Abstract
It is common practice in compositional data analysis to perform the log-ratio transformation in order to preserve sub-compositional coherence in the analysis. Correspondence analysis is an alternative approach to analyzing ratio-scale data and is often contrasted with log-ratio analysis. It turns out that if one introduces a power transformation into the correspondence analysis algorithm, then the limit of the power-transformed correspondence analysis, as the power parameter tends to zero, is exactly the log-ratio analysis. Depending on how the power transformation is applied, we can obtain as limiting cases either Aitchison’s unweighted log-ratio analysis or the weighted form called “spectral mapping”. The upshot of this is that one can come as close as one likes to the log-ratio analysis, weighted or unweighted, using correspondence analysis.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aitchison J (1983) Principal component analysis of compositional data. Biometrika 70(1):57–65
Aitchison J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London. Reprinted in 2003 with additional material by Blackburn Press
Aitchison J (1990) Relative variation diagrams for describing patterns of compositional variability. Math Geol 22(4):487–511
Aitchison J, Greenacre M (2002) Biplots for compositional data. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 51(4):375–392
Bartlett MS (1936) The square root transformation in analysis of variance. Suppl J R Stat Soc 3:68–78
Baxter MJ, Cool HEM, Heyworth MP (1990) Principal component and correspondence analysis of compositional data: some similarities. J Appl Stat 17(2):229–235
Beardah CC, Baxter MJ, Cool HEM, Jackson CM (2003) Compositional data analysis of archaeological glass—problems and possible solutions. Paper presented at Compositional Data Analysis Workshop, Girona, Spain. Available at http://ima.udg.es/Activitats/CoDaWork03/paper_baxter_Beardah2.pdf
Box GEP, Cox DR (1964) An analysis of transformations (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 35:473–479
Cuadras C, Cuadras D, Greenacre M (2006) A comparison of methods for analyzing contingency tables. Commun Stat Simul Comput 35(2):447–459
Field JG, Clarke KR, Warwick RM (1982) A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 8:37–52
Goodman LA (1968) The analysis of cross-classified data: independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables, with or without missing entries. J Am Stat Assoc 63:1091–1131
Greenacre M (2007) Correspondence analysis in practice. Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, London
Greenacre M (2008a) La práctica del análisis de correspondencias. Fundación BBVA, Madrid
Greenacre M (2008b) Power transformations in correspondence analysis. Comput Stat Data Anal (to appear). Economics Working Paper 1044, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (2007). Available at URL http://www.econ.upf.edu/en/research/onepaper.php?id=1044
Greenacre M, Lewi P (2008) Distributional equivalence and subcompositional coherence in the analysis of compositional data, contingency tables and ratio-scale measurements. J Classif (to appear). Economics Working Paper 908, Universitat Pompeu Fabra (2005). Available at URL http://www.econ.upf.edu/en/research/onepaper.php?id=908
Hinkley D (1975) On power transformations to symmetry. Biometrika 62(1):101–111
Lewi PJ (1976) Spectral mapping, a technique for classifying biological activity profiles of chemical compounds. Arzneim Forsch (Drug Res) 26:1295–1300
Lewi PJ (1980) Multivariate data analysis in APL. In: van der Linden GA (ed) Proceedings of APL-80 conference. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 267–271
Martín-Fernández JA, Barceló-Vidal C, Pawlowsky-Glahn V (2003) Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets. Math Geol 35(3):253–278
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greenacre, M. Log-Ratio Analysis Is a Limiting Case of Correspondence Analysis. Math Geosci 42, 129–134 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9212-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-008-9212-2