Abstract
Pyrus displays gametophytic self-incompatibility controlled by a single highly polymorphic gene complex termed S locus, which comprises a stylar-expressed gene (S-RNase) tighlty linked with a pollen expressed gene, that determines the specificity of the self-incompatibility locus. Deduced amino acid sequence of ‘Meigetsu’ S 8 -RNase in Pyrus pyrifolia and ‘Kuerlexiangli’ S 28 -RNase in P. sinkiangensis showed 100% identity. S 3 -RNase in Malus spectabilis was also found to be similar to S 8 -RNase in P. pyrifolia with 96.9% identity in the deduced amino acid sequence. The intron, which is generally highly polymorphic between alleles, was also remarkably well conserved within these allele pairs. The intron of PpS 8 -RNase showed 95.3 and 91.9% identity with PsS 28 -RNase and MsS 3 -RNase, respectively. Pollen tube growth in styles, pollen tube length in artificial media containing different S-RNases and segregation of S haplotypes in F1 plants revealed commonality of the recognition specificity between PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase and between PpS 8 -RNase and MsS 3 -RNase. Results suggested that PpS 8 -RNase, PsS 28 -RNase and MsS 3 -RNase have maintained the same recognition specificity after the divergence of the two species and that amino acid substitutions found between PpS 8 -RNase and MsS 3 -RNase do not alter the recognition specificity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Self-incompatibility (SI) is a genetically determined system for recognition and rejection of self-pollen. The predominant form of SI is a gametophytic SI (GSI) system, in which pollen-tube growth is inhibited when an S-haplotype of pollen matches one of the S-haplotypes of the pistil. The specificity of the SI response is determined by the haplotypes of the polymorphic S-locus, which contains at least two genes, i.e., one for the pistil determinant and one for the pollen determinant.
For most genes, new alleles can arise from the progressive accumulation of non-synonymous point mutations. Generation of new S-alleles is unlikely to be so straightforward, because of the co-adaptation of the two genes at the S-locus in S-RNase-based SI (Lewis 1949). Correct function of the S-locus depends upon interaction of stylar-S and pollen-S gene products in pollen tubes. Thus the generation of a new S-allele specificity requires complementary mutations in both stylar-S and pollen-S components. Mutation at only one or other component could breakdown the SI system, leading to self-compatibility, as demonstrated by the chimeric S-RNase experiments of Zurek et al. (1997).
Within plant families, S-RNases often show interspecific shared polymorphism, in which alleles from different species can be more similar than alleles of the same species (Ioerger et al. 1990). As a consequence of balancing selection, individual S-RNase lineages can persist for very long times in a population and in the subsequent species. Thus very similar S-haplotypes can be shared by relatively divergent species (Richman and Kohn 1996).
Exceptionally close identities between S-receptor kinase (SRK) and S-locus protein 11/S-locus cysteine-rich protein (SP11/SCR) alleles have been reported previously in Brassica oleracea and B. rapa (Kusaba et al. 1997, 2000; Kusaba and Nishio 1999; Kimura et al. 2002; Fujimoto et al. 2006) and the recognition specificity has been confirmed by cross pollination (Kimura et al. 2002; Sato et al. 2003). In the Rosaceae, S-RNase alleles of S 6 and S 11 in Prunus dulcis showed 98 and 100% DNA sequence identity with MRSN-2 in Prunus mume and S 1 -RNase in Prunus avium, respectively (Ortega et al. 2006). The S-RNase allele of S 8 in the dwarf almond Prunus tenella had 100% polypeptide identity with Prunus avium S 1 -RNase and differed by one amino acid with S 11 -RNase in Prunus dulcis (Surbanovski et al. 2007).
In the two plum species, six S-RNases have been identified with very high sequence identity to those of other Prunus spp., far higher than similarities typically observed in interspecific comparisons. High sequence identities of their corresponding pollen-S gene (S haplotype-specific F-box protein gene, SFB) have also been revealed by comparison with those in databases (Sutherland et al. 2008).
