Abstract
Comparative constructions form two classes, those that permit direct comparisons (comparisons of measurements as in Seymour is taller than he is wide) and those that only allow indirect comparisons (comparisons of relative positions on separate scales as in Esme is more beautiful than Einstein is intelligent). In contrast with other semantic theories, this paper proposes that the interpretation of the comparative morpheme remains the same whether it appears in sentences that compare individuals directly or indirectly. To develop a unified account, I suggest that all comparisons (whether in terms of height, intelligence or beauty) involve a scale of universal degrees that are isomorphic to the rational (fractional) numbers between 0 and 1. Crucial to a unified treatment, the connection between the individuals being compared and universal degrees involves two steps. First individuals are mapped to a value on a primary scale that ranks individuals with respect to the gradable property (whether it be height, beauty or intelligence). Second, the value on the primary scale is mapped to a universal degree that encodes the value’s relative position on the primary scale. Direct comparison results if measurements such as seven feet participate in the primary scale (as in Seven feet is tall). Otherwise the result is an indirect comparison.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bach E. (1986). Natural language metaphysics. In: Barcan Marcus, R., Dor, G.J.W. and Weingartner, P. (eds) Logic, methodology and philosophy of science VII, pp 573–595. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, New York
Bale, A. C. (2006). The universal scale and the semantics of comparison. Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University (www.alanbale.com).
Bartsch R. and Vennemann T. (1972). Semantic structures: A study in the relation between semantics and syntax. Frankfurt am Main, Athenaum
Bell J.L. and Alan B.S. (1969). Models and ultraproducts: An introduction. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam
Bell J.L. and Machover M. (1977). A course in mathematical logic. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam
Bierwisch M. (1987). Semantik der Graduierrung. In: Bierwisch, M. and Lang, E. (eds) Grammatische und Konseptuelle Aspekete von Dimensionsadjektiven, pp 91–286. Akademie Verlag, Berlin
Bresnan J. (1973). Syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4(3): 275–344
Bresnan J. (1975). Comparative deletion and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Analysis 1(1): 25–75
Chomsky N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton
Cresswell M.J. (1976). The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (eds) Montague grammar, pp 261–292. Academic Press, New York
Embick D. (2007). Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37
Fox D. and Hackl M. (2006). The universal density of measurement. Linguistics and Philosophy 29(5): 537–586
Hellan L. (1981). Towards an integrated theory of comparatives. Narr, Tubingen
Kennedy C. (1999). Projecting the adjective: The syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Garland, New York
Kennedy C. and McNally L. (2005). Scale structure and the semantic typology of gradable predicates. Language 81: 345–381
Klein, E. (1980). A semantics for positive and comparative deletion. Linguistics and Philosophy, 4(1), 1–46, 1980.
Klein E. (1982). The interpretation of adjectival comparatives. Journal of Linguistics 18: 113–136
Klein E. (1991). Comparatives. In: von Stechow A., Wunderlich, D. (eds) Semantik/semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research, pp 673–691. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin
Krantz D.H., Luce R.D. and Tversky A. (1971). Foundations of measurement. Academic Press, New York, London
Landman F. (1991). Structures for semantics. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston
Landman F. (2004). Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Oxford
Ludlow P. (1989). Implicit comparison classes. Journal of Linguistics 12: 519–533
McCawley, J. D. (1976). Quantitative and qualitative comparison in English. In Grammar and meaning (pp. 1–14). New York: Academic Press.
Nakanishi, K. (2003). Semantics of measure phrases. In M. Kadowaki & S. Kawahara (Eds.), The Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 225–244).
Schwarzschild R. (2002). The grammar of measurement. In: Jackson, B. (eds) Proceedings of SALT XII. CLC Publications, Ithaca
Seuren P.A.M. (1973). The comparative. In: Kiefer, F. and Ruwet, N. (eds) Generative grammar in Europe, pp 528–564. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht
von Stechow A. (1984). Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3: 1–77
Wheeler III, S.C. (1972). Attributives and their modifiers. Nous 6(4): 310–334
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bale, A.C. A universal scale of comparison. Linguist and Philos 31, 1–55 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9028-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-008-9028-z