, Oberforster M, Kempf H, Ramgraber L, Schacht J, Kazman E, Zechner E, Neumayer A, Hartl L, Mohler V (2015) Genome-wide association mapping of preharvest sprouting resistance in a diversity panel of European winter wheat. J Appl Genet 56:277–285
Barrero JM, Cavanagh C, Verbyla KL, Tibbits JFG, Verbyla AP, Huang BE, Rosewarne GM, Stephen S, Wang PH, Whan A, Rigault P, Hayden MJ, Gubler F (2015) Transcriptomic analysis of wheat near-isogenic lines identifies PM19-A1 and A2 as candidates for a major dormancy QTL. Genome Biol 16:93–111
Bi HH, Sun YW, Xiao YG, Xia LQ (2014) Characterization of DFR allelic variations and their associations with pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a set of red-grained Chinese wheat germplasm. Euphytica 195:197–207
Bradbury PJ, Zhang ZW, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics:2633–2635
Breseghello F, Mark ES (2006) Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172:1165–1177
Chang C, Feng JM, Si HQ, Yin B, Zhang HP, Ma CX (2010a) Validating a novel allele of viviparous-1 (Vp-1Bf) associated with high seed dormancy of Chinese wheat landrace, Wanxianbaimaizi. Mol Breed 25:517–525
Chang C, Zhang HP, Feng JM, Yin B, Si HQ, Ma CX (2010b) Identifying alleles of Viviparous-1B associated with pre-harvest sprouting in micro-core collections of Chinese wheat germplasm. Mol Breed 25:481–490
Chang C, Zhang HP, Zhao QX, Feng JM, Si HQ, Lu J, Ma CX (2011) Rich allelic variations of Viviparous-1A and their associations with seed dormancy/pre-harvest sprouting of common wheat. Euphytica 179:343–353
Chen CX, Cai SB, Bai GH (2008) A major QTL controlling seed dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting resistance on chromosome 4A in a Chinese wheat landrace. Mol Breed 21:351–358
Churchill GA, Doerge RW (1994) Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. Genetics 138:963–971
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation on study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620
Fakthongphan J, Bai GH, Graybosch RA, Baenziger PS (2016) Identification of markers linked to genes for sprouting tolerance (independent of grain color) in hard white winter wheat (HWWW). Theor Appl Genet 129:419–430
Flintham JE, Gale MD (1988) Genetics of pre-harvest sprouting and associated traits in wheat: review. Plant Variet Seeds 1:87–97
Flintham JE (2000) Different genetic components control coat-imposed and embryo-imposed dormancy in wheat. Seed Sci Res 10:43–50
Fofana B, Humphreys DG, Rasul G, Cloutier S, Brûlé-Babel A, Woods S, Lukow OM, Somers DJ (2009) Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling pre-harvest sprouting resistance in a red × white seeded spring wheat cross. Euphytica1 65:509–521
Gao X, Hu CH, Li HZ, Yao YJ, Meng M, Dong J, Zhao WC, Chen QJ, Li XY (2013) Factors affecting pre-harvest sprouting resistance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): a review. J Anim Plant Sci 23(2):556–565
Gelin JR, Elias EM, Kianian SF (2006) Evaluation of two durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. Var. durum) crosses for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Field Crop Res 97:188–196
Groos C, Gay G, Perretant RM, Bernard GM, Charmet DG (2002) Study of the relationship between pre-harvest sprouting and grain color by quantitative trait loci analysis in a white red grain bread-wheat cross. Theor Appl Genet 104:39–47
Hendricks AE, Zhu YY, Dupuis J (2009) Genome-wide association and linkage analysis traits: comparison of likelihood-ratio test and score statistic. BMC Proc 3(Suppl 7):S100. doi:10.1186/1753-6561-3-S7-S100
Hickey LT, Dieters MJ, Delacy IH, Kravchuk OY, Mares DJ, Banks PM (2009) Grain dormancy in fixed lines of white-grained wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grown under controlled environmental conditions. Euphytica 168:303–310
Himi E, Mares DJ, Yanagisawa A, Noda K (2002) Effect of grain colour gene (R) on grain dormancy and sensitivity of the embryo to abscisic acid (ABA) in wheat. J Exp Bot 53(374):1569–1574
Himi E, Maekawa M, Miura H, Noda K (2011) Development of PCR markers for Tamyb10 related to R-1, red grain color gene in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 122:1561–1576
Jaiswal V, Mir RR, Mohan A, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2012) Association mapping for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica 188:89–102
Kettlewell PS, Sothern RB, Koukkari WL (1999) U.K. wheat quality and economic value are dependent on the North Atlantic oscillation. J Cereal Sci 29:205–209