In this study, two pairs with high sequence similarities, S 8 -RNase (accession no. AB104908) in Pyrus pyrifolia (PpS 8 -RNase) with S 28 -RNase (accession no. EF566872) in P. sinkiangensis (PsS 28 -RNase); and S 8 -RNase in P. pyrifolia with S 3 -RNase (accession no. FJ943268) in Malus spectabilis (MsS 3 -RNase), were identified. To elucidate whether PpS 8 -RNase/PsS 28 -RNase and PpS 8 -RNase/MsS 3 -RNase have the same recognition specificity in the pollen and stigma, we carried out interspecific pollination followed by microscopic observation of pollen-tube growth in styles, in vitro culture of pollen in liquid media containing different S-RNases, and segregation tests of S-haplotypes in F1 plants to test recognition specificity.
Materials and methods
Plant material
Pyrus sinkiangensis cv. ‘Kuerlexiangli’, P. pyrifolia cvs. ‘Meigetsu’, ‘Imamuraaki’, and ‘Hosui’, and Malus spectabilis cvs. ‘Haitang No.1’, ‘Haitang No.3’ and ‘Haitang No.7’ were used for nucleotide sequence analysis and investigation of recognition specificity. Of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ × ‘Meigetsu’, 44 F1 progenies and 45 F1 progenies of ‘Meigetsu’ × ‘Kuerlexiangli’ were used for genetic analysis. All materials were collected from the Research Institute of Pomology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Xingcheng, Liaoning, China.
DNA and RNA extraction
Total genomic DNAs were isolated from young leaves using the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle 1987) and treated with RNase (TaKaRa, Kyoto, Japan). Total RNAs from ‘Kuerlexiangli’, ‘Meigetsu’ and ‘Haitang No.3’ were isolated from young frozen pistil tissue collected from flower buds at the ‘balloon stage’ according to Ikoma et al. (1996). mRNAs were isolated from total RNA using the Micro-FastTrack™ 2.0 mRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
PCR amplification of the intron of S-alleles and sequence analysis of genomic S-RNases
PCR to identify the intron of S-RNase alleles in Pyrus and Malus was carried out using the consensus primer pair PF and PR (Ishimizu et al. 1999), which have sequences of C1 and a region downstream of C2 of S-RNase, respectively (Supplementary table 1). PCR mixture (25 μL) contained 2.5 μL 10× reaction buffer (100 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.3, 500 mM KCl and 2.5 mM MgCl2), 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 0.2 μM forward and reverse primers, 1.0 units Taq polymerase (TaKaRa), and 25–50 ng genomic DNA. Amplification was conducted in a thermal cycler PTC-200 (Bio-Rad, Foster, CA, USA) with the following cycle parameters: 3 min at 94°C for pre-denaturation; followed by 10 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C and 45 s at 70°C; followed by 25 cycles of 30 s at 94°C, 30 s at 48°C and 45 s at 70°C; with a final extension of 7 min at 70°C. The amplified products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gel.
PCR products were cloned into pGEM-T (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Cloned PCR products were sequenced with a 3730 sequencer (Invitrogen). Nucleotide sequences were determined using DNASTAR software (Madison, WI, USA), and homology searches used the BLASTN program at NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi).
3′- and 5′-RACE cloning
mRNAs were reverse-transcribed for 1 h at 42°C to synthesize first-strand cDNA with the adapter primer NotI-(dT)18 (Takasaki et al. 2004). The 3′-region of cDNAs encoding S-RNase was amplified with Not I and PpS 8 -, PsS 28 - and MsS 3 -specific primers designed from the region between exons C2 and C3 of the PpS 8 -, PsS 28 - and MsS 3 -RNase genes, respectively (Supplementary table 1). The 5′-ends of the cDNAs were amplified using 5′-RACE System 2.0 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) with reverse primers specific to PpS 8 -, PsS 28 - and MsS 3 -RNase, respectively (Supplementary table 1).
Estimation of S-RNase concentration in the style
Style S-RNase from each cultivar was extracted and partially purified according to Hiratsuka et al. (2001) with some modifications. All procedures were carried out at 4°C. Of styles, about 4 g were ground in liquid nitrogen with a mortar and pestle. Then 170 ml of 50 mM MES/NaOH extraction buffer (pH 6.5) containing 5 mM Na2EDTA, 1.5% sodium ascorbate, and 3% polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (Polyclar-AT, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, Mo, USA) were added immediately, the whole stirred for 30 min and then centrifuged at 16,000g for 10 min. The supernatant was collected for further purification. The pellet and beaker used in the experiment were washed again with 40 ml of the same buffer, centrifuged, and the supernatant combined with the S-RNase sample collected before. The sample was filtered with a Millipore membrane (0.45 μm, Millipore, Mass, USA) and then passed through a carboxymethyl (CM) Sepharose column (20 × 1.6 cm) to adsorb S-RNase. The column was washed with 50 ml of 50 mM MES/NaOH buffer to elute the acid S-RNase and the adsorbed alkalescent S-RNases were eluted with 100 ml of 350 mM NaCl dissolved in 50 mM MES/NaOH buffer. The eluate was saturated with (NH4)2SO4 and then kept stable for 30 min, precipitated by centrifugation at 20,000g for 10 min. The sediment was washed with 1 ml of 50 mM MES/NaOH buffer and transferred into a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube, centrifuged at 20,000g for 15 min. The sediment was redissolved with 50 μL of 50 mM MES/NaOH buffer and dialyzed overnight in the same buffer to remove (NH4)2SO4. This S-RNase sample was stored in Eppendorf tubes at −80°C until use. S-RNase concentration was determined by the method of Bradford (1976).
Pollination tests and pollen-tube growth tests
For the ‘Kuerlexiangli’ × ‘Meigetsu’ and ‘Meigetsu’ × ‘Kuerlexiangli’ crosses, approximately 100 flowers at the balloon stage (1–2 days before anthesis) were emasculated, pollinated with pollen of tester cultivars, and covered with paper bags to avoid contamination. Subsequent fruits were collected about 3 months later.
Pollen-tube growth was observed after cross-pollinations between ‘Kuerlexiangli’, the female parent, and ‘Kuerlexiangli’, ‘Meigetsu’ and ‘Hosui’, as male parents. The cross-pollinations between ‘Meigetsu’, as female parent, and ‘Meigetsu’, ‘Haitang No.3’, ‘Imamuraaki’ and ‘Hosui’, were also performed. Pistils were harvested 72 h after self- or cross-pollination, and fixed in 1:1:18 (v/v/v) (formalin : acetic acid : 70% ethanol), washed thoroughly under running tap water, and incubated in 2 M NaOH for 3 h to soften the tissues. The styles were then soaked overnight in 0.1% (w/v) aniline blue solution in 0.1 M K3PO4 at 60°C in darkness. Pollen tubes in washed and squashed styles were observed by ultraviolet fluorescent microscopy (BX60; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).
Preparation of liquid medium and bioassay
The liquid media were prepared according to Hiratsuka et al. (2001) with the S-RNase concentration at 1.2 μg μl−1 for culturing pollen of ‘Meigetsu’. Percentage germination and pollen-tube length were determined under a light transmission microscope. For germination, >100 pollen grains were observed; and the lengths of >10 pollen tubes measured for each treatment. Each treatment was repeated three times.
Results
Sequence analysis of the S 8 -RNase in P. pyrifolia and S 28 -RNase in P. sinkiangensis
Two DNA fragments were amplified from genomic DNA of P. pyrifolia cv. ‘Meigetsu’ and P. sinkiangensis cv. ‘Kuerlexiangli’ by PCR using a primer set, PF and PR, which have sequences of the first and second exons including the RHV region, respectively. Nucleotide sequences of the amplified DNA fragments were determined and, based on deduced amino acid sequences, PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase were identified.
To determine the full-length cDNA sequences of PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase, 3′-RACE and 5′-RACE were carried out using mRNA extracted from pistils of ‘Meigetsu’ and ‘Kuerlexiangli’, respectively. Both PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase sequences contained an open reading frame (ORF) of 684 nucleotides encoding 228 amino acid residues (Fig. 1a). PpS 8 -RNase was identical with PsS 28 -RNase in both nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences. PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase were predicted to have a putative signal peptide from amino acids 1–27 by SignalP V2.0 (Nielsen et al. 1999).