Korir PC, Zhang J, Wu KJ, Zhao TJ, Gai JY (2013) Association mapping combined with linkage analysis for aluminum tolerance among soybean cultivars released in yellow and Changjiang River valleys in China. Theor Appl Genet 126:1659–1675
Korte A, Farlow A (2013) The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9:29–38
Kottearachchi NS, Uchino N, Kato K, Miura H (2006) Increased grain dormancy in white-grained wheat by introgression of preharvest sprouting tolerance QTLs. Euphytica 152:421–428
Kulwal PL, Kumar N, Gaur A, Khurana P, Khurana JP, Tyagi AK, Balyan HS, Gupta PK (2005) Mapping of a major QTL for preharvest sprouting tolerance on chromosome 3A in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet 111:1052–1059
Kulwal P, Ishikawa G, Benscher D, Feng ZY, Yu LX, Jadhav A, Mehetre S, Sorrells ME (2012) Association mapping for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 125:793–805
Kumar S, Knox RE, Clarke FR, Pozniak CJ, DePauw RM, Cuthbert RD, Fox S (2015) Maximizing the identification of QTL for pre-harvest sprouting resistance using seed dormancy measures in a white-grained hexaploid wheat population. Euphytica 205:287–309
Lei L, Zhu XK, Wang SW, Zhu MR, Carver BF, Yan LL (2013) TaMFT-A1 is associated with seed germination sensitive to temperature in winter wheat. PLoS One 8(9):e73330. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0073330
Lin M, Cai SH, Wang S, Liu SB, Zhang GR, Bai GH (2015) Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) identified SNP tightly linked to QTL for pre-harvest sprouting resistance. Theor Appl Genet 128:1385–1395
Liu SB, Cai SB, Robert G, Chen CX, Bai GH (2008) Quantitative trait loci for resistance to pre-harvest sprouting in US hard white winter wheat Rio Blanco. Theor Appl Genet 117:691–699
Liu SB, Bai GH, Cai SB, Chen CX (2011) Dissection of genetic components of preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Mol Breed 27:511–523
Liu SB, Sehgal SK, Li JR, Lin M, Trick HN, Yu JM, Gill BS, Bai GH (2013) Cloning and characterization of a critical regulator for pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Genetics 195:263–273
Liu SB, Sehgal SK, Lin M, Li J, Trick H, Gill BS, Bai GH (2015) Independent mis-splicing mutations in TaPHS1 causing loss of pre-harvest sprouting (PHS) resistance during wheat domestication. New Phytol 208:936–948
Mares DJ, Mrva K, Tan MK, Sharp P (2002) Dormancy in white-grained wheat: progress towards identification of genes and molecular markers. Euphytica 126:47–53
Mori M, Uchino N, Chono M, Kato K, Miura H (2005) Mapping QTLs for grain dormancy on wheat chromosome 3A and group 4 chromosomes, and their combined effect. Theor Appl Genet 110:1315–1323
Munkvold JD, Tanaka J, Benscher D, Sorrells ME (2009) Mapping quantitative trait loci for preharvest sprouting resistance in white wheat. Theor Appl Genet 119:1223–1235
Nakamura S, Abe F, Kawahigashi H, Nakazono K, Tagiri A, Matsumoto T, Utsugi S, Ogawa T, Handa H, Ishida H, Mori M, Kawaura K, Ogihara Y, Miura H (2011) A wheat homolog of MOTHER OF FT AND TFL1 acts in the regulation of germination. Plant Cell 23:3215–3229
Ogbonnaya FC, Imtiaz M, Ye G, Hearnden PR, Hernandez E, Eastwood RF, Van Ginkel M, Shorter SC, Winchester JM (2008) Genetic and QTL analysis of seed dormancy and preharvest sprouting resistance in the wheat germplasm CN10955. Theor Appl Genet 116:891–902
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Qi LL, Echalier B, Chao S, Lazo GR, Butler GE, Anderson OD, Akhunov ED, Dvořák J, Linkiewicz AM, Ratnasiri A, Dubcovsky J, Bermudez-Kandianis CE, Greene RA, Kantety R, La Rota CM, Munkvold JD, Sorrells SF, Sorrells ME, Dilbirligi M, Sidhu D, Erayman M, Randhawa HS, Sandhu D, Bondareva SN, Gill KS, Mahmoud AA, Ma XF, Miftahudin GJP, Conley EJ, Nduati V, Gonzalez-Hernandez JL, Anderson JA, Peng JH, Lapitan NLV, Hossain KG, Kalavacharla V, Kianian SF, Pathan MS, Zhang DS, Nguyen HT, Choi DW, Fenton RD, Close TJ, McGuire PE, Qualset CO, Gill BS (2004) A chromosome bin map of 16,000 expressed sequence tag loci and distribution of genes among the three genomes of polyploid wheat. Genetics 168:701–712
Rehman Arif MA, Neumann K, Nagel M, Kobiljski B, Lohwasser U, Börner A (2012) An association mapping analysis of dormancy and pre-harvest sprouting in wheat. Euphytica 188:409–417
Singh R, Matus-Cádiz M, Båga M, Hucl P, Chibbar RN (2010) Identification of genomic regions associated with seed dormancy in white-grained wheat. Euphytica 174:391–408
Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 109:1105–1114
Somyong S, Ishikawa G, Munkvold JD, Tanaka J, Benscher D, Cho YG, Sorrells ME (2014) Fine mapping of a preharvest sprouting QTL interval on chromosome 2B in white wheat. Theor Appl Genet 127:1843–1855
Soper JF, Cantrell RG, Dick JW (1989) Sprouting damage and kernel color relationships in durum wheat. Crop Sci 29:895–898
Sourdille P, Singh S, Cadalen T, Brown-Guedira GL, Gay G, Qi L, Gill BS, Dufour P, Murigneux A, Bernard M (2004) Microsatellite-based deletion bin system for the establishment of genetic-physical map relationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Integr Genom 4:12–25
Tan MK, Sharp PJ, Lu MQ, Howes N (2006) Genetics of grain dormancy in a white wheat. Aust J Agri Res 57:1157–1165
Torada A, Amano Y (2002) Effect of seed coat color on seed dormancy in different environments. Euphytica 126:99–105
Torada A, Koike M, Ogawa T, Takenouchi Y, Tadamura K, Wu J, Matsumoto T, Kawaura K, Ogihara Y (2016) A causal gene for seed dormancy on wheat chromosome 4A encodes a MAP kinase kinase. Cell Press, doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.063
Wang J, Li H, Zhang L, Meng L (2013) QTL IciMapping version 3.3. http://www.isbreeding.net
Wang SX, Zhu YL, Zhang HP, Chang C, Ma CX (2014) Analysis of genetic diversity and relationship among wheat breeding parents by SSR markers. J Triticeae Crops 34(5):621–627 (in Chinese with English abstract)
Xiao SH, Zhang XY, Yan CS, Lin H (2002) Germplasm improvement for preharvest sprouting resistance in Chinese white grained wheat: an overview of the current strategy. Euphytica 126:35–38
Yang Y, Zhao XL, Xia LQ, Chen XM, Xia XC, Yu Z, He ZH, Rŏder M (2007) Development and validation of a Viviparous-1 STS marker for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance in Chinese wheats. Theor Appl Genet 115:971–980
Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Vroh Bi I, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS, Nielsen DM, Holland JB et al (2006) A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet 38:203–208
Zhang YJ, Miao XL, Xia XC, He ZH (2014) Cloning of seed dormancy genes (TaSdr) associated with tolerance to pre-harvest sprouting in common wheat and development of a functional marker. Theor Appl Genet 127:855–866
Zhu YL, Wang SX, Zhao LX, Zhang DX, Hu JB, Yang YJ, Chang C, Ma CX, Zhang HP (2014) Exploring molecular markers of preharvest sprouting resistance gene using wheat intact spikes by association analysis. ACTA 40(10):1725–1732 in Chinese with English abstract
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Shi-He Xiao and Prof. Ji-Zeng Jia at the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences for kindly providing the RIL population and the 201 Chinese mini-core wheat collections, respectively. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31401372), the China Agriculture Research System (CARS-03), the Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation of China (1408085MC60), the Promotion project of high education of Anhui province “Team construction of high level teacher of crop discipline,” Wheat genetics and breeding research platform innovation team of Anhui’s University, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Modern Crop Production (JCIC-MCP), and the introduced leading talent research team for Universities in Anhui Province.
Author contribution statement
CC and CXM initiated the project and designed the experiment; YLZ and SXW conducted SSR and 12 gene-specific markers analysis, a CAPS and a dCAPS marker development, and prepared the manuscript; HPZ and LXZ performed linkage mapping analysis and GI and FS tests; ZYW, HJ, JJC, KL, MQ, and JL assisted in assaying all the GI and FS phenotypes; and GLS and XCX revised this paper. All authors provided comments and revisions of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical standards
The experiments conducted in this study comply with the current laws of China.
Additional information
Yu-Lei Zhu and Sheng-Xing Wang contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhu, YL., Wang, SX., Zhang, HP. et al. Identification of major loci for seed dormancy at different post-ripening stages after harvest and validation of a novel locus on chromosome 2AL in common wheat. Mol Breeding 36, 174 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0598-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-016-0598-0