Comparison of the cDNA sequences with the genomic sequences revealed the size of the introns was 234 and 227 bp in PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase, respectively. The intron sequences showed high similarity (95.3%) with only 4 bp substitutions and 7 bp indels (insertions/deletions) (Fig. 2a).
In vivo and in vitro pollen tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ inhibited by PsS 28 -RNase
In self-pollinated pistils of ‘Kuerlexiangli’, the pollen germinated well (Fig. 3a), but small numbers of pollen tubes penetrated only one-third into the style (Fig. 3d). Pollen-tube growth was arrested within the upper two-thirds of the style (Fig. 3g). In a cross between ‘Kuerlexiangli’ (PsS 22 /PsS 28 ) and ‘Meigetsu’ (PpS 1 /PpS 8 ), ‘Meigetsu’ pollen tubes could grow the full length of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ style (Fig. 3h), but about half were arrested in the middle of the style (Fig. 3e). In hybridization of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ and ‘Hosui’ (PpS 3 /PpS 5 ), most ‘Hosui’ pollen tubes reached the base of the ‘Kuerlexiangli’ style (Fig. 3i).
In liquid media, both pollen germination and pollen-tube elongation of ‘Meigetsu’ were inhibited by addition of S-RNase of ‘Meigetsu’. Pollen germination and pollen-tube elongation were 12.9% and 35.7 μm, respectively, while those of the controls without addition of S-RNase were 47.2% and 98.1 μm. The germination and tube elongation of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen in the media containing ‘Kuerlexiangli’ S-RNase were 25.2% and 68.4 μm, respectively, and those in media containing S-RNase of ‘Imamuraaki’(PpS 1 /PpS 6 ) were 21.3% and 60.6 μm. The germination and tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen were strongly inhibited by a mixture of S-RNases of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ and ‘Imamuraaki’, being 10.0% and 32.2 μm, respectively, comparable to those by S-RNase of ‘Meigetsu’. In liquid media containing S-RNase of ‘Hosui’ (PpS 3 /PpS 5 ), inhibition of germination and tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen were slight, 40.3% and 92.6 μm, respectively (Fig. 4).
Genetic analysis of F1 progeny between ‘Kuerlexiangli’ and ‘Meigetsu’
Since the S-genotypes of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ and ‘Meigetsu’ were PsS 22 /PsS 28 and PpS 1 /PpS 8 , respectively, the S-genotypes of F1 progeny in the ‘Kuerlexiangli’ × ‘Meigetsu’ cross should segregate into four classes: PpS 1 /PsS 22 , PpS 1 /PsS 28 , PpS 8 /PsS 22 and PpS 8 /PsS 28 . However, S-genotypes of the F1 progeny of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ × ‘Meigetsu’ were inconsistent with this hypothesis, and only PpS 1 /PsS 22 and PpS 1 /PsS 28 genotypes were observed with segregation ratio of 21:24, corresponding to 1:1 (χ 2 = 0.2, P < 0.05). F1 progeny of a reciprocal crossing, ‘Meigetsu’ × ‘Kuerlexiangli’, also produced two S-genotypes, PpS 1 /PsS 22 and PpS 8 /PsS 22 , with a segregation ratio of 22:22. These results showed that PpS 8 and PsS 28 function as the same S-haplotype.
Sequence analysis of the PpS 8 -RNase from Pyrus and MsS 3 -RNase from Malus
Two different DNA fragments were amplified from genomic DNA of a M. spectabilis cv. ‘Haitang No.3’ (MsS 3 /MsS 4 ) by PCR using the primer set, PF and PR. Based on sequence analysis, MsS 3 -RNase was identified. To determine the full-length cDNA sequence encoding MsS 3 -RNase, 3′-RACE and 5′-RACE were carried out using mRNA extracted from pistils of ‘Haitang No.3’. The MsS 3 -RNase cDNA sequence contained an ORF of 684 nucleotides encoding 228 amino acid residues. MsS 3 -RNase showed 96.9% amino acid identity with PpS 8 -RNase from the signal peptide region to the C-terminal region. Between MsS 3 -RNase and PpS 8 -RNase, there were seven different amino acid residues scattered throughout the sequences, three of which were one-conservative and two half-conservative replacements (Fig. 1b). The hypervariable regions, considered important for recognition specificity of S-RNase, were identical to each other.
Comparison of the cDNA sequence with the genomic sequence revealed the intron of 234 bp in the MsS 3 -RNase allele. The intron sequence of the MsS 3 -RNase allele showed high similarity (91.9%) to the PpS 8 -RNase allele with only 19 bp substitution (Fig. 2b).
Pollen tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ inhibited by MsS 3 -RNase
In self-pollinated pistils of ‘Meigetsu’, pollen-tube growth was arrested in the upper one-third of the style (Fig. 5f). In crosses with ‘Haitang No.3’ (MsS 3 /MsS 4 ) and ‘Imamuraaki’ (PpS 1 /PpS 6 ), both ‘Haitang No.3’ and ‘Imamuraaki’ pollen tubes could grow the full length of the ‘Meigetsu’ style (Fig. 5h, i), with about half of pollen tubes arrested in the upper one-third of styles (Fig. 5g, h). In the ‘Meigetsu’ × ‘Hosui’ cross, most ‘Hosui’ pollen tubes reached the base of the ‘Meigetsu’ style (Fig. 5n). In the ‘Meigetsu’ style hybridized with ‘Haitang No.7’ (MsS 2 /MsS 5 ), the pollen germination rate on the stigma was low because of low viability of ‘Haitang No.7’ pollen grains (Fig. 5e). Despite that, most pollen tubes penetrated the middle and reached the bottom of the ‘Meigetsu’ style, similar to that of ‘Hosui’ (Fig. 5j, o).
Germination and tube elongation of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen in liquid media containing S-RNase of ‘Haitang No.3’ were 24.5% and 50.7 μm, respectively, and those in media containing ‘Imamuraaki’ S-RNase were 20.3% and 46.6 μm. In liquid media containing S-RNases of both ‘Haitang No.3’ and ‘Imamuraaki’, the germination and tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen were strongly inhibited, being 7.9% and 33.8 μm, respectively; comparable with those with S-RNase of ‘Meigetsu’. S-RNases of ‘Hosui’ and ‘Haitang No.1’ (MsS 1 /MsS 2 ) did not affect germination and tube growth of ‘Meigetsu’ pollen (Fig. 6).
Discussion
There were no major barriers to hybridization between ‘Meigetsu’ and ‘Haitang No.3’. Pyrus probably originated in the foothills of the Tian Shen mountains in Xinjiang in western China, with isolation and adaptation after spreading eastward and westward, leading to speciation. By current consensus the genus is classified into 21–26 primary species, including P. bretschneideri, P. pyrifolia, P. sinkiangensis, P. ussuriensis and P. communis. Reciprocal crosses between Pyrus spp. have been successful (Challice and Westwood 1973; Bell and Hough 1986). Intergeneric hybridization is evidence of the close relationship between Pyrus and Malus (Crane and Marks 1952), as is pollen-tube elongation of ‘Haitang No.3’ and ‘Haitang No.7’ in the styles of ‘Meigetsu’ in the present study.
The PpS 8 haplotype in P. pyrifolia ‘Meigetsu’ was shown to have the same recognition specificity as the PsS 28 haplotype in P. sinkiangensis ‘Kuerlexiangli’ and the MsS 3 haplotype in M. spectabilis ‘Haitang No.3’, respectively. This was demonstrated by the methods of interspecific hybridization and cultivation of pollen in vitro. It is considered that the pairs of PpS 8 PsS 28 and PpS 8 MsS 3 have maintained the same recognition specificity since the divergence of species and genera, and that the amino acid substitutions have no influence on recognition specificity. In Prunus, Prunus tenella S 8 -RNase has 100% identity with Prunus avium S 1 -RNase, while 12 residues differ in SFB sequences at the protein level. Pollination tests have demonstrated that the SI function of Prunus tenella S 8 and Prunus avium S 1 haplotypes was not disturbed (Surbanovski et al. 2007). In several interspecific pairs of S-haplotypes identified between Brassica oleracea and B. rapa showing high similarities (<100%) identities in SRK and SP11/SCR sequences, the same recognition specificities have been demonstrated by interspecific hybridization, pollination tests with transgenic plants and bioassay using SP11 proteins (Kimura et al. 2002; Sato et al. 2003). These results indicated some flexibility of amino acid sequences in the specific recognition and that the different residues did not play a role in defining allelic specificities of the S-haplotypes.
The three S-haplotypes (i.e., PpS 8 , PsS 28 and MsS 3 ) exhibiting high sequence similarity of S-RNase and the same recognition specificity are considered to be derived from the same ancestral S-haplotype. There was higher sequence similarity between PpS 8 -RNase and PsS 28 -RNase than between PpS 8 -RNase and MsS 3 -RNase, indicating that diversification of PpS 8 and PsS 28 haplotypes occurred after divergence of the MsS 3 haplotype, corresponding with divergence of species in Pyrus and Malus (Ishimizu et al. 1998; Takasaki et al. 2004). There are similar relationships of S-haplotypes in Brassica spp. and Raphanus spp., although the sequence similarities between these S-haplotypes are lower than those in Pyrus spp. and Malus spp. (Sato et al. 2004).
Uyenoyama et al. (2001) proposed that the evolution of S-specificities allows self-compatible intermediates, while the model proposed by Matton et al. (1999) predicted dual-specificity intermediates that are self-incompatible. Point mutation, recombination and gene conversion played an important role in the generation of new alleles. In this study, PpS 8 -RNase, PsS 28 -RNase or MsS 3 -RNase might be intermediate steps to a new S-haplotype, without loss of SI. In fact, an S-haplotype could tolerate a small number of amino acid changes in the S-RNase or SFB and minor changes might broaden specificity. These incremental changes could in time give rise to a completely new specificity.
Alteration of SI strength might have occurred in evolution of S-haplotypes (Sato et al. 2004). In self-pollinated pistils of ‘Kuerlexiangli’, the pollen tubes could penetrate through the middle of style, reaching the bottom, but not be fertilized; while pollen tubes were arrested at one-third down the style in self-pollinated pistils of ‘Meigetsu’. The results suggested low SI strength in ‘Kuerlexiangli’ than in ‘Meigetsu’, possibly caused by changes in two S-haplotypes.
References
Bell RL, Hough LF (1986) Interspecific and intergeneric hybridization of Pyrus. HortScience 21:62–64
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Challice JS, Westwood MN (1973) Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus Pyrus using both chemical and botanical characters. Bot J Linn Soc 67:121–148
Crane MB, Marks E (1952) Pear-apple hybrids. Nature 170:1017
Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1987) A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue. Phytochem Bull 19:11–15
Fujimoto R, Okazaki K, Fukai E, Kusaba M, Nishio T (2006) Comparison of the genome structure of the self-incompatibility (S) locus in interspecific pairs of S haplotypes. Genetics 173:1157–1167
Hiratsuka S, Zhang SL, Nakagawa E, Kawai Y (2001) Selective inhibition of the growth of incompatible pollen tubes by S-protein in the Japanese pear. Sex Plant Reprod 13:209–215
Ikoma Y, Yano M, Ogawa K, Yoshioka T, Xu ZC, Hisada S, Omura M, Moriguchi T (1996) Isolation and evaluation of RNA from polysaccharide-rich tissues in fruit for quality by cDNA library construction and RT-PCR. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 64:809–814
Ioerger TR, Clark AG, Kao TH (1990) Polymorphism at the self-incompatibility locus in Solanaceae predates speciation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 87:9732–9735
Ishimizu T, Shinkawa T, Sakiyama F, Norioka S (1998) Primary structural features of rosaceous S-RNases associated with gametophytic self-incompatibility. Plant Mol Biol 37:931–941
Ishimizu T, Inoue K, Shimonaka M, Saito T, Terai O (1999) PCR-based method for identifying the S-genotypes of Japanese pear cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 98:961–967
Kimura R, Sato K, Fujimoto R, Nishio T (2002) Recognition specificity of self-incompatibility maintained after the divergence of Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa. Plant J 29:215–223
Kusaba M, Nishio T (1999) Comparative analysis of S haplotypes with very similar SLG alleles in Brassica rapa and B. oleracea. Plant J 17:83–91
Kusaba M, Nishio T, Satta Y, Hinata K, Ockendon D (1997) Striking sequence similarity in inter- and intra-specific comparisons of class I SLG alleles from Brassica oleracea and Brassica campestris: Implications for the evolution and recognition mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:7673–7678
Kusaba M, Matsushita M, Okazaki K, Satta Y, Nishio T (2000) Sequence and structural diversity of the S locus genes from different lines with the same self-recognition specificities in Brassica oleracea. Genetics 154:413–420
Lewis D (1949) Structure of the self-incompatibility gene II. Induced mutation rate. Heredity 3:339–355
Matton DP, Luu DT, Xike Q, Laublinm G, O’Brien M, Maes O, Morse D, Cappadocia M (1999) Production of an S-RNase with dual specificity suggests a novel hypothesis for the generation of new S-alleles. Plant Cell 11:2087–2097
Nielsen H, Brunak S, von Heijne G (1999) Machine learning approaches for the prediction of signal peptides and other protein sorting signals. Protein Eng 12:3–9
Ortega E, Bošković RI, Sargent DJ, Tobutt KR (2006) Analysis of S-RNase alleles of almond (Prunus dulcis): characterization of new sequences, resolution of synonyms and evidence of intragenic recombination. Mol Gen Genomics 276:413–426
Richman AD, Kohn JR (1996) Learning from rejection: the evolutionary biology of single-locus incompatibility. Trends Ecol Evol 11:497–502. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(96)10051-3
Sato Y, Fujimoto R, Toriyama K, Nishio T (2003) Commonality of self-recognition specificity of S haplotypes between Brassica oleracea and Brassica rapa. Plant Mol Biol 52:617–626
Sato Y, Okamoto S, Nishio T (2004) Diversification and alteration of recognition specificity of the pollen ligand SP11/SCR in self-incompatibility of Brassica and Raphanus. Plant Cell 16:3230–3241
Surbanovski N, Tobutt KR, Konstantinovic M, Maksimovic V, Sargent DJ, Stevanovic V, Ortega E, Boskovic R (2007) Self-incompatibility of Prunus tenella and evidence that reproductively isolated species of Prunus have different SFB alleles coupled with an identical S-RNase allele. Plant J 50:723–734
Sutherland BG, Tobutt KR, Robbins TP (2008) Trans-specific S-RNase and SFB alleles in Prunus self-incompatibility haplotypes. Mol Genet Genomics 279:95–106
Takasaki T, Okada K, Castillo C, Moriya Y, Saito T, Sawamura Y, Norioka N, Norioka S, Nakanishi T (2004) Sequence of the S 9 -RNase cDNA and PCR-RFLP system for discriminating S 1 - to S 9 -allele in Japanese pear. Euphytica 135:157–167
Ushijima K, Sassa H, Tao R, Yamane H, Dandekar AM, Gradziel TM, Hirano H (1998) Cloning and characterization of cDNAs encoding S-RNases from almond (Prunus dulcis): primary structural features and sequence diversity of the S-RNases in Rosaceae. Mol Gen Genet 260:261–268
Uyenoyama MK, Zhang Y, Newbigin E (2001) On the origin of self-incompatibility haplotypes: transition through self-compatible intermediates. Genetics 157:1805–1817
Zurek DM, Mou B, Beecher B, McClure B (1997) Exchanging sequence domains between S-RNases from Nicotiana alata disrupts pollen recognition. Plant J 11:797–808
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the State National Natural Foundation of P. R. China (No. 30671437).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heng, W., Wu, J., Wu, H. et al. Recognition specificity of self-incompatibility in Pyrus and Malus . Mol Breeding 28, 549–557 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9504-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-010-9504-3